Metaphors in Hugo Chávez's political discourse:conceptualizing nation, revolution and opposition

This book provides the first comprehensive analysis of metaphors used by Hugo Chávez in his efforts to construct and legitimize his Bolivarian Revolution. It focuses on metaphors drawn from three of his most frequent target domains: the nation, his revolution, and the opposition. The author argues that behind an official discourse of inclusion, Chávez's choice of metaphors contributes to the construction of a polarizing discourse of exclusion in which his political opponents are represented as enemies of the nation. Chávez constructs this polarizing discourse of exclusion by combining metaphors that conceptualize: (a) the nation as a person who has been resurrected by his government, as a person ready to fight for his revolution, or as Chávez himself; (b) the revolution as war; and (c) members of the opposition as war combatants or criminals. At the same time, by making explicit references in his discourse about the revolution as the continuation of Simón Bolívar's wars of independence, Chávez contributes to represent opponents as enemies of the nation, given that in the Venezuelan collective imaginary Bolívar is the symbol of the nation's emancipation.

Metaphors in Hugo Chávez's political discourse:conceptualizing nation, revolution and opposition

This dissertation examines Hugo Chávez's choice of metaphors in his efforts to construct and legitimize his Bolivarian Revolution. It focuses on metaphors drawn from three of the most frequent target domains present in his discourse: the nation, his revolution, and the opposition. The study argues that behind an official discourse of inclusion, Chávez's choice of metaphors contributes to the construction of a polarizing discourse of exclusion in which his political opponents are represented as enemies of the nation.The study shows that Chávez constructs this polarizing discourse of exclusion by combining metaphors that conceptualize: (a) the nation as a person who has been resurrected by his government, as a person ready to fight for his revolution, or as Chávez himself; (b) the revolution as war; and (c) members of the opposition as war combatants or criminals. At the same time, the study shows that by making explicit references in his discourse about the revolution as the continuation of Bolívar's wars of independence, Chávez contributes to represent opponents as enemies of the nation, given that in the Venezuelan collective imaginary Simón Bolívar is the symbol of the nation's emancipation.This research, which covers a period of nine years (from Chávez's first year in office in 1999 through 2007), is part of the discipline of Political Discourse Analysis (PDA). It is anchored both in the theoretical framework provided by the cognitive linguistic metaphor theory developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson described in their book Metaphors We Live By, and in Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) as defined by Jonathan Charteris-Black in his book Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis.The study provides the first comprehensive analysis of metaphors used by Chávez in his political discourse. It builds upon the findings of previous studies on political discourse analysis in Venezuela by showing that Chávez's discourse not only polarizes the country and represents opponents as detractors of national symbols such as Bolívar or his wars of independence (which have been clearly established in previous studies), but also represents political opponents as enemies of the nation.

The United States Congress and Venezuela's Hugo Chávez

The Soviet Union's dissolution in December 1991 marks the end of the Cold War and the elimination of the United States' main rival for global political-economic leadership. For decades U.S. foreign policymakers had formulated policies aimed at containing the spread of Soviet communism and Moscow's interventionist policies in the Americas. They now assumed that Latin American leftist revolutionary upheavals could also be committed to history. This study explores how Congress takes an active role in U.S. foreign policymaking when dealing with revolutionary changes in Latin America. This study finds that despite Chávez's vitriolic statements and U.S. economic vulnerability due to its dependence on foreign oil sources, Congress today sees Chávez as a nuisance and not a threat to U.S. vital interests. Devoid of an extra-hemispheric, anti-American patron intent on challenging the United States for regional leadership, Chávez is seen by Congress largely as a threat to the stability of Venezuela's institutions and political-economic stability. Today both the U.S. executive and the legislative branches largely see Bolivarianism a distraction and not an existential threat. The research is based on an examination of Bolivarian Venezuela compared to revolutionary upheaval and governance in Nicaragua over the course of the twentieth century. This project is largely descriptive, qualitative in approach, but quantitative data are used when appropriate. To analyze both the U.S. executive and legislative branches' reaction to revolutionary change, Cole Blasier's theoretical propositions as developed in the Hovering Giant: U.S. Responses to Revolutionary Change in Latin America 1910-1985 are utilized. The present study highlights the fact that Blasier's propositions remain a relevant means for analyzing U.S. foreign policymaking.

