Current concepts in the pathogenesis of meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae

In spite of improved antimicrobial therapy, bacterial meningitis still results in brain damage leading to significant long-term neurological sequelae in a substantial number of survivors, as confirmed by several recent studies. Meningitis caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae is associated with a particularly severe outcome. Experimental studies over the past few years have increased our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the events that ultimately lead to brain damage during meningitis. Necrotic damage to the cerebral cortex is at least partly mediated by ischemia and oxygen radicals and therefore offers a promising target for adjunctive therapeutic intervention. Neuronal apoptosis in the hippocampus may represent the major pathological process responsible for cognitive impairment and learning disabilities in survivors. However, the mechanisms involved in causing this damage remain largely unknown. Anti-inflammatory treatment with corticosteroids aggravates hippocampal damage, thus underlining the potential shortcomings of current adjuvant strategies. In contrast, the combined inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase and tumour necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme protected both the cortex and hippocampus in experimental meningitis, and may represent a promising new approach to adjunctive therapy. It is the hope that a more refined molecular understanding of the pathogenesis of brain damage during bacterial meningitis will lead to new adjunctive therapies.

Multimembership and Identity in Writing Centers and in Industry: Examining the Work of Reconciliation in the Michigan Tech Multiliteracies Center and at Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Writing center scholarship and practice have approached how issues of identity influence communication but have not fully considered ways of making identity a key feature of writing center research or practice. This dissertation suggests a new way to view identity -- through an experience of "multimembership" or the consideration that each identity is constructed based on the numerous community memberships that make up that identity. Etienne Wenger (1998) proposes that a fully formed identity is ultimately impossible, but it is through the work of reconciling memberships that important individual and community transformations can occur. Since Wenger also argues that reconciliation "is the most significant challenge" for those moving into new communities of practice (or, "engage in a process of collective learning in a shared domain of human endeavor" (4)), yet this challenge often remains tacit, this dissertation examines and makes explicit how this important work is done at two different research sites - a university writing center (the Michigan Tech Multiliteracies Center) and at a multinational corporation (Kimberly-Clark Corporation). Drawing extensively on qualitative ethnographic methods including interview transcriptions, observations, and case studies, as well as work from scholars in writing center studies (Grimm, Denney, Severino), literacy studies (New London Group, Street, Gee), composition (Horner and Trimbur, Canagarajah, Lu), rhetoric (Crowley), and identity studies (Anzaldua, Pratt), I argue that, based on evidence from the two sites, writing centers need to educate tutors to not only take identity into consideration, but to also make individuals' reconciliation work more visible, as it will continue once students and tutors leave the university. Further, as my research at the Michigan Tech Multiliteracies Center and Kimberly-Clark will show, communities can (and should) change their practices in ways that account for reconciliation work as identity, communication, and learning are inextricably bound up with one another.

An Experience-Driven Pedagogy for the Instruction of Software Testing in Computer Science

In the realm of computer programming, the experience of writing a program is used to reinforce concepts and evaluate ability. This research uses three case studies to evaluate the introduction of testing through Kolb's Experiential Learning Model (ELM). We then analyze the impact of those testing experiences to determine methods for improving future courses. The first testing experience that students encounter are unit test reports in their early courses. This course demonstrates that automating and improving feedback can provide more ELM iterations. The JUnit Generation (JUG) tool also provided a positive experience for the instructor by reducing the overall workload. Later, undergraduate and graduate students have the opportunity to work together in a multi-role Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) course. The interactions use usability analysis techniques with graduate students as usability experts and undergraduate students as design engineers. Students get experience testing the user experience of their product prototypes using methods varying from heuristic analysis to user testing. From this course, we learned the importance of the instructors role in the ELM. As more roles were added to the HCI course, a desire arose to provide more complete, quality assured software. This inspired the addition of unit testing experiences to the course. However, we learned that significant preparations must be made to apply the ELM when students are resistant. The research presented through these courses was driven by the recognition of a need for testing in a Computer Science curriculum. Our understanding of the ELM suggests the need for student experience when being introduced to testing concepts. We learned that experiential learning, when appropriately implemented, can provide benefits to the Computer Science classroom. When examined together, these course-based research projects provided insight into building strong testing practices into a curriculum.

The Role of Science in Controlling Invasive Species: A Case Study on Wild Pigs

Presentation by Dr. Stephen Ditchkoff.

