Report of the Superintendent of Insurance of the Dominion of Canada for the year ending 31st December ..

Imprint varies.

Interim report, Georgian bay ship canal : Brief description and detailed estimates of cost for proposed waterway. Printed by order of Parliament.

Arthur St. Laurent, engineer in charge.

Some early legislation and legislators in Upper Canada,

Mode of access: Internet.

Rapport du comité choisi sur le gouvernement civil du Canada microform

Reproduction of original in: Library of Congress. Photoduplication Service.

An act to re-write the provinces of Upper and Lower Canada, and for the government of Canada, 23d July, 1840.

Title-page reads: Anno tertio & quarto Victoriæ Reginæ. At the Parliament begun and holden at Westminster, etc.

Correspondence relative to the affairs of Canada, 1841

Reproduction of original in: Séminaire de Québec. Bibliothèque.

Copy of the minutes of the evidence taken before the select committee appointed in 1834, on the affairs of Lower Canada.

"96."

The British senate; or, A second series of Random recollections of the Lords and Commons.

Mode of access: Internet.

Transportaton interests of the United States and Canada. Hearing, [Fifty-first Congress, second session]. February, 26, 1891.

Mode of access: Internet.

Review of foreign policy, 1958. Hearings before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, Eighty-fifth Congress, second session ...

Hearings held Feb. 3-June 6, 1958.

Central Vermont R.R. reorganization : House bill no. 70. Hearing before the Railroad committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, sitting jointly. Argument in behalf of the bill, November 10, 1898 /

Mode of access: Internet.

The Office of the Auditor General of Canada : Government in Exile? (Working Paper 31)

How can a "servant of Parliament" be held in check if it disregards the constitutional conventions of responsible government and takes a place in its own right in the representative institutions? the paper presents a history of the modernization of the legislative audit in the federal Parliament. It considers the evolution of the powers and practices of the Office of the Auditor General, how its role has become intertwined with that of Treasury Board Secretariat, and the eclipse of the House of Commons' Standing Committee on Public Accounts. The paper is an abridged version of a paper prepared for a conference in Saskatoon in November, 2001. It is to be published in a UBC Press volume edited by David Smith, John Courtney and Duff Spafford of the Department of Political Science at the University of Saskatchewan. The Press will hold copyright. See also "Biggest Scandal in Canadian History," School of Policy Studies Working Paper Number 23.

The Australian Parliament: A Gendered Organisation

Limited work has been undertaken on the subject of gender and Australian parliamentary institutions. This study of 13 male and 15 female members of the Australian parliament addresses this gap in the literature. Data from the study are used to explore the ways in which the institutions of political office operate as ‘gendered organisations’ (Acker 1990). What emerges from this analysis is the pervasiveness of gender across the processes, practices and discourses of the parliament. This is a space infused with hegemonic masculinity. This gendering is, however, normalised and/or minimised by many of the parliamentarians involved in the study.

Gender and the Australian parliament

This dissertation by publication which focuses on gender and the Australian federal parliament has resulted in the submission of three refereed journal articles. Data for the study were obtained from 30 semi-structured interviews undertaken in 2006 with fifteen (15) male and fifteen (15) female members of the Australian parliament. The first of the articles is methodological and has been accepted for publication in the Australian Journal of Political Science. The paper argues that feminist political science is guided by five important principles. These are placing gender at the centre of the research, giving emphasis to women’s voice, challenging the public/private divide, using research to transform society and taking a reflexive approach to positionality. It is the latter principle, that of the importance of taking a reflexive approach to research which I explore in the paper. Through drawing on my own experiences as a member of the House of Representatives (Forde 1987-1996) I reflexively investigate the intersections between my background and my identity as a researcher. The second of the articles views the data through the lens of Acker’s (1990) notion of the ‘gendered organization’ which posits that there are four dimensions by which organizations are gendered. These are via the division of labour, through symbols, images and ideologies, by workplace interactions and through the gendered components of individual identity. In this paper which has been submitted to the British Journal of Political Science, each of Acker’s (1990) dimensions is examined in terms of the data from interviews with male and female politicians. The central question investigated is thus to what extent does the Australian parliament conform to Acker’s (1990) concept of the ‘gendered organization’? The third of the papers focuses specifically on data from interviews with the 15 male politicians and investigates how they view gender equality and the Australian parliament. The article, which has been submitted to the European Journal of Political Science asks to what extent contemporary male politicians view the Australian parliament as gendered? Discourse analysis that is ‘ways of viewing’ (Bacchi, 1999, p. 40) is used as an approach to analyse the data. Three discursive frameworks by which male politicians view gender in the Australian parliament are identified. These are: that the parliament is gendered as masculine but this is unavoidable; that the parliament is gendered as feminine and women are actually advantaged; and that the parliament is gender neutral and gender is irrelevant. It is argued that collectively these framing devices operate to mask the many constraints which exist to marginalise women from political participation and undermine attempts to address women’s political disadvantage as political participants. The article concludes by highlighting the significance of the paper beyond the Australian context and calling for further research which names and critiques political men and their discourses on gender and parliamentary practices and processes.