El cambio en la designación general de material (DGM) de las AACR a las RDA : Definición de los atributos tipo de contenido, tipo de medio y tipo de soporte

Se aborda el estudio de los atributos tipo de contenido, tipo de medio y tipo de soporte definidos por el código de catalogación Resource Description and Access (RDA) para solucionar los problemas que presentaba la lista de términos utilizadas para registrar la designación general de material (DGM) en las Anglo American Cataloging Rules (AACR). Los términos eran ambiguos combinando aspectos referidos al contenido y clase de material del recurso. Se parte de una exhaustiva revisión bibliográfica y del estudio de los documentos que se generaron en el proceso de elaboración del nuevo código. Se menciona el trabajo conjunto entre el Joint Steering Committee (JSC) y el estándar ONIX para el establecimiento de criterios que permitieron definir estos tres atributos, así como el aporte del modelo FRBR en la definición de los mismos. Se presentan ejemplos de registros bibliográficos donde se utilizan estos tres atributos en formato MARC21, ISBD consolidada a partir de la definición del área 0 y en el esquema de metadatos Dublin Core. Se finaliza destacando la necesidad de continuar con investigaciones que permitan concluir sobre la adecuación de estos tres atributos a las necesidades de los catalogadores, usuarios y a la realidad tecnológica

El cambio en la designación general de material (DGM) de las AACR a las RDA : Definición de los atributos tipo de contenido, tipo de medio y tipo de soporte

Se aborda el estudio de los atributos tipo de contenido, tipo de medio y tipo de soporte definidos por el código de catalogación Resource Description and Access (RDA) para solucionar los problemas que presentaba la lista de términos utilizadas para registrar la designación general de material (DGM) en las Anglo American Cataloging Rules (AACR). Los términos eran ambiguos combinando aspectos referidos al contenido y clase de material del recurso. Se parte de una exhaustiva revisión bibliográfica y del estudio de los documentos que se generaron en el proceso de elaboración del nuevo código. Se menciona el trabajo conjunto entre el Joint Steering Committee (JSC) y el estándar ONIX para el establecimiento de criterios que permitieron definir estos tres atributos, así como el aporte del modelo FRBR en la definición de los mismos. Se presentan ejemplos de registros bibliográficos donde se utilizan estos tres atributos en formato MARC21, ISBD consolidada a partir de la definición del área 0 y en el esquema de metadatos Dublin Core. Se finaliza destacando la necesidad de continuar con investigaciones que permitan concluir sobre la adecuación de estos tres atributos a las necesidades de los catalogadores, usuarios y a la realidad tecnológica

El cambio en la designación general de material (DGM) de las AACR a las RDA : Definición de los atributos tipo de contenido, tipo de medio y tipo de soporte

Se aborda el estudio de los atributos tipo de contenido, tipo de medio y tipo de soporte definidos por el código de catalogación Resource Description and Access (RDA) para solucionar los problemas que presentaba la lista de términos utilizadas para registrar la designación general de material (DGM) en las Anglo American Cataloging Rules (AACR). Los términos eran ambiguos combinando aspectos referidos al contenido y clase de material del recurso. Se parte de una exhaustiva revisión bibliográfica y del estudio de los documentos que se generaron en el proceso de elaboración del nuevo código. Se menciona el trabajo conjunto entre el Joint Steering Committee (JSC) y el estándar ONIX para el establecimiento de criterios que permitieron definir estos tres atributos, así como el aporte del modelo FRBR en la definición de los mismos. Se presentan ejemplos de registros bibliográficos donde se utilizan estos tres atributos en formato MARC21, ISBD consolidada a partir de la definición del área 0 y en el esquema de metadatos Dublin Core. Se finaliza destacando la necesidad de continuar con investigaciones que permitan concluir sobre la adecuación de estos tres atributos a las necesidades de los catalogadores, usuarios y a la realidad tecnológica

Epidemiological characteristics and diagnostic approach in patients admitted to the emergency room for transient loos of consciousness: Group for Syncope Study in the Emergency Room (GESINUR) study

