Effects of enteral carbohydrates on de novo lipogenesis in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Conversion of glucose into lipid (de novo lipogenesis; DNL) is a possible fate of carbohydrate administered during nutritional support. It cannot be detected by conventional methods such as indirect calorimetry if it does not exceed lipid oxidation. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the effects of carbohydrate administered as part of continuous enteral nutrition in critically ill patients. DESIGN: This was a prospective, open study including 25 patients nonconsecutively admitted to a medicosurgical intensive care unit. Glucose metabolism and hepatic DNL were measured in the fasting state or after 3 d of continuous isoenergetic enteral feeding providing 28%, 53%, or 75% carbohydrate. RESULTS: DNL increased with increasing carbohydrate intake (f1.gif" BORDER="0"> +/- SEM: 7.5 +/- 1.2% with 28% carbohydrate, 9.2 +/- 1.5% with 53% carbohydrate, and 19.4 +/- 3.8% with 75% carbohydrate) and was nearly zero in a group of patients who had fasted for an average of 28 h (1.0 +/- 0.2%). In multiple regression analysis, DNL was correlated with carbohydrate intake, but not with body weight or plasma insulin concentrations. Endogenous glucose production, assessed with a dual-isotope technique, was not significantly different between the 3 groups of patients (13.7-15.3 micromol * kg(-1) * min(-1)), indicating impaired suppression by carbohydrate feeding. Gluconeogenesis was measured with [(13)C]bicarbonate, and increased as the carbohydrate intake increased (from 2.1 +/- 0.5 micromol * kg(-1) * min(-1) with 28% carbohydrate intake to 3.7 +/- 0.3 micromol * kg(-1) * min(-1) with 75% carbohydrate intake, P: < 0. 05). CONCLUSION: Carbohydrate feeding fails to suppress endogenous glucose production and gluconeogenesis, but stimulates DNL in critically ill patients.

Energy deficit and length of hospital stay can be reduced by a two-step quality improvement of nutrition therapy: the intensive care unit dietitian can make the difference.

OBJECTIVE: Critically ill patients are at high risk of malnutrition. Insufficient nutritional support still remains a widespread problem despite guidelines. The aim of this study was to measure the clinical impact of a two-step interdisciplinary quality nutrition program. DESIGN: Prospective interventional study over three periods (A, baseline; B and C, intervention periods). SETTING: Mixed intensive care unit within a university hospital. PATIENTS: Five hundred seventy-two patients (age 59 ± 17 yrs) requiring >72 hrs of intensive care unit treatment. INTERVENTION: Two-step quality program: 1) bottom-up implementation of feeding guideline; and 2) additional presence of an intensive care unit dietitian. The nutrition protocol was based on the European guidelines. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Anthropometric data, intensive care unit severity scores, energy delivery, and cumulated energy balance (daily, day 7, and discharge), feeding route (enteral, parenteral, combined, none-oral), length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and mortality were collected. Altogether 5800 intensive care unit days were analyzed. Patients in period A were healthier with lower Simplified Acute Physiologic Scale and proportion of "rapidly fatal" McCabe scores. Energy delivery and balance increased gradually: impact was particularly marked on cumulated energy deficit on day 7 which improved from -5870 kcal to -3950 kcal (p < .001). Feeding technique changed significantly with progressive increase of days with nutrition therapy (A: 59% days, B: 69%, C: 71%, p < .001), use of enteral nutrition increased from A to B (stable in C), and days on combined and parenteral nutrition increased progressively. Oral energy intakes were low (mean: 385 kcal*day, 6 kcal*kg*day ). Hospital mortality increased with severity of condition in periods B and C. CONCLUSION: A bottom-up protocol improved nutritional support. The presence of the intensive care unit dietitian provided significant additional progression, which were related to early introduction and route of feeding, and which achieved overall better early energy balance.

