Évaluation des effets de l'utilisation des aides à la mobilité motorisées chez les personnes âgées de plus de 50 ans

Le vieillissement démographique augmente rapidement la représentation des personnes âgées de plus de 50 ans parmi les utilisateurs d’aides à la mobilité motorisées (AMMs), telles que le fauteuil roulant motorisé et le quadriporteur. Le but général de la thèse est de rendre compte d’une démarche d’analyse des effets des AMMs au cours des premiers 18 mois d’utilisation chez les adultes d’âge moyen et les aînés. Notre question de recherche concerne la nature et l'importance des effets sur le fonctionnement, la pertinence sociale et le bien-être subjectif, ainsi que les liens entre les divers facteurs impliqués dans leur impact optimal. La thèse s’articule en trois volets, synthétique, méthodologique et analytique, dont les principaux résultats sont présentés dans quatre articles scientifiques. Le volet synthétique comprend une recension systématique qui révèle la représentation marginale des personnes âgées de plus de 50 ans dans les publications scientifiques sur les effets des AMMs et le faible niveau de preuve dans ce champ d’études. Les travaux liés à ce volet proposent également un cadre d’analyse reliant l’intention d’utiliser l’AMM, les habitudes de déplacements, les dimensions d’effets des AMMs sur le fonctionnement, la pertinence sociale et le bien-être subjectif, ainsi que quatre catégories de cofacteurs associés à l’utilisation (personne, aide technique, intervention, environnement). Le volet méthodologique assemble un dispositif de mesure comprenant 5 questionnaires et 18 indicateurs arrimés au cadre d’analyse et démontre l’applicabilité de l’ensemble des questionnaires pour une administration téléphonique. La validation transculturelle de deux questionnaires implique deux études réalisées auprès d’utilisateurs d’AMMs âgés de 50 à 84 ans (n=45). Ces travaux confirment la fidélité test-retest et l’équivalence des questionnaires traduits avec la version d’origine. Finalement, le volet analytique se concentre sur l’étude des habitudes de déplacements chez 3 cohortes (n=116) de personnes âgées de 50 à 89 ans, recrutées en fonction du stade d’utilisation de l’AMM. Les résultats suggèrent une amélioration de l’aire de mobilité après l’utilisation initiale ou long terme de l’AMM en comparaison avec une cohorte en attente de l’AMM, ainsi qu’une augmentation significative de la fréquence des déplacements autour du domicile et dans le voisinage. Trois facteurs associés à une aire de mobilité optimale, à savoir le genre, la nature des objectifs de participation de l’utilisateur et le type d’appareil utilisé, sont identifiés par des analyses de régression linéaires contrôlant pour l’âge. La thèse soutient l’importance de tenir compte de l’environnement et d’une combinaison de facteurs reliés à la personne et à l’aide technique pour saisir les effets des AMMs au cours des premiers mois d’utilisation. Ces résultats ouvrent la voie au suivi systématique des utilisateurs d’AMMs par les professionels de réadaptation, puisqu’ils confirment l’utilité du dispositif pour en mesurer les effets et ciblent les déterminants de la mobilité des utilisateurs d’AMMs âgés de plus de 50 ans.

