1000 resultados para Daloz, Jean-Pascal
Resumo:
Comprend : Indice premier des matieres contenues en ce present livre [- Autre indice contenant les passages de la Bible, selon l'ordre des livres du vieil et nouveau testament]
Resumo:
Background: The appropriateness of use of therapy for severe active luminal Crohn's disease (CD) cases has never been formally assessed. The European panel on the appropriateness of Crohn's disease therapy [EPACT (http://www.epact.ch)] developed appropriateness criteria. We have applied these criteria to the EC-IBD prospectively assembled, uniformly diagnosed European population-based inception cohort of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients diagnosed between 1991 and 1993. Methods: 426 CD patients from 13 European participating centers (10 countries) were included at the time of diagnosis (first flare, naive patients, no maintenance treatment, no steroids). We used the EPACT definition of the severe active luminal CD, agreed upon by the panel experts (acute flare, hospitalized patient, without documented fistula or stenosis and who did not undergo surgery for abscess drainage or a fistulectomy). The various treatments were analyzed to determine the appropriateness of the medical decision, according to the EPACT criteria. Results: 84 (20%) patients met the inclusion criteria. Considering at least one appropriate (A) treatment as appropriate: 60 patients (71%) received an appropriate treatment, 24 patients (29%) an inappropriate treatment (I). Furthermore, in 87% of the cases with one appropriate treatment an additional mostly inappropriate treatment was added or continued. Detailed results are indicated in the table below. Conclusion: In the EC-IBD cohort, the treatment for severe active luminal CD was appropriate for more than 70% of the patients, but frequently an inappropriate treatment was continued or added, thus increasing the risk of adverse reactions, drugs interactions and costs.
Resumo:
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease remains an important cause of morbidity after kidney transplantation and has been associated with acute rejection, graft loss and other indirect effects. A 3-month course of VGC prophylaxis reduces the incidence of CMV disease. However, little is known about the indirect effects of lateonset CMV disease after VGC prophylaxis. Objective: To evaluate the impact and indirect consequences of late-onset CMV disease after VGC prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 61 consecutive adult kidney transplant recipient with positive CMV serology (donor or recipient) who received VGC prophylaxis for 3 months and completed a follow-up of at least 2 years post-transplantation. Patients who developed CMV disease within 1 year after transplantation were compared to CMV disease-free patients for renal function (plasma creatinine values) at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months and for the incidence of graft loss, acute rejection, diabetes, cancer and opportunistic infections. Results: 8/61 (13%) patients developed CMV disease at a median of 131 days after transplantation (range: 98-220). The CMV incidence in D+/R- high risk patients was 6/18 (33%), while it was 2/43 (5%) in intermediate-risk patients (p < 0.01). All 8 patients were treated by oral valganciclovir (median 39 days; range: 19-119) with a complete resolution of CMV disease. As shown in the figure, there was no difference in creatinine values between the two groups at any time during follow-up. There was no graft loss, and the incidence of acute rejection, cancer and opportunistic infections did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of post-transplant diabetes was higher (38% vs 15%) in patients with CMV disease, but this difference was not significant (p = 0.4). Conclusions: An incidence of 13% of late-onset CMV disease was observed despite 3 months VGC prophylaxis. However, no indirect consequences were found. Moreover, therapy of CMV disease by oral VGC was effective and safe. Larger trials are needed to study whether late-onset CMV disease is associated with indirect consequences, as described with early-onset CMV.
Resumo:
Introduction: The development of novel therapies and the increasing number of trials testing management strategies for luminal Crohn's disease (CD) have not filled all the gaps in our knowledge. Thus, in clinical practice, many decisions for CD patients need to be taken without high quality evidence. For this reason, a multidisciplinary European expert panel followed the RAND method to develop explicit criteria for the management of individual patients with active, steroid-dependent (ST-D) and steroid-refractory (ST-R) CD. Methods: Twelve international experts convened in Geneva, Switzerland in December 2007, to rate explicit clinical scenarios, corresponding to real daily practice, on a 9-point scale according to the literature evidence and their own expertise. Median ratings were stratified into three categories: appropriate (7-9), uncertain (4-6) and inappropriate (1-3). Results: Overall, panelists rated 296 indications pertaining to mild-to-moderate, severe, ST-D, and ST-R CD. In anti-TNF naïve patients, budesonide and prednisone were found appropriate for mildmoderate CD, and infliximab (IFX) when those had previously failed or had not been tolerated. In patients with prior success with IFX, this drug with or without co-administration of a thiopurine analog was favored. Other anti-TNFs were appropriate in case of intolerance or resistance to IFX. High doses steroids, IFX or adalimumab were appropriate in severe active CD. Among 105 indications for ST-D or ST-R disease, the panel considered appropriate the thiopurine analogs, methotrexate, IFX, adalimumab and surgery for limited resection, depending on the outcome of prior therapies. Anti-TNFs were generally considered appropriate in ST-R. Conclusion: Steroids, including budesonide for mild-to-moderate CD, remain first-line therapies in active luminal CD. Anti-TNFs, in particular IFX with respect to the amount of available evidence, remain second-line for most indications. Thiopurine analogs are preferred to anti-TNFs when steroids are not appropriate, except when anti-TNFs were previously successful. These recommendations are available online (www.epact.ch). A prospective evaluation of these criteria in a large database in Switzerland in underway to validate these criteria.