STUDIES INTO THE MOLECULAR MECHANISMS REGULATING MUSCULAR ATROPHY RESULTING FROM HINDLIMB IMMOBILIZATION IN THE RAT (PROTEIN, SYNTHESIS, RNA)

The purpose of the work performed in this dissertation was to examine some of the possible regulatory mechanisms involved in the initiation of muscular atrophy during periods of decreased muscle utilization resulting from hindlimb immobilization in the rat. A 37% decrease in the rate of total muscle protein synthesis which has been observed to occur in the first 6 h of immobilization contributes significantly to the observed loss of protein during immobilization.^ The rates of cytochrome c and actin synthesis were determined in adult rat red vastus lateralis and gastrocnemius muscles, respectively, by the constant infusion and incorporation of ('3)H-tyrosine into protein. The fractional synthesis rates of both actin and cytochrome c were significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in the 6th h of hindlimb immobilization.^ RHA was extracted from adult rat gastrocnemius muscle by modification of the phenol: chloroform: SDS extraction procedures commonly used for preparation of RNA for hybridization analysis from other mammalian tissues. RNA content of rat gastrocnemius muscle, as determined by this method of extraction and its subsequent quantification by UV absorbance and orcinol assay, was significantly greater than the RNA content previously determined for adult rat gastrocnemius by other commonly employed methods.^ RNA extracted by this method from gastrocnemius muscles of control and 6h immobilized rats was subjected to "dot blot" hybridization to ('32)P-labelled probe from plasmid p749, containing a cDNA sequence complementary to (alpha)-actin mRNA and from rat skeletal muscle. (alpha)-Actin specific mRNA content as estimated by this procedure is not significantly decreased in rat gastrocnemius following 6h or hindlimb immobilization. However, (alpha)-actin specific mRNA content is significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in adult rat gastrocnemius (alpha)-actin specific mRNA is not decreased in adult rat gastrocnemius muscle following 6h of immobilization, a time when actin synthesis is significantly decreased, it is concluded that a change in (alpha)-actin specific mRNA content is not the initiating event responsible for the early decrease in actin synthesis observed in the 6th h of immobilization. ^

Functional requirements of histone deacetylases in Tup1-Ssn6 repression

The corepressor complex Tup1-Ssn6 regulates many classes of genes in yeast including cell type specific, glucose repressible, and DNA damage inducible. Tup1 and Ssn6 are recruited to target promoters through their interactions with specific DNA binding proteins such as α2, Mig1, and Crt1. Most promoters that are repressed by this corepressor complex exhibit a high degree of nucleosomal organization. This chromatin domain occludes transcription factor access to the promoter element resulting in gene repression. Previous work indicated that Tup1 interacts with underacetylated isoforms of H3 and H4, and that mutation of these histones synergistically compromises repression. These studies predict that Tup1-hypoacetyalted histone interaction is important to the repression mechanism, and in vivo hyperacetylation might compromise the corepressors ability to repress target genes. ^ One way to alter histone acetylation levels in vivo is to alter the balance between histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases. To date five histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been identified in yeast Rpd3, Hos1, Hos2, Hos3 and Hda1. Deletion of single or double HDAC genes had little to no effect on Tup1-Ssn6 repression, but simultaneous deletion of three specific activities Rpd3, Hos1, and Hos2 abolished repression in vivo. Promoter regions of Tup1-Ssn6 target genes in these triple deacetylase mutant cells are dramatically hyperacetylated in both H3 and H4. Examination of bulk histone acetylation levels showed that this specific HDAC triple mutant combination (rpd3 hos1 hos2) caused a dramatic and concomitant hyperacetylation of both H3 and H4. The loss of repression in the rpd3 hos1 hos2 cells, but not in other mutants, is consistent with previous observations, which indicate that histones provide redundant functions in the repression mechanism and that high levels of acetylation are required to prevent Tup1 binding. Investigation into a potential direct interaction between the Tup1-Ssn6 corepressor complex and one or more HDAC activities showed that both Rpd3 and Hos2 interact with the corepressor complex in vivo. These findings indicate that Tup1-Ssn6 repression involves the recruitment of histone deacetylase activities to target promoters, where they locally deacetylate histone residues promoting Tup1-histone tail interaction to initiate and/or maintain the repressed state. ^

