Currículo y construcción de un habitus investigativo cualitativo entre sociólogos/as en formación

Este artículo analiza el diseño curricular de un Seminario de Investigación Socioeducativa para estudiantes de Sociología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, y reflexiona acerca de su contribución a forjar un "habitus investigativo cualitativo" entre estudiantes que asumen el rol de investigadores. El trabajo recupera diferentes abordajes acerca de la relación investigación-docencia en otras latitudes, para luego examinar los supuestos, objetivos y modalidades de trabajo del seminario y la utilización de trabajos prácticos secuenciales que vertebran la cursada. Se argumenta que esta experiencia de "enseñanza basada en investigación" contribuiría a inculcar una concepción dialógica, reflexiva y situada de la investigación social

Currículo y construcción de un habitus investigativo cualitativo entre sociólogos/as en formación

Este artículo analiza el diseño curricular de un Seminario de Investigación Socioeducativa para estudiantes de Sociología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, y reflexiona acerca de su contribución a forjar un "habitus investigativo cualitativo" entre estudiantes que asumen el rol de investigadores. El trabajo recupera diferentes abordajes acerca de la relación investigación-docencia en otras latitudes, para luego examinar los supuestos, objetivos y modalidades de trabajo del seminario y la utilización de trabajos prácticos secuenciales que vertebran la cursada. Se argumenta que esta experiencia de "enseñanza basada en investigación" contribuiría a inculcar una concepción dialógica, reflexiva y situada de la investigación social

Currículo y construcción de un habitus investigativo cualitativo entre sociólogos/as en formación

Este artículo analiza el diseño curricular de un Seminario de Investigación Socioeducativa para estudiantes de Sociología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, y reflexiona acerca de su contribución a forjar un "habitus investigativo cualitativo" entre estudiantes que asumen el rol de investigadores. El trabajo recupera diferentes abordajes acerca de la relación investigación-docencia en otras latitudes, para luego examinar los supuestos, objetivos y modalidades de trabajo del seminario y la utilización de trabajos prácticos secuenciales que vertebran la cursada. Se argumenta que esta experiencia de "enseñanza basada en investigación" contribuiría a inculcar una concepción dialógica, reflexiva y situada de la investigación social

The Methodological Application of Modern Historical Science to Qualitative Research

Since the middle of the twentieth century criticism towards quantitative research tools in social sciences has gradually led to attempts to find a new methodology, called 'qualitative research'. At the same time, qualitative research has called for a reconsideration of the usefulness of many of the beneficial tools and methodologies that were discarded during the move to research based on the employment of quantitative research tools. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the essential elements of the qualitative research approach, and then argue for the possibility of introducing the old-established methodology of historical science into qualitative research, in order to raise the accuracy of the qualitative data.

Mental Health Experiences within the Hmong American LGBTQ Community: A Qualitative Research Project

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

An Exploratory Qualitative Research Study on Resilience and Healing for Asian, Pacific Islander & South Asian Adult Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Postcolonialism and the politics of qualitative research in international business

This paper offers a re-configuration of international business research by subjecting it to a postcolonial critique. This critique sees international business research as exhibiting continuities with the colonial project in the way it appropriates the Other. Qualitative research in international business often reproduces a neopositivist separation of theory and method, which can marginalize discussion of the important ontological, epistemological and political issues inherent in any research process

Finding common ground in team-based qualitative research using the convergent interviewing method

Research councils, agencies, and researchers recognize the benefits of team-based health research. However, researchers involved in large-scale team-based research projects face multiple challenges as they seek to identify epistemological and ontological common ground. Typically, these challenges occur between quantitative and qualitative researchers but can occur between qualitative researchers, particularly when the project involves multiple disciplinary perspectives. The authors use the convergent interviewing technique in their multidisciplinary research project to overcome these challenges. This technique assists them in developing common epistemological and ontological ground while enabling swift and detailed data collection and analysis. Although convergent interviewing is a relatively new method described primarily in marketing research, it compares and contrasts well with grounded theory and other techniques. The authors argue that this process provides a rigorous method to structure and refine research projects and requires researchers to identify and be accountable for developing a common epistemological and ontological position.

"It's no skin off my nose":Why people take part in qualitative research

In this article, the authors analyze participants' accounts of why they took part in a repeat-interview study exploring newly diagnosed patients' perceptions of diabetes service provision in Lothian, Scotland. The study involved three semistructured in-depth interviews with each patient (N = 40), which spanned a year. The authors provide a thematic discursive analysis of responses to the question, Can I ask you what made you decide to part in the study and why you've stayed involved over the past year? The main themes are (a) recruitment within health contexts ("the nurse said it would help"), (b) altruism ("if it can help somebody"), (c) qualitative research being seen as inherently innocuous ("nothing to lose"), and (d) therapeutic aspects of interviewing ("getting it off my chest"). The analysis contributes both to the qualitative literature about generic research participation and to a germinal literature exploring qualitative health research participation. © 2006 Sage Publications.

Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews:A quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods

Objective: Qualitative research is increasingly valued as part of the evidence for policy and practice, but how it should be appraised is contested. Various appraisal methods, including checklists and other structured approaches, have been proposed but rarely evaluated. We aimed to compare three methods for appraising qualitative research papers that were candidates for inclusion in a systematic review of evidence on support for breast-feeding. Method: A sample of 12 research papers on support for breast-feeding was appraised by six qualitative reviewers using three appraisal methods: unprompted judgement, based on expert opinion; a UK Cabinet Office quality framework; and CASP, a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Papers were assigned, following appraisals, to 1 of 5 categories, which were dichotomized to indicate whether or not papers should be included in a systematic review. Patterns of agreement in categorization of papers were assessed quantitatively using κ statistics, and qualitatively using cross-case analysis. Results: Agreement in categorizing papers across the three methods was slight (κ =0.13; 95% CI 0.06-0.24). Structured approaches did not appear to yield higher agreement than that by unprompted judgement. Qualitative analysis revealed reviewers' dilemmas in deciding between the potential impact of findings and the quality of the research execution or reporting practice. Structured instruments appeared to make reviewers more explicit about the reasons for their judgements. Conclusions: Structured approaches may not produce greater consistency of judgements about whether to include qualitative papers in a systematic review. Future research should address how appraisals of qualitative research should be incorporated in systematic reviews. © The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd 2007.

How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective

Systematic review has developed as a specific methodology for searching for, appraising and synthesizing findings of primary studies, and has rapidly become a cornerstone of the evidence-based practice and policy movement. Qualitative research has traditionally been excluded from systematic reviews, and much effort is now being invested in resolving the daunting methodological and epistemological challenges associated with trying to move towards more inclusive forms of review. We describe our experiences, as a very diverse multidisciplinary group, in attempting to incorporate qualitative research in a systematic review of support for breastfeeding. We show how every stage of the review process, from asking the review question through to searching for and sampling the evidence, appraising the evidence and producing a synthesis, provoked profound questions about whether a review that includes qualitative research can remain consistent with the frame offered by current systematic review methodology. We conclude that more debate and dialogue between the different communities that wish to develop review methodology is needed, and that attempts to impose dominant views about the appropriate means of conducting reviews of qualitative research should be resisted so that innovation can be fostered. Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications.