Appropriate therapy for fistulizing and fibrostenotic Crohn's disease: results of a multidisciplinary expert panel - EPACT II

Introduction: Many therapeutic decisions in the management of fistulizing and fibrostenotic Crohn's disease (CD) have to be taken without the benefit of strong scientific evidence. For this reason, explicit appropriateness criteria for CD fistula and stenosis treatment were developed by a multidisciplinary European expert panel in 2004 with the aim of making them easily available on the Internet and thus allowing individual case scenario evaluation; these criteria were updated in 2007. Methods: Twelve international experts convened in Geneva, Switzerland in December 2007. Explicit clinical scenarios, corresponding to real daily practice, were rated on a 9-point scale based on evidence from the published literature and panelists' own expertise. Median ratings were stratified into three categories: appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6) and inappropriate (1-3). Results: Overall, panelists rated 60 indications pertaining to fistulas. Antibiotics, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and conservative surgery are the mainstay of therapy for simple and complex fistulas. In the event of previous failure of azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy, methotrexate and infliximab were considered appropriate for complex fistulas. The panel also rated 72 indications related to the management of fibrostenotic CD. The experts considered balloon dilation, if the stricture was endoscopically accessible, stricturoplasty and bowel resection to be appropriate for small bowel fibrostenotic Crohn's disease, and balloon dilation and bowel resection appropriate for fibrostenotic colonic disease. In the presence of an ileocolonic or ileorectal anastomotic stricture of <7 cm, endoscopic balloon dilation, and bowel resection were considered appropriate. Conclusion: Antibiotics, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, and conservative surgery are the mainstay of therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease. Infliximab is a therapeutic option in patients without prior response to immunosuppressant therapy. In fibrostenotic Crohn's disease, endoscopic balloon dilation, if feasible, or surgical therapy should be considered. These expert recommendations are available online (www.epact.ch). Prospective evaluation is now needed to test the validity of these appropriateness criteria in clinical practice. (C) 2009 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Appropriate therapy for fistulizing and fibrostenotic Crohn's disease: results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel (EPACT II)

Introduction Many therapeutic decisions in the management of fistulizing and fibrostenotic Crohn's disease (CD) have to be taken without the benefit of strong scientific evidence. For this reason, explicit appropriateness criteria for CD fistula and stenosis treatment were developed by a multidisciplinary European expert panel in 2004 with the aim of making them easily available on the Internet and thus allowing individual case scenario evaluation; these criteria were updated in 2007. Methods Twelve international experts convened in Geneva, Switzerland in December 2007. Explicit clinical scenarios, corresponding to real daily practice, were rated on a 9-point scale based on evidence from the published literature and panelists' own expertise. Median ratings were stratified into three categories: appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6) and inappropriate (1-3). Results Overall, panelists rated 60 indications pertaining to fistulas. Antibiotics, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and conservative surgery are the mainstay of therapy for simple and complex fistulas. In the event of previous failure of azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy, methotrexate and infliximab were considered appropriate for complex fistulas. The panel also rated 72 indications related to the management of fibrostenotic CD. The experts considered balloon dilation, if the stricture was endoscopically accessible, stricturoplasty and bowel resection to be appropriate for small bowel fibrostenotic Crohn's disease, and balloon dilation and bowel resection appropriate for fibrostenotic colonic disease. In the presence of an ileocolonic or ileorectal anastomotic stricture of <7 cm, endoscopic balloon dilation, and bowel resection were considered appropriate. Conclusion Antibiotics, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, and conservative surgery are the mainstay of therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease. Infliximab is a therapeutic option in patients without prior response to immunosuppressant therapy. In fibrostenotic Crohn's disease, endoscopic balloon dilation, if feasible, or surgical therapy should be considered. These expert recommendations are available online (www.epact.ch). Prospective evaluation is now needed to test the validity of these appropriateness criteria in clinical practice.

First-line therapies in inflammatory bowel disease.

