249 resultados para statins
Resumo:
Existe uma significativa associação entre a prevalência de doenças cardiovasculares e a síndrome metabólica. Evidências mostram que a obesidade está associada a alterações estruturais e funcionais do coração. As estatinas podem reduzir a síntese endógena de colesterol e, portanto, são utilizadas como uma importante ferramenta contra a hipercolesterolemia em pacientes obesos. O presente trabalho tem como objetivo estudar os efeitos da rosuvastatina no metabolismo lipídico e dos carboidratos, morfometria do tecido adiposo e no remodelamento cardíaco de camundongos alimentados com uma dieta hiperlipídica. Neste trabalho foram utilizados 50 camundongos distribuidos em cinco grupos: grupo controle (alimentado com dieta padrão), grupo hiperlipídico (alimentado com dieta hipelipídica 60%), grupo hiperlipídico + rosuvastatina 10 (alimentado com dieta hipelipídica 60% - acrescido de 10 mg de rosuvastatina), grupo hiperlipídico + rosuvastatina 20 (alimentado com dieta hipelipídica 60% - acrescido de 20 mg de rosuvastatina), grupo hiperlipídico + rosuvastatina 40 (alimentado com dieta hipelipídica 60% - acrescido de 40 mg de rosuvastatina). Foram estudados os efeitos do tratamento com diferentes doses de rosuvastatina na massa corporal, metabolismo dos carboidratos e lipídios, pressão arterial, remodelamento na estrutura cardíaca e mudanças ultraestruturais no coração de camundongos C57BL / 6 machos alimentados com uma dieta hiperlipídica. O tratamento com rosuvastatina reduziu os níveis de lípidos no sangue, melhorou a resistência à insulina e diminuiu a pressão arterial dos camundongos alimentados com dieta rica em lipídeos. Além disso, atenuou o remodelamento cardíaco, diminuindo a fibrose intersticial e perivascular, e manteve a integridade morfológica mitocondrial, com menor produção de proteina desacopladora-2 (UCP2). Assim, a rosuvastatina tem efeitos benéficos sobre as alterações metabólicas dos carboidratos e lipídios, e no remodelamento cardíaco induzidas por dieta hiperlipídica.
Resumo:
Em pacientes hipertensos e diabéticos, o sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona está relacionado com disfunção endotelial, rigidez vascular e aterosclerose. As principais medicações disponíveis para a inibição desse sistema são os inibidores da enzima conversora de angiotensina e os bloqueadores do receptor AT1 de angiotensina. A maioria das diretrizes internacionais faz as mesmas recomendações para as duas classes, mas diferenças no seu mecanismo de ação podem ter relevância clínica. O objetivo principal foi comparar benazepril e losartana em pacientes hipertensos e diabéticos com pressão arterial não controlada por anlodipino, analisando parâmetros inflamatórios (proteína C reativa), da função endotelial (através da dilatação mediada por fluxo da artéria braquial) e de rigidez vascular (através da velocidade da onda de pulso e das pressões aórticas). O objetivo secundário foi, através de uma análise post-hoc, pesquisar se há interação entre as estatinas e os inibidores do sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona. Pressão arterial, função endotelial e rigidez vascular foram comparados entre usuários e não-usuários de estatina. Os dados estão apresentados como mediana (intervalo interquartil). Os resultados principais mostraram que o grupo benazepril apresentou menor proteína C reativa [0,38 (0,15-0,95) mg/dl vs 0,42 (0,26-0,59) mg/dl, p=0,020]. Houve, ainda, uma leve melhora da dilatação mediada por fluxo da artéria braquial no grupo benazepril (aumento 45%, p=0,057) em comparação com o grupo losartana (aumento 19%, p=0,132). Não houve diferença na velocidade da onda de pulso [8,5 (7,8-9,4) m/s vs 8,5 (7,0-9,7) m/s, p=0,280] e na pressão aórtica sistólica [129 (121-145) mmHg vs 123 (117-130) mmHg, p=0,934] entre os grupos benazepril e losartana. Nos resultados secundários, observou-se que o grupo usuário de estatina apresentou maior redução na pressão arterial sistólica média das 24 horas [134 (120-146) mmHg para 122 (114-135) mmHg, p=0,007] e melhora na dilatação mediada por fluxo da artéria braquial [6,5% (5,1-7,1) para 10,9% (7,3-12,2), p=0,003] quando comparado com o grupo não usuário [137 (122-149) mmHg para 128 (122-140) mmHg, p=0,362, e 7,5% (6,0-10,2) para 8,3% (7,5-9,9), p=0,820, respectivamente]. Não houve diferença na velocidade de onda de pulso e nas pressões aórticas entre usuários ou não de estatina. Pode-se concluir que, em pacientes diabéticos com a pressão arterial não controlada por anlodipino, o benazepril promoveu maior redução da proteína C reativa e melhora da função endotelial em relação à losartana. Além disso, o uso combinado de estatinas, anlodipino e inibidores do sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona melhorou a resposta anti-hipertensiva e a função endotelial em pacientes hipertensos e diabéticos.
