970 resultados para Pseudomonas-syringae
Resumo:
The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 suppresses plant innate immunity with effector proteins injected by a type III secretion system (T3SS). The cysteine protease effector HopN1, which reduces the ability of DC3000 to elicit programmed cell death in non-host tobacco, was found to also suppress the production of defence-associated reactive oxygen species (ROS) and callose when delivered by Pseudomonas fluorescens heterologously expressing a P. syringae T3SS. Purified His 6 -tagged HopN1 was used to identify tomato PsbQ, a member of the oxygen evolving complex of photosystem II (PSII), as an interacting protein. HopN1 localized to chloroplasts and both degraded PsbQ and inhibited PSII activity in chloroplast preparations, whereas a HopN1 D299A non-catalytic mutant lost these abilities. Gene silencing of NtPsbQ in tobacco compromised ROS production and programmed cell death.
Resumo:
Un porcentaje importante de las pérdidas de la producción agrícola se deben a las enfermedades que causan en los cultivos los hongos necrótrofos y vasculares. Para mejorar la productividad agrícola es necesario tener un conocimiento detallado de las bases genéticas y moleculares que regulan la resistencia de las plantas a este tipo de patógenos. En Arabidopsis thaliana la resistencia frente a patógenos necrótrofos, como el hongo Plectosphaerella cucumerina BMM (PcBMM), es genéticamente compleja y depende de la activación coordinada de distintas rutas de señalización, como las reguladas por las hormonas ácido salicílico (SA), ácido jasmónico (JA), etileno (ET) y ácido abscísico (ABA), así como de la síntesis de compuestos antimicrobianos derivados del Triptófano y de la integridad de la pared celular (Llorente et al., 2005, Hernández-Blanco et al., 2007; Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Uno de los componentes claves en la regulación de la resistencia de las plantas a patógenos (incluidos hongos necrótrofos y biótrofos) es la proteína G heterotrimérica, un complejo proteico formado por tres subunidades (Gα, Gβ y Gγ), que también regula distintos procesos del desarrollo vegetal. En Arabidopsis hay un gen que codifica para la subunidad α (GPA1), otro para la β (AGB1), y tres genes para la subunidad γ (AGG1, AGG2 y AGG3). El complejo GPA1-AGB1-AGG (1-3) se activa y disocia tras la percepción de una señal específica, actuando el dímero AGB1-AGG1/2 como un monómero funcional que regula las respuestas de defensa (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Estudios transcriptómicos y análisis bioquímicos de la pared celular en los que se comparaban los mutantes agb1-2 y agg1 agg2, y plantas silvestres (Col-0) revelaron que la resistencia mediada por Gβ-Gγ1/2 no es dependiente de rutas de defensa previamente caracterizadas, y sugieren que la proteína G podría modular la composición/estructura (integridad) de la pared celular (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Recientemente, se ha demostrado que AGB1 es un componente fundamental de la respuesta inmune mediada por Pathogen- Associated Molecular Patterns (PTI), ya que los mutantes agb1-2 son incapaces de activar tras el tratamiento con PAMPs respuestas de inmunidad, como la producción de especies reactivas de oxígeno (ROS; Liu et al., 2013). Dada la importancia de la proteína G heterotrimérica en la regulación de la respuestas de defensa (incluida la PTI) realizamos un escrutinio de mutantes supresores de la susceptibilidad de agb1-2 al hongo necrótrofo, PcBMM, para identificar componentes adicionales de las rutas de señalización reguladas por AGB1. En este escrutinio se aislaron cuatro mutantes sgb (suppressors of agb1-2 susceptibility to pathogens), dos de los cuales, sgb10 y sgb11, se han caracterizado en la presente Tesis Doctoral. El mutante sgb10 es un segundo alelo nulo del gen MKP1 (At3g55270) que codifica la MAP quinasa-fosfatasa 1 (Bartels et al., 2009). Este mutante presenta lesiones espontáneas en plantas adultas y una activación constitutiva de las principales rutas de defensa (SA, JA y ET, y de metabolitos secundarios, como la camalexina), que explicaría su elevada resistencia a PcBMM y Pseudomonas syringae. Estudios epistáticos sugieren que la resistencia mediada por SGB10 no es dependiente, si no complementaria a la regulada por AGB1. El mutante sgb10 es capaz de restablecer en agb1-2 la producción de ROS y otras respuestas PTI (fosforilación de las MAPK6/3/4/11) tras