Making internalization theory good for practice: the essence of Alan Rugman’s contributions to international business

This perspectives paper and its associated commentaries examine Alan Rugman's conceptual contribution to international business scholarship. Most significantly, we highlight Rugman's version of internalization theory as an approach that integrates transaction cost economics and ‘classical’ internalization theory with elements from the resource-based view, such that it is especially relevant to strategic management. In reviewing his oeuvre, we also offer observations on his ideas for ‘new internalization theory’. We classify his other novel insights into four categories: Network Multinationals; National competitiveness; Development and public policy; and Emerging Economy MNEs. This special section offers multiple views on how his work informed the larger academic debate and considers how these ideas might evolve in the longer term.

International Business Research Forum

Professor Rodrigo Bandeira de Mello fala sobre o International Business Research Forum (IBRF)

Aircraft accident report : International Business Machines, inc., Grumman G-1159, N720Q, Kline, South Carolina, June 24, 1974 /

"File no. 3-1400."

Final reports of the International business conference. Private interprise; raw materials and foodstuffs; encouragement and protection of investments; industrialization in new areas; currency relations among nations; transportation and communications; cartels; commercial policy of nations; also roster of attendance. Westchester country club, Rye, New York, November 10-18, 1944.

Cover-title.

Postcolonialism and the politics of qualitative research in international business

This paper offers a re-configuration of international business research by subjecting it to a postcolonial critique. This critique sees international business research as exhibiting continuities with the colonial project in the way it appropriates the Other. Qualitative research in international business often reproduces a neopositivist separation of theory and method, which can marginalize discussion of the important ontological, epistemological and political issues inherent in any research process