Antitumor activity of an Ets protein, PEA3, in breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-361DYT2 and BT474M1

Polyomavirus enhancer activator 3 (PEA3) is a member of the Ets family of transcription factors. We demonstrated in a previous study that, through down-regulating the HER-2/neu oncogene at the transcriptional level, PEA3 can inhibit the growth and tumor development of HER-2/neu-overexpressing ovarian cancer cells. Here, we established stable clones of the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-361DYT2 that express PEA3 under the control of a tetracycline-inducible promoter. The expression of PEA3 in this cell line inhibited cell growth and resulted in cell cycle delay in the G1 phase independently of the HER-2/neu down-regulation. In an orthotopic breast cancer model, we showed that expression of PEA3 inhibited tumor growth and prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice. In a parallel experiment in another breast cancer cell line, BT474M1, we were unable to obtain stable PEA3-inducible transfectants, which suggests that PEA3 possessed a strong growth inhibitory effect in this cell line. Indeed, PEA3 coupled with the liposome SN2 demonstrated therapeutic effects in mice bearing tumors induced by BT474M1. These results provide evidence that the PEA3 gene could function as an antitumor and gene therapy agent for human breast cancers. ^

HRGbeta1 inhibits metastasis of breast cancer cell lines, one of which exhibits lineage infidelity

Recent publications have questioned the origin of the MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cell line and have suggested that it is of melanocyte origin rather than breast epithelial origin. The data presented herein show unequivocally that MDA-MB-435 does express breast epithelial markers and produces milk-specific lipids. The data also indicated that MDA-MB-435 does express some melanocyte proteins but this expression occurs in the same MDA-MB-435 cells that express breast epithelial proteins. Although MDA-MB-435 does not strictly adhere to a breast lineage, it does retain breast specific markers and is thus valid as an experimental cell line in breast cancer studies. ^ Heregulinβ1 (HRGβ1) has been shown to both stimulate and inhibit breast tumorigenic and metasastasic phenotypes. Some studies used only the EGF-like domain of the extracellular domain of HRGβ1 while others used bacterially-expressed HRGβ1. Our in vitro data demonstrated that the full-length extracellular domain of human HRGβ1 reduced clonal growth of MDA-MB-435 breast cancer cells but stimulated apoptosis in MDA-MB-435 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells. In addition, mammalian-expressed HRGβ1 did not dramatically affect matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity but did inhibit cell motility of MDA-MB-435 and MCF-7 cells. Taken together, the in vitro data indicated that HRGβ1 inhibits metastasis-associated properties. ^ The in vivo data demonstrated that inducible expression of the full-length extracellular domain of human HRGβ1 in MDA-MB-435 cells reduced tumor volume and cell proliferation but increased apoptosis of cells injected at the mammary fat pad in nude mice. More importantly, HRGβ1 reduced the number of metastases observed by a spontaneous metastasis assay. Taken together, these data indicate that the full-length extracellular domain of human HRGβ1 has the net effect of inhibiting breast cancer metastasis. ^

Chemopreventive function of retinoid X receptors in human squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

Retinoid therapy has been successful for the treatment of skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). A suppression of the predominant retinoid X receptor expressed in skin, retinoid X receptor α (RXRα), has been reported in skin SCC. These observations have led to the hypothesis that retinoid receptor loss contributes to the tumorigenic phenotype of epithelial cancers. To test this hypothesis, the RXRα gene was mapped in order to generate a targeting construct. Additionally the transcriptional regulation of the human RXRα a gene in keratinocytes was characterized after identifying the transcription initiation sites, the promoter, and enhancer regions of this gene. The structure is highly conserved between human and mouse. A nontumorigenic human skin-derived cell line called near diploid immortalized keratinocytes (NIKS) has the advantage of growing as organotypic raft cultures, under physiological conditions closely resembling in-vivo squamous stratification. We have exploited the raft culture technique to develop an in-vitro model for skin SCC progression that includes the NIKS cells, HaCaT cells, a premalignant cell line, and SRB 12-p9 cells, a tumorigenic SCC skin cell line. The differentiation, proliferation and nuclear receptor ligand response characteristics of this system were studied and significant and novel results were obtained. RXRs are obligate heterodimerization partners with many of the nuclear hormone receptors, including retinoic acid receptors (RARs), vitamin D3 receptors (VDR), thyroid hormone receptors (T3 R) and peroxisome proliferator activate receptors (PPARs), which are all known to be active in skin. Treatment of the three cell lines in raft culture with the RXR specific ligand BMS649, BMS961 (RARγ-specific), vitamin D3 (VDR ligand), thryoid hormone (T3R ligand) and clofibrate (PPARa ligand), and the combination of BMS649 with each of the 4 receptor partner ligands, resulted in distinct effects on differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. The effects of activation of RXRs in each of the four-receptor pathways; in the context of skin SCC progression, with an emphasis on the VDR/RXR pathway, are discussed. These studies will lead to a better understanding of RXRα action in human skin and will help determine its role in SCC tumorigenesis, as well as its potential as a target for the prevention, treatment, and control of skin cancer. ^