Influence du financement sur la performance des systèmes de soins

La thèse a pour objectif d’étudier l’influence du financement des soins de santé sur la performance des systèmes de soins compte tenu des caractéristiques organisationnelles sanitaires des systèmes. Elle s’articule autour des trois objectifs suivants : 1) caractériser le financement des soins de santé à travers les différents modèles émergeant des pays à revenu élevé ; 2) apprécier la performance des systèmes de soins en établissant les divers profils apparaissant dans ces mêmes pays ; 3) examiner le lien entre le financement et la performance en tenant compte du pouvoir modérateur du contexte organisationnel des soins. Inspirée du processus de circulation de l’argent dans le système de soins, l’approche a d’abord consisté à classer les pays étudiés – par une analyse configurationnelle opérationnalisée par les analyses de correspondance multiples (ACM) et de classification hiérarchique ascendante (CHA) – dans des modèles types, chacun représentant une configuration particulière de processus de financement des soins de santé (article 1). Appliquée aux données recueillies auprès des 27 pays de l’OCDE à revenu élevé via les rapports Health Care in Transition des systèmes de santé des pays produits par le bureau Européen de l’OMS, la banque de données Eco-Santé OCDE 2007 et les statistiques de l’OMS 2008, les analyses ont révélé cinq modèles de financement. Ils se distinguent selon les fonctions de collecte de l’argent dans le système (prélèvement), de mise en commun de l’argent collecté (stockage), de la répartition de l’argent collecté et stocké (allocation) et du processus de paiement des professionnels et des établissements de santé (paiement). Les modèles ainsi développés, qui vont au-delà du processus unique de collecte de l’argent, donnent un portrait plus complet du processus de financement des soins de santé. Ils permettent ainsi une compréhension de la cohérence interne existant entre les fonctions du financement lors d’un éventuel changement de mode de financement dans un pays. Dans un deuxième temps, nous appuyant sur une conception multidimensionnelle de la performance des systèmes, nous avons classé les pays : premièrement, selon leur niveau en termes de ressources mobilisées, de services produits et de résultats de santé atteints (définissant la performance absolue) ; deuxièmement, selon les efforts qu’ils fournissent pour atteindre un niveau élevé de résultats de santé proportionnellement aux ressources mobilisées et aux services produits en termes d’efficience, d’efficacité et de productivité (définissant ainsi la performance relative) ; et troisièmement, selon les profils types de performance globale émergeant en tenant compte simultanément des niveaux de performance absolue et relative (article 2). Les analyses effectuées sur les données collectées auprès des mêmes 27 pays précédents ont dégagé quatre profils de performance qui se différencient selon leur niveau de performance multidimensionnelle et globale. Les résultats ainsi obtenus permettent d’effectuer une comparaison entre les niveaux globaux de performance des systèmes de soins. Pour terminer, afin de répondre à la question de savoir quel mode – ou quels modes – de financement générerait de meilleurs résultats de performance, et ce, dans quel contexte organisationnel de soins, une analyse plus fine des relations entre le financement et la performance (tous définis comme précédemment) compte tenu des caractéristiques organisationnelles sanitaires a été réalisée (article 3). Les résultats montrent qu’il n’existe presque aucune relation directe entre le financement et la performance. Toutefois, lorsque le financement interagit avec le contexte organisationnel sanitaire pour appréhender le niveau de performance des systèmes, des relations pertinentes et révélatrices apparaissent. Ainsi, certains modes de financement semblent plus attrayants que d’autres en termes de performance dans des contextes organisationnels sanitaires différents. Les résultats permettent ainsi à tous les acteurs du système de comprendre qu’il n’existe qu’une influence indirecte du financement de la santé sur la performance des systèmes de soins due à l’interaction du financement avec le contexte organisationnel sanitaire. L’une des originalités de cette thèse tient au fait que très peu de travaux ont tenté d’opérationnaliser de façon multidimensionnelle les concepts de financement et de performance avant d’analyser les associations susceptibles d’exister entre eux. En outre, alors que la pertinence de la prise en compte des caractéristiques du contexte organisationnel dans la mise en place des réformes des systèmes de soins est au coeur des préoccupations, ce travail est l’un des premiers à analyser l’influence de l’interaction entre le financement et le contexte organisationnel sanitaire sur la performance des systèmes de soins.

Evaluación del programa uso seguro de medicamentos en un hospital especializado en pediatría y ortopedia infantil – Bogotá d.c., 2012 -2013

El uso de seguro de medicamentos, dentro del proceso de atención en salud, ha tomado importancia a nivel nacional e internacional al evidenciarse el aumento de incidentes y eventos relacionados con los medicamentos, que involucran desde el procesos de adquisición, pasando por la prescripción médica, la dispensación, la administración de medicamentos, hasta llegar a la utilización en los pacientes y cuidadores. El uso adecuado de medicamentos es una de las metas de seguridad del paciente de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, en las cuales trabaja todos los días el Instituto de Ortopedia Infantil Roosevelt, y en el caso específico de medicamentos lo hace a través de su Programa de Farmacovigilancia haciendo seguimiento y clasificación de los casos reportados, donde para los años 2012 al 2013 se observan avances considerables y la consolidación de estrategias que mejoran el uso del medicamento, que se da con una inducción adecuada a cada uno de los funcionarios que intervienen en este proceso y a la educación permanente de colaboradores, pacientes y sus cuidadores. El propósito de este estudio fue analizar los datos encontrados en las bases de del programa de Farmacovigilancia en el Instituto de Ortopedia Infantil Roosevelt en los años 2012-2013, estableciendo variables, comparando los resultados, determinando el estado actual y de ser posible establecer lineamientos de mejora al mismo