el tratamiento con PAMPs tan diversos como flg22, elf18 y quitina, lo que demuestra el papel relevante de SGB10/MKP1 y de AGB1 en PTI. El mutante sgb11 se caracteriza por presentar un fenotipo similar a los mutantes irregular xylem (e.g. irx1) afectado en pared celular secundaria: irregularidades en las células xilemáticas, reducción en el tamaño de la roseta y altura de planta, y hojas con un mayor contenido de clorofila. La resistencia de sgb11 a PcBMM es independiente de agb1-2, ya que la susceptibilidad del doble mutante sgb11 agb1-2 es intermedia entre la de agb1-2 y sgb11. El mutante sgb11 no revierte la deficiente PTI de agb1-2 tras el tratamiento con flg22, lo que indica que está alterado en una ruta distinta de la regulada por SGB10. sgb11 presenta una sobreactivación de la ruta del ácido abscísico (ABA), lo que podría explicar su resistencia a PcBMM. La mutación sgb11 ha sido cartografiada en el cromosoma III de Arabidopsis entre los marcadores AthFUS6 (81,64cM) y nga6 (86,41cM) en un intervalo de aproximadamente 200 kb, que comprende genes, entre los que no se encuentra ninguno previamente descrito como IRX. El aislamiento y caracterización de SGB11 apoya la relevancia de la proteína G heterotrimérica en la regulación de la interconexión entre integridad de la pared celular e inmunidad. ABSTRACT A significant percentage of agricultural losses are due to diseases caused by necrotrophic and vascular fungi. To enhance crop yields is necessary to have a detailed knowledge of the genetic and molecular bases regulating plant resistance to these pathogens. Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to necrotrophic pathogens, such as Plectosphaerella cucumerina BMM (PcBMM) fungus, is genetically complex and depends on the coordinated activation of various signaling pathways. These include those regulated by salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET) and abscisic acid (ABA) hormones and the synthesis of tryptophan-derived antimicrobial compounds and cell wall integrity (Llorente et al., 2005, Hernández-Blanco et al., 2007; Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). One key component in the regulation of plant resistance to pathogens (including biotrophic and necrotrophic fungi) is the heterotrimeric G-protein. This protein complex is formed by three subunits (Gα, Gβ and Gγ), which also regulates various plant developmental processes. In Arabidopsis only one gene encodes for subunits α (GPA1) and β (AGB1), and three genes for subunit γ (AGG1, AGG2 y AGG3). The complex GPA1- AGB1-AGG(1-3) is activated and dissociates after perception of an specific signal, AGB1- AGG1/2 acts as a functional monomer regulating defense responses (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Comparative transcriptomic studies and biochemical analyses of the cell wall of agb1-2 and agg1agg2 mutant and wild plants (Col-0), showed that Gβ-Gγ1/2-mediated resistance is not dependent on previously characterized defense pathways. In addition, it suggests that G protein may modulate the composition/structure (integrity) of the plant cell wall (Delgado-Cerezo et al., 2012). Recently, it has been shown that AGB1 is a critical component of the immune response mediated by Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns (PTI), as agb1-2 mutants are unable to activate immune responses such as oxygen reactive species (ROS) production after PAMPs treatment (Liu et al., 2013). Considering the importance of the heterotrimeric G protein in regulation of defense responses (including PTI), we performed a screening for suppressors of agb1-2 susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungus PcBMM. This would allow the identification of additional components of the signaling pathways regulated by AGB1. In this search four sgb mutants (suppressors of agb1-2 susceptibility to pathogens) were isolated, two of which, sgb10 and sgb11, have been characterized in this PhD thesis. sgb10 mutant is a second null allele of MKP1 gene (At3g55270), which encodes the MAP kinase-phosphatase 1 (Bartels et al., 2009). This mutant exhibits spontaneous lesions in adult plants and a constitutive activation of the main defense pathways (SA, JA and ET, and secondary metabolites, such as camalexin), which explains its high resistance to Pseudomonas syringae and PcBMM. Epistatic studies suggest that SGB10- mediated resistance is not dependent, but complementary to the regulated by AGB1. The sgb10 mutant is