Molecular mechanisms of prostacyclin receptor signaling: The intracellular domains in G protein coupling

To better understand the mechanisms of how the human prostacyclin receptor (1P) mediates vasodilation and platelet anti-aggregation through Gs protein coupling, a strategy integrating multiple approaches including high resolution NMR experiments, synthetic peptide, fluorescence spectroscopy, molecular modeling, and recombinant protein was developed and used to characterize the structure/function relationship of important segments and residues of the IP receptor and the α-subunit of the Gs protein (Gαs). The first (iLP1) and third (iLP3) intracellular loops of the IP receptor, as well as the Gαs C-terminal domain, relevant to the Gs-mediated IP receptor signaling, were first identified by observation of the effects of the mini gene-expressed corresponding protein segments in HEK293 cells which co-expressed the receptor and Gαs. Evidence of the IP iLP1 domain interacted with the Gαs C-terminal domain was observed by fluorescence and NMR spectroscopic studies using a constrained synthetic peptide, which mimicked the IP iLP1 domain, and the synthetic peptide, which mimicked Gαs C-terminal domain. The solution structural models and the peptide-peptide interaction of the two synthetic protein segments were determined by high resolution NMR spectroscopy. The important residues in the corresponding domains of the IP receptor and the Gαs predicted by NMR chemical shift mapping were used to guide the identification of their protein-protein interaction in cells. A profile of the residues Arg42 - Ala48 of the IP iLP1 domain and the three residues Glu392 ∼ Leu394 of the Gαs C-terminal domain involved in the IP/Gs protein coupling were confirmed by recombinant proteins. The data revealed an intriguing speculation on the mechanisms of how the signal of the ligand-activated IP receptor is transmitted to the Gs protein in regulating vascular functions and homeostasis, and also provided substantial insights into other prostanoid receptor signaling. ^

Insights into the biology of lymphatic metastasis

Recent data suggest that the generation of new lymphatic vessels (i.e. lymphangiogenesis) may be a rate-limiting step in the dissemination of tumor cells to regional lymph nodes. However, efforts to study the cellular and molecular interactions that take place between tumor cells and lymphatic endothelial cells have been limited due to a lack of lymphatic endothelial cell lines available for study. ^ I have used a microsurgical approach to establish conditionally immortalized lymphatic endothelial cell lines from the afferent mesenteric lymphatic vessels of mice. Characterization of lymphatic endothelial cells, and tumor-associated lymphatic vessels revealed high expression levels of VCAM-1, which is known to facilitate adhesion of some tumor cells to vascular endothelial cells. Further investigation revealed that murine melanoma cells selected for high expression of α4, a counter-receptor for VCAM-1, demonstrated enhanced adhesion to lymphatic endothelial cells in vitro, and increased tumorigenicity and lymphatic metastasis in vivo, despite similar lymphatic vessel numbers. ^ Next, I examined the effects of growth factors that regulate lymphangiogenesis, and report that several growth factors are capable of activating survival and proliferation pathways of lymphatic endothelial cells. The dual protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor AEE788 (EGFR and VEGFR-2) inhibited the activation of Akt and MAPK in lymphatic endothelial cells responding to multiple growth factors. Moreover, oral treatment of mice with AEE788 decreased lymphatic vessel density and production of lymphatic metastasis by human colon cancer cells growing in the cecum of nude mice. ^ In the last set of experiments, I investigated the surgical management of lymphatic metastasis using a novel model of sentinel lymphadenectomy in live mice bearing subcutaneous B16-BL6 melanoma. The data demonstrate that this procedure when combined with wide excision of the primary melanoma, significantly enhanced survival of syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. ^ Collectively, these results indicate that the production of lymphatic metastasis depends on lymphangiogenesis, tumor cell adhesion to lymphatic endothelial cells, and proliferation of tumor cells in lymph nodes. Thus, lymphatic metastasis is a multi-step, complex, and active process that depends upon multiple interactions between tumor cells and tumor associated lymphatic endothelial cells. ^

