The dramatic works of William Shakespeare; with a life of the poet, and notes, original and selected.

Edited by Oliver W. B. Peabody; based on Singer's edition, "carefully compared" with the folio of 1623; with the life by Dr. Symmons, revised, and "New facts" by Collier. The first critical American edition. cf. Preface and J. Sherzer, American editions of Shakespeare (Modern lang. assoc. Publ., v. 22, pp. 658-659)

Shakespeare's works.

1. Tempest. Two gentlemen of Verona. Merry wives of Windsor. Measure for measure. Comedy of errors.--2. Much ado about nothing. Love's labour's lost. Midsummer night's dream. Merchant of Venice. As you like it.--3. Taming of the shrew. All's well that ends well. Twelfth Night. Winter's tale.--4. King John. King Richard II. King Henry IV. King Henry V.--5. King Henry VI. King Richard III. King Henry VIII.--6. Troilus and Cressida. Coriolanus. Titus Andronicus. Romeo and Juliet.--7. Timon of Athens. Julius Caesar. Macbeth. Hamlet. King Lear.--8. Othello. Antony and Cleopatra. Cymbeline. Pericles.--9. Songs, sonnets, poems. Index to first lines.

Ten more plays of Shakespeare,

Running title: Lectures on Shakespeare.

Poor's manual of railroads.

Mode of access: Internet.

The works of William Shakespeare /

v. 1. Life, etc. The tempest. The two gentlemen of Verona. The merry wives of Windsor. Measure for measure.--v. 2. The comedy of errors. Much ado about nothing. Love's labour's lost. A midsummer night's dream. The merchant of Venice.--v. 3. As you like it. The taming of the shrew. All's well that ends well. Twelfth-night. The winter's tale.--v. 4. King John. King Richard II. King Henry IV. Pts. I-II. King Henry V.--v. 5. King Henry VI. Pts. I-III. King Richard III. King Henry VIII.--v. 6. Triolus and Cressida. Coriolanus. Titus Andronicus. Romeo and Juliet. Timon of Athens. Julius Caesar.--v. 7. Macbeth. Hamlet. King Lear. Othello. Antony and Cleopatra. Cymbeline.--v. 8. Pericles. The two noble kinsmen. Venus and Adonis. Lucrece. Sonnets. A lover's complaint. The passionate pilgrim. The phoenix and turtle.--v. 9. Glossary.

The dramatic works of William Shakspeare : accurately printed from the text of the corrected copy left by the late George Steevens ..., with glossarial notes and a sketch of the life of Shakspeare ; in two volumes.

Added title-pages, engraved (with vignette) : The plays of William Shakspeare, illustrated with engravings by George B. Ellis, from the designs of R. Smirk, R. A.

The complete works of Shakespeare with life, compendium, and concordance ...

At head of title: The Dr. Johnson edition.

A full and correct report of the important trial of Major Hart v. Henry Alexander, one of the partners of the late firm of Alexander and Co. of Calcutta : before Lord Abinger and a special jury, Court of Exchequer, 13tn Feb. 1837.

Mode of access: Internet.

Senator from West Virginia : hearing before the Committee on Privileges and Elections, United States Senate, Seventy-fourth Congress, first session relative to the contests of Henry D. Hatfield v. Rush D. Holt for the seat in the United States Senate from the state of West Virginia. June l, 1935 ...

Printed for the use of the Committee on Privileges and Elections. Walter F. George, chairman.

Corrected opinion of Harold R. Medina, United States circuit judge in United States of America, plaintiff v. Henry S. Morgan, Harold Stanley, et al., doing business as Morgan Stanley & Co., et al., defendants. Filed, February 4, 1954. [Civil action no. 43.-757.]

Mode of access: Internet.

Not for profit income tax exemption : is there a hole in the bucket, dear Henry?

Australia’s Future Tax System Review, headed by the then head of the Australian Treasury, and the Productivity Commission’s Research Report on the not for profit sector, both examined the state of tax concessions to Australia’s not for profit sector in the light of the High Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Word Investments Ltd. Despite being unable to quantify with any certainty the pre- or post-Word Investments cost of the tax concessions, both Reports indicated their support for continuation of the income tax exemption. However, the government acted in the 2011 Budget to target the not for profit income tax concessions more precisely, mainly on competitive neutrality grounds. This article examines the income tax exemption by applying the five taxation design principles, proposed in the Australia’s Future Tax System Review, for assessing tax expenditure. The conclusion is that the exemptions can be justified and, further, that a rationale for the exemption can be consistent with the reasoning in the Word Investments case.