Letters of a Jewish father to his son

by Ben-Eliezer [d.i. David Mierowsky]

Musical service for the New Year : according to the union prayer book for jewish worship

by Edward J. Stark

Musical service for the Eve of Atonement : according to the union prayer book for jewish worship

by Edward J. Stark

Musical service for the Day of Atonement : according to the union prayer book for jewish worship

by Edward J. Stark

The menorah : from Theodore Herzl ; for solo, tenor or soprano, violin and piano ; with 4 texts: Hebrew, Jewish, English and German

composed by A. Haitmann

The Ghetto song : Rachel oh Rachel ; for solo, tenor or soprano, violin and piano ; with 4 texts: Hebrew, Jewish, English and German

composed by A. Haitmann. [Words] from Hugo Zuckermann

Music to hymns and anthems for jewish worship by G. Gottheil

composed and selected by A. J. Davis

Anglo-Jewish coats of arms

by Lucien Wolf

Anglo-Jewish memories and other sermons

by Hermann Adler

From the heart of Israel : Jewish tales and types

by Bernard Drachman. Illustr. by A. Warshawsky

The Jewish marseillaise

words by Felix Schreiber [[Elektronische Ressource]]

Religion as Social Reality. A Take on the Emic–Etic Debate in Light of John Searle’s Philosophy of Society

In this article I argue that the shift from a private to a public–social understanding of religion raises new ontological and epistemological questions for the scientific study of religion\s. These questions are deeply related to three central features of the emic– etic debate, namely the problems of intentionality, objectivity, and comparison. Focusing on these interrelated issues, I discuss the potential of John Searle’s philoso- phy of society for the scientific study of religion\s. Considering the role of intentional- ity at the social level, I present Searle’s concept of “social ontology” and discuss its epistemological implications. To clarify Searle’s position regarding the objectivity of the social sciences, I propose a heuristic model contrasting different stances within the scientific study of religion\s. Finally, I explore some problematic aspects of Searle’s views for a comparative study of religion\s, and sketch a solution within his frame- work. I shall argue that a distinction between the epistemological and ontological dimensions of religious affairs would help clarify the issues at stake in the past and future of the emic–etic debate.

Dramas of Recognition: Philosophy as Literary History

Offers a critique of the concept of recognition (Honneth, Fraser), arguing that, from a literary-historical perspective, it connstitutes a step back behing modernism toward the agenda of Realism.