Alcohol Safety Action Project, Tampa, Florida. Final report. 1971-1977.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Driver and Pedestrian Programs, Washington, D.C.

An analysis of the impact of ASAP on the traffic safety system of Fairfax, Virginia - analytic study 4, court procedures: 1976. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

An analysis of the impact of ASAP on the traffic safety system in Columbus, Georgia from January, 1972 - December, 1974. Analytic study 4.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

New Orleans Alcohol Safety Action Project. Technical summary.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Greater Tampa Alcohol Safety Action Project. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Driver and Pedestrian Programs, Washington, D.C.

1976 annual report of the Los Angeles County Alcohol Safety Action Project. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Alcohol Countermeasures, Washington, D.C.

San Antonio Alcohol Safety Action Project. Final report for 1972 through 1974. Project director's report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Puerto Rico ASAP. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Driver and Pedestrian Programs, Washington, D.C.

Post ASAP analysis of project impact on ultimate measures of performance, level III - analytic study one. 1975-1976 period. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Driver and Pedestrian Programs, Washington, D.C.

Analytic study no. 1. Total project impact.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

New Orleans Alcohol Safety Action Project. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Case report.

Description based on: 1991; title from cover.

Report of review of court decisions.

Mode of access: Internet.

Adversarial interpreting – a forensic linguistic perspective

Interactions with second language speakers in public service contexts in England are normally conducted with the assistance of one interpreter. Even in situations where team interpreting would be advisable, for example in lengthy courtroom proceedings, financial considerations mean only one interpreter is normally booked. On occasion, however, more than one interpreter, or an individual (or individuals) with knowledge of the languages in question, may be simultaneously present during an interpreted interaction, either monitoring it or indeed volunteering unsolicited input. During police interviews or trials in England this may happen when the interpreter secured by the defence team to interpret during private consultation with the suspect or defendant is present also in the interview room or the courtroom but two independently sourced interpreters need not be limited to legal contexts. In healthcare settings for example, service users sometimes bring friends or relatives along to help them communicate with service providers only to find that the latter have booked an interpreter as a matter of procedure. By analogy to the nature of the English legal system, I refer to contexts where an interpreter’s output is monitored and/or challenged, either during the speech event or subsequently, as ‘adversarial interpreting’. This conceptualisation reflects the fact that interpreters in such encounters are sourced independently, often by opposing parties, and as a result can rarely be considered a team. My main concern in this paper is to throw spotlight on adversarial interpreting as a hitherto rarely discussed problem in its own right. That it is not an anomaly is evidenced by the many cases around the world where the officially recorded interpreted output was challenged, as mentioned in for example Berk-Seligson (2002), Hayes and Hale (2010), and Phelan (2011). This paper reports on the second stage of a research project which has previously involved the analysis of a transcript of an interpreted police interview with a suspect in a murder case. I will mention the findings of the analysis briefly and introduce some new findings based on input from practising interpreters who have shared their experience of adversarial interpreting by completing an online questionnaire. I will try to answer the question of how the presence of two interpreters, or an interpreter and a monitoring participant, in the same speech event impacts on the communication process. I will also address the issue of forensic linguistic arbitration in cases where incompetent interpreting has been identified or an expert opinion is sought in relation to an adversarial interpreting event of significance to a legal dispute. References Berk-Seligson (2002), The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process, University of Chicago Press. Hayes, A. and Hale, S. (2010), "Appeals on incompetent interpreting", Journal of Judicial Administration 20.2, 119-130. Phelan, M. (2011), "Legal Interpreters in the news in Ireland", Translation and Interpreting 3.1, 76-105.

La importancia del análisis jurídico del hecho administrativo, como forma de manifestación de la voluntad pública

LaAdministración Pública manifiesta su voluntad de diferentes maneras conocidas como Acto Administrativo, Actos de Simple Administración, Hecho Administrativo, Contrato Administrativo, Acto Normativo; todas estas formas de manifestación de voluntad son parte de la rama del Derecho Administrativo, las cuales han sido estudiadas por diversos doctrinarios; en este caso en concreto el estudio de esta monografía se centra en el Hecho Administrativoque no es más que toda actividad material traducida en actuaciones técnicas o físicas que son ejecutadas por medio de quien representa a la Administración Pública. En la primera parte de este proyecto monográfico el objetivo es recoger las diversas formas de manifestación de voluntad de la Administración Pública, para poder estudiarlas y analizarlas según la doctrina, y dentro de nuestro ordenamiento jurídico. Para así, una vez identificadas cada una de estas figuras, proceder al estudio del Hecho Administrativo. Una vez estudiado e identificado al Hecho Administrativo en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico; analizaremos su importancia dentro del campo práctico del Derecho Administrativo, para lo que nos remitiremos a un caso en la vía administrativa, como lo es la muerte de la hija de la ex ministra Guadalupe Larriva; y a un caso en la vía jurisdiccional, en que el señor Iván Vásquez demanda a la Federación Deportiva del Azuay, la impugnación de un Hecho Administrativo.