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 55 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Julien Wavrinek und Walter Benjamin (p. I 26, 1-130)

2 Briefe zwischen Marga Wadsack und Max Horkheimer, 24.08.1937, 29.08.1937; 1 Brief von Gloria H. Wagner an Max Horkheimer, 27.12.1948; 1 Brief von Herta Wagner an Leo Löwenthal, 05.06.1936; 3 Brief und 1 Beilage zwischen Herta Wagner, 12.03.1936, 1936; 8 Brief zwischen Katja Walch-Lux und Max Horkheimer, 1934-1938; 2 Brief zwischen K. Walcher und Max Horkheimer, 07.08.1936, 04.09.1936 sowie Bemerkungen zum Brief von Max Horkheimer; 2 Briefe zwischen Morris Waldman und Max Horkheimer, 17.04.1940, 11.05.1940; 6 Briefe zwischen Sidney Wallach und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Waldman; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Landau; 1 Brief Max Horkheimer an Warburg; 1 Brief von Hans Wallenberg an Leo Löwenthal, 06.05.1940; 1 Brief von Willard W. Waller an Franz Neumann, 28.04.1941; 2 Briefe und 1 Beilage zwischen Hans Waloschek und Max Horkheimer, 04.08.1938, 31.08.1938; 4 Briefe und 2 Beilagen zwischen Emil J. Walter und Max Horkheimer, 1937, 1938; 5 Briefe und 1 Beilage zwischen Hilde Walter und Max Horkheimer, 1937, 1945; 1 Brief von Rose Walter an Max Horkheimer, 16.11.1938; 2 Briefe zwischen Yu-Chuan Wang und Max Horkheimer, 12.10.1936, 09.12.1936; 1 Brief von Rike Wankmüller-Freyh an Max Horkheimer, 06.07.1949; 1 Brief von Ilse Bach an Heinz Wartenberg, 11.11.1940; 1 Brief von Heinz Wartenberg an Richard Bach, 07.02.1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Heinz Wartenberg, 11.03.1941; 1 Brief von Richard Bach an Max Horkheimer; 1 Brief von Franz und Hilde Wasem an Max Horkheimer, 16.02.1949; 5 Briefe zwischen Goodwin Watson und Franz Neumann, 1941; 11 Briefe und Notizen zwischen Julien Wavrinek und Max Horkheimer, 1938-1940; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an M. Bruhat; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Walter Benjamin, 03.05.1940;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 699 - Cultural Aspects of National Socialism. A Research Project (p. IX 170.15-17a - IX 170.19)

Neumann, Franz: Memorandum über Gespräche mit Harold Lasswell. 30.03.1941, Typoskript mit handschriftlichen Korekturen, 4 Blatt; Neumann, Franz: Memorandum über Gespräche mit Goodvin Watson. 21.05.1941, Typoskript, 2 Blatt; [Anderson, Eugene N.:] "Professor Anderson's Notes and criticisms to the project of German society and culture". Typoskript, 7 Blatt; "Budget for the proposed Research Project of Cultural Aspects of National Socialism". Handschriftliche Notizen, 1 Blatt; Institut of Social Research: Brief an Rockefeller Foundation, New York, 24.06.1941 verschiedene Typoskripte, zum Teil mit handschriftlichen Korrekturen, circa 35 Blatt; ein Manuskript, 6 Blatt; ein Entwurf, Typoskript, 1 Blatt; Adorno, Theodor W.: 2 Briefe an I. Berlin, ohne Ort, 1940-1941; Empfehlungsschreiben zur Unterstützung des Projekts, von: Lutz, Ralph H.: 1 Brief (Abschrift) an Frederick Pollock, 11.07.1941; MacIver, Robert M.: 1 Brief (Abschrift): an New York Foundation, ohne Ort, 07.07.1941; Shotwell, James T.: 1 Brief (Abschrift) an Frederick Pollock, Woodstock, 08.07.1941; Radin, MAx: 1 Brief (Abschrift) an New York Foundation, [Los Angeles], 08.07-1941; 5 Blatt; Antwortbriefe an das Institut bzw. Max Horkheimer aufgrund der Zusendung des Umrisses des Forschungsprojektes, von: Lorwin, Lewis L.; Wooleton, H.; O'Quin, Patricia, Odum, Howard W.; Fay, Sidney B.; Merriam, Charles E.; Hoover, Calvin B.; Garrison, Lloyd K.; März bis Mai 1941, 8 Blatt;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 571 - Korrespondenzen mit Franz Neumann (p. VI 30, 1-224)

