Evaluation of quality of life in a palliative care context: an integrative literature review

The use of scales that have been validated and standardized for different cultures is very useful for identifying demands in the field of Palliative Care and implementing the most appropriate care. This integrative literature review focuses on instruments assessing the Quality of Life of patients under Palliative Care through a journal search in electronic databases. The study consisted of 49 papers identified in Medline/PubMed, of which 18 met the inclusion criteria previously defined. Information concerning the selected studies is presented and later categorized, with a greater emphasis on the analysis of the psychometric properties of validations of the Palliative Outcome Scale, conducted in three countries. This review enabled the identification of instruments already developed and validated for different cultures, increasing the possibility of knowledge in the field.

Innovazione e governance delle reti di assistenza integrate: il caso delle cure palliative

In ambito oncologico il dolore affligge la maggior parte dei pazienti (incidenza riportata dal 53 al 90%), in tutte le fasi della malattia: nonostante l’esistenza di Linee Guida (OMS), l’attuale “undertreatment” del sintomo dolore oncologico, legato a un inappropriato uso degli oppioidi, in Italia raggiunge stime fino al 40% dei casi. Segnalazioni recenti sul consumo degli oppioidi in Italia riportano un aumento imputabile a un solo farmaco (fentanil TTS), il che suggerisce un comportamento prescrittivo inappropriato. Letteratura in merito alle valutazioni di efficacia delle terapie di controllo del dolore sia in fase iniziale – quando la terapia medica oncologica è attiva- sia in fase avanzata di malattia – quando il controllo del dolore si configura come una delle principali terapie di supporto- è ormai disponibile , con un buon livello di affidabilità. Quello che è necessario è aumentare la capacità del Servizio Sanitario di trasferire nella pratica clinica e assistenziale i risultati della ricerca sulla efficacia delle cure. Questi i quesiti ai quali la ricerca ha inteso rispondere: a. Le competenze globalmente espresse dal servizio sanitario dell’Emilia Romagna sono adeguate per consentire un tempestivo, globale, appropriato ed efficace controllo del dolore oncologico, in tutte le fasi della malattia e lungo tutto il percorso di assistenza si a domiciliare che ospedaliero, per tutti i malati che ne hanno bisogno? b. Quali raccomandazioni possiamo fornire, basate sulle evidenze di efficacia, a clinici e gestori per migliorare l’identificazione del bisogno, la scelta del trattamento, il suo monitoraggio, la possibilità di garantirne l’accesso e la disponibilità non solo in ospedale ma anche a domicilio? c. Quale efficacia hanno dimostrato i percorsi di formazione relativi al riconoscimento e al controllo del dolore messi in atto finora? d. Quali percorsi possono essere raccomandati per mettere a disposizione dei cittadini le conoscenze scientifiche sul controllo del dolore oncologico?

Neue palliative Therapieoptionen des kolorektalen Karzinoms

6. Zusammenfassung In der palliativen Therapie des metastasierten kolorektalen Karzinoms gibt es durch die Verbesserung der klassischen Therapien und die Entwicklung neuer Strategien inzwischen eine Vielzahl von Behandlungsoptionen. Die zwei Studien dieser Arbeit untersuchen das „älteste“ eingesetzte Zytostatikum in der Therapie des Kolonkarzinom, 5-Flurouracil, einmal in der Zweitlinientherapie als Hochdosisinfusionstherapie mit und Biomodulation mit Folinsäüre und einmal als Erstlinientherapie in Kombination mit Irinotecan im FOLFIRI-Protokoll. In der Zweitlinienbehandlung ergab sich hierbei ein geringer Vorteil in den Krankheitskontrollraten (57% vs. 44%) bei vergleichbaren Ansprechraten für die längere 5-FU-Infusion ohne Biomodulation. Bezüglich des Gesamtüberleben ab Beginn der Zweitlinientherapie und des Progressionsfreien Überleben zeigte die nicht biomodulierte Gruppe bessere, statistisch jedoch nicht signifikante Ergebnisse (16 vs. 9 bzw. 7,5 vs. 6 Monate). In der Erstlinientherapie erreichten wir eine Tumorkontrollrate von 74%, 4 komplette Remissionen (11%) und bei 3 Patienten die Möglichkeit einer Nachresektion der Lebermetastasen mit kurativem Ansatz. Der neoadjuvante Einsatz dieser Therapie sollte aufgrund dieser Ergebnisse weiter untersucht werden. Das Gesamtüberleben lag bei 17 Monaten (i.r. 9-25 Monate), die progressionsfreie Zeit mit 7 Monaten lag im Bereich unserer Zweitlinienstudie. Für beide Therapien befand sich die Toxizität im Rahmen der Erwartungen, die Symptome waren reversibel und im Allgemeinen akzeptabel. Ein Vergleich der Lebensqualität vor und während der Erstlinientherapie ergab für unsere Patienten keine deutlichen Veränderungen. Die Ergebnisse unserer untersuchten Studien zeigen, dass beide Therapien wirksame und gut verträgliche Optionen in der palliativen Behandlung des kolorektalen Karzinoms darstellen. Für jeden Patienten sollte aus der Vielzahl der bestehenden Möglichkeiten die für ihn bestmögliche individuelle Therapie ermittelt werden.

