A New Economic Analysis of the American Revolution

We offer an analysis of the American Revolution in which actors are modeled as choosing the sovereign organization that maximizes their net expected benefits. Benefits of secession derive from satisfaction of greed and settlement of grievance. Costs derive from the cost of civil war and lost benefit of Empire membership. When expected net benefits are positive for both secessionists and the Empire civil war ensues, otherwise it is settled or never begins in the first place. The novelty of our discussion is to show how diverse economic and non-economic factors (such as pamphleteering by Thomas Paine and the morale of the Revolutionary forces) can be integrated into a single economic model.

Formless as Water, Flaming as a Fire-Some observations on the Theory and Practice of Self-Determination

The concept of national self-determination is a highly contested concept from very outset. It is partly due to its dual parentage, namely nationalism and liberalism. Prior to 1945 it was only a political concept without legal binding. With the incorporation of the principle in the UN Charter it was universalized and legalized. However, there were two competing interpretations at the UN based on de-colonization and representative government. How to define self and what really determined remain highly controversial. How to reconcile the international norm of sovereignty of state and self determination of people became more complex problem with the tide of secessionist movements based on ethno-nationalism. The concept of internal self-determination came as a compromise; but it is also very vague and harbors a wide range of interpretations.

La arquitectura de Víctor Eusa

El arquitecto Víctor Eusa (Pamplona, 1894-1990) es la figura central de la arquitectura en Navarra durante la mayor parte del siglo XX. Desde 1920, año en que termina sus estudios en Madrid, hasta 1973, año de su jubilación, produjo centenares de obras y proyectos en esta región española, con esporádicas intervenciones en otras zonas, como las provincias vecinas de Guipúzcoa, Vizcaya y Zaragoza. Su periodo activo coincide con el de la construcción del II Ensanche de Pamplona. La cantidad y calidad de su producción hacen posible establecer una identificación entre la obra de Eusa y la ciudad entonces existente. Sus obras principales son auténticos hitos urbanos que caracterizan el Ensanche. El archivo personal del arquitecto se perdió desgraciadamente en los años setenta del pasado siglo. Este trabajo de investigación ha partido de la recopilación de la documentación gráfica existente en archivos públicos y privados, que ha dado como fruto la catalogación de las obras y proyectos de Víctor Eusa, que constituye el tomo II de la tesis. En el tomo I se analiza la trayectoria del arquitecto y la evolución formal de su lenguaje, a partir de su formación académica y las sucesivas influencias que jalonan sus primeros años de profesión: sus viajes por Europa y Oriente, Otto Wagner y la Sezession vienesa, Perret y el hormigón armado, el Art-Déco y la Exposición de París de 1925, Dudok y la arquitectura holandesa, etc. Todo ello fructifica en una arquitectura expresionista muy personal, basada en la geometría de líneas rectas y quebradas, que combina el ladrillo y el hormigón como sus materiales preferidos. Su madurez se alcanza a finales de los años veinte y se prolonga hasta la guerra civil española. En este periodo se concentran sus obras más conocidas: Casa de Misericordia, Iglesia de los Paúles, Colegio de Escolapios, edificios de viviendas en plaza Príncipe de Viana y calle García Castañón, Seminario, Casino Eslava,… Después del 36, sus responsabilidades públicas sucesivas como arquitecto municipal de Pamplona y como arquitecto provincial de la Diputación Foral de Navarra introducen en su obra una nueva dimensión urbana. ABSTRACT The architect Víctor Eusa (Pamplona, 1894-1990) was the central figure in architecture in Navarra for most of the 20th century. From 1920, when he finished his studies in Madrid, to his retirement in 1973, he was responsible for hundreds of buildings in Navarra, as well as occasional projects in the neighbouring provinces of Guipúzcoa, Vizcaya and Zaragoza. His career as an architect developed in parallel with the second phase of urban expansion in Pamplona. In terms of both quantity and quality, this new district can be seen as an embodiment of Eusa's work, and his most outstanding buildings form the landmarks which give character to this area. Unfortunately, Eusa's personal archive was lost in the 1970s. By collecting and analyzing the graphic information available in public archives, the author of this dissertation was able to compile a catalogue of Eusa's work and projects, which is provided in volume II. Volume I focuses on Eusa's career and the formal development of his language, starting from his academic training and tracing the successive influences that were at work during his early years as an architect: his journeys through Europe and the East, Otto Wagner and the Vienna Secession, Perret and reinforced concrete, Art-Déco and the Paris Exhibition of 1925, Dudok and the Dutch architecture represented in the magazines Wendingen and De Stijl, and many others. All of this came together in Eusa's highly personal expressionist style, based on a geometry of straight and zigzag lines, combining his favourite materials, brick and concrete. His mature period consolidated by end of the 1920s and lasted until the Spanish Civil War. After 1936, Eusa's responsibilities as municipal architect for Pamplona and later as head of architecture for Navarra enabled him to develop his talents in the area of urban design.

The Dutch wish-list for a lighter regulatory touch from the EU. CEPS Commentary, 1 July 2013

The Dutch government set out the results of its review of EU competences on June 21st, under the slogan “European where necessary, national where possible”, claiming that the EU does not adequately respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality. It published a list of 54 points for corrective action, which Michael Emerson assesses in this new CEPS Commentary. The political significance of this initiative is heightened because it comes alongside the UK's ongoing review of EU competences, although unlike the British, the Dutch make no mention of secession, treaty changes or repatriation of competences.