The Basis of Support for Hugo Chávez: Measuring the Determinants of Presidential Job Approval in Venezuela

Since 1999, Venezuela has experienced a dramatic transformation of its political system with the coming to power of Hugo Chávez and his movement, known in Venezuela as Chavismo. Chávez has dismantled the previous political system and established neo-populist structures that rely on his personal appeal and the close collaboration of the armed forces. Chávez has relied heavily on significant support from the poor and those who felt economically and politically excluded by the “Punto Fijo system.” President Chávez has built an impressive record of electoral victories; winning every electoral contest except one since coming to power in 1999. He continues to receive relatively high levels of support among sectors of Venezuelan society. However, there is evidence of growing discontent with high crime rates, high levels of inflation, and significant corruption in the public administration. Using data from the AmericasBarometer surveys conducted in 2007, 2008 and 2010, this paper seeks to examine the basis of Chávez’s popular support. In general, the AmericasBarometer findings suggest that Venezuelans support for President Chávez is closely linked to the access to social programs and that as long as the government is able to fund these social programs or missions, particularly MERCAL and Barrio Adentro, it will possess an important tool to garner and sustain support for President Chávez. Our analysis, however, also indicates that evaluations of the national economic situation, more than crime or insecurity, are a key factor that could undermine support for the regime.

The United States Congress and Venezuela's Hugo Chávez

The Soviet Union's dissolution in December 1991 marks the end of the Cold War and the elimination of the United States' main rival for global political-economic leadership. For decades U.S. foreign policymakers had formulated policies aimed at containing the spread of Soviet communism and Moscow's interventionist policies in the Americas. They now assumed that Latin American leftist revolutionary upheavals could also be committed to history. This study explores how Congress takes an active role in U.S. foreign policymaking when dealing with revolutionary changes in Latin America. This study finds that despite Chavez's vitriolic statements and U.S. economic vulnerability due to its dependence on foreign oil sources, Congress today sees Chavez as a nuisance and not a threat to U.S. vital interests. Devoid of an extra-hemispheric, anti-American patron intent on challenging the United States for regional leadership, Chavez is seen by Congress largely as a threat to the stability of Venezuela's institutions and political-economic stability. Today both the U.S. executive and the legislative branches largely see Bolivarianism a distraction and not an existential threat. The research is based on an examination of Bolivarian Venezuela compared to revolutionary upheaval and governance in Nicaragua over the course of the twentieth century. This project is largely descriptive, qualitative in approach, but quantitative data are used when appropriate. To analyze both the U.S. executive and legislative branches' reaction to revolutionary change, Cole Blasier's theoretical propositions as developed in the Hovering Giant: U.S. Responses to Revolutionary Change in Latin America 1910- 1985 are utilized. The present study highlights the fact that Blasier's propositions remain a relevant means for analyzing U.S. foreign policymaking.

La influencia de la política de adquisición de material bélico de la administración Chávez Frías en la agenda bilateral Venezuela- Estados Unidos

El propósito de esta monografía es explicar de qué manera la adquisición de material bélico de la administración Chávez desde el año 2004 al 2008, influyen en la relación bilateral Venezuela-Estados Unidos.

La política exterior de Chávez. La proyección de la revolución Bolivariana en las relaciones internacionales

El gobierno del presidente Hugo Chávez Frías se ha caracterizado por la polémica y la renovación, o, por lo menos, rearticulación de la vida política venezolana. Tras más de seis años en el poder, el proyecto venezolano comienza a ser estudiado ampliamente desde la perspectiva de las relaciones internacionales, al considerar la actual política exterior como un escenario definitivo para la consolidación del proyecto revolucionario de Chávez. Este artículo presenta algunas consideraciones acerca de la actual política exterior venezolana, y parte del supuesto de que ésta mostrará sus caracteres más “alternativos” conforme se dé un proceso de consolidación interno del proyecto Chávez y un incremento de las divergencias con Estados Unidos; buscando, a su vez, mostrar que la actual política exterior venezolana constituirá un elemento esencial de la Revolución Bolivariana proyectándose en el plano de las relaciones internacionales.-----President Hugo Chávez Frías’ government has been controversial and characterized by renovating, or at least reorganizing, Venezuela’s political life. After over 6 years in power, the Venezuelan project is now being examined widely from the perspective of international relations, since the foreign policy is a crucial scenario for the consolidation of Chávez’ revolutionary project. In this sense, the purpose of this article is to discuss some aspects of the current Venezuelan foreign affairs policy based on the assumption that it will show its “alternative” characteristics in keeping with the degree to which Chávez’ project consolidates internally and disagreements woth the United States increase. The article suggests that current Venezuelan foreign policy will be a key element of the so called ‘Revolución Bolivariana’ being projected in the sphere of international relations.