able to restore agb1-2 ROS production and other PTI responses (MAPK6/3/4/11 phosphorylation) upon treatment with PAMPs as diverse as, flg22, elf18 and chitin, demonstrating the relevant role of SGB10/MKP1 and AGB1 in PTI. sgb11 mutant is characterized by showing a similar phenotype to irregular xylem mutants (e.g. irx1), affected in secondary cell wall: irregular xylems cells, rosette size reduction and plant height, and higher chlorophyll content on leaves. The resistance of sgb11 to PcBMM is independent of agb1-2, as susceptibility of the double mutant agb1-2sgb11 is intermediate between agb1-2 and sgb11. The sgb11 mutant does not revert the deficient PTI response in agb1-2 after flg22 treatment, indicating that is altered in a pathway different to the one regulated by SGB10. sgb11 presents an over-activation of the abscisic acid pathway (ABA), which could explain its resistance to PcBMM. The sgb11 mutation has been mapped on chromosome III of Arabidopsis, between AthFUS6 (81.64 cM) and nga6 (86.41 cM) markers, in 200 kb interval, which does not include previously known IRX genes. The isolation and characterization of SGB11 supports the importance of heterotrimeric G protein in the regulation of the interconnection between the cell wall integrity and immunity.
Resumo:
Las NADPH oxidasas de plantas, denominadas “respiratory burst oxidase homologues” (RBOHs), producen especies reactivas del oxígeno (ROS) que median un amplio rango de funciones. En la célula vegetal, el ajuste preciso de la producción de ROS aporta la especificidad de señal para generar una respuesta apropiada ante las amenazas ambientales. RbohD y RbohF, dos de los diez genes Rboh de Arabidopsis, son pleiotrópicos y median diversos procesos fisiológicos en respuesta a patógenos. El control espacio-temporal de la expresión de los genes RbohD y RbohF podría ser un aspecto crítico para determinar la multiplicidad de funciones de estas oxidasas. Por ello, generamos líneas transgénicas de Arabidopsis con fusiones de los promoters de RbohD y RbohF a los genes delatores de la B-glucuronidasa y la luciferasa. Estas líneas fueron empleadas para revelar el patrón de expresión diferencial de RbohD y RbohF durante la respuesta inmune de Arabidopsis a la bacteria patógena Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, el hongo necrótrofo Plectosphaerella cucumerina y en respuesta a señales relacionadas con la respuesta inmune. Nuestros experimentos revelan un patrón de expresión diferencial de los promotores de RbohD y RbohF durante el desarrollo de la planta y en la respuesta inmune de Arabidopsis. Además hemos puesto de manifiesto que existe una correlación entre el nivel de actividad de los promotores de RbohD y RbohF con la acumulación de ROS y el nivel de muerte celular en respuesta a patógenos. La expression de RbohD y RbohF también es modulada de manera diferencial en respuesta a patrones moleculares asociados a patógenos (PAMPs) y por ácido abscísico (ABA). Cabe destacar que, mediante una estrategia de intercambio de promotores, hemos revelado que la región promotora de RbohD, es necesaria para dirigir la producción de ROS en respuesta a P. cucumerina. Adicionalmente, la activación del promotor de RbohD en respuesta al aislado de P. cucumerina no adaptado a Arabidopsis 2127, nos llevó a realizar ensayos de susceptibilidad con el doble mutante rbohD rbohF que han revelado un papel desconocido de estas oxidasas en resistencia no-huesped. La interacción entre la señalización dependiente de las RBOHs y otros componentes de la respuesta inmune de plantas podría explicar también las distintas funciones que median estas oxidasas en relación con la respuesta inmune. Entre la gran cantidad de señales coordinadas con la actividad de las RBOHs, existen evidencias genéticas y farmacológicas que indican que las proteínas G heterotriméricas están implicadas en algunas de las rutas de señalización mediadas por ROS derivadas de los RBOHs en respuesta a señales ambientales. Por ello hemos estudiado la relación entre estas RBOH-NADPH oxidasas y AGB1, la subunidad β de las proteínas G heterotriméricas en la respuesta inmune de Arabidopsis. Análisis de epistasis indican que las proteínas G heterotriméricas están implicadas en distintas rutas de señalización en defensa mediadas por las RBOHs. Nuestros resultados ilustran la relación compleja entre la señalización mediada por las RBOHs y las proteínas G heterotriméricas, que varía en función de la interacción