Um novo horizonte para a cooperação bilateral entre Espanha e Portugal em matéria de defesa

Os Estados Membros da UE devem assumir a responsabilidade pela sua defesa e segurança, num novo quadro com menos presença dos EUA e novas ameaças. A perda de capacidades militares desde o início da crise é evidente, tornando-se necessária uma partilha que permita manter a eficiência e a economia de meios. Nesta conjuntura, Portugal e Espanha têm definido no Tratado de Baiona (2015) o mais ambicioso quadro legal da sua história para uma necessária cooperação bilateral em defesa. Uma iniciativa que pode e deve servir de primeiro passo na integração da defesa comum europeia. O presente trabalho desenha uma estratégia de cooperação bilateral, materializada num modelo de cooperação construído sobre o Tratado de Baiona, que resulta de analisar os fins, os meios e os modos de cooperação em europa nos níveis regional (OTAN e UE) e sub-regional (bilaterais e minilaterais). Abstract: The Member States of the UE need to assume the responsibility of their defense and security, in the framework of a reduced presence of the USA and increased threats. The loss of military capabilities from the beginning of the crises appears to be evident, making necessary the establishment of a sharing procedure that ensures efficiency and economy of means. Within this situation, Portugal and Spain have defined in the Treaty of Baiona (2015) the most ambitious legal framework ever in their common history, for an enhanced bilateral defense cooperation. This initiative may and must serve as first step in the integration of an European common defense. The present work designs a strategy for bilateral cooperation, materialized in a cooperation model build upon the Treaty of Baiona, as a result of the analysis of the ends, ways and means of the European cooperation at both regional (NATO & EU) and sub-regional (bilateral & minilateral) levels.

Characterizing human cysticercosis in Portugal 2006-2013

Cysticercosis results from the ingestion Taenia solium eggs directly by faecal-oral route or contaminated food or water. While, still considered a leading cause of acquired epilepsy in developed countries, this zoonosis has been controlled or eradicated in industrialized countries due to significant improvements in sanitation, pig rearing and slaughterhouse control systems. We developed a retrospective study on human neurocysticercosis (NCC) hospitalisations based on the national database resulting from National Health Service (NHS) hospital episodes except those of Madeira and Azores Islands. Between 2006 and 2013 there were 357 hospitalized NCC cases in Portugal. Annual frequency of cases between 2006-2013 kept stable (mean 45). NCC was most frequent in those aged 25-34 years (59; 16,5%) and those >75 years (65; 18,2%). Overall, mean age was 47,3 years (median age 45, standard deviation 41,1, mode 28) and 176 cases were in males (49,3%); no significant differences were observed between age and gender (t-student, p>0,05). In Norte Region cases tended to be older than in Lisboa and Vale do Tejo Region. The Directorate-General of Health established the National Observatory of Cysticercosis and Teniiasis which will define criteria for NCC cases monitoring and surveillance (hospitalized and non-hospitalized cases).

1ST CYSTINET INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE TAENIOSIS AND CYSTICERCOSIS: A ONE HEALTH CHALLENGE – Belgrade 2015

CYSTINET INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE TAENIOSIS AND CYSTICERCOSIS: A ONE HEALTH CHALLENGE –

A Model for Creating Strategic Alliances. A Study of Inter-firm Cooperation in the North European ICT Sector

In this study, it is argued that the view on alliance creation presented in the current academic literature is limited, and that using a learning approach helps to explain the dynamic nature of alliance creation. The cases in this study suggest that a wealth of inefficiency elements can be found in alliance creation. These elements can further be divided into categories, which help explain the dynamics of alliance creation. The categories –combined with two models brought forward by the study– suggest that inefficiency can be avoided through learning during the creation process. Some elements are especially central to this argumentation. First, the elements related to the clarity and acceptance of the strategy of the company, the potential lack of an alliance strategy and the elements related to changes in the strategic context. Second, the elements related to the length of the alliance creation processes and the problems a long process entails. It is further suggested that the different inefficiency elements may create a situation, where the alliance creation process is –sequentially and successfully– followed to the end, but where the different inefficiencies create a situation where the results are not aligned with the strategic intent. The proposed solution is to monitor and assess the risk for inefficiency elements during the alliance creation process. The learning, which occurs during the alliance creation process as a result of the monitoring, can then lead to realignments in the process. This study proposes a model to mitigate the risk related to the inefficiencies. The model emphasizes creating an understanding of the other alliance partner’s business, creating a shared vision, using pilot cooperation and building trust within the process. An analytical approach to assessing the benefits of trust is also central in this view. The alliance creation approach suggested by this study, which emphasizes trust and pilot cooperation, is further critically reviewed against contracting as a way to create alliances.

European Union Cross-Border Cooperation and Conflict Amelioration

The relevance of European Union (EU) cross-border cooperation for European border con?ict amelioration may be questioned in the contemporary global climate of threat and insecurity posed by forces of ’dark globalisation’. In any case, empirical evidence exposes the limitations of cross-border cooperation in advancing con?ict amelioration in some border regions. Nevertheless, in an enlarged EU which encompasses Central and East European member states and reaches out to neighbouring states through cross-border cooperation initiatives, the number of real and potential border con?icts with which it is concerned has risen exponentially. Fortunately, there are cases of EU ’borderscapes’ that have adopted a cross-border ’peace-building from below’ approach leading to border con?ict amelioration. Unfortunately, countervailing pressures on EU cross-border cooperation from border security regimes (principally Schengen), the Eurozone crisis, EU budgetary constraints, the conceptualisation of ’Europe as Empire’, and the possible recon?guration of the EU itself compromises this approach. Therefore, the path of European integration may well shift from one of inter-state peace-building and regional crossborder cooperation after the Second World War, to border con?ict and coercion in constituting and reconstituting state borders after the recon?guration of the EU.

European Union Cross-Border Cooperation as Conflict Transformation:Potential and Limits

Cross-border cooperation as conflict transformation provides a potential strategy for the European Union (EU) to help realise its founding peacebuilding objective. A wealth of cross-border cooperation activity sponsored by the EU spans a quarter of a century. Although the conflict transformation capacity of that cooperation is questionable in some border regions there is evidence to suggest that it has delivered peacebuilding dividends in other border regions. However, EU cross-border cooperation as conflict transformation faces a number of significant twenty-first century challenges including: ghost borders of the communal imagination; EU external border securitization; perceptions of EU and Russian empire-building; and the Mediterranean transmigrant/refugee crisis. It is argued that these challenges pose significant obstacles to EU cross-border cooperation as conflict transformation and undermine the peacebuilding objective of European integration.

The PERINE Project : cooperation between European Education Databases

Resumen basado en el del autor. El nombre del proyecto, PERINE, es el acr??nimo de Pedagogical and Educational Research Information Network for Europe, y fue coordinador del proyecto ante el organismo patrocinador, la Comisi??n Europea