The effects of proteasome inhibition in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and prostate cancer

The use of proteasome inhibitors in cancer has received much attention with the recent FDA approval of bortezomib (Velcade/PS-341). However, in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) clinical trial, bortezomib was not as effective as it was in vitro. Accordingly, results in prostate cancer were not remarkable, although regression of lymphadenopathy was observed. This response was also seen in CLL. ^ The proteasome degrades ∼80% of intracellular proteins. Although specific pathways affected by proteasome inhibitors are known, there are still unidentified mechanisms by which they induce apoptosis. The efficacy and mechanism of action of the reversible proteasome inhibitor bortezomib were compared to the novel irreversible inhibitor NPI-0052 in this study, and their mechanisms of action in CLL and prostate cancer were examined. ^ NPI-0052 inhibited proteasome activity and induced apoptosis with more rapid kinetics than bortezomib in CLL. Inhibition of proteasome activity with NPI-0052 was also more durable. Interestingly, bortezomib is cleared from the serum within 15min, which is insufficient time for bortezomib to effectively inhibit the proteasome. However, only 5min exposure was needed for NPI-0052 to produce maximal proteasome inhibition. The data suggest that bortezomib's slow kinetics and reversible nature limit its potential in vivo and the use of NPI-0052 should be considered. ^ In examining the mechanism(s) by which bortezomib and NPI-0052 induce apoptosis in CLL, both were found to elicit the ER stress pathway. A stromal cell co-culture system prevented apoptosis induced by both proteasome inhibitors, suggesting that if such factors in vivo were responsible for reducing bortezomib's efficacy, NPI-0052 would not prove useful either. Finally, Lyn, a Src family kinase (SFK), was decreased in response to bortezomib and NPI-0052 and correlated with apoptosis induction in CLL and prostate cancer. Both proteasome inhibitors specifically targeted Lyn rather than SFKs in general. ^ SFKs are overexpressed in cancer and involved in cell signaling, survival, and metastasis. In prostate cancer cells, both proteasome inhibition and Lyn-silencing significantly inhibited migration. Preliminary evidence also suggested that Lyn downregulation decreases invasion potential. Together, these data suggest that proteasome inhibitors are potential candidates for anti-metastasic therapy and further investigation is warranted for the use of Lyn-targeted therapy to treat metastases. ^

Emerging roles for the double strand break repair protein 53BP1 in transcriptional regulation

Disruption of the mechanisms that regulate cell-cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, and apoptosis results in genomic instability and often leads to the development of cancer. In response to double stranded breaks (DSBs) as induced by ionizing radiation (IR), generated during DNA replication, or through immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) rearrangements in T and B cells of lymphoid origin, the protein kinases ATM and ATR are central players that activate signaling pathways leading to DSB repair. p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) participates in the repair of DNA double stranded breaks (DSBs) where it is recruited to or near sites of DNA damage. In addition to its well established role in DSB repair, multiple lines of evidence implicate 53BP1 in transcription which stem from its initial discovery as a p53 binding protein in a yeast two-hybrid screen. However, the mechanisms behind the role of 53BP1 in these processes are not well understood. ^ 53BP1 possesses several motifs that are likely important for its role in DSB repair including two BRCA1 C-terminal repeats, tandem Tudor domains, and a variety of phosphorylation sites. In addition to these motifs, we identified a glycine and arginine rich region (GAR) upstream of the Tudor domains, a sequence that is oftentimes serves as a site for protein arginine methylation. The focus of this project was to characterize the methylation of 53BP1 and to evaluate how methylation influenced the role of 53BP1 as a tumor suppressor. ^ Using a variety of biochemical techniques, we demonstrated that 53BP1 is methylated by the PRMT1 methyltransferase in vivo. Moreover, GAR methylation occurs on arginine residues in an asymmetric manner. We further show that sequences upstream of the Tudor domains that do not include the GAR stretch are sufficient for 53BP1 oligomerization in vivo. While investigating the role of arginine methylation in 53BP1 function, we discovered that 53BP1 associates with proteins of the general transcription apparatus as well as to other factors implicated in coordinating transcription with chromatin function. Collectively, these data support a role for 53BP1 in regulating transcription and provide insight into the possible mechanisms by which this occurs. ^

