Use of targeted therapy in cancer patients in the end-of-life period: results from an Australian centre

PURPOSE: Data on the use of targeted therapies at the end of life are scarce. This study reviews the pattern of use of targeted and potentially futile, toxic, or costly therapies at an Australian cancer centre. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre review of data from patients who died within 3 months of having targeted therapy examined demographic characteristics, types of cancers, types of therapy, age, and lines of prior therapy. RESULTS: Over 24 months, two groups were analysed. Firstly, 889 patients died with 107 patients who were prescribed targeted therapy. Secondly, 457 patients were treated with targeted therapies with 52 patients, (11 %) dying within 3 months. To focus on the 52 patients: median age was 69 years, 65 % were men and 35 % were women, 50 % had haematologic cancers and 50 % had solid tumours. Ten therapeutic agents were represented: a higher total number of deaths among those prescribed erlotinib, bevacizumab, and rituximab. There were no deaths within 3 months of treatment with trastuzumab, ipilimumab, or vemurafenib. The targeted therapy was the first-line treatment in 54 %, second in 15 %, and third and beyond in 15 %. The patient's sex and type of cancer had no statistically significant influence on death within 3 months of targeted treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of targeted therapy at the end of life in this single-centre descriptive study was lower than documented in other studies. There is a need to prospectively document the factors leading to this prescribing behaviour to guide future protocols.

El fenotipo "basal-her2" en el cáncer de mama: caracterización clínico-molecular e implicaciones terapéuticas

Clinically HER2+ (cHER2+) breast cancer (BC), as exclusively determined by immunohistochemistry of HER2 protein overexpression and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization of HER2 gene amplification, has been largely considered a single disease entity in terms of clinical outcome and in the susceptibility to the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin). However, although the adjuvant/neoadjuvant use of the trastuzumab has been shown to significantly reduce recurrence risk when added to standard chemotherapy in women with early-stage cHER2+ BC, not all cases derive similar benefit from trastuzumab because a significant number of cHER2+ BC patients develop disease recurrence. Unfortunately, the identification of a robust clinical predictor of trastuzumab benefit, including HER2 itself, has proven challenging in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting. Thus, we suggest that a new generation of research needs to refine the prognostic taxonomy of cHER2+ BC and develop easy-to-use, clinicbased prediction algorithms to distinguish between good- and poor- responders to trastuzumab-based therapy ab initio. This study offered two hypotheses: 1.) HER2 overexpression can unexpectedly take place in a molecular background owned by basal-like BC (a commonly HER2-negative BC subtype which possesses many epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics and exhibits robust cancer stem cell [CSC]-like features), thus generating a so-called basal/cHER2+ BC subtype; 2.) the basal/cHER2+ phenotype confers poor prognosis and delineates a subgroup of intrinsically aggressive cHER2+ BC with primary resistance to trastuzumab...