Seguridad, poder, y conflictos diplomáticos: las relaciones diplomáticas Colombia – Venezuela (periodo Uribe – Chávez, 2002 - 2010)

La relación Colombia – Venezuela ha estado signada por un clima de conflictividad durante los periodos presidenciales de Hugo Chávez y Álvaro Uribe (2002 - 2010), se observa como la construcción de las agendas diplomáticas de Colombia y Venezuela han estado centradas en la seguridad y el conflicto. Estando, la construcción de las agendas diplomáticas de ambos Estados, configuradas por la búsqueda de resultados electorales positivos a lo interno, y en el plano internacional, buscan alianzas y legitimidad, todo esto para cumplir con las dinámicas internas de cada Estado. Evidenciándose manifestaciones de conflictividad tales como: diplomacias rígidas con ausencia de diálogo; el presidencialismo; y la diplomacia de micrófono. Esta temática ocupa el trabajo de tesis que se presenta con el propósito de exponer para la discusión la siguiente interrogante: ¿Qué factores, presentes en los respectivos gobiernos, explican la creación de una agenda de política exterior Colombia – Venezuela centrada en la seguridad y el conflicto? Plateándose como objetivo general de este trabajo de tisis: Analizar las relaciones diplomáticas Colombia – Venezuela en el marco de los conceptos de seguridad divergentes, y sus conflictividades. Durante el periodo presidencial Chávez-Uribe (2002-2010). Para alcanzar dicho objetivo, la investigación se realizó en dos fases que dan lugar a la estructura de dos capítulos. En la primera, se identificarán las lógicas de los conceptos de seguridad y su repercucion en las relaciones diplomática Colombia – Venezuela; y en el segundo capitulo, se describen las manifestaciones de conflictividad entre Colombia y Venezuela, en sus relaciones con sus dinamicas internas.

A guerra midiática contra a Venezuela de Hugo Chavez: a cobertura da revista veja (1998-2002)

A pretensão deste trabalho foi o de analisar o discurso da revista semanal Veja sobre o governo de Hugo Chávez Frías, atual presidente da República Bolivariana da Venezuela. Através da leitura das reportagens, procuramos apresentar o comportamento da revista em relação ao se governo e a forma que sua política é classificada, representada. Reunimos edições da revista, entre 1998 a 2002, início do seu governo - eleito em dezembro de 1998, toma posse no início de 1999, período da tentativa de golpe (frustrada) em abril de 2002. O trabalho procura mostrar como as matérias não são isentas e que há um claro posicionamento ideológico da revista, que se insere no conjunto mais geral da mídia conservadora e anti-Chávez. O presidente, eleito e reeleito democraticamente, aparece sempre nas diversas reportagens da revista caracterizado como golpista, ditador, populista, fanfarrão. O nosso objetivo é o de revelar como Veja criou uma imagem negativa do presidente da Venezuela, coerente com os princípios neoliberais defendidos pela revista. A Venezuela com Hugo Chávez, com a chamada Revolução Bolivariana , realiza uma experiência singular de governo num país de larga tradição antidemocrática e afirma caminhar na contracorrente do pensamento hegemônico neoliberal. Em contrapartida, a revista Veja se apresenta com um representante da burguesia financeira e importante sujeito na construção e continuidade do neoliberalismo

O governo Chávez e o ensaio da superação do retismo venezuelano: do nacionalismo bolivariano ao socialismo do século XXI

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)