Resumo:
Introdução: A atual epidemia de obesidade tem chamado a atenção para a doença hepática gordurosa não alcoólica (DHGNA). Atualmente não existe um medicamento para o tratamento da esteatose hepática, embora as estatinas sejam muito prescritas para pacientes obesos, este medicamento destina-se ao tratamento da hipercolesterolemia. Este trabalho teve como objetivo investigar os efeitos da rosuvastatina em um modelo de obesidade induzida por dieta, como foco principal a DHGNA e os marcadores hepáticos da lipogênese e beta-oxidação e ativação de células estreladas hepáticas (CEHs) em camundongos. Métodos: Camundongos machos C57BL/6 receberam dieta padrão (SC, 10% de energia como lipídios) ou dieta rica em gorduras (HF, 50% de energia como lipídios) durante 12 semanas. Em seguida, 7 semanas de tratamento, foram feitas, formando os grupos: SC, SCR (SC + rosuvastatina), HF e HFR (HF + rosuvastatina). As análises bioquímicas e técnicas moleculares foram aplicadas para abordar os resultados plasmáticos e moleculares. Resultados: O grupo HF apresentou maiores valores de insulina, colesterol total, triglicerídeos e leptina que o grupo SC, todos os quais foram reduzidos significativamente após o tratamento com Rosuvastatina no grupo HFR. O grupo HF apresentou maior percentual de esteatose, assim como maior ativação das CEHs, enquanto que a rosuvastatina provocou uma redução de 21% na esteatose hepática e atenuou a ativação das CEHs no grupo HFR. Em concordância com os achados histológicos, as expressões de SREBP-1 e PPAR-gama foram aumentados nos animais HF e reduzido após o tratamento no grupo HFR. Por outro lado, a expressão reduzida de PPAR-alfa e CPT-1 foram encontrados nos animais HF, sendo tais parâmetros restaurados após o tratamento no grupo HFR. Conclusão: A rosuvastatina atenua significativamente a ativação das células estreladas na obesidade induzida por dieta, afetando o equilíbrio dos PPARs na lipotoxicidade. Diante desses achados a Rosuvastatina pode ser indicada como alternativa para auxiliar o tratamento da esteatose hepática.
Resumo:
Projeto de Pós-Graduação/Dissertação apresentado à Universidade Fernando Pessoa como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Ciências Farmacêuticas
Resumo:
The SREBP (sterol response element binding proteins) transcription factors are central to regulating de novo biosynthesis of cholesterol and fatty acids. The SREBPs are regulated by retention or escape from the ER to the Golgi where they are proteolytically cleaved into active forms. The SREBP cleavage activating protein (SCAP) and the INSIG proteins are essential in this regulatory process. The aim of this thesis is to further characterise the molecular and cellular aspects surrounding regulation of SREBP processing. SREBP and SCAP are known to interact via their carboxy-terminal regulatory domains (CTDs) but this interaction is poorly characterised. Significant steps were achieved in this thesis towards specific mapping of the interaction site. These included cloning and over expression and partial purification of tagged SREBP1 and SREBP2 CTDs and probing of a SCAP peptide array with the CTDs. Results from the SREBP2 probing were difficult to interpret due to insolubility issues with the protein, however, probing with SREBP1 revealed five potential binding sites which were detected reproducibly. Further research is necessary to overcome SREBP2 insolubility issues and to confirm the identified SREBP1 interaction site(s) on SCAP. INSIG1 has a central role in regulating SREBP processing and in regulating stability of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), a rate limiting enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. There are two protein isoforms of human INSIG1 produced through the use of two in-frame alternative start sites. Bioinformatic analysis indicated that the presence of two in-frame start sites within the 5-prime region of INSIG1 mRNA is highly conserved and that production of two isoforms of INSIG1is likely a conserved event. Functional differences between these two isoforms were explored. No difference in either the regulation of SREBP processing or HMGCR degradation between the INSIG1 isoforms was observed and the functional significance of the two isoforms is as yet unclear. The final part of this thesis focused on enhancing the cytotoxicity of statins by targeted inhibition of SREBP processing by oxysterols. Statins have significant potential as anti-cancer agents as they inhibit the activity of HMGCR leading to a deficiency