Marital counselling: follow-up study of marriage guidance clients: perceptions of the agency, the process and outcomes. Available in 2 volumes.

This study is a consumer-survey conducted with former Marriage Guidance Council clients. The objectives were to identify and examine why they chose the agency, what their expectations and experiences were of marital counselling and whether anything was achieved. The material was derived from tape recorded interviews with 51 former M.G. clients (17 men and 34 women) from 42 marriages and with 21 counsellors; data from written material and a card-sort completed by the research sample; and the case record sheets of the research population (174 cases). The results from the written data of clients showed that 49% were satisfied with counselling, 25.5% were satisfied in some ways but not in others, and 25.5% were dissatisfied. Forty-six percent rated they had benefited from counselling, either a great deal or to some degree, 4% were neutral and 50% recorded they had not benefited. However the counsellors' assessments were more optimistic. It was also ascertained that 50% of the research sample eventually separated or divorced subsequent to counselling. A cross-check revealed that the majority who rated they were satisfied with counselling were those who remained married, whilst dissatisfied clients were the ones who unwillingly separated or divorced. The study then describes, discusses and assesses the experiences of clients in the light of these findings on a number of dimensions. From this it was possible to construct a summary profile of a "successful" client describing the features which would contribute to "success". Two key themes emerged from the data. (1) the discrepancy between clients expectations and the counselling offered, which included mis­ match over the aims and methods of counselling, and problem definition; and (2) the importance of the client/counsellor relationship. The various implications for the agency are then discussed which include recommendations on policy, the training of counsellors and further research.

Pain response and follow-up of patients undergoing panretinal laser photocoagulation with reduced exposure times

Purpose - We performed a study of laser panretinal photocoagulation in 20 patients with proliferative retinopathy. We compared short exposure, high-energy laser settings with conventional settings, using a 532?nm, frequency doubled, Neodymium–Yag laser and assessed the patients in terms of pain experienced and effectiveness of treatment. Methods - Twenty patients having panretinal photocoagulation for the first time underwent random allocation to treatment of the superior and inferior hemi-retina. Treatment A used ‘conventional’ parameters: exposure time 0.1?s, power sufficient to produce a visible grey-white burns, spot size 300?µm. The other hemi- retina was treated with treatment B using exposure 0.02?s, 300?µm and sufficient power to have similar endpoint. All patients were asked to evaluate severity of pain on a visual analogue scale. (0=no pain, 10=most severe pain). All patients were masked as to the type of treatment and the order of carrying out the treatment on each patient was randomised. Patients underwent fundus photography and were followed up for 6–45 months. Results - Seventeen patients had proliferative diabetic retinopathy, two had ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion and one had ocular ischaemic syndrome. The mean response to treatment A was 5.11, compared to 1.40 treatment B, on the visual analogue scale, which was statistically significant (P=0.001). All patients preferred treatment B. Further treatments, if required, were performed with treatment B parameters and long-term follow-up has shown no evidence of undertreatment. Conclusions - Shortening exposure time of retinal laser is significantly less painful but equally effective as conventional parameters.

OCT retinal thickness ratios and frequency of follow-up in Wet AMD

Poster Introduction: In neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an important tool to determine when intravitreal injections of ranibizumab should be administered. Current guidelines recommend that patients should be reviewed four weekly and OCT indications for further treatment include subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid or cysts. Purpose: We have reviewed the OCT scans of subjects who have successfully responded to ranibizumab to look for factors that might predict which patients will not require injection and could have extended appointments. Method: This was a prospective study in which we observed for 6 consecutive months the OCT images of 28 subjects who had received intravitreal ranibizumab for nAMD and were judged to be clinically inactive at recruitment to the study. Ratios between full retinal thickness (FRT = neurosensory retina + outer reflective band) and outer reflective band (ORB) thickness at the fovea were calculated for each subject at the moment of entering the study and at each successive visit for 6 consecutive months. Results: Patients with lower FRT/ORB ratios were found to be less likely to require an additional injection of ranibizumab and no subject with a ratio of 1.75 or less needed further injections. Conclusion: This small pilot study suggests that on macular OCT, the FRT/ORB ratio, and in particular values of 1.75 or less, may prove to be a useful, practical tool when deciding the follow up period for subjects undergoing treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab for nAMD.