987 resultados para FAMILY WELFARE
Resumo:
Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, June 2005
Resumo:
A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, July 2005
Resumo:
A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, August 2005
Resumo:
Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
A paper given by Dr. Emma McCloy Layman before the Iowa Conference on Child Development and Parent Education on May 5th, 1940.
Resumo:
Children occupy centre-stage in any new welfare equilibrium. Failure to support families may produce either of two undesirable scenarios. We shall see a society without children if motherhood remains incompatible with work. A new family policy needs to recognize that children are a collective asset and that the cost of having children is rising. The double challenge is to eliminate the constraints on having children in the first place, and to ensure that the children we have are ensured optimal opportunities. The simple reason why a new social contract is called for is that fertility and child quality combine both private utility and societal gains. And like no other epoch in the past, the societal gains are mounting all-the-while that families’ ability to produce these social gains is weakening.In the following 1 analyze the twin challenges of fertility and child development. I then examine which kind of policy mix will ensure both the socially desired level of fertility and investment in our children? The task is to identify a Paretian optimum that will maximize efficiency gains and social equity simultaneously.
Resumo:
The exchange of social and economic support between the generationsis one of the main pillars of both family life and welfare systems. Thedebate on how to reform the generational contract is still truncated, however, by focusing on its public dimension only, especially on pensions and health care provisions. For a full account, the transfer of resources between adult generations in the family needs to be included as well. In our previous research we have shown that intergenerationalexchange is more likely to take place but less intense in the Nordicwelfare regime than in the Continental and Southern ones. In thepresent paper we analyze the social mechanisms that create and explain this nexus between patterns of intergenerational transfers and welfare regimes. The notion that Southern European family support networksare stronger and more effective than those of Continental and Northern European countries is only partially confirmed. In Southern (and partly in Continental) countries, children are mostly supported by means of co-residence with their parents till their complete economicindependence. However, once they have left the parental home thereare fewer transfers; support tends to be restricted to children who have special needs (such as for the formation of their own family), and depends more on their parents’ resources. In the Nordic countries, in contrast, transfers are less driven by children’s needs and parentalresources.
Resumo:
A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, October 2005
Resumo:
A-1 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program - November 2005
Resumo:
A-1 December 2005 - Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report - Family Investment Program
Resumo:
Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, January 2006
Resumo:
A-1 Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, February 2006
Resumo:
A-1 - March 2006 -Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program
Resumo:
Monthly Public Assistance Statistical Report Family Investment Program, April 2006
