Risālah fī maʻná al-mafhūm min al-manṭūq : manuscript, [ca. 1918]

Bound with: Risālah / ʻĪsá ibn Muḥammad ibn Nūr.

Kashf al-ghayn ʻammā bi-wādī al-Shardad min dhurrīyat al-sibṭayn : manuscript, [ca. 1918]

Title not mentioned in Brockelmann, S, II, 548.

Sharḥ Bukhārī min taṣānīf Mawlānā Luṭfī : manuscript, 1586

Beginning of a commentary on Bukhārī's al-Jāmiʻ al-Ṣaḥīḥ. It seems that the author never completed his work.

Muqaddimah fī-mā yajibu ʻalá al-awlād maʻrifatuh min al-aḥkām al-sharʻīyah / lil-Faqīh al-Mālikī : manuscript

undated.

Hādhā al-Majmūʻ fī masāʼil al-inzālāt wa-al-khalawāt wa-al-kardār wa-mā yatbaʻu dhālika min al-naṣbah wa-al-jalsah wa-al-ḥazqah wa-min bayʻ al-waqf al-kharib ʻalá mashʹhūr madhhab al-Imām al-Aʻẓam Abī Ḥanīfah al-Nuʻmān wa-madhhab Imām Dār al-Hijrah Mālik ibn Anas

1. Risālah fī al-khulūw wa-wujūhihi ʻinda al-Miṣrīyīn wa-al-Maghāribah / li-Ismāʻīl al-Tamīmī -- 2. Suʼāl wa-fatāwá ʻanh / li-Ibrāhīm al-Riyāḥī -- 3. Asʼilah wa-ajwibah fī masāʼil al-kardār / li-Aḥmad ibn al-Khūjah -- 4. Faṣl fī ʻĀrīyat al-khulūw wa-faṣl fī al-inzālāt min Manẓūmat Laqṭ al-durar / li-Muḥammad al-Sanūsī -- 5. Jumlat Taqārīr wa-fatāwá fī al-khalawāt wa-al-inzālāt / li-Muḥammad Bayram wa-al-Shādhilī ibn Ṣāliḥ -- 6. Risālah fī Taḥqīq masʼalat al-khulūw ʻinda al-Mālikīyah / li-Aḥmad al-Fayyūmī al-Farqāwī al-Miṣrī -- 7. Risālah fī al-Kalām ʻalá bayʻ al-waqf idhā khariba wa-mā li-ahl al-madhhab min al-kalām fī dhālik / li-Yaḥyá ibn Muḥammad al-Ḥaṭṭāb.

Juzʻ fīhi ʻAsharat majālis min amālī al-Shaykh al-Ḥāfiẓ Abī Muḥammad al-Ḥasan ibn Muḥammad al-Ḥasan al-Khallāl : manuscript, [12--?]

Bound with ʻAlī ibn al-Ḥasan ibn ʻAsākir, Kitāb al-Arbaʻīn al-buldānīyah, and other hadith collections.

al- Juzʼ al-thālith wa-al-arbaʻūn min Sharḥ Kitāb Sībawayh / taʼlīf al-Qāḍī Abī al-Saʻīd al-Ḥasan ibn ʻAbd Allāh al-Sīrāfī : manuscript, [ca. 979]

Written in one column, 18 lines per pages, in black ink.

Kitāb Basṭ al-yadayn li-ikrām al-abawayn / min taṣnīf al-Fāḍil al-Naḥrīr Mawlawī Muḥammad Ghawth ibn Nāṣir al-Dīn ibn Muḥammad : manuscript, 1848 or 9

Title from f. 25r.

Risālah fī iʻrāb al-rabb min Allāhumma Rabb hādhihi al-daʻwah / lil-fāḍil al-kāmil Ṣibghat Allāh ibn Mawlawī Muḥammad Ghawth ibn Nāṣir al-Dīn ibn Muḥammad : manuscript, [ca. 1848]

Title from f. 50r.

al- Juz al-awwal min Asmā al-mubhamah fī al-anbā al-muḥkamah / taṣnīf al-Imām al-Ḥāfiẓ Abī Bakr Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī ibn Thābit al-Khaṭīb al-Baghdādī : manuscript, [12--?]

Bound with ʻAlī ibn al-Ḥasan ibn ʻAsākir, Kitāb al-Arbaʻīn al-buldānīyah, and other hadith collections.

Hādhā Risālah fī bayān ḥadīth ikhtilāf al-ummah / min al-Fāḍil al-ʻAllāmah Imām al-ʻulamāʼ Mawlawī Ṣibghat Allāh Qāḍī al-Mulk : manuscript, 1863 or 4

Title from f. 13r.

Nuzhat al-nāẓirīn fī tārīkh man waliya Miṣr min al-khulafāʼ wa-al-nāṣirīn : manuscript, 1777

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم وبه تعال قال العبد الفقير الى الله تعالاى مرعي بن يوسف الحنبلي ... :Incipit

Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys: Experimental Results for the Randomized Response Technique (RRT) and the Unmatched Count Technique (UCT)

Gaining valid answers to so-called sensitive questions is an age-old problem in survey research. Various techniques have been developed to guarantee anonymity and minimize the respondent's feelings of jeopardy. Two such techniques are the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT). In this study we evaluate the effectiveness of different implementations of the RRT (using a forced-response design) in a computer-assisted setting and also compare the use of the RRT to that of the UCT. The techniques are evaluated according to various quality criteria, such as the prevalence estimates they provide, the ease of their use, and respondent trust in the techniques. Our results indicate that the RRTs are problematic with respect to several domains, such as the limited trust they inspire and non-response, and that the RRT estimates are unreliable due to a strong false "no" bias, especially for the more sensitive questions. The UCT, however, performed well compared to the RRTs on all the evaluated measures. The UCT estimates also had more face validity than the RRT estimates. We conclude that the UCT is a promising alternative to RRT in self-administered surveys and that future research should be directed towards evaluating and improving the technique.