Aims: To assess the clinical presentation and acute management of patients with transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) in the emergency department (ED). Methods and results: A multi-centre prospective observational study was carried out in 19 Spanish hospitals over 1 month. The patients included were 14 years old and were admitted to the ED because of an episode of T-LOC. Questionnaires and corresponding electrocardiograms (ECGs) were reviewed by a Steering Committee (SC) to unify diagnostic criteria, evaluate adherence to guidelines, and diagnose correctly the ECGs. We included 1419 patients (prevalence, 1.14%).ECG was performed in 1335 patients (94%) in the ED: 498 (37.3%) ECGs were classified as abnormal. The positive diagnostic yield ranged from 0% for the chest X-ray to 12% for the orthostatic test. In the ED, 1217 (86%) patients received a final diagnosis of syncope, whereas the remaining 202 (14%) were diagnosed of non-syncopal transient lossof consciousness (NST-LOC). After final review by the SC, 1080 patients (76%) were diagnosed of syncope, whereas 339 (24%) were diagnosed of NST-LOC (P , 0.001). Syncope was diagnosed correctly in 84% of patients. Only 25% of patients with T-LOC were admitted to hospitals. Conclusion Adherence to clinical guidelines for syncope management was low; many diagnostic tests were performed with low diagnostic yield. Important differences were observed between syncope diagnoses at the ED and by SC decision.

The Civil Society Forum of the Eastern Partnership four years on: Progress, challenges and prospects. CEPS Special Report, January 2014

Established in 2009, during the Eastern Partnership Summit in Prague, the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum supports the development of civil society organisations from the EU-28 and the six Partnership countries, namely Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. After four years of operation, the Secretariat of the Forum’s Steering Committee commissioned CEPS to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of its programme. This report singles out the institutionalisation and socialisation inculcated among its members as the Forum’s greatest accomplishment. In contrast to its internal developments, it argues that the external policy successes of the Forum remain modest. This report is the first attempt to conduct an in-depth assessment of the Forum's Annual Assembly, the Steering Committee and its Secretariat, the Working Groups and National Platforms. Ten actionable recommendations are put forward aimed at improving the Civil Society Forum’s standing and performance.

The twenty-first century needs a better G20 and a new G7+. Bruegel Policy Contribution 2014/13, 14 November 2014

During the 2008 financial crisis, the G20 was hastily elevated to ‘global economic steering committee’. In the early stages of the crisis, the G20 was an effective forum for crisis containment. As the crisis has eased, however, the G20 has lost both direction and momentum. Governments and policymakers have felt less need to act in unison and have rather refocused on their national agendas, as is their duty and primary function. However, effective global governance is needed permanently, not just in crisis times. It is desirable to have more representative and effective global governance that, among other things, is equipped to prevent crises rather than just react to them. In an environment of rapid change in global patterns of trade and wealth creation, a new revamped (but highly representative) grouping should be created within the G20, to provide leadership on key economic policy matters. Euro-area members should give up their individual seats in this G7+, allowing room for China and other large emerging economies. Without euro-area countries taking such a step, it would be impossible to reconcile effectiveness and representation in this new G7+, which would take charge of decision making on global economic imbalances, financial and monetary issues. All existing G20 countries, including individual euro-area countries, would however remain in the G20, which could potentially expand and would remain the prime forum for discussion on all remaining matters at global level.

Selected major elements and trace elements of ferrar dolerite clasts from sediment core CRP-1 (Table 1,2)

One of the objectives of the Cape Roberts Project is to study the tectonic history of the western Ross Sea region. Timing of the uplift of the Transantarctic Mountains, which are adjacent to the drillsite, will be a component of the tectonic studies (International Steering Committee, 1994; Cale Roberts Science Team, 1998a). The study of the clast samples from the core will be an important means of providing insight into the timing of uplift of the Transantarctic Mountains. Tholeiitic igneous rocks of the Jurassic (180 Ma) Ferrar large igneous province (FLIP) are widespreaded along the Transantarctic Mountains and have the potential to provide distinct indicators of erosion during uplift of the mountains. In the Transantarctic Mountains adjacent to the Cape Roberts drill site the FLIP is represented by lavas and pyroclastic of the Kirkpatrick basalts and by thick Ferrar dolerite sills which intrude the Beacon Supergroup sediments and, occasionally, the granitic basement rocks. In the Prince Albert Mountains, the youngest Kirkpatrick basalt lava is over 150 m thick, and has a very distinct high TiO2 chemical composition which is unique in the FLIP. If such rocks can be identified in the core they may provide precise timing of the initiation of uplift and denudation of the Transantarctic Mountains. Here we report on an examination of 20 Ferrar dolerite clasts. This brief report is intended as a pilot study to the examination of FLIP clasts from older drillcore.