Identification of germ cell tumor modifier genes from the 129.MOLF-Chr19 consomic mouse strain

Naturally occurring genetic variants confer susceptibility to disease in the human population, including in testicular germ cell tumor development. Disease susceptibility loci for testicular germ cell tumors have been identified by genetic mapping in humans and mice. However, the identity of many of the susceptibility genes remains unclear. My study utilized a chromosome substitution strain, the 129.MOLF-Chr 19 (or M19 strain), to identify candidate testicular germ cell tumor susceptibility genes. Males of this strain have a high incidence of germ cell tumors in the testes. By forward genetic approaches, five susceptibility loci were fine-mapped and the genetic interactions were dissected. In addition, I identified three protein-coding genes and one micro-RNA as testicular tumor susceptibility genes by genomic screening. Using reverse genetic approaches, I verified one of the candidates, Splicing factor 1, as a modifier of testicular tumor. Deficiency of SF1 significantly reduces the incidence of testicular tumors in mice. This study highlights the advantage of the 129.MOLF-Chr 19 consomic strain in disease gene identification and validation. It also sets the stage to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of tumorigenesis in the testis. ^

Mechanisms by which nonsense codons downregulate T-cell receptor transcripts

Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a quality control mechanism that degrades aberrant mRNAs harboring premature termination codons (PTCs). Two out of three T-cell receptor β (TCRβ) transcripts carry PTCs as a result of error-prone programmed rearrangements that occur at this locus during lymphocyte maturation. PTCs decrease TCRβ mRNA levels to a much greater extent than mRNAs transcribed from non-rearranging genes. This robust decrease in TCRβ mRNA levels is not a unique characteristic of the T-cell environment or the TCRβ promoter. The simplest explanation for this is that PTC-bearing TCRβ mRNAs elicit a stronger NMD response. An alternative explanation is NMD collaborates with another mechanism to dramatically decrease PTC-bearing TCRβ mRNA levels. ^ In my dissertation, I investigated the molecular mechanism behind the strong decrease in TCRβ mRNA levels triggered by PTCs. To determine the location of this response, I performed mRNA half-life analysis and found that PTCs elicited more rapid TCRβ mRNA decay in the nuclear fraction, not the cytoplasmic fraction. Although decay was restricted to the nuclear fraction, PTC-bearing TCRβ transcript levels were extremely low in the cytoplasm, a phenomenon that I named the nonsense-codon induced partitioning shift (NIPS). I established that NIPS shares several qualities with NMD, including its dependence on translation and NMD factors. Several lines of evidence suggested that NIPS results from PTCs eliciting retention of TCRβ transcripts in the nuclear fraction. This retention, as well as rapid TCRβ mRNA decay, most likely occurs in either the nucleoplasm or the outer nuclear membrane, based on analysis of nuclear and cytoplasmic markers in the highly purified nuclei I used for my studies. To further address the location of decay, I asked whether nuclear or cytoplasmic RNA decay factors mediated the destruction of PTC-bearing mRNAs. My results suggested that a nuclear component of the 3'-to-5' exosome, as well as an endonucleolytic activity, are involved in the destruction of PTC-containing TCRβ mRNAs. Individual endogenous NMD substrates had differential requirements for nuclear and cytoplasmic exonucleases. In summary, my results provide evidence that PTCs trigger multiple mechanisms involving multiple decay factors to remove and regulate mRNAs in mammalian cells. ^