in mevalonate which is essential for cell survival. The levels of HMGCR fluctuate widely due to cholesterol feedback of SREBP processing. The relationship between sterol feedback and statin mediated cell death was investigated in depth in HeLa cells. Down regulation of SREBP processing by sterols significantly enhanced the efficacy of statin mediated cell death. Investigation of sterol feedback in additional cancer cell lines showed that sterol feedback was absent in cell lines A- 498, DU-145, MCF-7 and MeWo but was present in cell lines HT-29, HepG2 and KYSE-70. In the latter inhibition of SREBP processing using oxysterols significantly enhanced statin cytotoxicity. The results indicate that this approach is valid to enhance statin cytotoxicity in cancer cells, but may be limited by deregulation of SREBP processing and off target effects of statins, which were observed for some of the cancer cell lines screened.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Palliative medicine has made rapid progress in establishing its scientific and clinical legitimacy, yet the evidence base to support clinical practice remains deficient in both the quantity and quality of published studies. Historically, the conduct of research in palliative care populations has been impeded by multiple barriers including health care system fragmentation, small number and size of potential sites for recruitment, vulnerability of the population, perceptions of inappropriateness, ethical concerns, and gate-keeping. METHODS: A group of experienced investigators with backgrounds in palliative care research convened to consider developing a research cooperative group as a mechanism for generating high-quality evidence on prioritized, clinically relevant topics in palliative care. RESULTS: The resulting Palliative Care Research Cooperative (PCRC) agreed on a set of core principles: active, interdisciplinary membership; commitment to shared research purposes; heterogeneity of participating sites; development of research capacity in participating sites; standardization of methodologies, such as consenting and data collection/management; agile response to research requests from government, industry, and investigators; focus on translation; education and training of future palliative care researchers; actionable results that can inform clinical practice and policy. Consensus was achieved on a first collaborative study, a randomized clinical trial of statin discontinuation versus continuation in patients with a prognosis of less than 6 months who are taking statins for primary or secondary prevention. This article describes the formation of the PCRC, highlighting processes and decisions taken to optimize the cooperative group's success.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of statin use after radical prostatectomy (RP) on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with prostate cancer who never received statins before RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1146 RP patients within the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine differences in risk of BCR between post-RP statin users vs nonusers. To account for varying start dates and duration of statin use during follow-up, post-RP statin use was treated as a time-dependent variable. In a secondary analysis, models were stratified by race to examine the association of post-RP statin use with BCR among black and non-black men. RESULTS: After adjusting for clinical and pathological characteristics, post-RP statin use was significantly associated with 36% reduced risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.87; P = 0.004). Post-RP statin use remained associated with reduced risk of BCR after adjusting for preoperative serum cholesterol levels. In secondary analysis, after stratification by race, this protective association was significant in non-black (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.75; P = 0.001) but not black men (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.53-1.28; P = 0.384). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort of men undergoing RP, post-RP statin use was significantly associated with reduced risk of BCR. Whether the association between post-RP statin use and BCR differs by race requires further study. Given these findings, coupled with other studies suggesting that statins may reduce risk of advanced prostate cancer, randomised controlled trials are warranted to formally test the hypothesis that statins slow prostate cancer progression.