Background and Aims: Medical therapy of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is becoming more complex, given the increasing choice of drugs to treat Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to summarize the current guidelines for first-line treatments in IBD. Methods: An extensive literature search with focus on the guidelines of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation for the diagnosis and treatment of CD and UC was performed. First-line treatments were defined as the following drug categories: 5-aminosalicylates, budesonide, systemic steroids, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol. The following drug categories were not included: cyclosporine and tacrolimus (not yet approved by Swissmedic for IBD treatment). Results: Treatment recommendations for the following clinically frequent situations are presented according to disease severity: ileocecal CD, colonic CD, proximal small bowel CD and perianal CD. For UC the following situations are presented: ulcerative proctitis, left-sided colitis and pancolitis. Conclusions: We provide a summary on the use of first-line therapies for clinically frequent situations in patients with CD and UC.

Cost effectiveness of a new combined immunosuppressive and antiviral regimen on the one-year follow-up of kidney transplant patients.

Background: Medical prescription after organ transplant must prevent both rejection and infectious complications. We assessed the 1-year effectiveness and cost of introducing a new combined regimen in kidney transplantation. Methods: Patients transplanted from January 2000 to March 2003 (Period 1) were compared to patients transplanted from April 2003 to July 2005 (Period 2). In period 1, patients were treated with Basiliximab, Cyclosporin, steroids and Mycophenolate (MMF) or Azathioprine. Prophylaxis with Valacyclovir was prescribed only in CMV D+/R- patients. In period 2, immunosuppressive drugs were Basiliximab, Tacrolimus, steroids and MMF. A 3-month universal CMV prophylaxis with Valganciclovir was used. Medical charts of outpatient visits allowed identifying drug, laboratory and radiological tests use, and hospital information system causes of hospitalisation and length of stay (LOS) over the first year after transplant. Patients with incomplete costs data were excluded. Results: 53 patients were analysed in period 1, and 60 in period 2. CMV serostatus patterns were not significantly different between the 2 periods. Over 12 months, acute rejection decreased from 22 patients (42%) in period 1 to 4 patients (7%) in period 2 (p<0.001), and CMV infection from 25 patients (47%) to 9 patients (15%, p<0.001). Average total rehospitalisation LOS decreased from 28±19 to 20±11 days (p<0.007). Average outpatient visits decreased from 49±10 to 39±8 (p<0.001). Average immunosuppression and CMV prophylaxis costs increased from US$ 18,362±6,546 to 24,637±5,457 (p<0.001), while average graft rejection costs decreased form US$ 4,135±9,164 to 585±2,850 (p=0.005), and average CMV treatment costs from US$ 2,043±5,545 to 91±293 (p=0.008). Average outpatient visits costs decreased from US$ 7,619±1,549 to 6,074±1,043 (p<0.001), and other hospital costs from US$ 3,801±6,519 to 1,196±3,146 (p=0.007). Altogether, average 1-year treatment costs decreased from US$ 35,961±14,916 to 32,584±6,211 (p=0.115). Cost-effectiveness ratios to avoid graft rejection and CMV infection decreased from US$ 61,482±9,292 to 34,911± 1,639 (p=0.006) and US$ 68,070±11,122 to 39,899±2,650 (p=0.015), respectively. Conclusion: The new combined regimen administered in period 2 was significantly more effective. Its additional cost was more than offset by savings linked with complications avoidance.

Gender differences in paediatric patients of the swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort study.

PURPOSE: Gender differences in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are frequently reported as a secondary outcome and the results are divergent. To assess gender differences by analysing data collected within the Swiss IBD cohort study database since 2008, related to children with IBD, using the Montreal classification for a systematic approach. METHODS: Data on gender, age, anthropometrics, disease location at diagnosis, disease behaviour, and therapy of 196 patients, 105 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 91 with ulcerative or indeterminate colitis (UC/IC) were retrieved and analysed. RESULTS: THE CRUDE GENDER RATIO (MALE : female) of patients with CD diagnosed at <10 years of age was 2.57, the adjusted ratio was 2.42, and in patients with UC/IC it was 0.68 and 0.64 respectively. The non-adjusted gender ratio of patients diagnosed at ≥10 years was 1.58 for CD and 0.88 for UC/IC. Boys with UC/IC diagnosed <10 years of age had a longer diagnostic delay, and in girls diagnosed with UC/IC >10 years a more important use of azathioprine was observed. No other gender difference was found after analysis of age, disease location and behaviour at diagnosis, duration of disease, familial occurrence of IBD, prevalence of extra-intestinal manifestations, complications, and requirement for surgery. CONCLUSION: CD in children <10 years affects predominantly boys with a sex ratio of 2.57; the impact of sex-hormones on the development of CD in pre-pubertal male patients should be investigated.

