924 resultados para conferences - Southeast Asia - Hamburg - 1998
Resumo:
"Published under the auspices of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace."
Resumo:
"DA pam. 550-14."
Resumo:
Includes bibliography.
Resumo:
Reproduction of the original edition.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"A companion to the bibliography on peoples and cultures of the mainland Southeast Asia, by Professor John F. Embree."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
At head of title: 91st Congress, 1st session. Committee print.
Resumo:
Bibliography: leaves 112-118.
Resumo:
Hearings held Apr. 15-Aug. 13, 1970.
Resumo:
Pub. by the institute under its earlier name: East Indies Institute of America.
Resumo:
It is commonly assumed that processes associated with globalisation are affecting the sovereignty of states. While the extent and implications of such processes may be debatable, globalisation presents even the most powerful states with new challenges to their autonomy and authority. In Southeast Asia, where the principle of sovereignty has been a crucial and jealously guarded part of regional governance structures, globalisation is an especially acute challenge for national governments. This paper examines the theoretical and policy implications of globalisation in Southeast Asia and argues that not only is globalisation threatening to unravel existing governmental practices in Southeast Asia, but that as a consequence we also need to re-think the way we understand core theoretical principles like sovereignty.
Resumo:
Australian foreign and security policy confronts a series of difficult challenges in coping with the emergence of an Islamic extremist threat in Southeast Asia. Australian policy makers are being drawn into unfamiliar linkages with moderate Islam, and into closer cooperation with Indonesia, the most populous Islamic nation in the world, in an attempt to offset Islamic extremists. Further, they must achieve those objectives at a time when important interests are at stake beyond Southeast Asia, when bipartisan agreement about the direction of foreign policy is waning, and when divisions over the appropriate trajectory of Australian security policy are intense. A delicacy almost unprecedented in Australian foreign policy will be required.