Resumo:
Objective: To compare baseline cardiovascular risk management between people recruited from two different healthcare systems, to a research trial of an intervention to optimize secondary prevention. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: General practices, randomly selected: 16 in Northern Ireland (NI) (UK NHS, ‘strong’ infrastructure); 32 in Republic of Ireland (RoI) (mixed healthcare economy, less infrastructure). Patients: 903 (mean age 67.5 years; 69.9% male); randomly selected, known coronary heart disease. Main outcome measures: Blood pressure, cholesterol, medications; validated questionnaires for diet (DINE), exercise (Godin), quality of life (SF12); healthcare usage. Results: More RoI than NI participants had systolic BP>140 mmHg (37% v 28%, p=0.01) and cholesterol >5mmol/l (24% v 17%, p=0.02): RoI mean systolic BP was higher (139 v 132 mm Hg). More RoI participants reported a high fibre intake (35% v 23%), higher levels of physical activity (62% v 44%), and better physical and mental health (SF12); they had more GP (5.6 v 4.4) and fewer nurse visits (1.6 v 2.1) in the previous year. Fewer in RoI (55% v 70%) were prescribed B blockers. Both groups’ ACE inhibitor (41%; 48%) prescribing was similar; high proportions were prescribed statins (84%; 85%) and aspirin (83%; 77%). Conclusions Blood pressure and cholesterol are better controlled among patients in a primary healthcare system with a ‘strong’ infrastructure supporting computerization and rewarding measured performance but this is not associated with healthier lifestyle or better quality of life. Further exploration of differences in professionals’ and patients’ engagement in secondary prevention in different healthcare systems is needed.
Resumo:
Objective The objective of this research was to examine differences in patterns of statin prescribing between Northern Ireland and England both before and after the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Setting: Primary care practices in Northern Ireland and England. Method Northern Ireland practices were matched with practices in England, statin prescribing data and QOF achievement scores (for the first year post-QOF) were obtained. Crude prescribing data from matched practices were manipulated to provide a data set of Defined Daily Doses (DDDs)/1,000 patients and cost/DDD/1,000 patients for each statin drug entity covering 1 year before and after the introduction of QOF. QOF achievements were converted into percentage scores for matched practices. Main outcome measure Cost per defined daily dose (DDD) per 1,000 patients. Results Significantly less statins (DDD/1,000 patients) were dispensed in Northern Ireland compared with the matched region in England both before and after the introduction of QOF (P
Resumo:
Rationale: There is no effective pharmacological treatment for acute lung injury (ALI). Statins are a potential new therapy because they modify many of the underlying processes important in ALI.
Objectives: To test whether simvastatin improves physiological and biological outcomes in ALI.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in patients with ALI. Patients received 80 mg simvastatin or placebo until cessation of mechanical ventilation or up to 14 days. Extravascular lung water was measured using thermodilution. Measures of pulmonary and nonpulmonary organ function were assessed daily. Pulmonary and systemic inflammation was assessed by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma cytokines. Systemic inflammation was also measured by plasma C-reactive protein.
Measurements and Main Results: Sixty patients were recruited. Baseline characteristics, including demographics and severity of illness scores, were similar in both groups. At Day 7, there was no difference in extravascular lung water. By Day 14, the simvastatin-treated group had improvements in nonpulmonary organ dysfunction. Oxygenation and respiratory mechanics improved, although these parameters failed to reach statistical significance. Intensive care unit mortality was 30% in both groups. Simvastatin was well tolerated, with no increase in adverse events. Simvastatin decreased bronchoalveolar lavage IL-8 by 2.5-fold (P = 0.04). Plasma C-reactive protein decreased in both groups but failed to achieve significance in the placebo-treated group.
Conclusions: Treatment with simvastatin appears to be safe and may be associated with an improvement in organ dysfunction in ALI. These clinical effects may be mediated by a reduction in pulmonary and systemic inflammation.
Resumo:
Experimental use of statins as stimulators of bone formation suggests they may have widespread applicability in the field of orthopaedics. With their combined effects on osteoblasts and osteoclasts, statins have the potential to enhance resorption of synthetic materials and improve bone ingrowth. In this study, the effect of oral and local administration of simvastatin to a 0 tricalcium phosphate (beta TCP)-filled defect around an implant was compared with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP2). On hundred and sixty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to treatment groups: local application of 0.1, 0.9 or 1.7 mg of simvastatin, oral simvastatin at 5, 10 or 50 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 20 days, local delivery of I or 10 mu g of rhBMP2, or control. At 6 weeks rhBMP2 increased serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b levels and reduced PTCP area fraction, particle size and number compared with control, suggesting increased osteoclast activity. There was reduced stiffness and increased mechanical strength with this treatment. Local simvastatin resulted in a decreased mineral apposition rate at 6 weeks and increased fibrous area fraction, PTCP area fraction, particle size and number at 26 weeks. Oral simvastatin had no effect compared with control. Local application of rhBMP2 increased resorption and improved mechanical strength whereas simvastatin was detrimental to healing. Oral simvastatin was ineffective at promoting either ceramic resorption or bone formation. The effect of statins on the repair of bone defects with graft substitute materials is influenced by its bioavailability. Thus, further studies on the optimal delivery system are needed. (C) 2007 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resumo:
Background: Current guidelines encourage the use of statins to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients; however the impact of these drugs on diabetic retinopathy is not well defined. Moreover, pleiotropic effects of statins on the highly specialised retinal microvascular endothelium remain largely unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of clinically relevant concentrations of simvastatin on retinal endothelium in vitro and in vivo.