Maladies inflammatoires de l'intestin [Main therapeutic advances in IBD in 2007].

In 2008 three biological agents against TNFalpha will be available. The combination of infliximab with azathioprine is no longer recommended, as hepatosplenic lymphomas with a particularly bad prognosis have been associated with this combined therapy. Regular maintenance therapy with infliximab is as effective in preventing the development of anti-infliximab antibodies as co-administration of this anti-TNFalpha agent with an immunomodulator. The benefit of regular maintenance therapy is probably linked to the presence of residual trough levels of infliximab between perfusions.

Appropriate management of special situations in Crohn's disease (upper gastro-intestinal; extra-intestinal manifestations; drug safety during pregnancy and breastfeeding): results of a multidisciplinary international expert panel-EPACT II

Introduction: High-grade evidence is lacking for most therapeutic decisions in Crohn's disease. Appropriateness criteria were developed for upper gastro-intestinal, extra-intestinal manifestations and drug safety during conception, pregnancy and breastfeeding in patients with Crohn's disease, to assist the physician in clinical decision making. Methods: The European Panel on the Appropriateness of Crohn's Disease Therapy (EPACT II), a multidisciplinary international European expert panel, rated clinical scenarios based on evidence from the published literature and panelists' own clinical expertise. Median ratings (on a 9-point scale) were stratified into three categories: appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6 with or without disagreement) and inappropriate (1-3). Experts were also asked to rank appropriate medications by priority. Results: Proton pump inhibitors, steroids, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine and infliximab are appropriate for upper gastro-duodenal Crohn's disease; for stenosis, endoscopic balloon dilation is the first-tine therapy, although surgery is also appropriate. Ursodeoxycholic acid is the only appropriate treatment for primary sclerosing cholangitis. Infliximab is appropriate for Pyoderma gangrenosum, ankylosing spondylitis and uveitis, steroids for Pyoderma gangrenosum and ankylosing spondylitis, adalimumab for Pyoderma gangrenosum and ankylosing spondylitis, cyclosporine-A/tacrolimus for Pyoderma gangrenosum. Mesalamine, sulfasalazine, prednisone, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, ciprofloxacin, and probiotics, may be administered safety during pregnancy or for patients wishing to conceive, with the exception that mate patients considering conception should avoid sulfasalazine. Metronidazol is considered safe in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters whereas infliximab is rated safe in the 1st trimester but uncertain in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Methotrexate is always contraindicated at conception, during pregnancy or during breastfeeding, due to its known teratogenicity. Mesalamine, prednisone, probiotics and infliximab are considered safe during breastfeeding. Conclusion: EPACT II recommendations are freely available online (www.epact.ch). The validity of these criteria should now be tested by prospective evaluation. (C) 2009 European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Treatment of postoperative Crohn's disease.

At 1 year after a first resection, up to 80% of patients show an endoscopic recurrence, 10-20% have clinical relapse, and 5% have surgical recurrence. Smoking is one of the most important risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Preoperative disease activity and the severity of endoscopic lesions in the neoterminal ileum within the first postoperative year are predictors of symptomatic recurrence. Mesalamine is generally the first-line treatment used in the postoperative setting but still provokes considerable controversy as to its efficacy, in spite of the results of a meta-analysis. Immunosuppressive treatment (azathioprine, 6-MP) is based on scant evidence but is currently used as a second-line treatment in postsurgical patients at high risk for recurrence, with symptoms or with early endoscopic lesions in the neoterminal ileum. Nitroimidazole antibiotics (metronidazole, ornidazole) are also effective in the control of active Crohn's disease in the postoperative setting. Given their known toxicity, they may be used as a third-line treatment as initial short-term prevention therapy rather than for long-term use. Conventional corticosteroids, budesonide or probiotics have no proven role in postoperative prophylaxis. Infliximab has not as yet been studied for use in the prevention of relapse after surgery.