Molecular epidemiological studies on genetic predispositions to squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Two molecular epidemiological studies were conducted to examine associations between genetic variation and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In the first study, we hypothesized that genetic variation in p53 response elements (REs) may play roles in the etiology of SCCHN. We selected and genotyped five polymorphic p53 REs as well as a most frequently studied p53 codon 72 (Arg72Pro, rs1042522) polymorphism in 1,100 non-Hispanic White SCCHN patients and 1,122 age-and sex-matched cancer-free controls recruited at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. In multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, smoking and drinking status, marital status and education level, we observed that the EOMES rs3806624 CC genotype had a significant effect of protection against SCCHN risk (adjusted odds ratio= 0.79, 95% confidence interval =0.64–0.98), compared with the -838TT+CT genotypes. Moreover, a significantly increased risk associated with the combined genotypes of p53 codon 72CC and EOMES -838TT+CT was observed, especially in the subgroup of non-oropharyneal cancer patients. The values of false-positive report probability were also calculated for significant findings. In the second study, we assessed the association between SCCHN risk and four potential regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of DEC1 (deleted in esophageal cancer 1) gene, a candidate tumor suppressor gene for esophageal cancer. After adjustment for age, sex, and smoking and drinking status, the variant -606CC (i.e., -249CC) homozygotes had a significantly reduced SCCHN risk (adjusted odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.52–0.99), compared with the -606TT homozygotes. Stratification analyses showed that a reduced risk associated with the -606CC genotype was more pronounced in subgroups of non-smokers, non-drinkers, younger subjects (defined as ≤ 57 years), carriers of TP53 Arg/Arg (rs1042522) genotype, patients with oropharyngeal cancer or late-stage SCCHN. Further in silico analysis revealed that the -249 T-to-C change led to a gain of a transcription factor binding site. Additional functional analysis showed that the -249T-to-C change significantly enhanced transcriptional activity of the DEC1 promoter and the DNA-protein binding activity. We conclude that the DEC1 promoter -249 T>C (rs2012775) polymorphism is functional, modulating susceptibility to SCCHN among non-Hispanic Whites. Additional large-scale, preferably population-based studies are needed to validate our findings.^

Functional Analysis of Drosophila Integrator Complex in snRNA 3' End Processing

Uridine-rich small nuclear RNAs (U snRNAs) play essential roles in eukaryotic gene expression by facilitating the removal of introns from mRNA precursors and the processing of the replication-dependent histone pre-mRNAs. Formation of the 3’ end of these snRNAs is carried out by a poorly characterized, twelve-membered protein complex named Integrator Complex. In the effort to understand Integrator Complex function in the formation of the snRNA 3’ end, we performed a functional RNAi screen in Drosophila S2 cells to identify protein factors required for snRNA 3’ end formation. This screen was conducted by using a fluorescence-based reporter that elicits GFP expression in response to a deficiency in snRNA processing. Besides scoring the known Integrator subunits, we identified Asunder and CG4785 as additional core members of the Integrator Complex. Additionally, we also found a conserved requirement for Cyclin C and Cdk8 in both fly and human snRNA 3’ end processing. We have further demonstrated that the kinase activity of Cdk8 is critical for snRNA 3’ end processing and is likely to function independent of its well-documented function within the Mediator Cdk8 module. Taken together, this work functionally defines the Drosophila Integrator Complex and demonstrates a novel function for Cyclin C/Cdk8 in snRNA 3’ end formation. This thesis work has also characterized an important functional interaction mediated by a microdomain within Integrator subunit 12 (IntS12) and IntS1 that is required for the activity of the Integrator Complex in processing the snRNA 3’ end. Through the development of a reporter-based functional RNAi-rescue assay in Drosophila S2 cells, we analyzed domains within IntS12 required for snRNA 3’ end formation. This analysis unexpectedly revealed that an N-terminal 30 amino acid region and not the highly conserved central PHD finger domain, is required for snRNA 3’ end cleavage. The IntS12 microdomain (1-45) functions autonomously, and is sufficient to interact and stabilize the putative scaffold protein IntS1. Our findings provide more details of the Integrator Complex for understanding the molecular mechanism of snRNA 3’ end processing. Moreover, these results lay the foundation for future studies of the complex through the identification of a novel functional domain within one subunit and the identification of additional subunits.

The risk prediction for SPM and its impact on the survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth common malignancy in the world, with high rates of developing second primary malignancy (SPM) and moderately low survival rates. This disease has become an enormous challenge in the cancer research and treatments. For HNSCC patients, a highly significant cause of post-treatment mortality and morbidity is the development of SPM. Hence, assessment of predicting the risk for the development of SPM would be very helpful for patients, clinicians and policy makers to estimate the survival of patients with HNSCC. In this study, we built a prognostic model to predict the risk of developing SPM in patients with newly diagnosed HNSCC. The dataset used in this research was obtained from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. For the first aim, we used stepwise logistic regression to identify the prognostic factors for the development of SPM. Our final model contained cancer site and overall cancer stage as our risk factors for SPM. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p-value= 0.15>0.05) showed the final prognostic model fit the data well. The area under the ROC curve was 0.72 that suggested the discrimination ability of our model was acceptable. The internal validation confirmed the prognostic model was a good fit and the final prognostic model would not over optimistically predict the risk of SPM. This model needs external validation by using large data sample size before it can be generalized to predict SPM risk for other HNSCC patients. For the second aim, we utilized a multistate survival analysis approach to estimate the probability of death for HNSCC patients taking into consideration of the possibility of SPM. Patients without SPM were associated with longer survival. These findings suggest that the development of SPM could be a predictor of survival rates among the patients with HNSCC.^

