Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 60 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 7. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 8. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Baseline test of compact vehicle side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 9. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Volume two (2) - staged collision and damage data report for accident reconstruction of thirty (30) test vehicles. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Test and evaluation of the AMF, Inc. and Fairchild Industries experimental safety vehicles. Volume IV. ESV program summary. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Analysis of frontal impact test data - new car assessment project. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Electric/conventional vehicle comparison crash test. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, Washington, D.C.

CRASH III model improvements: MRB-to-car side impact test of a 90 [degree] moving rigid barrier to a 1981 Chevrolet Citation test speed 35.2 mph.

Mode of access: Internet.

Test and evaluation of the AMF, Inc. and Fairchild Industries experimental safety vehicles. Volume 1. ESV program summary. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Initial crash test screening studies utilizing the NHTSA/BCL computer simulation program for collinear car/car and car/barrier collisions. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

A Novel Range Test

In a range test, one party holds a ciphertext and needs to test whether the message encrypted in the ciphertext is within a certain interval range. In this paper, a range test protocol is proposed, where the party holding the ciphertext asks another party holding the private key of the encryption algorithm to help him. These two parties run the protocol to implement the test. The test returns TRUE if and only if the encrypted message is within the certain interval range. If the two parties do not conspire, no information about the encrypted message is revealed from the test except what can be deduced from the test result. Advantages of the new protocol over the existing related techniques are that it achieves correctness, soundness, °exibility, high e±ciency and privacy simultaneously.