Direct support and general support maintenance repair parts and special tools list (including depot maintenance repair parts and special tools) for angle drive, cooling fan (2990-00-712-1280), gearcase, transfer (2520-01-061-5570, 2520-01-047-8613, P/N 12313144 (19207), P/N 12323520 (19207), transmission, transfer (2520-00-572-8605, 2520-00-800-3405 ...

Includes index.

Operator's manual : grinding kit, valve seat, electric 35 degree angle type concentric drive, 1/4 horsepower, AC/DC, single phase, 115-volt, 14000 RPM rated no load speed (K.O. Lee Company model P300BB) (4910-060-9983) and (K.O. Lee Company model P300BB-M2) (4910-473-6437).

"February 1965."

Operator's manual : grinding kit, valve seat, electric, 35 degree angle, concentric drive, driver, AC/DC, 115-volt, 7,500 RPM rated no load speed (Albertson and Company model 1712-M) (4910-060-9983).

"June 1965."

Operator's manual : grinding machine, valve face, bench mounting, 9/32 inch to 11/16 inch chuck, 0 to 45 degree valve, face angle adjustment, 115-volt, AC/DC, 60-cycle, single phase (Cedar Rapids model "KWIK-WAY" KK) (4910-540-4679).

"6 October 1967."

Unit maintenance repair parts and special tools lists : tractor, full tracked, low speed, heavy drawbar pull, (size T-11), w/angle dozer, winch and rops, Caterpillar model D8K-8A-58 (CCE), NSN 2410-00-574-7597 and w/bulldozer (semi-u-tilt), ripper and rops, Caterpillar model D8K-8S-8 (CCE), NSN 2410-00-574-7598.

Includes indexes.

Direct support and general support maintenance repair parts and special tools list including depot maintenance repair parts and special tools for azimuth laying set, guided missile AN/TSQ-110(X0-1) 1430-00-399-5318, encoder, shaft angle, digital (in container) 1430-01-034-2268, gyro reference unit (in container) 1430-01-033-4044 ...

Includes index.

Operator, organizational, and field maintenance manual : voltmeter, phase angle ME-223/U and North Atlantic Industries models 202R and 202AR.

"August 1962."

Computed induced velocity, induced drag, and angle of attack distributions for a two-bladed rotor

Cover title.

Influence of accommodation and refractive status on the peripheral refractive profile

AIM: The aim of the study was to determine, objectively and non-invasively, whether changes in accommodative demand modify differentially the peripheral refraction in emmetropic and myopic human eyes. METHODS: Forty subjects (19 male, 21 female) aged 20-30 years (mean 22.7 (SD 2.8) years), 21 emmetropes (mean spherical equivalent refractive error (MSE) -0.13 (SD 0.29) D) and 19 myopes (MSE -2.95 (SD 1.76) D) participated in the study. Ametropia was corrected with soft contact lenses (etafilcon A, 58% water content). Subjects viewed monocularly a stationary, high contrast (85%) Maltese cross at 0.0, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 D of accommodative demand and at 0, 10, 20 and 30 degrees field angle (nasal and temporal) through a +3.0 D Badal optical system. Static recordings of the accommodation response were obtained for each accommodative level, at each field angle, with an objective, open-view, infrared optometer. RESULTS: Peripheral mean spherical equivalent (M) data showed that the emmetropic cohort exhibited relative myopic shifts into the periphery, while the myopic group showed hypermetropic shifts. Increasing accommodative demand did not alter the peripheral refractive profile in either the temporal (p = 0.25) or nasal (p = 0.07) periphery with no differential accommodative effect between refractive groups in either the temporal (p = 0.77) or nasal (p = 0.73) field. Significant shifts in the J(0) astigmatic component were seen in the temporal (p<0.0005) and nasal (p<0.0005) fields with increasing eccentricity. Interaction effects between eccentricity and accommodative demand illustrated that increasing accommodative demand significantly altered the peripheral refractive profile in the temporal J(0) astigmatic component (p<0.0005). The nasal periphery, however, failed to show such an effect (p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in peripheral refraction augmented by changes in ocular accommodation are relatively unaffected by refractive error for young, healthy human eyes.

Another angle on contact lens surface analysis

Purpose: Dynamic contact angle (DCA) methods have advantages over other contact angle methodologies, not least that they can provide more than single contact angle values. Here we illustrate the use of DCA analysis to provide “fingerprint” characterisation of contact lens surfaces, and the way that different materials change in the early stages of wear. Method: The DCA method involves attaching to a microbalance weighted strips cut from a lens. The strips are then cyclically inserted into and removed from an aqueous solution. Conventionally, readings of force taken from linear portions of the resultant dipping curves are translated into advancing (CAa) and receding contact (CAr) angles. Additionally, analysis of the force versus immersion profile provides a “fingerprint” characterisation of the state of the lens surface. Results: CAa and CAr values from DCA traces provide a useful means of differentiating gross differences in hydrophilicity and molecular mobility of surfaces under particular immersion and emersion conditions, such as dipping rate and dwell times. Typical values for etafilcon A (CAa:63.1; CAr:37) and balafilcon B (CAa:118.4; CAr:36.4) illustrate this. Surface modifications induced in lens manufacture are observed to produce not only changes in these value, which may be small, but also changes in the DCA “fingerprint” (slope, undulations, length of plateau). Interestingly, similar changes are induced in the first few hours of lens wear with some lens-patient combinations. Conclusions: Although single parameter contact angles are useful for material characterisation, information of potential clinical interest can be obtained from more detailed analysis of DCA traces.

Profile Of The Use Of Disease Modifying Drugs In The Brazilian Registry Of Spondyloarthritides.

Few studies have evaluated the profile of use of disease modifying drugs (DMD) in Brazilian patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). A common research protocol was applied prospectively in 1505 patients classified as SpA by criteria of the European Spondyloarthropathies Study Group (ESSG), followed at 29 referral centers in Rheumatology in Brazil. Demographic and clinical variables were obtained and evaluated, by analyzing their correlation with the use of DMDs methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ). At least one DMD was used by 73.6% of patients: MTX by 29.2% and SSZ by 21.7%, while 22.7% used both drugs. The use of MTX was significantly associated with peripheral involvement, and SSZ was associated with axial involvement, and the two drugs were more administered, separately or in combination, in the mixed involvement (p < 0.001). The use of a DMD was significantly associated with Caucasian ethnicity (MTX , p = 0.014), inflammatory back pain (SSZ, p = 0.002) , buttock pain (SSZ, p = 0.030), neck pain (MTX, p = 0.042), arthritis of the lower limbs (MTX, p < 0.001), arthritis of the upper limbs (MTX, p < 0.001), enthesitis (p = 0.007), dactylitis (MTX, p < 0.001), inflammatory bowel disease (SSZ, p < 0.001) and nail involvement (MTX, p < 0.001). The use of at least one DMD was reported by more than 70% of patients in a large cohort of Brazilian patients with SpA, with MTX use more associated with peripheral involvement and the use of SSZ more associated with axial involvement.