Incidence et traitement des lymphocèles après greffe rénale

1.1. La greffe de rein La greffe d'organes a révolutionné la médecine. De tout le temps elle a suscité les fantasmes et les rêves : la pratique est ancestrale ; elle remonte au 3ème siècle lorsque Saint Côme et Saint Damien réalisent pour la première fois une greffe de jambe de Maure sur un patient. Il faudra néanmoins attendre le 20ème siècle pour voir la transplantation se réaliser plus concrètement avec succès et se généraliser. A Vienne, en 1902, le Dr. Ulmann (1861-1937) pratique la toute première autogreffe de rein sur un chien. Il replace le rein de l'animal au niveau du cou, pratiquant une anastomose vasculaire. Depuis, les tentatives se multiplient et peu après le Dr. Von Decastello, pratique la première transplantation chien-chien. Par la suite, en associa- tion avec le Dr. Ulmann la première greffe entre un chien et une chèvre aura lieu, avec un certain succès. En effet, elle a permis à l'animal receveur de produire de l'urine. L'avancée majeure durant ce début de siècle fut le développement d'une nouvelle technique de suture vasculaire par le Dr. Carrel, qui obtiendra le prix Nobel en 1912. Son élève, le Dr. Jaboulay (1860-1913) a réalisé plusieurs tentatives de xénogreffes rénales. Il pratiquera en 1906 les deux premières xénogreffes en utilisant un cochon et une chèvre comme donneurs. Le greffon fut respectivement placé au niveau de la cuisse et du bras des patients. La fonction rénale durera une heure. En 1909 Ernest Unger (1875-1938) transplanta un rein de fox-terrier sur un boxer, avec une production d'urine pendant 14 jours. Durant la même année le Dr. Unger a pratiqué une xénogreffe en transplantant un rein de nouveau né sur un babouin, cette intervention se terminant par la mort de l'animal. Un autre essai de greffe singe à humain, pratiqué sur une femme mourant de défaillance rénale, a fait comprendre à Unger qu'il y a des barrières biologiques dans la transplantation, mais que la greffe rénale est techniquement faisable. En 1914, J.B. Murphy découvre l'importance de la rate et de la moelle osseuse dans la réponse immune. En 1933 et 1949 en Ukraine, les premières allogreffes humaines de reins sont pratiquées par le chirurgien soviétique Yu Yu Voronoy. Malheureuse- ment aucune fonction rénale des greffons n'a été observée. Après une période de « stagnation scientifique » générale qui durera à peu près 10 ans, l'intérêt pour la transplantation refait surface dans les années 1950. Deux équipes de chirurgien se forment : une à Boston et l'autre à Paris. De nombreux cas d'allogreffes humaines sans immunosuppression sont documentés de 1950 à 1953. Malheureusement chaque opération aboutit à un échec, ceci dû aux phénomènes du rejet. M. Simonsen et WJ. Dempster découvrent qu'un mécanisme immun est à la base du rejet. Ils établissent aussi que la position pelvienne était meilleure que la position plus superficielle. Grâce aux découvertes dans le domaine du rejet et les nombreux progrès techniques, une allogreffe entre vrais jumeaux est pratiquée à Boston en 1954. L'opération est un succès total et permet de contrer toutes les hypothèses négatives avancées par certains groupes de travail. Depuis 1948, de nombreux travaux dans le domaine de l'immunosuppression ont été entrepris. La découverte de l'action immunosuppressive de la cortisone permet son instauration dans le traitement anti-rejet, malheureusement avec peu de succès. En effet, l'irradiation totale reste la méthode de choix jusqu'en 1962, date de l'apparition de l'Azaothioprine (Imuran®). La découverte de l'Azaothioprine, permet d'avancer de nouvelles hypothèses concernant le rejet : en évitant le rejet post-opératoire aigu, une protection et une adaptation au receveur pourraient être modulées par l'immunosuppression. Dans les années 1960, l'apparition des immunosuppresseurs de synthèse permet de développer de nouvelles lignes de traitement. Le Dr.Starzl et ses collègues, découvrent l'efficacité d'un traitement combiné de Prednisone et d'Azathioprine qui devient alors le standard d'immunosuppression post greffe durant cette période. Les années 60 et 70 sont des années d'optimisme. La prise en charge des patients s'améliore, le développement de la dialyse permet de maintenir en vie les patients avant la greffe, les techniques de conservation des organes s'améliorent, la transplantation élargit son domaine d'action avec la première greffe de coeur en 1968. Le typage tissulaire permet de déterminer le type d'HLA et la compatibilité entre le re- ceveur et le donneur afin de minimiser les risques de rejet aigu. Les années 1970 se caractérisent par deux amélioration majeures : celle du typage HLA-DR et l'apparition des inhibiteurs de la calcineurine (Cyclosporine A). Ce dernier restera l'agent de premier choix jusqu'aux alentours des années 1990 où apparaissaient de nouveaux immunosuppresseurs, tels que les inhibiteurs mTOR (siroli- mus) et les inhibiteurs de l'inosine monophosphate déshydrogénase (mycophénolate mofétil), par exemple. En conclusion, la transplantation rénale a été une des premières transplantations d'organes solides pratiquées sur l'homme avec de nombreux essais cliniques impliquant une multitude d'acteurs. Malgré des périodes de hauts et de bas, les avancements techniques ont été notables, ce qui a été très favorable en terme de survie pour les patients nécessitant une greffe. 