planta-patógeno analizada. Además, hemos explorado la posible asociación entre AGB1 con RBOHD y RBOHF en eventos tempranos de la respuesta immune. Cabe señalar que experimentos de coímmunoprecipitación apuntan a una posible asociación entre AGB1 y la kinasa citoplasmática reguladora de RBOHD, BIK1. Esto indica un posible mecanismo de control de la función de esta NADPH oxidase por AGB1. En conjunto, estos datos aportan nuevas perspectivas sobre cómo, a través del control transcripcional o mediante la interacción con las proteínas G heterotriméricas, las NADPH oxidases de plantas median la producción de ROS y la señalización por ROS en la respuesta inmune. Nuestro trabajo ejemplifica cómo la regulación diferencial de dos miembros de una familia multigénica, les permite realizar distintas funciones fisiológicas especializadas usando un mismo mecanismo enzimático. ABSTRACT The plant NADPH oxidases, termed respiratory burst oxidase homologues (RBOHs), produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) which mediate a wide range of functions. Fine tuning this ROS production provides the signaling specificity to the plant cell to produce the appropriate response to environmental threats. RbohD and RbohF, two of the ten Rboh genes present in Arabidopsis, are pleiotropic and mediate diverse physiological processes in response to pathogens. One aspect that may prove critical to determine the multiplicity of functions of RbohD and RbohF is the spatio-temporal control of their gene expression. Thus, we generated Arabidopsis transgenic lines with RbohD- and RbohF-promoter fusions to the β-glucuronidase and the luciferase reporter genes. These transgenics were employed to reveal RbohD and RbohF promoter activity during Arabidopsis immune response to the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000, the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina and in response to immunity-related cues. Our experiments revealed a differential expression pattern of RbohD and RbohF throughout plant development and during Arabidopsis immune response. Moreover, we observed a correlation between the level of RbohD and RbohF promoter activity, the accumulation of ROS and the amount of cell death in response to pathogens. RbohD and RbohF gene expression was also differentially modulated by pathogen associated molecular patterns and abscisic acid. Interestingly, a promoter-swap strategy revealed the requirement for the promoter region of RbohD to drive the production of ROS in response to P. cucumerina. Additionally, since the RbohD promoter was activated during Arabidopsis interaction with a non-adapted P. cucumerina isolate 2127, we performed susceptibility tests to this fungal isolate that uncovered a new role of these oxidases on non-host resistance. The interplay between RBOH-dependent signaling with other components of the plant immune response might also explain the different immunity-related functions mediated by these oxidases. Among the plethora of signals coordinated with RBOH activity, pharmacological and genetic evidence indicates that heterotrimeric G proteins are involved in some of the signaling pathways mediated by RBOH–derived ROS in response to environmental cues. Therefore, we analysed the interplay between these RBOH-NADPH oxidases and AGB1, the Arabidopsis β-subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins during Arabidopsis immune response. We carried out epistasis studies that allowed us to test the implication of AGB1 in different RBOH-mediated defense signaling pathways. Our results illustrate the complex relationship between RBOH and heterotrimeric G proteins signaling, that varies depending on the type of plant-pathogen interaction. Furthermore, we tested the potential association between AGB1 with RBOHD and RBOHF during early immunity. Interestingly, our co-immunoprecipitation experiments point towards an association of AGB1 and the RBOHD regulatory kinase BIK1, thus providing a putative mechanism in the control of the NADPH oxidase function by AGB1. Taken all together, these studies provide further insights into the role that transcriptional control or the interaction with heterotrimeric G-proteins have on RBOH-NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS production and signaling in immunity. Our work exemplifies how, through a differential regulation, two members of a multigenic family achieve specialized physiological functions using a common enzymatic mechanism.