169 Briefe zwischen Franz Neumann und Max Horkheimer; 4 Briefe von Franz Neumann an Frederick Pollock, 1937 - 1941; 7 Briefe zwischen Franz Neumann und Walter L. Dorn, 1941 - 1942; 2 Briefe zwischen Walter L. Dorn und Max Horkheimer, März 1943; 1 Brief von Tom an Franz Neumann, 09.09.1941; 1 Brief von Phillip C. Jessup an Franz Neumann, 22.08.1941; 1 Brief von Athur und Wicky Goldschmidt an Franz Neumann, 22.08.1941; 2 Briefe von Goodwin Watson an Franz Neumann, 1941; 1 Brief von Harold Lasswell an Franz Neumann, 07.07.1941; 2 Briefe von Eugene N. Anderson an Franz Neumann, 1941; 1 Brief von C. J. Friedrich an Franz Neumann, 18.06.1941; 1 Brief von Alfred E. Cohn an Max Horkheimer, 30.01.1941; 1 Brief von Alfred E. Cohn an Franz Neumann, 30.01.1941; 3 Briefe von Leo Löwenthal an Franz Neumann, 1940; 1 Brief von Thurman Arnold an Max Horkheimer, 21.12.1938; 2 Briefe zwischen Ernst Kahn und Franz Neumann, 1938; 1 Brief von Franz Neumann an Walter Socoloff, 21.06.1938; 1 Brief von Franz Neumann an Flegenheimer, 31.06.1935; 1 Brief von Anita [Schwester von Felix Weil] an Felix Weil, 24.08.1937; 2 Briefe zwischen Franz Neumann und C. D. Medley, 1935/1936; 7 Briefe zwischen The Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced German Scholars (New York) und Max Horkheimer, 1936; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Guerreo, 08.09.1936; 1 Brief (Abschrift) von der Columbia University (New York) an United States of America, Consul General (London), 05.03.1936; 1 Brief von Franz Neumann an Juliette Favez, 11.12.1935;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 600 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Friedrich Pollock (p. VI 42, 211-386)