1.2. Le lymphocèle La greffe rénale, comme toute autre acte chirurgical, comporte des risques et une morbidité spécifique. Le lymphocèle a la prévalence la plus élevée, qui peut aller de 0.6 à 51% 1-3 avec des variations entre les études. Le lymphocèle est défini comme une collection post opératoire de liquide lymphatique dans une cavité non épithélialisée et n'est pas causée par une fuite urinaire ou une hémorragie1, 4. Historiquement, le lymphocèle a été décrit pour la première fois dans la littérature médicale dans les années 1950, par Kobayashi et Inoue5 en chirurgie gynécologique. Par la suite Mori et al.6 en 1960 documentent la première série d'analyse de lymphocèles. En 1969 le lymphocèle est décrit pour la première fois par Inociencio et al.7 en tant que complication de greffe rénale. Sa pathogénèse n'est pas complètement élucidée, cependant plusieurs facteurs de risque ont été identifiés tels que : la ligature inadéquate des vaisseaux lymphatiques lors de la dissection des vaisseaux iliaques du donneur et de la préparation du greffon, le BMI, les diurétiques, l'anticoagulation (héparine), les hautes doses de stéoïdes, certains agents immunosuppresseurs (sirolimus), le diabète, les problèmes de cicatrisation, une hypoalbuminémie, une chirurgie rétropéritonéale préalable et le rejet aigu de greffe. (Tableau 1) Une symptomatologie peut être présente ou absente : elle découle directement de la localisation et de la taille de la collection8, 9, 10. Lorsqu'on se trouve devant un tableau de lymphocèle asymptomatique, la découverte se fait de manière fortuite lors d'un contrôle de suivi de greffe11, 12 cliniquement ou par échographie. En cas de lymphocèle non significatif cela ne requiert aucun traitement. Au contraire, lorsqu'il atteint une certaines taille il provoque un effet de masse et de compression qui provoque la symptomatologie. Cette dernière est peu spécifique et apparait en moyenne entre 2 semaines et 6 mois 13 après la greffe. Le patient va se présenter avec un tableau pouvant aller de la simple douleur abdominale en passant par un oedème du membre inférieur ou, dans de plus rares cas, une thrombose veineuse profonde sera le seul signe consécutif au lymphocèle14, 15. La plupart du temps on observera des valeurs de créatinine élevées, signant une souffrance rénale. Le diagnostic du lymphocèle peut se faire selon plusieurs techniques. La plus utilisée est la ponction à l'aiguille fine sous guidage ultrasonographique4. L'analyse du liquide ponctionné permet de différencier un lymphocèle d'un urinome. Les autres techniques existantes sont : la ponction après injection de carmin d'indigo15, un pyelogramme intraveineux et un lymphangiogramme16, le CT-Scan ou l'IRM15. Le dosage sanguin d'IL6 et IL8 est parfois utilisé pour déterminer si le lymphocèle est infecté.15 Suite à l'apparition d'une collection symptomatique; le rein transplanté peut être dans une situation à risque pour laquelle un traitement doit être entrepris. A l'heure actuelle, il n'existe pas de solution universelle dans la prévention et le traitement de ce type de complication. Les solutions sont multiples et dépendent principalement de la localisation et de la taille de la collection. Pendant de nombreuses années, le seul traitement du lymphocèle a été celui de l'aspiration percutanée simple. Cette dernière conduit cependant à un taux de récidive de presque 100%.17 Cette technique reste une solution utilisée principalement à visée diagnostique18, 19, 20, 21 ou pour soulager les patients à court terme15. Pour améliorer l'efficacité de cette technique on a fait appel à des agents sclérosants comme l'éthanol, la povidone-iodine, la tétracycline, la doxycycline ou de la colle de fibrine. Des complications chirurgicales ont cependant été rapportées, pouvant aller jusqu'au rejet de greffe22. La fenestration par laparoscopie a été décrite pour la première fois en 1991 par McCullough et al.23 Cette technique reste, de nos jours, la technique la plus utilisée pour le traitement du lymphocèle. Elle a de nombreux avantages : un temps de convalescence court, des pertes de sang minimes et une réalimentation rapide24, 25. On constate en outre la quasi absence de récidives après traitement11, 26. L'évaluation radiologique est très importante, car la marsupialisation par laparoscopie est limitée par l'emplacement et le volume de la collection. Ainsi, on évitera ce type de traite- ment lorsque la collection se situera postérieurement, à proximité de la vessie, de l'uretère ou du hile rénal. Dans ces situations, la laparotomie s'impose malgré l'augmentation de la morbidité liée à cette technique24. Actuellement on cherche à trouver une technique universelle du traitement des lymphocèles avec la chirurgie la moins invasive possible et le taux de récidive le plus faible possible. Malgré ses li- mites, la fenestration par laparoscopie apparaît comme une très bonne solution. Cette étude consiste en une évaluation rétrospective des traitements chirurgicaux de cette complication post-opératoire de la greffe rénale au CHUV (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois) de 2003 à 2011. Le but est de recenser et analyser les différentes techniques que l'on observe actuellement dans la littérature et pouvoir ainsi proposer une technique idéale pour le CHUV.