Resumo:
The cell death response known as the hypersensitive response (HR) is a central feature of gene-for-gene plant disease resistance. A mutant line of Arabidopsis thaliana was identified in which effective gene-for-gene resistance occurs despite the virtual absence of HR cell death. Plants mutated at the DND1 locus are defective in HR cell death but retain characteristic responses to avirulent Pseudomonas syringae such as induction of pathogenesis-related gene expression and strong restriction of pathogen growth. Mutant dnd1 plants also exhibit enhanced resistance against a broad spectrum of virulent fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens. The resistance against virulent pathogens in dnd1 plants is quantitatively less strong and is differentiable from the gene-for-gene resistance mediated by resistance genes RPS2 and RPM1. Levels of salicylic acid compounds and mRNAs for pathogenesis-related genes are elevated constitutively in dnd1 plants. This constitutive induction of systemic acquired resistance may substitute for HR cell death in potentiating the stronger gene-for-gene defense response. Although cell death may contribute to defense signal transduction in wild-type plants, the dnd1 mutant demonstrates that strong restriction of pathogen growth can occur in the absence of extensive HR cell death in the gene-for-gene resistance response of Arabidopsis against P. syringae.
Resumo:
Bacterial pathogens of both animals and plants use type III secretion machines to inject virulence proteins into host cells. Although many components of the secretion machinery are conserved among different bacterial species, the substrates for their type III pathways are not. The Yersinia type III machinery recognizes some secretion substrates via a signal that is encoded within the first 15 codons of yop mRNA. These signals can be altered by frameshift mutations without affecting secretion of the encoded polypeptides, suggesting a mechanism whereby translation of yop mRNA is coupled to the translocation of newly synthesized polypeptide. We report that the type III machinery of Erwinia chrysanthemi cloned in Escherichia coli recognizes the secretion signals of yopE and yopQ. Pseudomonas syringae AvrB and AvrPto, two proteins exported by the recombinant Erwinia machine, can also be secreted by the Yersinia type III pathway. Mapping AvrPto sequences sufficient for the secretion of reporter fusions in Yersinia revealed the presence of an mRNA secretion signal. We propose that 11 conserved components of type III secretion machines may recognize signals that couple mRNA translation to polypeptide secretion.
Resumo:
The Arabidopsis PAD4 gene previously was found to be required for expression of multiple defense responses including camalexin synthesis and PR-1 gene expression in response to infection by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola. This report describes the isolation of PAD4. The predicted PAD4 protein sequence displays similarity to triacyl glycerol lipases and other esterases. The PAD4 transcript was found to accumulate after P. syringae infection or treatment with salicylic acid (SA). PAD4 transcript levels were very low in infected pad4 mutants. Treatment with SA induced expression of PAD4 mRNA in pad4–1, pad4–3, and pad4–4 plants but not in pad4–2 plants. Induction of PAD4 expression by P. syringae was independent of the regulatory factor NPR1 but induction by SA was NPR1-dependent. Taken together with the previous observation that pad4 mutants have a defect in accumulation of SA upon pathogen infection, these results suggest that PAD4 participates in a positive regulatory loop that increases SA levels, thereby activating SA-dependent defense responses.