O cuidado humanístico como foco institucional: um estudo sobre empatia dos profissionais de saúde na área obstétrica

Empathy is a basic facilitating element of the therapeutic helping relationship and the humanization process in health care. The objectives of this study were to identify the empathy level of health professionals working in the obstetrical sector of a university hospital recognized for its humanistic care and the perceptions of the women under their care regarding the empathic behavior shown by these professionals during hospitalization. We conducted a quanti/qualitative study with 47 health professionals that worked in the obstetrical sector (13 obstetricians, 12 nurses, 22 nurse technicians) and an intentional sample of 101 women that received cared from these professionals during the study period. We collected data by means of the Jefferson Empathy Scale for Health Professioals (JEPS-HR) and the Patient´s Perception of Health Professional Empathy (PPHPE), and two additional open questions designed to obtain the subjective opinion about the empathic behavior during the care. We utilized thematic analysis for the data obtained through the open questions and descriptive and inferential statistics for the quantitative data. We identified five thematic categories that represent the aspects valued by the professionals in their relationship with the women under their care: emotional involvement, communication, warm environment, integral vision and technical/scientific knowledge. The mean score on the JEPS-HR reported for the health professionals was 120,40, being that the maximum possible was 140.The Cronbach Alpha for the JEPS-HR was 0,83, indicating an acceptable level of reliability for this population. We consider therefore, that these professionals presented an acceptable empathy level when compared to other populations observed with the JEPS-HR. The results also indicated that women had statistically significant (p ≤ 0,05) higher scores than men and that professionals with higher working hours tended to have lower scores in the empathy scale (r = -0,288; p ≤ 0,05). The analysis of the subjective responses of the women indicated that they were satisfied with the humanistic care provided by the professionals but they also point out the existence of some power relationships. There were no significant differences in the empathy level of the medical or nursing team perceived by the women who registered means of 41,90 and 41,20 respectively on the PPHPE. In view of these results and considering the relevance of the element of empathy for care based on humanistic values, we reiterate the importance of further in-service training for the health team of the hospital in focus, on the topics of empathy and global aspects of humanized care for the implementation of its mission

Apresentação e desfecho da febre reumática em uma série de casos

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Different prescribed doses of high-volume peritoneal dialysis and outcome of patients with acute kidney injury.

The optimal dialysis dose for the treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) is controversial. No studies have directly examined the effects of peritoneal dialysis (PD) dose on outcomes in AKI. From January 2005 to January 2007, we randomly assigned critically ill patients with AKI to receive higher- or lower-intensity PD therapy (prescribed Kt/Vof 0.8 and 0.5 per session respectively). The main outcome measure was death within 30 days. Of the 61 enrolled patients, 30 were randomly assigned to higher-intensity therapy, and 31, to a lower-intensity PD dose. The two study groups had similar baseline characteristics and received treatment for 6.1 days and 5.7 days respectively (p = 0.42). At 30 days after randomization, 17 deaths had occurred in the higher-intensity group (55%), and 16 deaths, in the lower-intensity group (53%, p = 0.83). There was a significant difference between the groups in the PD dose prescribed compared with the dose delivered (higher-intensity group: 0.8 vs. 0.59, p = 0.04; lower-intensity group: 0.5 vs. 0.49, p = 0.89). The groups had similar metabolic control after 4 PD sessions (blood urea nitrogen: 69.3 +/- 14.4 mg/dL and 60.3 +/- 11.1 mg/dL respectively, p = 0. 71). In critically ill patients with AKI, an intensive PD dose did not lower the mortality or improve the recovery of kidney function or metabolic control. The PD dose is limited by dialysate flow and membrane permeability, and clearance per exchange can decrease if a shorter dwell time is applied.

