1000 resultados para Sport, dopage, éthique, travail, justice.
Resumo:
This document is the DMC Section of Iowa’s 2009 federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDP Act) formula grant three year plan update. The Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning (CJJP) wrote this update. CJJP is the state agency responsible for administering the JJDP Act in Iowa. Federal officials refer to state administering agencies as the state planning agency (SPA). The Plan was developed and approved by Iowa’s Juvenile Justice Advisory Council. That Council assists with administration of the JJDP Act, and also provides guidance and direction to the SPA, the Governor and the legislature regarding juvenile justice issues in Iowa. Federal officials refer to such state level groups as state advisory groups (SAG’s). The acronyms SPA and SAG are used through this report.
Resumo:
This document contains two related, but separate reports. The Juvenile Crime Prevention Community Grant Fund Outcomes Report is a summary of outcomes from services and activities funded through the Juvenile Crime Prevention Community Grant Fund in FY2001. The Juvenile Justice Youth Development Program Summary describes Iowa communities’ current prevention and sanction programs supported with funding from the Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning (CJJP) during FY2002. The material in Juvenile Crime Prevention Community Grant Fund Outcomes Report is presented in response to a legislative mandate to report specific prevention outcomes for the community Grant Fund. It includes a brief description of a Youth Development Results Framework established by the Iowa Collaboration for Youth Development. Outcomes are reported using this results framework, which was developed by a number of state agencies as a common tool for various state programs involving youth development related planning and funding processes. Included in this report is a description of outcomes from the prevention activities funded, all or in part, by the Community Grant Fund, as reported by local communities. The program summaries presented in the Juvenile Justice Youth Development Program Summary provide an overview of local efforts to implement their 2002 Juvenile Justice Youth Development plans and include prevention and sanction programs funded through the combined resources of the State Community Grant Fund and the Federal Title V Prevention, Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention Act Formula Grant and Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant programs. These combined funds are referred to in this document as the Juvenile Justice Youth Development (JJYD) funds. To administer the JJYD funds, including funds from the Community Grant Fund, CJJP partners with local officials to facilitate a community planning process that determines the communities’ priorities for the use of the funds. The local planning is coordinated by the Iowa’s Decategorization Boards (Decats). These local officials and/or their staff have been leaders in providing oversight or staff support to a variety of local planning initiatives (e.g. child welfare, Comprehensive Strategy Pilot Projects, Empowerment, other) and bring child welfare and community planning experience to the table for the creation of comprehensive community longterm planning efforts. The allocation of these combined funds and the technical assistance received by the Decats from CJJP is believed to have helped enhance both child welfare and juvenile justice efforts locally and has provided for the recognition and establishment of connections for joint child welfare/juvenile justice planning. The allocation and local planning approach has allowed funding from CJJP to be “blended” or “braided” with other local, state, and federal dollars that flow to communities as a result of their local planning responsibilities. The program descriptions provided in this document reflect services and activities supported with JJYD funds. In many cases, however, additional funding sources have been used to fully fund the programs. Most of the information in this document’s two reports was submitted to CJJP by the communities through an on- line planning and reporting process established jointly by the DHS and CJJP.
Resumo:
Iowa Code Section 216A.135 requires the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Advisory Council (CJJPAC) to submit a long-range plan for Iowa's justice system to the Governor and General Assembly every five years. The Criminal and Juvenile Justice Advisory Council directed that the 2005 plan be developed with input from the public. A public hearing was held in September 2004, utilizing the Iowa Communications Network at 5 sites across Iowa. Using the information gained, the Council developed new goals and strategies and modified others from the 2000 plan. The 2005 Long Range Goals for Iowa’s Criminal and Juvenile Justice Systems, organized as follows, are meant to facilitate analyses and directions for justice system issues and concerns in Iowa.