E-Learning-Webseite als facettenreiches Werkzeug in Forschung und Lehre

Im Rahmen des blended learning kann eine E-Learning-Webseite als Begleitmaterial einer Lehrveranstaltung eingesetzt werden oder Studierende zur aktiven Teilnahme an der Erstellung der Webseiteninhalte anregen. Darüber hinaus eignet sich eine solche Webseite als Plattform zur E-Learning-Forschung. Auch empirische Studien können dort eingebettet werden. Eine weitere wissenschaftliche Anwendung bietet die Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens, mit der sich aktuelle Forschungsergebnisse zum Lernen mit Hypermedien überprüfen lassen. Wir beschreiben eine solche, vielseitig einsetzbare Webseite, die eine Verknüpfung von universitärer Lehre und Forschung ermöglicht und als Anregung für ähnliche Projekte dienen kann. Erste Erfahrungen werden dabei berichtet und ausgewählte Empfehlungen für Dozierende und Forscher abgeleitet.

Social-Software-Portfolios im Einsatz

Die Dissertationsschrift widmet sich der Erforschung des Online-Lernens mittels Weblogs unter Anwendung der E-Portfolio Methode als einer seit mehreren Jahren verstärkt aufkommenden Lern- und Präsentationsform im Bildungskontext. Über mehrere Lehrveranstaltungen des Studiengangs "Angewandte Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft" an der Technischen Universität Ilmenau hinweg wurden drei Fallstudien gebildet. Innerhalb dieser wurde das Führen von eigenen E-Portfolio Blogs durch Studierende über einen Zeitraum von etwa drei Jahren evaluiert. Als Evaluationsziel wurde anhand spezifischer Fragestellungen ermittelt, wie das damit einhergehende selbstgesteuert-konnektive Lernen zu entsprechendem Erfolg führen kann. Hierbei wurde insbesondere die Teildimension Medienkompetenz im Spannungsfeld von Lernaktivität, Wissenserwerb und Informations-/Wissensmanagement betrachtet sowie weitere intervenierende Variablen, wie zum Beispiel Aufwand oder Akzeptanz, berücksichtigt. Inhaltlich wurden zunächst begriffliche Grundlagen dargestellt, die Nutzung von E-Portfolios in Theorie und Praxis beschrieben, Medienkompetenz-Ansätze detailliert aufgezeigt sowie in den Kontext von E-Portfolios gebracht und schließlich eine umfangreiche Analyse des Forschungsstandes aufbereitet. Diese gingen mit Erkenntnissen aus einer qualitativen Vorstudie in Form von fünf leitfadengestützten Experteninterviews einher. Die darauf aufbauende Hauptstudie widmete sich anschließend der Erhebung und Auswertung quantitativer Daten anhand von Online-Befragungen mit den Studierenden zu fünf Zeitpunkten aus intra- und interindividueller Perspektive. Als markanteste empirische Erkenntnis der Arbeit kann festgehalten werden, dass es durch das selbstgesteuert-konnektive Lernen mit E-Portfolio Blogs zu einer nachhaltigen Förderung der Medienkompetenz kommt, die sich auch in signifikanten Zusammenhängen mit den anderen Teildimensionen und intervenierenden Variablen widerspiegelt. Darüber hinaus bieten sich aber auch Potenziale für eine steigende Lernaktivität, einen ansteigenden Wissenserwerb und ein verbessertes Informations-/Wissensmanagement, die es aber noch weiterführend zu erforschen gilt. Demgegenüber können allerdings der entstehende und kontinuierlich hohe Aufwand sowie die erforderliche (Eigen-) Motivation als entscheidende Herausforderungen dieser Lernmethode identifiziert werden.

Using Single-Case Participatory Action Research as a Methodology to Explore Appalachian Summer Camp Communities

Community educators have long known the value of direct experience in the learning process. Participatory action research extends this philosophy to the realm of research. This article examines the value of involving front line camp staff, members of the camp community in Appalachia as practitioner researchers with university scientists in studying the type and conditions of transformative learning in young adult camp staff. A young adult who was a camp community member assisted the researchers with methodology, data analysis, data interpretation, and dissemination of findings. This resulted in a more accurate, richer, and thicker description of the camp community member’s transformative learning experience. The benefits of involving practitioner researchers are examined, as well as promising practices for conducting participatory action research in community education environments.