O significado para o enfermeiro do processo de trabalho na UTIS de um hospital universitário do estado de São Paulo

Pós-graduação em Enfermagem (mestrado profissional) - FMB

Gerenciamento dos resíduos de serviços de saúde da Unidade de Terapia Intensiva do Pronto Socorro do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu – UNESP

Health care waste (HCW) is the type of waste that results from activities performed in health care services during care provision to humans or animals. Presently, according to RDC 306/04, issued in 2004 by Anvisa, and Resolution no. 358/05, by CONAMA, waste groups have the following classification: Group A (biological waste), Group B (chemical waste), Group C (waste containing radionucleotides), Group D (common waste) and Group E (piercing and cutting waste). In Brazil, 149 tons of wastes are collected every day, and HCW corresponds to approximately 1% to 3 % of that total. An efficient way to adequately manage HCW is through the Health Care Waste Management Plan (HCWMP), and it is possible to reduce the risk posed by certain materials in addition to ensuring disposal in an ecologically correct and economical fashion. According to the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO), the management process enables health care establishments to adequately manage waste. Hence, there is greater control and reduction in the health risks caused by infectious or special waste, in addition to facilitated recycling, treatment, storage, transport and final disposal of solid hospital waste in an environmentally safe fashion. To evaluate the management of HCW of Groups A and D from the Intensive Care Unit of the University Emergency Hospital - FMB - UNESP in the city of Botucatu according to the guidelines presently in force. The waste flow was followed up, and during four random days in the month of September 2011, waste was quantified by estimating daily and monthly values, according to its classification. : In 2011, the University hospital has produced an average of 57,676.8 kg/month of biological and common waste. By adding Groups A and D, during the four days, approximately 209.8 Kg of waste (202.2 Kg of Group A and 7.6 Kg of Group D) were produced in the establishment under study, which... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)

Resultados maternos e neonatais em centro de parto normal peri-hospitalar e hospital

OBJETIVO: Comparar os resultados maternos e neonatais em mulheres de baixo risco atendidas em centro de parto normal peri-hospitalar e hospital. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal com amostra representativa de mulheres de baixo risco atendidas em São Paulo, SP, de 2003 a 2006. Foram incluídas 991 mulheres que tiveram o parto no centro de parto normal e 325 que deram à luz no hospital. Os dados foram obtidos dos prontuários. A análise comparativa foi realizada para o total de mulheres e estratifi cada segundo a paridade. Foram aplicados os testes qui-quadrado e exato de Fisher. RESULTADOS: Houve distribuição homogênea das mulheres segundo a paridade (45,4% nulíparas e 54,6% mulheres com um ou mais partos anteriores). Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente signifi cantes em relação às seguintes intervenções: amniotomia (mais freqüente entre nulíparas do hospital); utilização de ocitocina no trabalho de parto e utilização de analgésico no pós-parto (mais freqüentes no hospital entre as mulheres de todas as paridades). A taxa de episiotomia foi maior entre as nulíparas, tanto no centro de parto como no hospital. Houve maior freqüência de intervenções com o neonato no hospital: aspiração das vias aéreas superiores, aspiração gástrica, lavagem gástrica, oxigênio por máscara aberta. Também ocorreram com mais freqüência no hospital bossa serossanguínea, desconforto respiratório e internação na unidade neonatal. Não houve diferença nos valores de Apgar no quinto minuto nem casos de morte materna ou perinatal. CONCLUSÕES: A assistência no centro de parto normal foi realizada com menos intervenções e com resultados maternos e neonatais semelhantes aos do hospital.

Educational levels and the functional dependence of ischemic stroke survivors

We evaluated the functional dependence of stroke survivors from the Study of Stroke Mortality and Morbidity, using the Rankin Scale. Out of 355 ischemic stroke survivors (with a mean age of 67.9 years), 40% had some functional dependence at 28 days and 34.4% had some functional dependence at 6 months. Most predictors of physical dependence were identified at 28 days. These predictors were: low levels of education [illiterate vs. >= 8 years of education, multivariate odds ratio (OR) = 3.7; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.60-8.54] and anatomical stroke location (total anterior circulation infarct, OR = 16.9; 95%CI: 2.93-97.49). Low levels of education and ischemic brain injury influenced functional dependence in these stroke survivors. Our findings reinforce the necessity of developing strategies for the rehabilitation of stroke patients, more especially in formulating specific strategies for care and treatment of stroke survivors with low socioeconomic status.

Anatrophic Nephrotomy as Nephron-Sparing Approach for Complete Removal of Intraparenchymal Renal Tumors

Objective: Partial nephrectomy for small kidney tumors has increased in the last decades, and the approach to non-palpable endophytic tumors became a challenge, with larger chances of positive margins or complications. The aim of this study is to describe an alternative nephron-sparing approach for small endophytic kidney tumors through anatrophic nephrotomy. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy at our institution was performed and the subjects with endophytic tumors treated with anatrophic nephrotomy were identified. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes and oncological results were evaluated. Results: Among the partial nephrectomies performed for intraparenchymal tumors between 06/2006 and 06/2010, ten patients were submitted to anatrophic nephrotomy. The mean patient age was 42 yrs, and the mean tumor size was 2.3 cm. Mean warm ischemia time was 22.4 min and the histopathological analysis showed 80% of clear cell carcinomas. At a mean follow-up of 36 months, no significant creatinine changes or local or systemic recurrences were observed. Conclusion: The operative technique described is a safe and effective nephron-sparing option for complete removal of endophytic renal tumors.

Outcomes of truncal vascular injuries in children.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric truncal vascular injuries occur infrequently and have a reported mortality rate of 30% to 50%. This report examines the demographics, mechanisms of injury, associated trauma, and outcome of patients presenting for the past 10 years at a single institution with truncal vascular injuries. METHODS: A retrospective review (1997-2006) of a pediatric trauma registry at a single institution was undertaken. RESULTS: Seventy-five truncal vascular injuries occurred in 57 patients (age, 12 +/- 3 years); the injury mechanisms were penetrating in 37%. Concomitant injuries occurred with 76%, 62%, and 43% of abdominal, thoracic, and neck vascular injuries, respectively. Nonvascular complications occurred more frequently in patients with abdominal vascular injuries who were hemodynamically unstable on presentation. All patients with thoracic vascular injuries presenting with hemodynamic instability died. In patients with neck vascular injuries, 1 of 2 patients who were hemodynamically unstable died, compared to 1 of 12 patients who died in those who presented hemodynamically stable. Overall survival was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Survival and complications of pediatric truncal vascular injury are related to hemodynamic status at the time of presentation. Associated injuries are higher with trauma involving the abdomen.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine maternal and neonatal outcomes by labor onset type and gestational age. STUDY DESIGN: We used electronic medical records data from 10 US institutions in the Consortium on Safe Labor on 115,528 deliveries from 2002 through 2008. Deliveries were divided by labor onset type (spontaneous, elective induction, indicated induction, unlabored cesarean). Neonatal and maternal outcomes were calculated by labor onset type and gestational age. RESULTS: Neonatal intensive care unit admissions and sepsis improved with each week of gestational age until 39 weeks (P < .001). After adjusting for complications, elective induction of labor was associated with a lower risk of ventilator use (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.53), sepsis (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.26-0.49), and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.57) compared to spontaneous labor. The relative risk of hysterectomy at term was 3.21 (95% CI, 1.08-9.54) with elective induction, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.24-5.58) with indicated induction, and 6.57 (95% CI, 1.78-24.30) with cesarean without labor compared to spontaneous labor. CONCLUSION: Some neonatal outcomes improved until 39 weeks. Babies born with elective induction are associated with better neonatal outcomes compared to spontaneous labor. Elective induction may be associated with an increased hysterectomy risk.