Frequency and Type of Side Effects of Immunomodulating Medication in the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort

Background: Medical treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is becoming more and more complex, as several classes of immuno-modulating drugs (IMD) are often used simultaneously. Thus, the probability of adverse effects is greatly increased. Most studies reporting on adverse effects focus on single therapy, and studies providing a global survey of side effects for multiple treatments are lacking. Aim: To assess the type and frequency of adverse events in IBD patients treated with single and multiple IMD therapy. Methods: Analysis of data from the Swiss IBD Cohort Study (SIBDCS) that collects data on a large sample of IBD patients from hospitals and private practices across Switzerland. The following IMD categories were analyzed: 5-ASA, azathioprine (Aza), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), methotrexate (MTX), anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab-pegol), cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and steroids. The following side effects were assessed: hepatitis, pancreatitis, leucopenia, thrombopenia, nephritis, allergic reaction, pneumonitis, infections (including tuberculosis), osteoporosis, abdominal pain/diarrhea (unrelated to IBD activity), cataract, diabetes, exanthema, hirsutism, lupus-like syndrome, myalgias, depression/psychosis, tumor development. Results: A total of 1,961 patients were analyzed (977 [50%] female, mean age 42.1 ± 14.4 years): 1,119 with Crohn's disease (CD), 800 with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 42 with indeterminate colitis (IC). Three-hundred eighteen (16.2%) patients were not treated with any of the above-mentioned medications, while 650 (33.2%), 569 (29%) and 424 (21.6%) patients had one-, two-, and three- or more- IMD therapy, respectively. Of the 1,643 patients treated with IMD, 535 (32.6%) patients reported at least one side effect. We found a significant correlation between the number of drugs used by a patient and the frequency of side effects (17.4% side effects for one drug, 29% for 2 drugs, and 60.6% for three or more drugs, p < 0.001). The frequency of side effects for the different IMD classes were as follows: 5-ASA (n = 980 treated patients) 10.8%, Aza/6-MP (n = 636) 51.9% (pancreatitis in 57 = 9%, hepatitis in 17 = 2.7% of treated patients), MTX (n = 146) 42.5% (hepatitis in 4 = 2.7% of treated patients), anti-TNF (n = 255) 23.1%, cyclosporine (n = 49) 10.2%, tacrolimus (n = 5) 20%, steroids (systemic or topical, n = 1,150) 9.6%. Conclusion: IBD treatment is associated with a significant number of side effects. A direct correlation between the number of IMD used simultaneously and the frequency of side effects was observed. The results of this study indicate that treating physicians should be vigilant for the occurrence of side effects in IBD patients under single and/or multiple drug therapy.