Pharmacogenetics in palliative care

Response to analgesics, anticancer pharmacotherapy and pharmacotherapy of other cancer related symptoms vary broadly between individuals. Age, disease, comorbidities, concomitant medication, organ function and patients' compliance may partly explain the differences. However, the focus of ongoing research has shifted towards genomic variants of phase I and II drug metabolizing enzymes with one important goal being an individual dose adjustment according to a patient's genotype. Polymorphisms of the cytochrome P 450 2D6 influence the metabolism of many drugs including the analgesics codeine, tramadol, hydrocodone and oxycodone, as well as the metabolism of tricyclic antidepressants and the anticancer drug tamoxifen. Other candidate genes such as (opioid)-receptors, transporters and other molecules important for pharmacotherapy in pain management are discussed. Although pharmacogenetics as a diagnostic tool has the potential to improve patient therapy, study results are often equivocal and limited by small sample sizes and often by their retrospective design. Well designed studies are needed to demonstrate superiority of pharmoacogenetics to conventional dosing regimes.

Reduction of inappropriate medications among older nursing-home residents: a nurse-led, pre/post-design, intervention study

Background: Medication-related problems are common in the growing population of older adults and inappropriate prescribing is a preventable risk factor. Explicit criteria such as the Beers criteria provide a valid instrument for describing the rate of inappropriate medication (IM) prescriptions among older adults. Objective: To reduce IM prescriptions based on explicit Beers criteria using a nurse-led intervention in a nursing-home (NH) setting. Study Design: The pre/post-design included IM assessment at study start (pre-intervention), a 4-month intervention period, IM assessment after the intervention period (post-intervention) and a further IM assessment at 1-year follow-up. Setting: 204-bed inpatient NH in Bern, Switzerland. Participants: NH residents aged ≥60 years. Intervention: The intervention included four key intervention elements: (i) adaptation of Beers criteria to the Swiss setting; (ii) IM identification; (iii) IM discontinuation; and (iv) staff training. Main Outcome Measure: IM prescription at study start, after the 4-month intervention period and at 1-year follow-up. Results: The mean±SD resident age was 80.3±8.8 years. Residents were prescribed a mean±SD 7.8±4.0 medications. The prescription rate of IMs decreased from 14.5% pre-intervention to 2.8% post-intervention (relative risk [RR] = 0.2; 95% CI 0.06, 0.5). The risk of IM prescription increased nonstatistically significantly in the 1-year follow-up period compared with post-intervention (RR = 1.6; 95% CI 0.5, 6.1). Conclusions: This intervention to reduce IM prescriptions based on explicit Beers criteria was feasible, easy to implement in an NH setting, and resulted in a substantial decrease in IMs. These results underscore the importance of involving nursing staff in the medication prescription process in a long-term care setting.