Desertification mitigation and water harvesting based on sustainable land management

Traditionally, desertification research has focused on degradation assessments, whereas prevention and mitigation strategies have not sufficiently been emphasised, although the concept of sustainable land management (SLM) is increasingly being acknowledged. SLM strategies are interventions at the local to regional scale aiming at increasing productivity, protecting the natural resource base, and improving livelihoods. The global WOCAT initiative and its partners have developed harmonized frameworks to compile, evaluate and analyse the impact of SLM practices around the globe. Recent studies within the EU research project DESIRE developed a methodological framework that combines a collective learning and decision-making approach with use of best practices from the WOCAT database. In-depth assessment of 30 technologies and 8 approaches from 17 desertification sites enabled an evaluation of how SLM addresses prevalent dryland threats such as water scarcity, soil and vegetation degradation, low production, climate change, resource use conflicts and migration. Among the impacts attributed to the documented technologies, those mentioned most were diversified and enhanced production and better management of water and soil degradation, whether through water harvesting, improving soil moisture, or reducing runoff. Water harvesting offers under-exploited opportunities for the drylands and the predominantly rainfed farming systems of the developing world. Recently compiled guidelines introduce the concepts behind water harvesting and propose a harmonised classification system, followed by an assessment of suitability, adoption and up-scaling of practices. Case studies go from large-scale floodwater spreading that make alluvial plains cultivable, to systems that boost cereal production in small farms, as well as practices that collect and store water from household compounds. Once contextualized and set in appropriate institutional frameworks, they can form part of an overall adaptation strategy for land users. More field research is needed to reinforce expert assessments of SLM impacts and provide the necessary evidence-based rationale for investing in SLM. This includes developing methods to quantify and value ecosystem services, both on-site and off-site, and assess the resilience of SLM practices, as currently aimed at within the new EU CASCADE project.

Managing Knowledge Transfer in Software-Maintenance Outsourcing Transitions: A System-Dynamics Perspective

The existing literature suggests that transitions in software-maintenance offshore outsourcing projects are prone to knowledge transfer blockades, i.e. situations in which the activities that would yield effective knowledge transfer do not occur, and that client management involvement is central to overcome them. However, the theoretical understanding of the knowledge transfer blockade is limited, and the reactive management behavior reported in case studies suggests that practitioners may frequently be astonished by the dynamics that may give rise to the blockade. Drawing on recent research from offshore sourcing and reference theories, this study proposes a system dynamics framework that may explain why knowledge transfer blockades emerge and how and why client management can overcome the blockade. The results suggest that blockades may emerge from a vicious circle of weak learning due to cognitive overload of vendor staff and resulting negative ability attributions that result in reduced helping behavior and thus aggravate cognitive load. Client management may avoid these vicious circles by selecting vendor staff with strong prior related experience. Longer phases of coexistence of vendor staff and subject matter experts and high formal and clan controls may also mitigate vicious circles.

Diagnosing institutional barriers and opportunities for adaptation to climate change

Institutions are one of the decisive factors which enable, constrain and shape adaptation to the impacts of climate change, variability and extreme events. However, current understanding of institutions in adaptation situations is fragmented across the scientific community, evidence diverges, and cumulative learning beyond single studies is limited. This study adopts a diagnostic approach to elaborate a nuanced understanding of institutional barriers and opportunities in climate adaptation by means of a model-centred meta-analysis of 52 case studies of public climate adaptation in Europe. The first result is a novel taxonomy of institutional attributes in adaptation situations. It conceptually organises and decomposes the many details of institutions that empirical research has shown to shape climate adaptation. In the second step, the paper identifies archetypical patterns of institutional traps and trade-offs which hamper adaptation. Thirdly, corresponding opportunities are identified that enable actors to alleviate, prevent or overcome specific institutional traps or trade-offs. These results cast doubt on the validity of general institutional design principles for successful adaptation. In contrast to generic principles, the identified opportunities provide leverage to match institutions to specific governance problems that are encountered in specific contexts. Taken together, the results may contribute to more coherence and integration of adaptation research that we need if we are to foster learning about the role of institutions in adaptation situations in a cumulative fashion.

Long Term Follow-up of Morbidity and Quality of Life Associated with Isolated Gastroschisis

Gastroschisis is a birth defect in which an opening in the abdominal wall allows herniation of the viscera. Prenatal counseling regarding gastroschisis typically discusses that, although these infants often endure a difficult neonatal course, they experience few long-term complications. However, information regarding long-term outcomes is based on limited studies that lack specificity. Therefore, we aimed to study the long-term morbidity and quality of life in children born with gastroschisis in a large and diverse population drawn from the Texas Birth Defects Registry (TBDR). Study packets with informed consent, a questionnaire, and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scale 4.0 (PedsQL 4.0) in English and Spanish were mailed to 1,112 parents of children born with isolated gastroschisis in Texas between 1999 and 2008 via the TBDR. Information was abstracted from the TBDR for 58 mothers of children with gastroschisis who returned study materials. Three hundred fifty five packets were returned to sender, giving a response rate of 7.7%. Children born with gastroschisis had quality of life scores that were not significantly different than expected (p = 0.981). However, factors such as having a learning disability (p = 0.001) and missing school due to gastrointestinal issues (p = 0.020) were found to significantly decrease quality of life. Overall, children with gastroschisis had a significantly increased risk for learning disabilities regardless of whether they were preterm (p = 0.021) or full term (p = 0.021). Additionally, there appeared to be an increased risk for auditory impairment in Caucasian children (p < 0.0005). Therefore, while overall long-term quality of life is not significantly altered for children born with gastroschisis, the previously unreported increased risk for learning disabilities and possible association with hearing impairment are important findings that should be conveyed to prospective parents.