Appropriateness of therapy for fistulizing Crohn's disease: findings from a national inflammatory bowel disease cohort.

BACKGROUND: About 30-50% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) develop fistulae, implying significant disease burden and complicated clinical management. AIM: To assess appropriate use of therapy for fistulizing CD patients enrolled in the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort using criteria developed by the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Crohn's disease Therapy. METHODS: Specific questionnaires were used to gather information on disease and its management. We assessed appropriateness of therapy at enrolment for adult CD patients with one or several fistulae. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-eight CD patients had fistulizing disease, of which 80% had complex fistulae and 32% currently had active draining fistulae. Mean age (s.d.) at diagnosis was 27 years (11), 51% males. Of the patients, 78% were judged as having globally an appropriate therapy, which was more often given for complex fistulae (87%) than for simple fistulae (67%). Antibiotics, azathioprine/MP, methotrexate and conservative surgery were almost always appropriate. Anti-tumor necrosis factor α was considered globally appropriate (91%), although most often with an uncertain indication. The 5ASA compounds, steroids and aggressive surgery were most often inappropriate (84%, 58% and 86% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Formal appropriateness criteria for CD therapy were applied to a national cohort of IBD patients. For more than three-quarters of the patients with fistulizing CD, therapy was globally appropriate.

Monitoring de l'immunosuppression par les thiopurines dans les maladies inflammatoires chroniques de l'intestin par le suivi de la macrocytose

Background¦Erythrocyte MCV might be used as an inexpensive marker to predict and¦optimize the efficacy and tolerability of thiopurine therapy in IBD patients.¦Aim and methods¦This retrospective observational study aimed to assess the monitoring¦performances of MCV in patients under 3 months or more thiopurine treatment followed up¦in the Swiss IBD Cohort Study. All available MCV, white blood cells (WBC) and 6¦thioguanine nucleotide (6TGN) measurements, among others, were recorded. An IBD¦"flare" was defined as a composite outcome encompassing treatment change,¦colonoscopy, histology, CT scan or MRI reports showing active IBD lesions, occurrence of¦intestinal surgery and IBD-related hospitalisations. Whether MCV measurements predicted¦efficacy of thiopurine treatment was investigated by assessing the statistical association¦between the occurrence of IBD "flares", and the current or recent MCV values, taking into¦account the patient clustering and longitudinal aspect of data.¦Results¦140 patients (77 women), mean age 38 years (17-74), 104 diagnosed with¦Crohn's disease, 36 with ulcerative colitis, mean disease duration 8 years (0.25-36),¦receiving either azathioprine (n=125) or 6-mercaptopurine (n=15) were included, most of¦them over 3-year follow up.¦Thiopurines increased mean patient MCV by an average 5.8±5.2 fL, while¦patientsfluctuated by ±4.3 fL around their individual mean (p<0.001). They decreased¦WBC by an average of 2.4+/- 2.6 G/L (p<0.001).¦Significant associations were observed between the probability of flare occurrence and low¦current MVC (p=0.017) or high current WBC (p=0.009) and, with a relative risk of 3.7% for¦every fL of MCV decrease or 8% for every G/L of WBC increase. Both markers revealed¦some memory effect.¦Despite this, the performance of MCV and WBC to predict IBD "flare" remained rather¦limited, as it is less accurate than the 6-TGN-level , although only determined in a¦subgroup of patients in this study.¦Conclusion¦MCV and WBC deserve to be observed to check and monitor therapeutic¦exposure to thiopurine agents in IBD patients. Unfortunately, their predictive performance¦precludes their privileged use for optimization of therapy. Further prospective studies¦should suitably include the systematic measurement of metabolite concentration.

