The third space : Metaphor and the disturbing observer

This book is a collaboration with a poet,a painter and two literary critics/philosophers. It is an investigation into aesthetics and examines and presents the possibilities for a poet and a painter in going beyond appropriating words and images from practitioners within their respective verbal and visual fields. In this book, the poet and the painter have been placed in a dialogic position to each other. This book attempts to create further meaning in the positioning of poems alongside paintings. It is a book about the processes of creativity, the making of art, the irresolvable dilemma of attempting to create from a world from which one cannot separate. The subject matter deals with art processes when attempting to re-discover lost identities with a focus on historical, psychological and political contexts

Enhancing English language learners’ text understanding through metaphor awareness

 The study examined awareness of metaphor as a tool to enhance English language learners’ understanding of texts with embedded metaphors. Findings revealed that an enhanced awareness of metaphor, as indicated by greater use of the metalanguage of metaphor, longer turns conversation and reflective journals, helped them get deeper text meaning.

Fly your kite: a metaphor for a theory of territorial development

Includes bibliography

Connectionism as metaphor: Towards an integrated, unified conception of self-system and individual difference

Comments on an article by Kashima et al. (see record 2007-10111-001). In their target article Kashima and colleagues try to show how a connectionist model conceptualization of the self is best suited to capture the self's temporal and socio-culturally contextualized nature. They propose a new model and to support this model, the authors conduct computer simulations of psychological phenomena whose importance for the self has long been clear, even if not formally modeled, such as imitation, and learning of sequence and narrative. As explicated when we advocated connectionist models as a metaphor for self in Mischel and Morf (2003), we fully endorse the utility of such a metaphor, as these models have some of the processing characteristics necessary for capturing key aspects and functions of a dynamic cognitive-affective self-system. As elaborated in that chapter, we see as their principal strength that connectionist models can take account of multiple simultaneous processes without invoking a single central control. All outputs reflect a distributed pattern of activation across a large number of simple processing units, the nature of which depends on (and changes with) the connection weights between the links and the satisfaction of mutual constraints across these links (Rummelhart & McClelland, 1986). This allows a simple account for why certain input features will at times predominate, while others take over on other occasions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved)