The economic impact of alternative cyanide standards in Illinois /

"Project no. 20.065."

The Impact of sulphur dioxide regulations on the market for Illinois coal /

"Project no. 80.187."

Environment: Illinois.

Mode of access: Internet.

Efficient investments in wastewater treatment plants.

Item 1005-C

Future recreation environments.

Originally published as "Future leisure environments," Research paper NE-301, 1974.

Alternative goals : 1985 Resources Planning Act Program.

"December 1981."

Proceedings of a panel discussion on the Energy impacts of proposed transportation plans and projects /

Mode of access: Internet.

Research outlook /

Description based on: [5th] (1980); title from cover

United Nations : U.S. participation in the Environment Program ; report to congressional requesters /

"GAO/NSIAD-89-142."

Conservation and the gospel of efficiency; the progressive conservation movement, 1890-1920.

"Bibliographical note": p. [277]-282. Bibliographical footnotes.

Evaluaciones del desempeño ambiental: Chile 2016

En esta evaluación, preparada por la OCDE en cooperación con la Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). se examinan los avances logrados por Chile en la consecución de los objetivos de su política ambiental, en particular a partir de 2005, cuando se dio a conocer la primera evaluación del desempeño ambiental. En el documento se realizan 54 recomendaciones con el objeto de ayudar al país a lograr una economía más verde, y a mejorar la gestión y la gobernanza ambientales, con especial hincapié en las políticas relativas al cambio climático y la diversidad biológica.

Balancing Cooperation and Competition: A New in Era in U.S.-China Relations

Created as part of the 2016 Jackson School for International Studies SIS 495: Task Force.

Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas

Since the mid-1990s, numerous methodologies have been developed to assess the management effectiveness of protected areas, many tailored to particular regions or habitats. Recognizing the need for a generic approach, the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) developed an evaluation framework allowing specific evaluation methodologies to be designed within a consistent overall approach. Twenty-seven assessment methodologies were analyzed in relation to this framework. Two types of data were identified: quantitative data derived from monitoring and qualitative data derived from scoring by managers and stakeholders. The distinction between methodologies based on data types reflects different approaches to assessing management. Few methodologies assess all the WCPA framework elements. More useful information for adaptive management will come from addressing all six elements. The framework can be used to adapt existing methodologies or to design new, more comprehensive methodologies for evaluation, using quantitative monitoring data, qualitative scoring data, or a combination of both.

Management effectiveness: Assessing management of protected areas?

To maximise the potential of protected areas, we need to understand the strengths and weaknesses in their management and the threats and stresses that they face. There is increasing pressure on governments and other bodies responsible for protected areas to monitor their effectiveness. The reasons for assessing management effectiveness include the desire by managers to adapt and improve their management strategies, improve planning and priority setting and the increasing demands for reporting and accountability being placed on managers, both nationally and internationally. Despite these differing purposes for assessment, some common themes and information needs can be identified, allowing assessment systems to meet multiple uses. Protected-area management evaluation has a relatively short history. Over the past 20 years a number of systems have been proposed but few have been adopted by management agencies. In response to a recognition of the need for a globally applicable approach to this issue, the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas developed a framework for assessing management effectiveness of both protected areas and protected area systems. This framework was launched at the World Conservation Congress in Jordan in 2000. The framework provides guidance to managers to develop locally relevant assessment systems while helping to harmonise assessment approaches around the world. The framework is strongly linked to the protected area management process and is adaptable to different types and circumstances of protected areas around the world. Examples from Fraser Island in Australia and the Congo Basin illustrate the use of the framework.

The role of uncertainty in the relationship between fairness evaluations and willingness to pay

Participants in contingent valuation studies may be uncertain about a number of aspects of the policy and survey context. The uncertainty management model of fairness judgments states that individuals will evaluate a policy in terms of its fairness when they do not know whether they can trust the relevant managing authority or experience uncertainty due to insufficient knowledge of the general issues surrounding the environmental policy. Similarly, some researchers have suggested that, not knowing how to answer WTP questions, participants convey their general attitudes toward the public good rather than report well-defined economic preferences. These contentions were investigated in a sample of 840 residents in four urban catchments across Australia who were interviewed about their WTP for stormwater pollution abatement. Four sources of uncertainty were measured: amount of prior issue-related thought, trustworthiness of the water authority, insufficient scenario information, and WTP response uncertainty. A logistic regression model was estimated in each subsample to test the main effects of the uncertainty sources on WTP as well as their interaction with fairness and proenvironmental attitudes. Results indicated support for the uncertainty management model in only one of the four samples. Similarly, proenvironmental attitudes interacted rarely with uncertainty to a significant level, and in ways that were more complex than hypothesised. It was concluded that uncertain individuals were generally not more likely than other participants to draw on either fairness evaluations or proenvironmental attitudes when making decisions about paying for stormwater pollution abatement.