Optimisation of energy provision with supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition (EN) is recommended for patients in the intensive-care unit (ICU), but it does not consistently achieve nutritional goals. We assessed whether delivery of 100% of the energy target from days 4 to 8 in the ICU with EN plus supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) could optimise clinical outcome. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial was undertaken in two centres in Switzerland. We enrolled patients on day 3 of admission to the ICU who had received less than 60% of their energy target from EN, were expected to stay for longer than 5 days, and to survive for longer than 7 days. We calculated energy targets with indirect calorimetry on day 3, or if not possible, set targets as 25 and 30 kcal per kg of ideal bodyweight a day for women and men, respectively. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive EN or SPN. The primary outcome was occurrence of nosocomial infection after cessation of intervention (day 8), measured until end of follow-up (day 28), analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00802503. FINDINGS: We randomly assigned 153 patients to SPN and 152 to EN. 30 patients discontinued before the study end. Mean energy delivery between day 4 and 8 was 28 kcal/kg per day (SD 5) for the SPN group (103% [SD 18%] of energy target), compared with 20 kcal/kg per day (7) for the EN group (77% [27%]). Between days 9 and 28, 41 (27%) of 153 patients in the SPN group had a nosocomial infection compared with 58 (38%) of 152 patients in the EN group (hazard ratio 0·65, 95% CI 0·43-0·97; p=0·0338), and the SPN group had a lower mean number of nosocomial infections per patient (-0·42 [-0·79 to -0·05]; p=0·0248). INTERPRETATION: Individually optimised energy supplementation with SPN starting 4 days after ICU admission could reduce nosocomial infections and should be considered as a strategy to improve clinical outcome in patients in the ICU for whom EN is insufficient. FUNDING: Foundation Nutrition 2000Plus, ICU Quality Funds, Baxter, and Fresenius Kabi.

Nova técnica de alimentação enteral em fístulas esôfago-jejunais

BACKGROUND: A new procedure for the treatment of esophageal fistula, mainly associated to the ebb esophagojejunal in patients submitted to the total gastrectomy and reconstruction with loop jejunal Rouxen-Y anastomosis is present. METHODS: The method is based in the use of "probe standard enteral prolongated with drain to laminate adapted in extremity", which results in advanced positioning inside the jejunum, making the administration of enteral nutrition possible and impeding ebb esophagojejunal. RESULTS: The authors discuss the theoretical advantages of the procedure and they suggest that the treatment of esofagic fistula with probe prolonged enteral would be suitable in the treatment of the fistula esophagojejunal by preventing the ebb esophagojejunal, which would result in smaller period of duration of the fistula esophagojejunal and it would prevent the high mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary studies demonstrated that this is a technically easy, low cost procedure through the endoscopic use. A prospective evaluation for morbility and mortality related to the method is needed.

Costos asociados al soporte nutricional enteral en la unidad de cuidados intensivos, revisión de literatura

Objetivo:Describir los costos asociados al soporte nutricional enteral en pacientes adultos hospitalizados en Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI), Metodología: La elaboración de este documento se realizó en una búsqueda exhaustiva de acuerdo a las especificaciones y recomendaciones de la revisión de literatura, en MEDLINE, PUBMED, SCIENCE DIRECT, EBSCO por considerarse como bases de datos reconocidas por contener artículos de mayor fiabilidad y más usadas en el ámbito académico. Se evidencio en los 70 artículosel cumplimiento de los criterios de inclusión, enel cual se realizó un análisis de costos en el manejo del soporte nutricional enteral y se identificó la importancia del manejo de la nutrición en pacientes adultos del servicio de UCI. Resultados: De tal manera la importancia del soporte nutricional enteral, en su proceso precoz se identifica la reducción de costos y de recursos que se puede manejar ante el paciente crítico. Dentro de este marco se resalta que el soporte nutricional enteral debe ser la primera opción en paciente. Conclusión:La nutrición enteral considerada un modelo de innovación al soporte nutricional en las últimas décadas, ha evolucionado contribuyendo una adecuada alternativa de intervención y sin efectos adversos clínicos relevantes, que además mejoran la calidad de vida y contribuyen a la toma de decisiones clínicas basadas en la evidencia y en los análisis de costes con el uso racional de los recursos, así mismo, es una práctica costo- efectiva,con componente de costo- beneficio para el usuario al mejorar calidad de vida, obteniendo mayores beneficios a un menor costo.

A randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of total enteral and total parenteral nutritional support on metabolic, inflammatory and oxidative markers in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (APACHE II >= 66)

Background: Total enteral nutrition (TEN) within 48 h of admission has recently been shown to be safe and efficacious as part of the management of severe acute pancreatitis. Our aim was to ascertain the safety of immediate TEN in these patients and the effect of TEN on systemic inflammation, psychological state, oxidative stress, plasma glutamine levels and endotoxaemia. Methods: Patients admitted with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (APACHE II score 15) were randomised to total enteral (TEN; n = 8) or total parenteral nutrition (TPN; n = 9). Measurements of systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein), fatigue ( visual analogue scale), oxidative stress ( plasma thiobarbituric acid- reactive substances), plasma glutamine and anti-endotoxin IgG and IgM antibody concentrations were made on admission and repeated on days 3 and 7 thereafter. Clinical progress was monitored using APACHE II score. Organ failure and complications were recorded. Results: All patients tolerated the feeding regime well with few nutrition-related complications. Fatigue improved in both groups but more rapidly in the TEN group. Oxidative stress was high on admission and rose by similar amounts in both groups. Plasma glutamine concentrations did not change significantly in either group. In the TPN group, 3 patients developed respiratory failure and 3 developed non-respiratory single organ failure. There were no such complications in the TEN group. Hospital stay was shorter in the TEN group [ 7 (4-14) vs. 10 (7-26) days; p = 0.05] as was time to passing flatus and time to opening bowels [1 (0-2) vs. 2 (1-5) days; p = 0.01]. The cost of TEN was considerably less than of TPN. Conclusion: Immediate institution of nutritional support in the form of TEN is safe in predicted severe acute pancreatitis. It is as safe and as efficacious as TPN and may be beneficial in the clinical course of this disease. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP.

Nutrição enteral como fator de risco para diarréia em adultos hospitalizados

Diarréia, especialmente em ambiente hospitalar, gera mudanças no manejo do paciente, contribuindo para aumento no tempo e custos com a hospitalização. Na prática clínica, o uso de nutrição enteral é amplamente apontado como fator de risco para diarréia, demandando freqüentes alterações na terapia nutricional. Neste sentido, o objetivo desta dissertação é determinar o efeito independente do uso de nutrição enteral no risco para diarréia em adultos hospitalizados, controlando para outras variáveis clínicas relacionadas com o desfecho. Para tanto, primeiramente foi realizada revisão da literatura, a fim de identificar diferentes fatores associados à ocorrência de diarréia hospitalar. Foram utilizados como termos de busca diarrhea, diarrhoea, bowel movements, hospital, enteral nutrition, tube feeding, drug e pharmaceutical preparations, através do Pubmed, Cochrane Library e Scielo. Foram também avaliadas referências citadas em publicações selecionadas. Contatos com autores foram empregados quando textos completos não estavam disponíveis para consulta. A incidência de diarréia observada na literatura, dentre adultos hospitalizados, foi de 5% a 70%, variando de acordo com os critérios adotados para sua definição e do perfil clínico do grupo de pacientes estudados. Poucos estudos foram delineados para identificar variáveis associadas à diarréia. Uso de antibióticos, antiácidos, quimioterápicos, gravidade clínica do paciente, número de dias de hospitalização e uso de nutrição enteral foram fatores descritos como de risco para diarréia. O efeito isolado de cada um destes fatores, no entanto, não é suficientemente claro. Por esta razão, entre junho de 2004 e maio de 2005, foi conduzido um estudo de dupla coorte, de acordo com a exposição e não-exposição dos pacientes à nutrição enteral. Foram acompanhados adultos internados em unidades clínicas e cirúrgicas do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, um hospital geral universitário de alta complexidade. A fim de minimizar a variabilidade associada ao manejo dos pacientes pelas equipes assistentes e estabelecer perfil clínico comparável, o grupo não-exposto à nutrição enteral foi constituído de acordo com a unidade de internação, equipe assistente/especialidade e exposição a antimicrobianos do grupo em uso de nutrição enteral. Para identificação dos fatores de risco independentemente associados à diarréia, foi realizada regressão múltipla de Cox. A incidência de diarréia identificada neste estudo foi de 18% entre expostos à nutrição enteral e de 6% nos não-expostos (p<0,01). Foi verificado que pacientes em uso de nutrição enteral apresentam 2,7 (IC95%:1,6-4,7) vezes o risco de desenvolver diarréia do que aqueles nãoexpostos à nutrição enteral, se hospitalizados durante o verão o risco é 2,4 (IC95%:1,5-3,9) vezes em comparação a outros períodos do ano e, a cada acréscimo de 1 ano na idade, o risco aumenta em 1,6% (IC95%: 0 - 3,3). Dentre os pacientes em uso de nutrição enteral, aqueles para quem foram mais freqüentemente observadas (em mais de 75% dos dias avaliados) adesão às rotinas de higienização e troca de equipos de administração da dieta (verificadas em uma visita realizada em dias intercalados, observando a identificação da data no equipo e pela informação de entrega para a lavagem pelas atendentes de nutrição) apresentaram menor incidência de diarréia (6,5% vs. 20,3% e 5,9% vs. 19,8%, respectivamente). Assim, é elevada a incidência de diarréia em ambiente hospitalar, sendo a exposição à nutrição enteral fator de risco independente para este desfecho, além da idade avançada e hospitalização durante o verão.

