Testing the descriptive performance of the rank-dependent utility in the domain of health profiles

Expected utility theory (EUT) has been challenged as a descriptive theoryin many contexts. The medical decision analysis context is not an exception.Several researchers have suggested that rank dependent utility theory (RDUT)may accurately describe how people evaluate alternative medical treatments.Recent research in this domain has addressed a relevant feature of RDU models-probability weighting-but to date no direct test of this theoryhas been made. This paper provides a test of the main axiomatic differencebetween EUT and RDUT when health profiles are used as outcomes of riskytreatments. Overall, EU best described the data. However, evidence on theediting and cancellation operation hypothesized in Prospect Theory andCumulative Prospect Theory was apparent in our study. we found that RDUoutperformed EU in the presentation of the risky treatment pairs in whichthe common outcome was not obvious. The influence of framing effects onthe performance of RDU and their importance as a topic for future researchis discussed.

Descriptive epidemiology of isolated anal anomalies: a survey of 4.6 million births in Europe.

The prevalence of anal anomalies among 4,618,840 births recorded in 33 EUROCAT registries between 1980 and 1994 was 4.05 per 10,000 births. Of the 1,846 recorded cases, 672 (36.4%) were isolated anal anomalies while 1,174 (63.6%) occurred together with other anomalies. Only isolated anal anomalies were analyzed in this study: 75.5% were atresias, 10.1% of which were above and 89.9% were below the level of the levator ani muscle. Fistula occurred in 53% of supralevator and 37% of infralevator atresia. Other anal anomalies were ectopic anus (3.4%), congenital anal fistula (14.7%), and persistent cloaca (0.9%). There was a predominance of males in anal atresia without fistula (male to female (M:F) ratio was 6.7 for supralevator and 2.3 for infralevator atresia), but no significant sex difference in atresias with fistula. There was a predominance of females in ectopic anus and congenital anal fistula (M:F = 0.11 and 0.36 respectively). High frequencies of fetal deaths were recorded in supralevator atresia without fistula (8.3%) and in persistent cloaca (11.1%). Mean gestational length and mean birth weights were reduced for persistent cloaca but were within normal limits for other isolated anal anomalies. Odds ratios (ORs) for mothers above 35 years were increased for supralevator atresia without fistula, supralevator atresia with fistula, and congenital anal fistula. ORs for mothers below 30 years were slightly increased for supralevator atresia without fistula and decreased for persistent cloaca. There were marked differences in prevalence and distribution of anal anomalies among the EUROCAT registries. The results indicated that there are epidemiological differences among the various types of anal anomalies which might reflect different embryological origins.

Descriptive epidemiology of Cornelia de Lange syndrome in Europe.

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) is a multiple congenital anomaly/mental retardation syndrome consisting of characteristic dysmorphic features, microcephaly, hypertrichosis, upper limb defects, growth retardation, developmental delay, and a variety of associated malformations. We present a population-based epidemiological study of the classical form of CdLS. The data were extracted from the database of European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) database, a European network of birth defect registries which follow a standard methodology. Based on 23 years of epidemiologic monitoring (8,558,346 births in the 1980-2002 period), we found the prevalence of the classical form of CdLS to be 1.24/100,000 births or 1:81,000 births and estimated the overall CdLS prevalence at 1.6-2.2/100,000. Live born children accounted for 91.5% (97/106) of cases, fetal deaths 2.8% (3/106), and terminations of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis 5.7% (6/106). The most frequent associated congenital malformations were limb defects (73.1%), congenital heart defects (45.6%), central nervous system malformations (40.2%), and cleft palate (21.7%). In the last 11 years, as much as 68% of cases with major malformations were not detected by routine prenatal US. Live born infants with CdLS have a high first week survival (91.4%). All patients were sporadic. Maternal and paternal age did not seem to be risk factors for CdLS. Almost 70% of patients, born after the 37th week of gestation, weighed <or=2,500 g. Low birth weight correlated with a more severe phenotype. Severe limb anomalies were significantly more often present in males.

