Recollections of four years' service in the East with H. M. fortieth regiment : comprising an account of the taking of Kurachee in Lower Scinde, in 1839, operations in Upper Scinde in 1840 and 1841, and the operations of the Candahar Division of "The Avenging Army of the Afghanistan" in 1841 and 1842, under Major-General Sir w. Nott, G.C.B. /

Mode of access: Internet.

Napoleon and the grand army in Russia, or, A critical examination of Count Philip de Ségur's work [microform].

Master microform held by: Readex.

Indian wars of the Northwest, a California sketch,with map

Mode of access: Internet.

Imaginary Portraits,

Mode of access: Internet.

Register of the Society of Colonial Wars in the District of Columbia, 1904 ...

Prepared for the society by A.C. Peale and edited by Marcus Benjamin.

Modern battles of Trenton ...

Mode of access: Internet.

The conquest of New France : a chronicle of the colonial wars /

Includes index.

Dictionary of battles, from the earliest date to the present time.

Mode of access: Internet.

Journal of imprisonment in Affghanistan (continued and concluded).

Mode of access: Internet.

Radical Language, Radical Identity: Korean Writers in Japanese Spaces and the Burden to "Represent"

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Helene & Writing Abuse, Shame, and Death: A Poetics of Spirit within the Failing Body

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Planning for a Communist Future: Professionalization, Nationalism, and Planning Practice in Soviet Moscow, 1964-1974

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

On Selmer groups and factoring p-adic L-functions

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Supreme Emergencies and the protection of non-combatants in war

Is it ever justifiable to target non-combatants deliberately? This article assesses Michael Walzer's claim that the deliberate targeting of non-combatants may be justifiable during 'supreme emergencies', a view that has received some support but that has elicited little debate. It argues that the supreme emergencies exception to the prohibition on targeting non-combatants is problematic for at least four reasons. First, its utilitarianism contradicts Walzer's wider ethics of war based on a conception of human rights. Second, the exception may undermine the principle of non-combatant immunity. Third, it is based on a historical fallacy. Finally, it is predicated on a strategic fallacy-the idea that killing noncombatants can win wars. The case for rejecting the exception, however, has been opposed by those who persuasively argue that it is wrong to tie leaders' hands when they confront supreme emergencies. The final part of the article addresses this question and suggests that the principle of proportionality may give political leaders room for manoeuvre in supreme emergencies without permitting them deliberately to target non-combatants.