British Balance of Competence Reviews, Part II: Again, a huge contradiction between the evidence and Eurosceptic populism. EPIN Paper No. 40, June 2014

This paper is the second in a series for a CEPS project entitled “The British Question and the Search for a Fresh European Narrative”. It is pegged on an ambitious exercise by the British government to review all the competences of the European Union on the basis of evidence submitted by independent stakeholders. In all, 32 sectoral policy reviews are being produced over the period 2013-2015, as input into public information and debate leading up to a referendum on whether the UK should remain in, or secede from, the EU, planned for 2017. This second set of reviews covers a broad range of EU policies (for the single market for goods, external trade, transport policy, environment, climate change, research, asylum, non-EU immigration, civil judicial cooperation, tourism, culture and sport). The findings confirm what emerged from the first set of reviews, namely that there is little or no case for repatriation of EU competences at the level they are defined in the treaties. This does not exclude that at a more detailed level there can be individual actions or laws that might be done better or not at all. However, that is the task of all the institutions to work at on a regular basis, and hardly a rationale for secession. For the UK in particular the EU has shown considerable flexibility in agreeing to special arrangements, such as in the case of the policies here reviewed of asylum, non-EU immigration and civil judicial cooperation. In other areas reviewed here, such as the single market for goods, external trade, transport, environment, climate change and research, there is a good fit between the EU’s policies and UK priorities, with the EU perceived by stakeholders as an ‘amplifier’ of British interests.

With the Scottish vote, Brussels can heave a great big sigh of relief. CEPS Commentary, 19 September 2014

On the morning after the momentous vote in Scotland, Michael Emerson also breathes a deep sigh of relief that the nightmare scenario of secession will not unfold and expresses his hope that Brussels can now return to its own business, with its renewed leadership feeling a bit encouraged to go about their burdensome agenda with more confidence.

Dear Donald … Yours, David. CEPS Commentary, 12 November 2015

The cordial letter of November 10th from the British Prime Minister to the President of the European Council is an important document. It sets the stage for deliberations on whether the UK stays in the EU, or quits in an historic act of destructive disintegration for the EU that condemns the UK to what has fittingly been called “the spectre of geo-political irrelevance”. Overall the letter is looking like a plausible move towards settling the Brussels part of the Prime Minister’s manifest objective to keep the UK in the EU, argues Michael Emerson in this CEPS Commentary. But there is one major part of the debate that is underdeveloped so far: the clarification of the scenarios and consequences of secession. Eurosceptics have not detailed their positions on how to manage the secession, but what is becoming clearer is that all conceivable options are far more problematic than the status quo.

Britain’s Future in Europe: The known Plan A to remain or the unknown Plan B to leave. CEPS Paperback 2nd Ed., March 2016

Following the agreement made by Prime Minister David Cameron with the EU on 18-19 February 2016, the day for the referendum for the UK to remain in or leave the EU is set for 23 June 2016. This will be the most important decision taken by the British people in half a century, and whose consequences will live on for another half century. The first edition of this book, published in March 2015, laid the foundations for any objective assessment of the workings of the EU and the UK’s place in it. It was widely acclaimed and rated as “a myth-breaking exercise of the best kind”. This second edition adds a substantial new chapter following Cameron’s agreement with the EU and announcement of the referendum. It reviews both the ‘Plan A’, namely the status quo for the UK in the EU as amended by the new agreement, and three variants of a ‘Plan B’ for secession. The key point is that the ‘leave’ camp have not done their homework or ‘due diligence’ to specify the post-secession scenario, or how the British government would face up to the challenges that this would bring. The authors therefore do the ‘leave’ camp’s homework for them, setting out three Plan Bs more concretely and in more depth than the ‘leave’ camp have been able or wanted to do, or any other source has done. The book is therefore unique and essential reading for anyone concerned with the fateful choice that lies soon ahead.

Offizieller Katalog der IX. internationalen Kunstausstellung im Kgl. Glaspalast zu München 1905 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Offizieller Katalog der VII. Internationalen Kunstausstellung im Kgl. Glaspalaste zu München, 1897 /

Mode of access: Internet.

Vom Wesen der Hieratischen Kunst : Ein Vorwort zur Ausstellung der Beuroner Kunstschule in der Weiner Sezession /

Mode of access: Internet.

Constitution of form of government for the people of Florida,

Mode of access: Internet.

The battle of principles; a study of the heroism and eloquence of the anti-slavery conflict,

"Originally published in 1912."

L'état et ses limites: suivi d'essais politiques /

Préface.--L'état et ses limites.--La liberté antique et la liberté moderne.--Alexis de Tocqueville.--L'instruction publique et le suffrage universel.--Le droit de pétition suivant la constitution de 1852.--La question financière.--La France en Amérique.--Les États-Unis et la France.--Pourquoi le Nord ne peut accepter la séparation.

Katalog der 1. Kunst-Austellung der Vereinigung Bildender Künstler Österreichs.

Catalog of an exhibition held March 26-June 15, 1898.