Methods and Findings: Retinal microvascular endothelial cells (RMECs) were treated with 0.01–10 µM simvastatin and a biphasic dose-related response was observed. Low concentrations enhanced microvascular repair with 0.1 µM simvastatin significantly increasing proliferation (p<0.05), and 0.01 µM simvastatin significantly promoting migration (p<0.05), sprouting (p<0.001), and tubulogenesis (p<0.001). High concentration of simvastatin (10 µM) had the opposite effect, significantly inhibiting proliferation (p<0.01), migration (p<0.01), sprouting (p<0.001), and tubulogenesis (p<0.05). Furthermore, simvastatin concentrations higher than 1 µM induced cell death. The mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy was used to investigate the possible effects of simvastatin treatment on ischaemic retinopathy. Low dose simvastatin(0.2 mg/Kg) promoted retinal microvascular repair in response to ischaemia by promoting intra-retinal re-vascularisation (p<0.01). By contrast, high dose simvastatin(20 mg/Kg) significantly prevented re-vascularisation (p<0.01) and concomitantly increased pathological neovascularisation (p<0.01). We also demonstrated that the pro-vascular repair mechanism of simvastatin involves VEGF stimulation, Akt phosphorylation, and nitric oxide production; and the anti-vascular repair mechanism is driven by marked intracellular cholesterol depletion and related disorganisation of key intracellular structures.
Conclusions: A beneficial effect of low-dose simvastatin on ischaemic retinopathy is linked to angiogenic repair reducing ischaemia, thereby preventing pathological neovascularisation. High-dose simvastatin may be harmful by inhibiting reparative processes and inducing premature death of retinal microvascular endothelium which increases ischaemia-induced neovascular pathology. Statin dosage should be judiciously monitored in patients who are diabetic or are at risk of developing other forms of proliferative retinopathy.
Resumo:
Recent years have seen a growing recognition that dementia is a terminal illness and that patients with advanced dementia nearing the end of life do not currently receive adequate palliative care. However, research into palliative care for these patients has thus far been limited. Furthermore, there has been little discussion in the literature regarding medication use in patients with advanced dementia who are nearing the end of life, and discontinuation of medication has not been well studied despite its potential to reduce the burden on the patient and to improve quality of life. There is limited, and sometimes contradictory, evidence available in the literature to guide evidence-based discontinuation of drugs such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, antipsychotic agents, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), antibacterials, antihypertensives, antihyperglycaemic drugs and anticoagulants. Furthermore, end-of-life care of patients with advanced dementia may be complicated by difficulties in accurately estimating life expectancy, ethical considerations regarding withholding or withdrawing treatment, and the wishes of the patient and/or their family. Significant research must be undertaken in the area of medication discontinuation in patients with advanced dementia nearing the end of life to determine how physicians currently decide whether medications should be discontinued, and also to develop the evidence base and provide guidance on systematic medication discontinuation.
Resumo:
There is some evidence that statins may have a protective and symptomatic benefit in Alzheimer disease (AD). The LEADe study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in patients with mild to moderate AD.
Resumo:
Growing evidence suggests that elevated cholesterol levels in mid-life are associated with increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD), and that statins might have a protective effect against AD and dementia. The Lipitor's Effect in Alzheimer's Dementia (LEADe) study tests the hypothesis that a statin (atorvastatin 80 mg daily) will provide a benefit on the course of mild to moderate AD in patients receiving background therapy of a cholinesterase inhibitor (donepezil 10 mg daily).