Briefwechsel zwischen Max Horkheimer, Frederick Pollock und Karl August und Olga Wittfogel; 2 Briefe zwischen Edith B. Bernett und Max Horkheimer, April 1940; 2 Briefe zwischen Max Horkheimer und Philip Vaudrin, Juli 1939; 3 Briefe an David H. Stevens von Max Horkheimer, 26.03.1938; 1 Brief von A. Radcliffe an Frederick Pollock, 18.11.1937; 3 Briefe an Max Horkheimer von der Columbia University Faculty of Political Science (New York), November 1937; 2 Briefe von der Columbia University Department of History (New York) an Max Horkheimer, November 1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Sharon Beard, 27.11.1937; 1 Brief von Ruth Benedict an Max Horkheimer, 19.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Franz Boas, 19.11.1937; 1 Brief von R. E. Chaddock an Max Horkheimer, 21.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Ch'ao-ting Chi, 19.11.1937; 1 Brief von J. M. Clark an Max Horkheimer, 22.11.1937; 1 Brief an Dr. Wertheimer von Morris R. Cohen, 29.11.1937; 1 Brief von Alfred E. Cohn an Max Horkheimer, 26.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von John J. Coss, 22.11.1937; 1 Brief von George S. Counts an Max Horkheimer, 24.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von A. P. Evans, 22.11.1937; 3 Briefe von Gertrude Stewart an Max Horkheimer, 20. - 24.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von L. C. Goodrich, 22.11.1937; 1 Brief von John W. Innes an Max Horkheimer, 20.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Philip C. Jessup, 24.11.1937; 1 Brief von John A. Krout an Max Horkheimer, 23.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Bruno Lasker, 20.11.1937; 1 Brief von Samuel McCune Lindsay an Max Horkheimer, 24.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von K. N. Llewellyn, 26.11.1937; 1 Brief von R. S. Lynd an Max Horkheimer, [November 1937]; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von R. M. MacIver, 19.11.1937; 1 Brief von Julian W. Mack an Max Horkheimer, 24.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Arthur Maxmahon, 20.11.1937; 1 Brief von Jerome Michael an Max Horkheimer, 26.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Wesley C. Mitchell, 22.11.1937; 1 Brief von der Columbia University School of Business (New York) an Max Horkheimer, 22.11.1937; 2 Briefe zwischen Max Horkheimer und der John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (New York), November 1937; 2 Briefe von der Columbia University Department of Psychology (New York) an Max Horkheimer, November 1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Goodwin Watson, 23.11.1937; 1 Brief von Otto Nathan an Max Horkheimer, 26.11.937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von John K. Norton, 23.11.1937; 1 Brief von der Columbia University Department of Chinese (New York) an Max Horkheimer, 23.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Gerold Tanquary Robinson, 19.11.1937; 1 Brief von der Columbia University Department of Public Law and Government (New York) an Max Horkheimer, 22.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von R. C. Sailer, 20.11.1937; 1 Brief von Herbert W. Schneider an Max Horkheimer, 22.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von R. L. Schuyler, 20.11.1937; 1 Brief von Pauline Steorns an Max Horkheimer, 22.11.1937; 1 Brief an Max Horkheimer von Frank Tannenbaum, 19.11.1937; 1 Brief von Alfred Vagés an Max Horkheimer, 26.11.1937;

Cross-cultural equivalence and associations among food insecurity and parental influences of children's fruit and vegetable consumption

Over the past several decades, the prevalence of obesity has dramatically increased. Cause for concern has increased because overweight and obesity are major contributors to morbidity and mortality. Intervention research aimed at reducing the prevalence of obesity has identified the family, specifically the parent, as a key component of the home environment. However, findings from dietary behavior change interventions have been disheartening because few studies have reported meaningful change, suggesting methodological and/or measurement issues within the intervention process. A lack of appropriate mediators and cross-cultural equivalence may partially explain the reason for little change.^ The study aims were to (1) evaluate the psychometric properties and assess the cross cultural equivalence of the Food Insecurity Scale (paper 1) and the modified Parent Feeding Practices Questionnaire (paper 2) and to assess the overall relationships among food insecurity, parent mediators, and parent behaviors towards children's dietary behavior (paper 3) through structural equation modeling and tests of invariance. The study aims were accomplished through conducting secondary analyses using baseline data from English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanic women who participated in the Healthy Families: Step by Step (BHF) study.^ Results indicated that although the FIS and the mPFPQ exhibited sound psychometric properties, the instruments exhibited a lack of invariance across language spoken groups. The lack of invariance was more pronounced in the FIS. Results also supported the theoretical framework identifying parent's perceived barriers and self-efficacy as mediators of parent's behaviors toward improving children's health eating. Results did not suggest that the relationships were moderated by food insecurity.^ In conclusion, the identification of differential item functioning in food insecurity and parent feeding practices may be beneficial in enhancing tailored interventions through the incorporation of cultural differences into the change mechanisms. However, future research needs to be conducted to determine if the lack of invariance demonstrates the existence of item bias or if it is a reflection of true difference among the language spoken groups. Additionally, obesity intervention studies targeting parent/family barriers and parent self-efficacy to provide/encourage healthy diets may result in an increase in parent behaviors which promote healthy eating behaviors among children. Future research should also examine a more complete causal pathway to determine whether parental changes in the mediators ultimately lead to an increase in healthy dietary behavior among children.^