Les méthodes d'ajustement dans les modèles d'évaluation de la mortalité hospitalière. Partie 1, Etude descriptive : document de travail

Suite à la demande du Président de la République de disposer d'indicateurs de mortalité en établissements de santé » (discours du 18 septembre 2008 sur le thème de la politique de la santé et de la réforme du système de soins), la Direction de la recherche, des études, de l'évaluation et des statistiques (DREES) a piloté en 2009, en lien avec la Direction générale de l'offre de soins (DGOS) et la Haute autorité de santé (HAS), l'instruction des aspects méthodologiques relatifs à la construction de ces indicateurs de mortalité. Cette revue de littérature portant sur les différentes méthodes d'ajustement a été réalisée dans ce cadre, à la demande conjointe de la DREES et de la HAS.Ce rapport décrit les méthodes et modèles d'estimation et d'ajustement de la mortalité hospitalière identifiées dans la littérature.Il ressort de cette revue, que d'une manière générale, trois questions méthodologiques majeures préoccupent les épidémiologistes, les chercheurs et les décideurs s'intéressant à l'indicateur de la mortalité hospitalière : i) premièrement, sur l'opportunité d'établir l'indicateur de mortalité hospitalière à partir de groupes de population de patients homogènes définis par des pathologies et/ou des procédures médicales/chirurgicales cibles ; ii) deuxièmement, sur le type d'approche analytique et de l'intérêt de prendre en compte plusieurs niveaux dans l'analyse statistique ; iii) enfin troisièmement, sur le choix des variables d'ajustement permettant de contrôler les différences de case-mix entre plusieurs établissements ou groupes de patients pour réaliser des comparaisons. [Ed.]

Outpatient Quick Diagnosis Units for the evaluation of suspected severe diseases: an observational, descriptive study

Background: Hospitals in countries with public health systems have recently adopted organizational changes to improve efficiency and resource allocation, and reducing inappropriate hospitalizations has been established as an important goal. AIMS: Our goal was to describe the functioning of a Quick Diagnosis Unit in a Spanish public university hospital after evaluating 1,000 consecutive patients. We also aimed to ascertain the degree of satisfaction among Quick Diagnosis Unit patients and the costs of the model compared to conventional hospitalization practices. DESIGN: Observational, descriptive study. METHODS: Our sample comprised 1,000 patients evaluated between November 2008 and January 2010 in the Quick Diagnosis Unit of a tertiary university public hospital in Barcelona. Included patients were those who had potentially severe diseases and would normally require hospital admission for diagnosis but whose general condition allowed outpatient treatment. We analyzed several variables, including time to diagnosis, final diagnoses and hospitalizations avoided, and we also investigated the mean cost (as compared to conventional hospitalization) and the patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: In 88% of cases, the reasons for consultation were anemia, anorexia-cachexia syndrome, febrile syndrome, adenopathies, abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea and lung abnormalities. The most frequent diagnoses were cancer (18.8%; mainly colon cancer and lymphoma) and Iron-deficiency anemia (18%). The mean time to diagnosis was 9.2 days (range 1 to 19 days). An estimated 12.5 admissions/day in a one-year period (in the internal medicine department) were avoided. In a subgroup analysis, the mean cost per process (admission-discharge) for a conventional hospitalization was 3,416.13 Euros, while it was 735.65 Euros in the Quick Diagnosis Unit. Patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction with Quick Diagnosis Unit care. CONCLUSIONS: Quick Diagnosis Units represent a useful and cost-saving model for the diagnostic study of patients with potentially severe diseases. Future randomized study designs involving comparisons between controls and intervention groups would help elucidate the usefulness of Quick Diagnosis Units as an alternative to conventional hospitalization.

Comprehensive assessment of patients in palliative care: a descriptive study utilizing the INTERMED.

Documentation in palliative care is often restricted to medical and sociodemographic information, and the assessment of physical and psychological symptoms or the quality of life. In order to overcome the lack of comprehensive information, we have evaluated the utility of the INTERMED-a biopsychosocial assessment method to document integrated information of patients' needs-in 82 consecutive patients for whom a palliative care consultation was requested. Results confirm the biopsychosocial heterogeneity of the sample, and the importance of integrated information to clinical, scientific, educational, and health care policy agendas. The INTERMED could become a useful method to tailor interdisciplinary interventions based on comprehensive patient needs assessment.