Avaliação do estado nutricional precedente ao uso de nutrição enteral

CONTEXTO: O adequado diagnóstico do estado nutricional é de vital importância para a prescrição da terapia nutricional enteral no ambiente hospitalar. OBJETIVO: Avaliar indicadores do estado nutricional em pacientes ingressantes na terapia nutricional enteral em uma unidade hospitalar. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com 100 pacientes adultos, sendo analisado o estado nutricional de ingresso à terapia nutricional enteral, por meio do índice de massa corporal obtido do peso e estatura estimados a partir de fórmulas de predição, e de indicadores laboratoriais do estado metabólico e nutricional. RESULTADOS: do total, 29% dos pacientes foram classificados como desnutridos pelo índice de massa corporal, enquanto 80% dos mesmos apresentaram albumina abaixo do valor de referência (<3,2 g/dL). Não houve diferença na distribuição das causas de base da internação entre os grupos classificados quanto ao estado nutricional pelo índice de massa corporal, prevalecendo as doenças cardiovasculares e pulmonares entre as principais causas. As concentrações abaixo dos valores de referência de albumina não foram diferentes entre os grupos classificados pelo índice de massa corporal e pelo diagnóstico de internação. CONCLUSÃO: O índice de massa corporal estimado foi indicador específico do estado nutricional, porém pouco sensível, enquanto a albumina mostrou-se mais sensível, o que reafirma a necessidade da combinação de vários indicadores para obtenção de um adequado diagnóstico nutricional.

Serum Vitamins in Adult Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome Receiving Intermittent Parenteral Nutrition

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Comparação entre as necessidades energéticas prescritas e administradas a pacientes em terapia nutricional enteral

Objective: evaluating the adequacy, prescription and energy supply of enteral nutrition therapy in hospitalized patients. Methods: was performed a retrospective survey of the evolution of TNE protocol of 59 patients hospitalized in a general hospital in Marília / SP / BR. Data collected included gender, age, clinical diagnosis, anthropometric and dietary data related to the prescribed dietary formula, route and method of administration of the enteral nutrition, the daily volume prescribed and administered, the daily amount of energy required and offered in the diet, as well as possible complications. Body mass index (BMI), triceps skinfold (TSF) and arm muscle circumference (AMC) were used to establish the nutritional status of the patients. The adequacy of ENT was done according to the daily energy requirement compared to the average energy received during the daily use of ENT. Results: The average found to the BMI was 21.4 kg/m 2, and no differences were found comparing male and female. The data for TSF and AMC were different between genders (p<0.05) and suggest a more severe muscle mass in relation to adipose tissue. The averaged to the energy requirements was 1642 kcal/day but the average of energy prescribed was 1045 kcal/day and the amount offered was 1035 kcal/day. There was a significant difference between the necessity and the supplied energy offered through enteral nutrition (p=0.00) as well between the energy required and prescribed (p =0.00), both were shorter than the necessity. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in energy supply, volume of enteral nutrition prescribed and administered among eutrophic, underweight or overweight patients. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that the prescription and energy supply were not based on the needs of these patients, causing a significant energy deficit, which can lead to worsening of the nutritional status of the same. In hospitalized patients in use of ENT, the energy requirement must be made by a qualified professional within the multidisciplinary team, based on the needs of each patient.