Aprendizaje del lenguaje escrito : Su evaluación

Este trabajo, que forma parte de una investigación más amplia, está destinado a examinar la disponibilidad y utilización de instrumentos de evaluación del desempeño de alumnos a lo largo del trayecto formativo, respecto del aprendizaje del lenguaje escrito . Surge de la consideración de niveles de rendimiento críticos en el dominio de la lectura y escritura en diferentes niveles educativos, señalados reiteradamente en la literatura especializada del país y del exterior. Con ese propósito se revisan las habilidades y conocimientos implicados a partir de la evidencia empírica surgida de múltiples investigaciones. En el estado actual de la investigación en curso es posible identificar la insuficiencia de disponibilidad y uso de instrumentos de evaluación en nuestro medio. Se desprenden de ello, por un lado, las dificultades para detectar la oportunidad y naturaleza de los problemas que presentan los lectores con dificultades y con trastornos específicos de aprendizaje, y por el otro, la insuficiencia de información sobre indicadores específicos que permitan diseñar las estrategias para optimizar el desempeño en lectura y escritura

Aprendizaje del lenguaje escrito : Su evaluación

Este trabajo, que forma parte de una investigación más amplia, está destinado a examinar la disponibilidad y utilización de instrumentos de evaluación del desempeño de alumnos a lo largo del trayecto formativo, respecto del aprendizaje del lenguaje escrito . Surge de la consideración de niveles de rendimiento críticos en el dominio de la lectura y escritura en diferentes niveles educativos, señalados reiteradamente en la literatura especializada del país y del exterior. Con ese propósito se revisan las habilidades y conocimientos implicados a partir de la evidencia empírica surgida de múltiples investigaciones. En el estado actual de la investigación en curso es posible identificar la insuficiencia de disponibilidad y uso de instrumentos de evaluación en nuestro medio. Se desprenden de ello, por un lado, las dificultades para detectar la oportunidad y naturaleza de los problemas que presentan los lectores con dificultades y con trastornos específicos de aprendizaje, y por el otro, la insuficiencia de información sobre indicadores específicos que permitan diseñar las estrategias para optimizar el desempeño en lectura y escritura

Aprendizaje del lenguaje escrito : Su evaluación

Este trabajo, que forma parte de una investigación más amplia, está destinado a examinar la disponibilidad y utilización de instrumentos de evaluación del desempeño de alumnos a lo largo del trayecto formativo, respecto del aprendizaje del lenguaje escrito . Surge de la consideración de niveles de rendimiento críticos en el dominio de la lectura y escritura en diferentes niveles educativos, señalados reiteradamente en la literatura especializada del país y del exterior. Con ese propósito se revisan las habilidades y conocimientos implicados a partir de la evidencia empírica surgida de múltiples investigaciones. En el estado actual de la investigación en curso es posible identificar la insuficiencia de disponibilidad y uso de instrumentos de evaluación en nuestro medio. Se desprenden de ello, por un lado, las dificultades para detectar la oportunidad y naturaleza de los problemas que presentan los lectores con dificultades y con trastornos específicos de aprendizaje, y por el otro, la insuficiencia de información sobre indicadores específicos que permitan diseñar las estrategias para optimizar el desempeño en lectura y escritura

Value Chain Dynamics and Growth of Local Firms:The Case of Motorcycle Industry in Vietnam

Vietnam’s burgeoning market for motorcycles has attracted global industry eaders,players from developing countries, and local firms. This has led to a dynamic evolution of value chains. This paper presents an explanation of the varieties of the growth patterns xperienced by the local suppliers, focusing on the roles of customer and local supplier strategies. Case studies showed that while the role of customers may be important, strategies of suppliers to improve the ompetitive edge in the production of otorcycle components and to diversify into other products account for important ariations of growth trajectories among local suppliers. Findings presented in this paper suggest the need to direct more attention to strategy that local firms use to boost their competitive edge in business.