930 resultados para Raritan and Delaware Land Company.
The Contribution of Agriculture, Forestry and other Land Use activities to Global Warming, 1990-2012
Resumo:
Date of Acceptance: 16/12/2014 Acknowledgements: This work was carried out with generous funding by the Governments of Germany (GCP/GLO/286/GER) and Norway (GCP/GLO/325/NOR) to the ‘Monitoring and Assessment of GHG Emissions and Mitigation Potential from Agriculture’ Project of the FAO Climate, Energy and Tenure Division. P. Smith is a Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award holder, and his input contributes to the University of Aberdeen Environment and Food Security Theme and to Scotland's ClimateXChange. J. House was funded by a Leverhulme Research Fellowship. The FAO Statistics Division maintains the FAOSTAT Emissions database with regular program funds allocated through Strategic Objective 6. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Resumo:
Against the background of the current discussion about the EU’s common agricultural policy (CAP) after 2013, the question of the impact of government support on land prices is crucially important. Validation of the CAP’s success also hinges on a proper assessment of a choice of policy instruments. This study therefore has the objective of investigating on a theoretical basis the effects of different government support measures on land rental prices and land allocation. The different measures under consideration are the price support, area payments and decoupled single farm payments (SFPs) of the CAP. Our approach evaluates the potential impact of each measure based on a Ricardian land rent model with heterogeneous land quality and multiple land uses. We start with a simple model of one output and two inputs, where a Cobb-Douglas production technology is assumed between the two factors of land and non-land inputs. In a second step, an outside option is introduced. This outside option, as opposed to land use of the Ricardian type, is independent of land quality. The results show that area payments and SFPs become fully capitalised into land rents, whereas in a price support scheme the capitalisation depends on per-acreage productivity. Moreover, in a price support scheme and a historical model, the capitalisation is positively influenced by land quality. Both area payments and price supports influence land allocation across different uses compared with no subsidies, where the shift tends to be larger in an area payment scheme than in a price support scheme. By contrast, SFPs do not influence land allocation.
Resumo:
Shipping list no.: 2001-0272-P.
Resumo:
Cover-title.
Resumo:
"J.W. Gascoigne, secretary."
Resumo:
Brooks, W.K. On some methods of locomotion in animals.--Martin, H.N. How skulls and backbones are built.--Sedgwick, W.T. On fermentation.--Sewall, H. How we move.
Resumo:
v. 29-65, report year ends June 30; v. 66-1971, report year ends Dec. 31.
Resumo:
Prepared by American Society of Planning Officials under contract no. 68-01-1969.
Resumo:
Caption title: The future of the railroads.
Resumo:
Signed on p. 20: Winborn Lawton, J.L. Pearce, David Maybank, E.H. Prioleau, and others.
Resumo:
Cover title: The NERBC 1980 Connecticut River basin plan.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Signed, Harry H. Schwartz, chairman, Russell Wolfe, Robert E. Stone.
Resumo:
Some parts are composed chiefly of statistical tables.