Study on the effect of metformin in patients of metastatic renal cell cancer with diabetes receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy

Objective: The primary objective of our study was to study the effect of metformin in patients of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) and diabetes who are on treatment with frontline therapy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The effect of therapy was described in terms of overall survival and progression free survival. Comparisons were made between group of patients receiving metformin versus group of patients receiving insulin in diabetic patients of metastatic renal cancer on frontline therapy. Exploratory analyses were also done comparing non-diabetic patients of metastatic renal cell cancer receiving frontline therapy compared to diabetic patients of metastatic renal cell cancer receiving metformin therapy. ^ Methods: The study design is a retrospective case series to elaborate the response rate of frontline therapy in combination with metformin for mRCC patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The cohort was selected from a database, which was generated for assessing the effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy associated hypertension in metastatic renal cell cancer at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients who had been started on frontline therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma from all ethnic and racial backgrounds were selected for the study. The exclusion criteria would be of patients who took frontline therapy for less than 3 months or were lost to follow-up. Our exposure variable was treatment with metformin, which comprised of patients who took metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes at any time of diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The outcomes assessed were last available follow-up or date of death for the overall survival and date of progression of disease from their radiological reports for time to progression. The response rates were compared by covariates that are known to be strongly associated with renal cell cancer. ^ Results: For our primary analyses between the insulin and metformin group, there were 82 patients, out of which 50 took insulin therapy and 32 took metformin therapy for type 2 diabetes. For our exploratory analysis, we compared 32 diabetic patients on metformin to 146 non-diabetic patients, not on metformin. Baseline characteristics were compared among the population. The time from the start of treatment until the date of progression of renal cell cancer and date of death or last follow-up were estimated for survival analysis. ^ In our primary analyses, there was a significant difference in the time to progression of patients receiving metformin therapy vs insulin therapy, which was also seen in our exploratory analyses. The median time to progression in primary analyses was 1259 days (95% CI: 659-1832 days) in patients on metformin therapy compared to 540 days (95% CI: 350-894) in patients who were receiving insulin therapy (p=0.024). The median time to progression in exploratory analyses was 1259 days (95% CI: 659-1832 days) in patients on metformin therapy compared to 279 days (95% CI: 202-372 days) in non-diabetic group (p-value <0.0001). ^ The median overall survival was 1004 days in metformin group (95% CI: 761-1212 days) compared to 816 days (95%CI: 558-1405 days) in insulin group (p-value<0.91). For the exploratory analyses, the median overall survival was 1004 days in metformin group (95% CI: 761-1212 days) compared to 766 days (95%CI: 649-965 days) in the non-diabetic group (p-value<0.78). Metformin was observed to increase the progression free survival in both the primary and exploratory analyses (HR=0.52 in metformin Vs insulin group and HR=0.36 in metformin Vs non-diabetic group, respectively). ^ Conclusion: In laboratory studies and a few clinical studies metformin has been proven to have dual benefits in patients suffering from cancer and type 2-diabetes via its action on the mammalian target of Rapamycin pathway and effect in decreasing blood sugar by increasing the sensitivity of the insulin receptors to insulin. Several studies in breast cancer patients have documented a beneficial effect (quantified by pathological remission of cancer) of metformin use in patients taking treatment for breast cancer therapy. Combination of metformin therapy in patients taking frontline therapy for renal cell cancer may provide a significant benefit in prolonging the overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer and diabetes. ^

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance: Differences between natural and acquired adriamycin -resistant human colon carcinoma cells

Mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR) were studied in two independent MDR sublines (AdR1.2 and SRA1.2) derived from the established human colon carcinoma cell line LoVo. AdR1.2 was developed by long-term continuous exposure of the cells to adriamycin (AdR) in stepwise increments of concentration, while SRA1.2 was selected by repetitive pulse treatments with AdR at a single concentration. In this dissertation, the hypothesis that the mechanism of drug resistance in SRA1.2 is different than that in AdR1.2 is tested. While SRA1.2 demonstrated similar biological characteristics when compared to the parental LoVo, AdR1.2 exhibited remarkable alterations in biological properties. The resistance phenotype of AdR1.2 was reversible when the cells were grown in the drug-free medium whereas SRA1.2 maintained its resistance for at least 10 months under similar conditions. Km and Vmax of carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion AdR transport were similar among the three lines. However, both resistant sublines exhibited an energy-dependent drug efflux. AdR1.2 appeared to possess an activated efflux pump, and a decreased nucleus-binding of AdR, whereas SRA1.2 showed merely a lower affinity in binding of AdR to the nuclei. Southern blot analysis showed no amplification of the MDR1 gene in either of the two resistant subclones. However, Western blot analysis using the C219 monoclonal antibody against P170 glycoprotein detected a Mr 150-kDa plasma protein (P150) in AdR1.2 but not in SRA1.2 or in the parental LoVo. In vitro phosphorylation studies revealed that P150 was a phosphoprotein; its phosphorylation was Mg$\sp{2+}$-dependent and could be enhanced by verapamil, an agent capable of increasing intracellular AdR accumulation in AdR1.2 cells. The phosphorylation studies also revealed elevated phosphorylation of a Mr 66-kDa plasma membrane protein that was detectable in the AdR1.2 revertant and in AdR1.2 when verapamil was present, suggesting that hyperphosphorylation of the Mr 66-kDa protein may be related to the reversal of MDR. SDS-PAGE of the plasma membrane protein demonstrated overproduction of a Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa, MDR-related protein in both the resistant sublines. The Mr 130-kDa protein was not immunoreactive with C219, but its absence in the AdR1.2 revertant and the parental LoVo suggests that it is an MDR-related plasma membrane protein. In conclusion, the results from this study support the author's hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for "Acquired" and "Natural" MDR are not identical. ^

Regulation of myogenesis and suppression of {\it mck\/} 5$\sp\prime$ enhancer elements by TGF$\beta$ and RAS

The regulation of muscle differentiation, like cell differentiation in general, is only now beginning to be understood. Here are described several key features to myogenesis: a beginning, some intermediary events, and an endpoint. Muscle differentiation proceeds spontaneously when myoblasts are cultured in serum-poor medium. Transforming growth factor type $\beta$ (TGF$\beta$), a component of fetal serum, was found to potently suppress muscle differentiation. Prolonged blockade of differentiation required replenishing TGF$\beta$. When TGF$\beta$ was removed, cells rapidly differentiated. Both TGF$\beta$ and RAS, which also blocks myogenesis, suppress the genes for a series of muscle-specific proteins. Regions that regulate transcription of one such gene, muscle creatine kinase (mck), were located by linking progressively smaller parts of the mck 5$\sp\prime$ region to the marker gene cat and testing the constructs for regulated expression of cat in myoblasts and muscle cells. The mck promoter is not muscle-specific but requires activation. Two enhancers were found: a weak, developmentally regulated enhancer within the first intron, and a strong, compact, and tightly developmentally regulated enhancer about 1.2 Kb upstream of the transcription start site. Activity of this enhancer is eliminated by activated ras. Suppression of activated N-RAS restores potency to the upstream enhancer. Further deletion shows the mck 5$\sp\prime$ enhancer to contain an enhancer core with low but significant muscle-specific activity, and at least one peripheral element that augments core activity. The core and this peripheral element were comprised almost entirely of factor-binding motifs. The peripheral element was inactive as a single copy, but was constitutively active in multiple copies. Regions flanking the peripheral element augmented its activity and conferred partial muscle-specificity. The enhancer core is also modulated by its 5$\sp\prime$ flanking region in a complex manner. Site-specific mutants covering most of the enhancer core and interesting flanking sequences have been made; all mutants tested diminish the activity of the 5$\sp\prime$ enhancer. Alteration of the site to which MyoD1 is reported to bind completely inactivates the enhancer. A theoretical analysis of cooperativity is presented, through which the binding of a constitutively expressed nuclear factor is shown to have weak positive cooperativity. In summary, TGF$\beta$, RAS, and enhancer-binding factors are found to be initial, intermediary, and final regulators, respectively, of muscle differentiation. ^