Resumo:
The Pto gene encodes a serine/threonine kinase that confers resistance in tomato to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strains that express the avirulence gene avrPto. Partial characterization of the Pto signal transduction pathway and the availability of transgenic tomato lines (± Pto) make this an ideal system for exploring the molecular basis of disease resistance. In this paper, we test two transgenic tomato cell suspension cultures (±Pto) for production of H2O2 following independent challenge with two strains of P. syringae pv. tomato (±avrPto). Only when Pto and avrPto are present in the corresponding organisms are two distinct phases of the oxidative burst seen, a rapid first burst followed by a slower and more prolonged second burst. In the remaining three plant–pathogen interactions, we observe either no burst or only a first burst, indicating that the second burst is correlated with disease resistance. Further support for this observation comes from the finding that both resistant and susceptible tomato lines produce the critical second oxidative burst when challenged with P. syringae pv. tabaci, a nonhost pathogen that elicits a hypersensitive response on both tomato lines. The Pto kinase is not required, however, for the oxidative burst initiated by non-specific elicitors such as oligogalacturonides or osmotic stress. A model describing a possible role for the Pto kinase in the overall scheme of oxidative burst signaling is proposed.
Isolation and characterization of a tobacco mosaic virus-inducible myb oncogene homolog from tobacco
Resumo:
Salicylic acid (SA) plays an important role in signaling the activation of plant defense responses against pathogen attack including induction of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. To gain further insight into the SA-mediated signal transduction pathway, we have isolated and characterized a tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)-inducible myb oncogene homolog (myb1) from tobacco. The myb1 gene was induced upon TMV infection during both the hypersensitive response and development of systemic acquired resistance in the resistant tobacco cultivar following the rise of endogenous SA, but was not activated in the susceptible cultivar that fails to accumulate SA. The myb1 gene was also induced by incompatible bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae during the hypersensitive response. Exogenous SA treatment rapidly (within 15 min) activated the expression of myb1 in both resistant and susceptible tobacco cultivars with the subsequent induction of PR genes occurring several hours later. Biologically active analogs of SA and 2,6-dichloroisonicotinic acid (a synthetic functional analog of SA), which induce PR genes and enhanced resistance, also activated the myb1 gene. In contrast, biologically inactive analogs were poor inducers of myb1 gene expression. Furthermore, the recombinant Myb1 protein was shown to specifically bind to a Myb-binding consensus sequence found in the promoter of the PR-1a gene. Taken together, these results suggest that the tobacco myb1 gene encodes a signaling component downstream of SA that may participate in transcriptional activation of PR genes and plant disease resistance.
Resumo:
The Arabidopsis thaliana disease resistance genes RPS2 and RPM1 belong to a class of plant disease resistance genes that encode proteins that contain an N-terminal tripartite nucleotide binding site (NBS) and a C- terminal tandem array of leucine-rich repeats. RPS2 and RPM1 confer resistance to strains of the bacterial phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae carrying the avirulence genes avrRpt2 and avrB, respectively. In these gene-for-gene relationships, it has been proposed that pathogen avirulence genes generate specific ligands that are recognized by cognate receptors encoded by the corresponding plant resistance genes. To test this hypothesis, it is crucial to know the site of the potential molecular recognition. Mutational analysis of RPS2 protein and in vitro translation/translocation studies indicated that RPS2 protein is localized in the plant cytoplasm. To determine whether avirulence gene products themselves are the ligands for resistance proteins, we expressed the avrRpt2 and avrB genes directly in plant cells using a novel quantitative transient expression assay, and found that expression of avrRpt2 and avrB elicited a resistance response in plants carrying the corresponding resistance genes. This observation indicates that no bacterial factors other than the avirulence gene products are required for the specific resistance response as long as the avirulence gene products are correctly localized. We propose that molecular recognition of P. syringae in RPS2- and RPM1-specified resistance occurs inside of plant cells.
