856 resultados para TENDER OFFER SYSTEM LAW
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"May 1991."
Resumo:
Spine title: English ecclesiastical law.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"Compiled to supersede and bring up to date the previous edition, published in 1940."
Resumo:
On cover: National bank laws as of Jan. 1, 1936
Resumo:
Kept up to date by "revised" or replacement vols. ; subtitle varies.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
The adjuvanticity of liposomes can be directed through formulation to develop a safe yet potent vaccine candidate. With the addition of the cationic lipid dimethyldioctadecylammonium bromide (DDA) to stable neutral distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC):cholesterol (Chol) liposomes, vesicle size reduces while protein entrapment increases. The addition of the immunomodulator, trehalose 6,6-dibehenate (TDB) to either the neutral or cationic liposomes did not affect the physiochemical characteristics of these liposome vesicles. However, the protective immune response, as indicated by the amount of IFN-? production, increases considerably when TDB is present. High levels of IFN-? were observed for cationic liposomes; however, there was a marked reduction in IFN-? release over time. Conversely, for neutral liposomes containing TDB, although the initial amount of IFN-? was slightly lower than the cationic equivalent, the overall protective immune responses of these neutral liposomes were effectively maintained over time, generating good levels of protection. To that end, although the addition of DSPC and Chol reduced the protective immunity of DDA:TDB liposomes, relatively high protection was observed for the neutral counterpart, DSPC:Chol:TDB, which may offer an effective neutral alternative to the DDA:TDB cationic system, especially for the delivery of either zwitterionic (neutral) or cationic molecules or antigens.
Resumo:
This paper is a constructivist attempt to understand a global political space where states as actors (the traditional domain of international relations theory and international law) are joined by international organizations, firms, NGOs, and others. Today we know that many supposedly private or international orders (meaning sources of order other than the central institutions of the territorial state) are engaged in the regulation of large domains of collective life in a world where the sources of power are multiple, sovereignties are overlapping, and anarchy is meaningless. The paper begins with an attempt, discussed in the first section, to sort out what the rule of law might mean in the context of the WTO, where we soon see that it can only be understood by also considering the meaning of Administrative Law. Much of the debate about rule of law depends on positivist and centralist theories of “law,” whose inadequacy for my purposes leads, in the second section, to a discussion of legal pluralism and implicit law in legal theory. These approaches offer an alternative theoretical framework that respects the role of the state while not seeing it as the only source of normativity. The third section looks directly at WTO law and dispute settlement. I tr y to show that the sources and interpretations of law in the WTO and the trading system cannot be reduced to the Dispute Settlement Body. I conclude in the fourth section with some suggestions on how a WTO rule of law could be understood as democratic.