Delirium upon admission to Swiss nursing homes

QUESTIONS UNDER STUDY: We wished to investigate the prevalence of delirium in patients upon admission to nursing homes and whether or not the previous place of residence predicts delirium. METHODS: The Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS) and the Nursing Home Confusion Assessment Method (NHCAM) were used to determine whether the previous place of residence (community, nursing home, acute care, psychiatric, rehabilitation hospital) predicted the prevalence of sub-syndromal or full delirium in nursing home residents in three Swiss cantons (n = 11745). RESULTS: 39.7% had sub-syndromal and 6.5% had full delirium. Lower cognitive performance and increased depressive symptoms were significant predictors of higher NHCAM values independent of previous residence. Age, civil status, continence, newly introduced drugs, and basic activities of daily living were predictors in some resident groups. The variance of NHCAM scores explained varied between 25.1% and 32.3% depending on previous residence. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-syndromal and full delirium are common upon nursing home admission. Increased dependence and depression are consistently associated with higher NHCAM scores. Patients from psychiatric settings have an increased risk of delirium. Although factors associated with delirium depend on a patient's previous residence, all patients must be carefully screened for sub-syndromal and full delirium.

Diabetes-related knowledge among medical and nursing house staff

To assess the diabetes-related knowledge of medical and nursing house staff with particular focus on inpatient diabetes management and insulin therapy.

Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations

Perinatal care of pregnant women at high risk for preterm delivery and of preterm infants born at the limit of viability (22-26 completed weeks of gestation) requires a multidisciplinary approach by an experienced perinatal team. Limited precision in the determination of both gestational age and foetal weight, as well as biological variability may significantly affect the course of action chosen in individual cases. The decisions that must be taken with the pregnant women and on behalf of the preterm infant in this context are complex and have far-reaching consequences. When counselling pregnant women and their partners, neonatologists and obstetricians should provide them with comprehensive information in a sensitive and supportive way to build a basis of trust. The decisions are developed in a continuing dialogue between all parties involved (physicians, midwives, nursing staff and parents) with the principal aim to find solutions that are in the infant's and pregnant woman's best interest. Knowledge of current gestational age-specific mortality and morbidity rates and how they are modified by prenatally known prognostic factors (estimated foetal weight, sex, exposure or nonexposure to antenatal corticosteroids, single or multiple births) as well as the application of accepted ethical principles form the basis for responsible decision-making. Communication between all parties involved plays a central role. The members of the interdisciplinary working group suggest that the care of preterm infants with a gestational age between 22 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks should generally be limited to palliative care. Obstetric interventions for foetal indications such as Caesarean section delivery are usually not indicated. In selected cases, for example, after 23 weeks of pregnancy have been completed and several of the above mentioned prenatally known prognostic factors are favourable or well informed parents insist on the initiation of life-sustaining therapies, active obstetric interventions for foetal indications and provisional intensive care of the neonate may be reasonable. In preterm infants with a gestational age between 24 0/7 and 24 6/7 weeks, it can be difficult to determine whether the burden of obstetric interventions and neonatal intensive care is justified given the limited chances of success of such a therapy. In such cases, the individual constellation of prenatally known factors which impact on prognosis can be helpful in the decision making process with the parents. In preterm infants with a gestational age between 25 0/7 and 25 6/7 weeks, foetal surveillance, obstetric interventions for foetal indications and neonatal intensive care measures are generally indicated. However, if several prenatally known prognostic factors are unfavourable and the parents agree, primary non-intervention and neonatal palliative care can be considered. All pregnant women with threatening preterm delivery or premature rupture of membranes at the limit of viability must be transferred to a perinatal centre with a level III neonatal intensive care unit no later than 23 0/7 weeks of gestation, unless emergency delivery is indicated. An experienced neonatology team should be involved in all deliveries that take place after 23 0/7 weeks of gestation to help to decide together with the parents if the initiation of intensive care measures appears to be appropriate or if preference should be given to palliative care (i.e., primary non-intervention). In doubtful situations, it can be reasonable to initiate intensive care and to admit the preterm infant to a neonatal intensive care unit (i.e., provisional intensive care). The infant's clinical evolution and additional discussions with the parents will help to clarify whether the life-sustaining therapies should be continued or withdrawn. Life support is continued as long as there is reasonable hope for survival and the infant's burden of intensive care is acceptable. If, on the other hand, the health car...