Resumo:
Le monde de l'action humanitaire a connu des développements importants durant les dernières décennies. Sur les terrains d'interventions, les crises et les conflits se sont fortement complexifiés, nécessitant la participation de spécialistes de nombreux domaines. Par ailleurs, les volumes financiers générés par les campagnes de dons et mis à disposition par les bailleurs de fonds ont considérablement augmenté. En corollaire de cette croissance financière, les exigences de contrôle et de traçabilité des fonds se sont renforcées. En lien avec ces éléments, le nombre de salariés dans les grandes organisations non gouvernementales a augmenté de manière exponentielle. Une littérature spécifique sur les modalités d'évaluation des performances, le management et le « leadership » des organisations dites du « tiers secteur » a d'ailleurs vu le jour, comme l'illustre la naissance, en 1990, de la revue « Nonprofit Management and Leadership ». Les pays bénéficiaires de l'aide ont également développé des exigences spécifiques envers les projets mis en oeuvre par les ONG. Par des phénomènes de « socialisation des standards occidentaux », ces derniers attendent des acteurs internationaux un certain niveau de qualité des programmes.Pour s'adapter à ces évolutions et répondre aux exigences d'efficacité auxquelles elles sont soumises, les organisations d'aide ont dû se transformer. Les grandes organisations ont ainsi connu durant les dernières décennies un mouvement de professionnalisation de leur structure, les conduisant à se rapprocher d'un modèle de fonctionnement que nous nommerons ici « institutionnel », à savoir formalisé et organisé. Nous employons ici le terme de professionnalisation dans l'appréciation qu'en font les acteurs du milieu humanitaire, à savoir en ce qu'il désigne « les restructurations internes auxquelles leurs organisations font face depuis la fin des années 1980 ». Différents indicateurs de cette professionnalisation au sein des ONG peuvent être identifiés, notamment une plus forte division du travail, le développement de statuts spécifiques, la salarisation croissante des métiers de l'humanitaire ou encore le recours aux fonds publics.Une conséquence également de cette évolution est l'entrée de nouveaux métiers sur la scène humanitaire. À côté des professions traditionnellement à l'origine des ONG (médecins, ingénieurs, juristes, etc.), la complexification et la diversification des tâches a rendu nécessaire de faire appel à des compétences professionnelles spécifiques dans des domaines tels que la communication, l'informatique ou la finance, pour ne citer que quelques exemples. Des connaissances et des pratiques spécifiques en matière de management des ONG se sont développées depuis la fin des années 1990. Le métier de logisticien est apparu, lequel est enseigné dans des structures spécialisées (par exemple par l'association Bioforce en France). Des formations académiques spécialisées dans le domaine de l'humanitaire et de la coopération ont également vu le jour, avec le but affiché de former des professionnels spécialistes de l'humanitaire. On peut par exemple citer le PIAH en Suisse (Programme interdisciniplinaire en action humanitaire, 2011), ou encore les formations dispensées par le CIHC aux États-Unis. [auteur]
Resumo:
Audit report on the Black Hawk County Criminal Justice Information System for the year ended June 30, 2013
Resumo:
Perceiving injustice is a key antecedent of a large range of undesirable employee attitudes and behaviors at work. For example, research has shown that employees who perceive their workplace as unfair are less satisfied, less committed and engage in more counterproductive behaviors. In this study, we suggest that justice motives like the belief in a just world (BJW) contribute to explaining relations between justice perceptions and undesirable behaviors. Specifically, we propose that individual differences in BJW (i.e, the belief that the world is just, where everyone is rewarded for his or her behavior) are related to work-related behaviors and attitudes by coloring perceptions of workplace fairness. We investigated our hypotheses in a survey study with 176 employees of various organizations (36% women; mean tenure 12.3 yeares). Results showed that after controlling for other influencing factors (e.g., neuroticism) BJW was negatively related to self-reported work deviant behaviors and to cynical, disillusioned attitudes toward the current job. Moreover, BJW was positively related to overall job satisfaction. Consistent with our expectations, relations of BJW with deviant behaviors and with attitudes were mediated by perceptions of interactional and procedural justice. These results suggest extending models of justice and deviance by including motives such as BJW.
Resumo:
Kirjoitus perustuu Suomalaisen Lakimiesyhdistyksen Lakimiespäivillä 5.10.2002 pidettyyn esitykseen