Women with banner Ban the Bomb during Peace march on Sunday April 5th 1964, Brisbane.

Women with banner Ban the Bomb during Peace march, Sunday April 5th Brisbane, Australia, 1964.

A paralysis in public health policy: water fluoridation in Queensland (1996-2006)

By focusing on developments between 1996 and 2006, this paper explains the reasons for one of Australia’s public health inconsistencies, the comparatively low adoption of adjusted water fluoridation in Queensland. As such, this work involved literature review and traditional historical method. In Queensland, parliamentary support for water fluoridation is conditional on community approval. Political ambivalence and the constraints of the “Fluoridation of Public Water Supplies Act (1963)” Qld have hindered the advocacy of water fluoridation. The political circumstance surrounding the “Lord Mayor’s Taskforce on Fluoridation Report” (1997) influenced its findings and confirms that Australia’s biggest local authority, the Brisbane City Council, failed to authoritatively analyse water fluoridation. In 2004, a private member’s bill to mandate fluoridation failed in a spectacular fashion. In 2005, an official systems review of Queensland Health recommended public debate about water fluoridation. Our principal conclusion is that without mandatory legislation, widespread implementationof water fluoridation in Queensland is most unlikely.

A comparison of telepaediatric activity at two regional hospitals in Queensland

We conducted a 15-month feasibility study of telepaediatrics. A novel service was offered to two hospitals in Queensland (Mackay and Hervey Bay). We used data from all other hospitals throughout the state as the control group. Although both intervention hospitals were provided with the same service, the telepaediatric activity generated and the effect on admissions and outpatient activity were markedly different. There was a significant decrease in the number of patient admissions to Brisbane from the Mackay region. In addition, there was an increase in the number of Mackay patients treated locally (as outpatients). In contrast, little change was observed in Hervey Bay. We assessed whether the observed differences between the two hospitals were due to various factors which influenced the use of the telepaediatric service. These factors included the method of screening patients before transfer to the tertiary centre and the physical distance between each facility and the tertiary centre. We believe that the screening method used for patient referrals was the most important determinant of the use of the telepaediatric service.