Resumo:
A compatible interaction between a plant and a pathogen is the result of a complex interplay between many factors of both plant and pathogen origin. Our objective was to identify host factors involved in this interaction. These factors may include susceptibility factors required for pathogen growth, factors manipulated by the pathogen to inactivate or avoid host defenses, or negative regulators of defense responses. To this end, we identified 20 recessive Arabidopsis mutants that do not support normal growth of the powdery mildew pathogen, Erysiphe cichoracearum. Complementation analyses indicated that four loci, designated powdery mildew resistant 1–4 (pmr1–4), are defined by this collection. These mutants do not constitutively accumulate elevated levels of PR1 or PDF1.2 mRNA, indicating that resistance is not simply due to constitutive activation of the salicylic acid- or ethylene- and jasmonic acid-dependent defense pathways. Further Northern blot analyses revealed that some mutants accumulate higher levels of PR1 mRNA than wild type in response to infection by powdery mildew. To test the specificity of the resistance, the pmr mutants were challenged with other pathogens including Pseudomonas syringae, Peronospora parasitica, and Erysiphe orontii. Surprisingly, one mutant, pmr1, was susceptible to E. orontii, a very closely related powdery mildew, suggesting that a very specific resistance mechanism is operating in this case. Another mutant, pmr4, was resistant to P. parasitica, indicating that this resistance is more generalized. Thus, we have identified a novel collection of mutants affecting genes required for a compatible interaction between a plant and a biotrophic pathogen.
Resumo:
The plant-signaling molecules salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play an important role in induced disease resistance pathways. Cross-talk between SA- and JA-dependent pathways can result in inhibition of JA-mediated defense responses. We investigated possible antagonistic interactions between the SA-dependent systemic acquired resistance (SAR) pathway, which is induced upon pathogen infection, and the JA-dependent induced systemic resistance (ISR) pathway, which is triggered by nonpathogenic Pseudomonas rhizobacteria. In Arabidopsis thaliana, SAR and ISR are effective against a broad spectrum of pathogens, including the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst). Simultaneous activation of SAR and ISR resulted in an additive effect on the level of induced protection against Pst. In Arabidopsis genotypes that are blocked in either SAR or ISR, this additive effect was not evident. Moreover, induction of ISR did not affect the expression of the SAR marker gene PR-1 in plants expressing SAR. Together, these observations demonstrate that the SAR and the ISR pathway are compatible and that there is no significant cross-talk between these pathways. SAR and ISR both require the key regulatory protein NPR1. Plants expressing both types of induced resistance did not show elevated Npr1 transcript levels, indicating that the constitutive level of NPR1 is sufficient to facilitate simultaneous expression of SAR and ISR. These results suggest that the enhanced level of protection is established through parallel activation of complementary, NPR1-dependent defense responses that are both active against Pst. Therefore, combining SAR and ISR provides an attractive tool for the improvement of disease control.
Resumo:
Strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) carrying avrBs2 are specifically recognized by Bs2 pepper plants, resulting in localized cell death and plant resistance. Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of the Xcv avrBs2 gene in plant cells results in Bs2-dependent cell death, indicating that the AvrBs2 protein alone is sufficient for the activation of disease resistance-mediated cell death in planta. We now provide evidence that AvrBs2 is secreted from Xcv and that secretion is type III (hrp) dependent. N- and C-terminal deletion analysis of AvrBs2 has identified the effector domain of AvrBs2 recognized by Bs2 pepper plants. By using a truncated Pseudomonas syringae AvrRpt2 effector reporter devoid of type III signal sequences, we have localized the minimal region of AvrBs2 required for type III secretion in Xcv. Furthermore, we have identified the region of AvrBs2 required for both type III secretion and translocation to host plants. The mapping of AvrBs2 sequences sufficient for type III delivery also revealed the presence of a potential mRNA secretion signal.
