996 resultados para Staatliche Museen zu Berlin.
Resumo:
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich Wilhelms-Universitat zu Berlin, 1894.
Resumo:
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Berlin, 1899.
Resumo:
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Berlin, 1898.
Resumo:
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Berlin, 1897.
Resumo:
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Berlin, 1900.
Resumo:
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat zu Berlin, 1899.
Resumo:
Latest issue consulted: Teilband 106, published in 1990.
Resumo:
1. Abt. Werke, hrsg. von Albert Leitzmann. 1. -9. Bd.- 2. Abt. Politische Denkschriften, hrsg. von Bruno Gebhardt. 10.-12. Bd.- 3. Abt. Tagebucher, hrsg. von Albert Leitzmann. 14.-15. Bd.- 1. Abt. Werke...13. Bd. Nachtrage, unter Mitwirkung von Siegfried Kahler und Eduard Spranger.- 4. Abt. Politische Briefe, hrsg. von Wilhelm Richter. 16.-17. Bd.-
Resumo:
Bd. 1, Heft 1 series t.p. is dated 1883 and its analytic t.p. is dated 1882.
Resumo:
Includes the publications of the various sections of the Academy.
Resumo:
Accompanied by "Allgemeiner Kantindex. In Zusammenarbeit mit Ingeborg Heidemann [et al.] Hrsg. von Gottfried Martin." (v.) Published: Berlin, 196- .
Resumo:
von Dr. August Ife, Lehrer der italien. u. französ. Sprache zu Berlin
Resumo:
von Dr. Karl Dove, Lehrer der kolonialen Landeskunde am Seminar für orientalische Sprachen, Privatdozent der Geographie an der Universität zu Berlin
Resumo:
von F. Baltzer, Geh. Oberbaurat und vortragendem Rat im Reichskolonialministerium, ordentl. Honorarprofessor an der techn. Hochschule zu Berlin
Resumo:
This paper deals with the place of narrative, that is, storytelling, in public deliberation. A distinction is made between weak and strong conceptions of narrative. According to the weak one, storytelling is but one rhetorical device among others with which social actors produce and convey meaning. In contrast, the strong conception holds that narrative is necessary to communicate, and argue, about topics such as the human experience of time, collective identities and the moral and ethical validity of values. The upshot of this idea is that storytelling should be a necessary component of any ideal of public deliberation. Contrary to recent work by deliberative theorists, who tend to adopt the weak conception of narrative, the author argues for embracing the strong one. The main contention of this article is that stories not only have a legitimate place in deliberation, but are even necessary to formulate certain arguments in the fi rst place; for instance, arguments drawing on historical experience. This claim, namely that narrative is constitutive of certain arguments, in the sense that, without it, said reasons cannot be articulated, is illustrated by deliberative theory’s own narrative underpinnings. Finally, certain possible objections against the strong conception of narrative are dispelled.