Report of Machine Workshop on the 6-GeV Synchrotron Radiation Source : National Bureau Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 28-30, 1985.

"Sponsored by the US Department of Energy through the Advanced Photon Source Steering Committee"--Pref.

Wisconsin Library network plan report : recommendations for network development at the area level /

WI docs. no: Ed.3/2:2250

"Streamlined auditing and monitoring of community based services: first steps toward a more efficient system for providers, state government, and the community" : report to the Illinois General Assembly as required by PA 96-1141 /

The Steering Committee recognizes that the Departments may need to implement reviews necessary to address specific Federal requirements and that while consolidated reporting should be used when possible, the review and reporting processes should facilitate the ability to garner Federal funding. However, the analysis thus far confirms the need for change and a significant potential to reduce redundant monitoring and reporting. At the end of this Executive Summary, there is a summary presentation, including a timeline and progress indicators, that gives more details on these recommendations.

Some proposals to management : a suggested approach to sound industrial and public relations /

Mode of access: Internet.

Some proposals to management. A suggested approach to sound industrial and public relations.

Mode of access: Internet.

Status report[s] on Clinch River Study.

UC-70

The Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance (NETmundial)

This case study examines NETmundial, the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance, which was held in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 23 and 24 of 2014. The meeting was convened by 1net, a coalition of This case study examines NETmundial, the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance, which was held in Sao Paulo, Brazil on April 23 and 24 of 2014. The meeting was convened by 1net, a coalition of stakeholder groups involved in Internet governance discussions, in partnership with the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (CGI.br), in response to revelations of mass surveillance of communications by the United States. It sought to develop a set of universally acceptable Internet governance principles as well as a way forward for the evolution of the Internet governance system, which together could serve as a framework for the governance and use of the Internet. It convened 930 participants from 110 different countries, representing civil society, the private sector, academia, the technical community, governments and intergovernmental organizations, as well as over 1000 remote participants from 23 countries around the globe. It also employed a content contribution platform that sought to crowd source inputs from stakeholders for the production of the outcome document. The meeting served as a demonstration of the multistakeholder process in action: in the production of the outcome document, stakeholders with a diverse range of backgrounds and interests collectively negotiated the inclusion or exclusion of highly sensitive and complex issues. While the process of achieving rough consensus involved sometimes messy debates and there were procedural imperfections, the case is informative for its structured production of bottom-up multistakeholder outcomes.groups involved in Internet governance discussions, in partnership with the Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (CGI.br), in response to revelations of mass surveillance of communications by the United States. It sought to develop a set of universally acceptable Internet governance principles as well as a way forward for the evolution of the Internet governance system, which together could serve as a framework for the governance and use of the Internet. It convened 930 participants from 110 different countries, representing civil society, the private sector, academia, the technical community, governments and intergovernmental organizations, as well as over 1000 remote participants from 23 countries around the globe. It also employed a content contribution platform that sought to crowd source inputs from stakeholders for the production of the outcome document. The meeting served as a demonstration of the multistakeholder process in action: in the production of the outcome document, stakeholders with a diverse range of backgrounds and interests collectively negotiated the inclusion or exclusion of highly sensitive and complex issues. While the process of achieving rough consensus involved sometimes messy debates and there were procedural imperfections, the case is informative for its structured production of bottom-up multistakeholder outcomes.

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

Objective To improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy, to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in a study, and to evaluate a study's generalisability. Methods The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) steering committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and extracted potential items into an extensive list. Researchers, editors, and members of professional organisations shortened this list during a two day consensus meeting, with the goal of developing a checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy. Results The search for published guidelines about diagnostic research yielded 33 previously published checklists, from which we extracted a list of 75 potential items. At the consensus meeting, participants shortened the list to a 25 item checklist, by using evidence, whenever available. A prototype of a flow diagram provides information about the method of patient recruitment, the order of test execution, and the numbers of patients undergoing the test under evaluation and the reference standard, or both. Conclusions Evaluation of research depends on complete and accurate reporting. If medical journals adopt the STARD checklist and flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve to the advantage of clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals, and the public.