Resumo:
Plant disease resistance (R) genes confer race-specific resistance to pathogens and are genetically defined on the basis of intra-specific functional polymorphism. Little is known about the evolutionary mechanisms that generate this polymorphism. Most R loci examined to date contain alternate alleles and/or linked homologs even in disease-susceptible plant genotypes. In contrast, the resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pathovar maculicola (RPM1) bacterial resistance gene is completely absent (rpm1-null) in 5/5 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions that lack RPM1 function. The rpm1-null locus contains a 98-bp segment of unknown origin in place of the RPM1 gene. We undertook comparative mapping of RPM1 and flanking genes in Brassica napus to determine the ancestral state of the RPM1 locus. We cloned two B. napus RPM1 homologs encoding hypothetical proteins with ≈81% amino acid identity to Arabidopsis RPM1. Collinearity of genes flanking RPM1 is conserved between B. napus and Arabidopsis. Surprisingly, we found four additional B. napus loci in which the flanking marker synteny is maintained but RPM1 is absent. These B. napus rpm1-null loci have no detectable nucleotide similarity to the Arabidopsis rpm1-null allele. We conclude that RPM1 evolved before the divergence of the Brassicaceae and has been deleted independently in the Brassica and Arabidopsis lineages. These results suggest that functional polymorphism at R gene loci can arise from gene deletions.
Resumo:
Disease resistance in plants is often controlled by a gene-for-gene mechanism in which avirulence (avr) gene products encoded by pathogens are specifically recognized, either directly or indirectly, by plant disease resistance (R) gene products. Members of the NBS-LRR class of R genes encode proteins containing a putative nucleotide binding site (NBS) and carboxyl-terminal leucine-rich repeats (LRRs). Generally, NBS-LRR proteins do not contain predicted transmembrane segments or signal peptides, suggesting they are soluble cytoplasmic proteins. RPM1 is an NBS-LRR protein from Arabidopsis thaliana that confers resistance to Pseudomonas syringae expressing either avrRpm1 or avrB. RPM1 protein was localized by using an epitope tag. In contrast to previous suggestions, RPM1 is a peripheral membrane protein that likely resides on the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane. Furthermore, RPM1 is degraded coincident with the onset of the hypersensitive response, suggesting a negative feedback loop controlling the extent of cell death and overall resistance response at the site of infection.
Resumo:
We have investigated the origin of the Pto disease resistance (R) gene that was previously identified in the wild tomato species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium and isolated by map-based cloning. Pto encodes a serine-threonine protein kinase that specifically recognizes strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) that express the avirulence gene avrPto. We examined an accession of the distantly related wild species Lycopersicon hirsutum var. glabratum that exhibits avrPto-specific resistance to Pst. The Pst resistance of L. hirsutum was introgressed into a susceptible Lycopersicon esculentum background to create the near-isogenic line 96T133-3. Resistance to Pst(avrPto) in 96T133-3 was inherited as a single dominant locus and cosegregated with a restriction fragment length polymorphism detected by the Pto gene. This observation suggested that a member of the Pto gene family confers Pst(avrPto) resistance in this L. hirsutum line. Here we report the cloning and characterization of four members of the Pto family from 96T133-3. One gene (LhirPto) is 97% identical to Pto and encodes a catalytically active protein kinase that elicits a hypersensitive response when coexpressed with avrPto in leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana. In common with the Pto kinase, the LhirPto protein physically interacts with AvrPto and downstream members of the Pto signaling pathway. Our studies indicate that R genes of the protein kinase class may not evolve rapidly in response to pathogen pressure and rather that their ability to recognize specific Avr proteins can be highly conserved.