Avaliação da capacidade funcional de pacientes vítimas de trauma um ano após alta hospitalar

Objetivos: Avaliar a capacidade funcional de pacientes vítimas de trauma um ano após alta hospitalar e verificar associação da capacidade funcional com fatores relacionados ao trauma e à internação hospitalar. Metodologia: Estudo de coorte prospectivo, com pacientes vítimas de trauma grave (Injury Severity Score - ISS >=16), internados entre Junho e Setembro de 2010 em unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) cirúrgica especializada em paciente politraumatizado de um hospital público de grande porte na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil. Variáveis de interesse como idade, sexo, escore de Glasgow, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II), mecanismos de trauma, número de lesões, região corpórea afetada, número de cirurgias, duração da ventilação mecânica (VM) e tempo de internação hospitalar foram coletadas dos prontuários médicos. A capacidade funcional foi avaliada um ano após alta hospitalar utilizando as escalas Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) e Escala de Atividades Instrumentais de Vida Diária de Lawton (AIVDL). Os pacientes também foram questionados se haviam retornado ao trabalho ou estudo. Resultados: O seguimento um ano após trauma foi completo em 49 indivíduos, a maioria composta por jovens (36±11 anos), do sexo masculino (81,6%) e vítimas de acidentes de trânsito (71,5%). Cada indivíduo sofreu aproximadamente 4 lesões corporais, acarretando uma média no ISS de 31 ± 14,4. O traumatismo cranioencefálico foi o tipo de lesão mais comum (65,3%). De acordo com a GOS, a maioria dos pacientes apresentou disfunção moderada (43%) ou disfunção leve ou ausente (37%) um ano após o trauma. A escala AIVDL apresentou pontuação média de 12±4 com aproximadamente 60- 70% dos indivíduos capazes de realizar de forma independente a maioria das atividades avaliadas. Escore de Glasgow, APACHE II, duração da VM e tempo de internação hospitalar foram associadas com a capacidade funcional um ano após lesão. A regressão linear múltipla considerando todas as variáveis significativas revelou associação entre a pontuação da escala AIVDL e o tempo de internação hospitalar. Apenas 32,6% dos indivíduos retornaram ao trabalho ou estudo. Conclusões: A maioria dos pacientes vítimas de trauma grave foi capaz de realizar as atividades avaliadas com independência; apenas um terço deles retornou ao trabalho e/ou estudo um ano após alta hospitalar. O tempo de internação hospitalar foi revelado como preditor significativo para a recuperação da capacidade funcional um ano após lesão grave

Responsividade da escala de avaliação funcional do sentar e levantar do solo para distrofia muscular de Duchenne (FES-DMD - D4), no período de um ano

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a responsividade da escala de avaliação funcional para pacientes com distrofia muscular de Duchenne (FES-DMD-D4), sentar e levantar do solo, no período de um ano. MÉTODO: Estudo observacional, longitudinal e retrospectivo. Foi estudada, utilizando o software FES-DMDDATA, uma amostra com 25 pacientes na atividade sentar no solo e 28 pacientes para a atividade levantar do solo. As avaliações ocorreram a cada três meses no período de um ano. Para análise estatística da capacidade de resposta foram utilizados índices de tamanho de efeito, como, effect size (ES) e Standardized Response Mean (SRM). RESULTADOS: A responsividade da atividade de sentar no solo foi considerada baixa a moderada em intervalos de três meses (ES de 0.28 a 0.54 e SRM de 0.38 a 0.71), moderada a alta em intervalos de seis meses (ES de 0.69 a 1.07 e SRM de 0.86 a 1.19), alta em intervalos de nove meses (ES de 1.3 a 1.17 e SRM de 1.26 a 1.55) e doze meses (ES de 1.9 e SRM de 1.72). Na atividade levantar do solo, a responsividade variou em baixa, moderada e alta em intervalos de três meses (ES de 0.21 a 0.33 e SRM de 0.45 a 0.83), baixa a alta em intervalos de seis meses (ES de 0.46 a 0.59 e SRM de 0.73 a 0.97), moderada a alta em intervalos de nove meses (ES de 0.76 a 0.88 e SRM de 1.03 a 1.22) e alta em doze meses (ES de 1.14 e SRM de 1.25). CONCLUSÃO: Para detectar alterações clinicamente significativas e consistentes nas atividades funcionais sentar e levantar do solo recomendamos a utilização da FES-DMD-D4 em intervalos a partir de seis meses, pois foi neste período de tempo que a capacidade de resposta variou de moderada a alta