Fistulização temporária do ceco em equinos: estudo experimental da técnica cirúrgica e da viabilidade desta via para a administração de fluído enteral

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Saúde bucal de pacientes com desordens neurológicas e nutrição enteral: análise microbiológica, bioquímica e protocolo de prevenção

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Desperdício de dieta enteral em UTI: análise de modo de falhas e efeitos de danos ao paciente grave

Pós-graduação em Enfermagem (mestrado profissional) - FMB

Selenium and vitamin A and E in the nutrition of very low-birth weight preterm infants

Deficient antioxidant defenses in preterm infants have been implicated in diseases such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, and intraventricular hemorrhage. The antioxidant properties of selenium, vitamin A, and vitamin E make these elements important in the nutrition of Very Low-Birth Weight (VLBW) infants. Selenium is a component of glutathione peroxidase, an enzyme that prevents the production of free radicals. The decrease in plasma selenium in VLBW infants in the first month after birth makes evident that preterm infants have low selenium store and require supplementation by parenteral and enteral nutrition. A meta-analysis, with only three trials, showed that selenium supplementation did not affect mortality, and the incidence of neonatal chronic lung disease or retinopathy of prematurity, but was associated with a reduction in lateonset sepsis. Most VLBW infants and extremely Low-Birth Weight Infants (ELBW) are born with low vitamin A stores and need vitamin A supplementation by intramuscular or enteral route. Low plasma retinol concentrations increase the risk of chronic lung disease/bronchopulmonary dysplasia and long-term respiratory disabilities in preterm infants. There is evidence that vitamin A supplementation decreases the mortality or oxygen requirement at one month of age, and oxygen requirement at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age. Vitamin E blocks natural peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids from lipid layers of cell membranes. VLBW infants have a decrease in plasma concentrations in the first month after birth suggesting the need of vitamin E supplementation. A meta-analysis on vitamin E supplementation concluded that vitamin E did not affect mortality, risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and necrotizing enterocolitis but reduced the risk of intraventricular hemorrhage and increased the risk of sepsis. Serum vitamin E concentrations higher than 3.5 mg/dL are associated with a decrease in the risk of severe retinopathy of prematurity, and blindness, but also with an increase in neonatal sepsis. Caution is recommended with the supplementation of high doses of parenteral vitamin E and supplementation that increases serum levels above 3.5 mg/dL. In conclusion: although it is known that preterm infants are deficient in selenium, vitamin A and E, more studies are required to determine the best way to supplement and the impact of supplementation on neonatal outcome.

International Consensus Guidelines for Nutrition Therapy in Pancreatitis

Guidelines for nutrition support in pancreatitis have been inconsistently adapted to clinical practice. The International Consensus Guideline Committee (ICGC) established a pancreatitis task force to review published guidelines for pancreatitis in nutrition support. A PubMed search using the terms pancreatitis, acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, nutrition support, parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, and guidelines was conducted for the period from January 1999 to May 2011. Eleven guidelines were identified for review. The ICGC used the following process to develop unified guideline statements: summarize the strength of evidence (grading) of the guidelines; establish level of evidence for ICGC statements as high, intermediate, and low; assign published guideline levels of evidence; and define an ICGC grading system. International Pancreatitis Guideline Grades were established as follows: platinum-high level of evidence and consistent agreement among the guidelines; gold-acceptable level of evidence and no conflicting statements in guidelines; and silver-single existing guideline statement with no conflict in other guidelines. Eighteen ICGC statements were derived from the 11 published pancreatitis guidelines. Uniform agreement from widely disparate groups (United States, Europe, Japan, and China) resulted in 4 platinum-level guideline statements for nutrition in pancreatitis: nutrition support therapy (NST) is generally not needed for mild to moderate disease, NST is needed for severe disease, enteral nutrition (EN) is preferred over parenteral nutrition (PN), and use PN when EN is contraindicated or not feasible. This methodology provides a template for future ICGC nutrition guideline development. (JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36:284-291)