Family Preservation Journal, 2002, Volume 6, Issue 1 (Entire issue)

The entire issue. Large file.

Family Preservation Journal, 2002, Volume 6, Issue 2. (Entire issue)

Entire issue (large pdf file) Articles include: Applying the Strengths Perspective to Increase Safety and Well-Being: Views from Families and Providers. Diane DePanfilis, Joshua Okundaye, Esta Glazer-Semmel, Lisa Kelly, and Joy Swanson Ernst Changing Tides and Changing Focus: Mapping the Challenges and Successes of One State's Implementation Of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. Scottye J. Cash, Scott D. Ryan, and Alison Glover Promising Practices to Engage Families and Support Family Preservation. Marianne Berry Implementing Intensive Family Preservation Services: A Case of lnfidelity. Raymond S. Kirk, Kellie Reed-Ashcrafi, and Peter J. Pecora Supporting Families through Short-Term Foster Care: An Essay Review. Anthony Maluccio Failed Child Welfare Policy: An Essay Review. Anthony Maluccio

Aberrant regulation of the Src -FAK signaling pathway in the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line HT-29

c-Src, a protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) the specific activity of which is increased $>$20-fold in $\sim$80% of colon tumors and colon tumor cell lines, plays a role in both growth regulation and tumorigenicity of colon tumor cells. To examine the effect of increased c-Src specific activity on colon tumor cells, coumarin-derived tyrosine analog PTK inhibitors were assessed in a standard colon tumor cell line, HT-29. Of the nine compounds tested for inhibiting c-Src activity in a standard immune complex kinase assay from c-Src precipitated from HT-29 cells, the 7,8-dihydroxy-containing compounds daphnetin and fraxetin were most effective, with IC$\sb{50}$s of 0.6 $\pm$ 0.2 mM and 0.6 $\pm$ 0.3 mM, respectively. Treatment of HT-29 cells with daphnetin resulted in inhibition of cell growth in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, scopoletin, a relatively poor Src inhibitor in vitro, did not inhibit HT-29 cell growth in the concentration range tested. In daphnetin treated cells, a dose-dependent decrease of c-Src activity paralleling cell growth inhibition was also observed; the IC$\sb{50}$ was 0.3 $\pm$ 0.1 mM for c-Src autophosphorylation. In contrast, the IC$\sb{50}$ for c-Src protein level was $>$ 0.6 mM, indicating that the effects of daphnetin were primarily an enzymatic activity of c-Src, rather than protein level in HT-29 cells. These results are the first to demonstrate that c-Src specific activity regulates colon tumor cell growth.^ To elucidate the signaling pathways activated by c-Src in colon tumor cells, the Src family substrate FAK, which has been shown to play a role in both extracellular matrix-dependent cell growth and survival, was examined. Coprecipitation assays showed Src-FAK association in detergent insoluble fractions of both attached and detached HT-29 cells, indicating that Src-FAK association in HT-29 cells is stable and, unlike untransformed cells, not dependent on cell-substratum contact. FAK also coprecipitated with Grb2, an adaptor protein also playing a role in cell proliferation and survival, in both attached and detached HT-29 cells, suggesting that a Src-FAK-Grb2-mediated signaling pathway(s) in HT-29 cells is/are constitutively activated.^ FAK was also analyzed in c-src antisense HT-29 clones AS15 and AS33 in which c-Src is specifically reduced by transfection of an antisense expression vector. FAK protein level is unexpectedly decreased in both AS15 and AS33 cells by 5-fold and 1.5-fold compared to HT-29, respectively, corresponding with the decreased expression of c-Src observed in these cells. FAK protein level was not decreased compared to parental in the c-src "sense" clone S8. Northern blot analyses showed decreased FAK mRNA levels compared to parental in AS15 and AS33, correlating with decreased FAK protein level, indicating that FAK activity in the antisense cells is regulated, at least in part, by altering FAK expression, and that this regulation is Src dependent. Because FAK has been implicated in anoikis, the ability of c-src antisense cells to survive in the absence of cell-substratum contact was examined. Decreased cell survival is seen in both AS15 and AS33, correlating with the decreases in c-Src and FAK levels and tumorigenicity in these cells. These results suggest that at least one mechanism by which activation of c-Src contributes to tumorigenic phenotype of colon tumor cells is by aberrantly promoting a survival signal through unregulated Src-FAK-Grb2 complexes. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Constitutive expression of interleukin-6 in renal cell carcinoma is modulated by p53

Several studies indicate that interleukin-6 (IL-6) production is elevated in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells, and that IL-6 can serve as an autocrine growth factor in this malignancy. Wild type (wt) p53 represses transcription from the IL-6 promoter in an inducible system. The objective of this study was to determine the role of p53 in regulating constitutive IL-6 production in RCC cells. RCC cell lines containing mutant (mut) p53 produced significantly higher levels of IL-6 than those containing wt p53 (p < 0.05). Transfection of wt p53 into RCC cell lines resulted in significant repression of IL-6 promoter CAT activity p < 0.05). Mutant p53 was less effective at repressing IL-6 promoter activity in ACHN cells, and actually enhanced IL-6 promoter activity in the A498 cell line. A498 cells stably transfected with mutant p53 produced significantly higher levels of IL-6 than A498 cells transfected with an empty expression vector (p < 0.05). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed a significant decrease in binding of C/EBP, CREB, and NF-kB transcription factors to the IL-6 promoter in A498 cells transfected with wt p53. Mut p53 was unable to inhibit transcription factor binding to the IL-6 promoter in these cells. Mutant p53-expressing UOK 121LN cells showed decreased binding of C/EBP and CREB, but not NF-kB, following wt p53 transfection. These data suggest that (i) mutation of p53 contributes to the over-expression of IL-6 in RCC; and (ii) wt p53 represses IL-6 expression at least in part by interfering with the binding of C/EBP, CREB, and in some cases, NF-kB transcription factors to the IL-6 promoter. ^