Heerfordt syndrome with unilateral facial nerve palsy: a rare presentation of sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Heerfordt syndrome is rare and is characterized by fever, uveitis, parotid gland enlargement, and facial nerve palsy. We hereby present a case of Heerfordt syndrome with unilateral facial nerve palsy as a presentation of sarcoidosis. HISTORY AND SIGNS: A 29-year-old male patient from Sri Lanka presented with eye redness OU, blurred vision OD, fever, headache, night sweat, fatigue, and weight loss (5 kg over 1 month). Examination revealed mild anterior uveitis OU, mild vitritis OD, fundus whitish lesions OU, left otalgia, taste disorders, bilateral parotid gland enlargement, and left facial nerve palsy. Work-up for infection or tumour was negative. Chest computed tomography and transbronchial lymph node biopsy set the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. THERAPY AND OUTCOME: The patient recovered completely within 2 months under therapy with prednisone and azathioprine. One year after onset of treatment, no recurrence was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Heerfordt syndrome is a rare manifestation of neurosarcoidosis and has to be included in the differential diagnosis of facial nerve palsy.

Miller-Fisher syndrome in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis treated with adalimumab.

Adalimumab is a frequently prescribed TNFalpha inhibitor for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. We report on a patient who probably developed a Miller-Fisher syndrome after the second injection of adalimumab.

Comparative socio-economic evaluation of IBD patients with and without infliximab maintenance therapy

Background: The anti-TNFα agent Infliximab (IFX) is used for the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with insufficient response to conventional immunomodulator therapy. IFX maintenance therapy is expensive and it is unknown if indirect costs (eg. by loss of work productivity) can be reduced by this therapy. Goal: to evaluate the direct and indirect costs of an IBD patient cohort under maintenance IFX compared to a cohort under "conventional" immunomodulator therapy. Methods: Direct and indirect costs of an IBD cohort under IFX and a reference cohort (similar disease activity and location) under conventional immunomodulator therapy (Azathioprine, or 6-MP, or MTX) were retrospectively evaluated over 12 months (January to December 2008). Results: 54 IFX-patients (24f/30m, 37 CD, 10 UC, 7 IC) and 71 non-IFX-patients (38f/33m, 56 CD, 12 UC, 3 IC) were included. IFX patients were younger than non-IFX patients (36 vs. 47 years, P = 0.0003). The mean duration of inpatient stay in hospital (23 in IFX vs. 21 days for non-IFX, P = 0.909) and the hospitalization costs (7,692 in IFX vs. 4,179 SFr for non-IFX, P = 0.4540) did not differ. IFX-patients had significantly more frequently specialist outpatient consultations (8 vs. 4, P < 0.001) and outpatient-related costs (3,633 vs. 2,186 SFr, P <0.001). Total costs for all diagnostic procedures (blood work, endoscopies, radiology) were higher in the IFXcohort (2,265 vs. 1,164 SFr, P < 0.001). Sixty-five percent of IFX-patients had a 100% job employment compared to 80% in the non-IFX cohort (P = 0.001). Conclusions: The direct and indirect costs of maintenance IFX-treated IBD patients are higher compared to IBD patients under conventional immunomodulators. Care should be taken not only to judge the costs as the IFX treated population may represent a cohort with more aggressive disease phenotype, furthermore, quality of life aspects were not assessed.