975 resultados para Army-McCarthy controversy, 1954
Resumo:
Social controversy is a sustained, mediated debate between at least two oppositional parties which is more than just a difference of opinion; rather it is a persistent conflict over the political and cultural implications that dominant forms of communicative reasoning, practices, and norms have for a public. Simply put, during social controversies the norms guiding public life can be negotiated, reaffirmed, negated, and/or transformed. This can lead to progressive political, cultural, and/or social change in some instances, while establishing or reifying conservative and even oppressive norms, practices, and laws in others. Building upon Olson and Goodnight's (1994) theoretical and methodological framework of social controversy, this dissertation argues that scholars should analyze the role affect plays in this type of conflict as a means to address the regulation of public conduct as well as public discourse. The rhetorical and argumentative significance of the affective dimensions of social controversy have been conceptualized and analyzed via an examination of emotion-based claims and affective states that have become salient, discernable and/or apprehendable during specific public disagreements. Such a conceptualization demonstrates that critical insights regarding the norms that guide public conduct, the role risk and vulnerability play in the regulation of individuals' public behavior, and the relationship between affect and citizenship can be gained by focusing on a controversy's affective dimensions. To highlight the importance of the study of affect in social controversy as well as better understand the larger critical significance affect theory has for rhetorical and argumentation studies, this dissertation has analyzed the affective dimensions of three conflicts. They are: the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse social controversy, the International Freedom Center social controversy, and the controversy over the 2004 French ban on conspicuous religious attire in public schools. The findings from this dissertation that have specific and general implications for future work in the field of controversy as well as rhetoric and argumentation, respectively.
Resumo:
A lo largo del siglo XX, la población española fue consolidando su proceso de transición nutricional y alimentaria. En la etapa pre-transicional, se produjo un renovado interés por las deficiencias que mostraba la alimentación de los niños y se apostó por la educación alimentaria-nutricional para superarlas. El objetivo del trabajo es analizar el estado nutricional, a través de la talla como parámetro antropométrico, que mostraba la población escolar del ámbito rural español, entre las décadas de 1950 y 1970, su evolución y las diferencias que existían entre regiones. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto que al inicio de la década de 1960 se apreciaban dos patrones: un primer grupo donde la estatura de los niños de la costa cantábrica, zona de Levante, Cataluña y Baleares, mostraba niveles similares a los de niños bien alimentados; y un segundo grupo donde las tallas eran inferiores, en el que se encontraban las regiones de Andalucía, Extremadura y Galicia. Entre 1954 y 1977, las tallas de los niños bien alimentados mostraron un incremento que fue especialmente intenso entre 1954 y la primera mitad de la década de 1960. En el caso de los niños y niñas que acudían a las escuelas nacionales del ámbito rural, también se produjo un significativo incremento en la talla, además de corregirse las diferencias regionales que existían al principio de los años sesenta. En todos aquellos avances habrían influido tanto el complemento alimenticio, como las actividades de educación alimentación y nutrición que se llevaron a cabo en el marco del Programa EDALNU.
Resumo:
Nowadays, on a global level, the Higher Education System has a complex and broad horizon of curricular tools to use in the teaching and learning process. In addition to these new educational instruments, full of possibilities, we face specific socio-economic conditions that affect in a significantly way the Curriculum Development in certain knowledge areas (areas traditionally built on a methodology based on a physical presence of students in the classroom). Some areas such as Restoration, Rehabilitation or Construction Pathologies, and the construction sector in general, require very defined and particular knowledge that only a small number of experts claim as specialized training. All these aspects condition the teaching methodology performed in a physical classroom at a university campus (the only option used until recent years) and made us consider the integration of online teaching in these areas too. The present work shows the teaching methodology used for the development of two online courses, where we offer distance learning for "highly specialized" formation in the Edification area (an area where traditionally there was only classroom training). At the beginning, both courses were designed by classroom training, but got a really small number of applications due to the specialized topic proposed. Later, we proposed a "Curriculum Redesign" of the contents, offering an online modality, which implied a significant demand both within and outside the university area. A notable feature of this educational experience is the great spectrum opened for attendees of both courses in the online version. This situation improved significantly the "Curriculum Development" for the student and implied an interesting new proposal on the offered contents and materials (what would have been really difficult to get in a face to face classroom). In conclusion, the absence of certain types of specialized contents in the academic university curricula makes essential to raise new methodologies to save the gap in this area through additional training courses as those analyzed in this paper. Thus, our experience opens a debate on the appropriateness of implementing online training in relation to the face to face training in constructive content subjects and, especially, presents a new scheme, not without controversy, for the curriculum design.