A systematic review of longitudinal population-based studies on the predictors of smoking cessation in adolescent and young adult smokers.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the determinants of self-initiated smoking cessation of duration of at least 6 months as identified in longitudinal population-based studies of adolescent and young adult smokers. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases using smoking, tobacco, cessation, quit and stop as keywords was performed. Limits included articles related to humans, in English, published between January 1984 and August 2010, and study population aged 10-29 years. A total of 4502 titles and 871 abstracts were reviewed independently by 2 and 3 reviewers, respectively. Nine articles were retained for data abstraction. Data on study location, timeframe, duration of follow-up, number of data collection points, sample size, age/grade of participants, number of quitters, smoking status at baseline, definition of cessation, covariates and analytic method were abstracted from each article. The number of studies that reported a statistically significant association between each determinant investigated and cessation were tabulated, from among all studies that assessed the determinant. RESULTS: Despite heterogeneity in methods across studies, five factors robustly predicted quitting across studies in which the factor was investigated: not having friends who smoke, not having intentions to smoke in the future, resisting peer pressure to smoke, being older at first use of cigarette and having negative beliefs about smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The literature on longitudinal predictors of cessation in adolescent and young adult smokers is not well developed. Cessation interventions for this population will remain less than optimally effective until there is a solid evidence base on which to develop interventions.

Fertility discourse in parental leave policies' media coverage : a frame analysis of French-speaking Swiss press articles from 1999 to 2009

This paper analyses the media coverage of parental leave policies (parental and paternity leaves) in Swiss French-speaking press articles from 1999 to 2009. Switzerland is one of the rare European countries which has no statutory parental or paternity leave. The aim is to describe the mediatisation of these policies and to analyse the arguments in favour and against their implementation. We investigate the status of a fertility frame - the mobilisation of discourse relating to fertility issues - among the various arguments used to justify or reject parental leave policies. We proceed with a content analysis of 579 press articles, as well as a frame analysis on a subset in which parental leave policies are the central theme (N=206). Results show that paternity leave is the predominant public issue addressed in the dataset. A mediatisation peak was reached in 2007, following an initiative of a member of the Federal executive to implement a short paternity leave. Parental leave policies are predominantly represented in a positive light. The main positive frame is economic, in which leaves are represented as serving the interests of companies. Involved fatherhood and gender equality are also frequently mentioned as positive frames. The fertility frame is only moderately used in articles covering Swiss news on paternity leaves. Conversely, the fertility frame is largely mobilised in articles covering parental leave in other countries. We discuss some interpretations of this discrepancy and suggest future avenues of research on parental leave policies in Switzerland.

Combined written and oral information prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy compared with oral information alone: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how to most effectively deliver relevant information to patients scheduled for endoscopy. METHODS: To assess the effects of combined written and oral information, compared with oral information alone on the quality of information before endoscopy and the level of anxiety. We designed a prospective study in two Swiss teaching hospitals which enrolled consecutive patients scheduled for endoscopy over a three-month period. Patients were randomized either to receiving, along with the appointment notice, an explanatory leaflet about the upcoming examination, or to oral information delivered by each patient's doctor. Evaluation of quality of information was rated on scales between 0 (none received) and 5 (excellent). The analysis of outcome variables was performed on the basis of intention to treat-analysis. Multivariate analysis of predictors of information scores was performed by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 718 eligible patients 577 (80%) returned their questionnaire. Patients who received written leaflets (N = 278) rated the quality of information they received higher than those informed verbally (N = 299), for all 8 quality-of-information items. Differences were significant regarding information about the risks of the procedure (3.24 versus 2.26, p < 0.001), how to prepare for the procedure (3.56 versus 3.23, p = 0.036), what to expect after the procedure (2.99 versus 2.59, p < 0.001), and the 8 quality-of-information items (3.35 versus 3.02, p = 0.002). The two groups reported similar levels of anxiety before procedure (p = 0.66), pain during procedure (p = 0.20), tolerability throughout the procedure (p = 0.76), problems after the procedure (p = 0.22), and overall rating of the procedure between poor and excellent (p = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Written information led to more favourable assessments of the quality of information and had no impact on patient anxiety nor on the overall assessment of the endoscopy. Because structured and comprehensive written information is perceived as beneficial by patients, gastroenterologists should clearly explain to their patients the risks, benefits and alternatives of endoscopic procedures. Trial registration: Current Controlled trial number: ISRCTN34382782.

Etude de mentions manuscrites apposées dans des conditions non conventionnelles (dans le cadre des articles 322-1 à 322-4 du nouveau code pénal français)

Résumé Les experts forensiques en documents peuvent être confrontés à des écritures réalisées en conditions non conventionnelles. Ces circonstances atypiques pourraient être à l'origine d'une plus grande variabilité de la forme de l'écriture, en particulier lorsque des positions à priori inhabituelles du corps et / ou du support sont impliquées. En effet, en dépit de son aspect stéréotypé /standardisé évident, résultat d'un apprentissage par un modèle, notre écriture est caractérisée par une variabilité intrinsèque de la forme, qui évolue au cours du temps et qui, dans sa dimension qualitative, confère à l'écriture son caractère individuel. En d'autres termes, nous n'écrivons jamais deux fois de la même façon. Cette variabilité intraindividuelle (ou intra-variabilité) observée en condition conventionnelle, c'est-à-dire assis devant un support horizontal, pourrait augmenter en conditions non conventionnelles, par exemple dans une position inconfortable. Cela pourrait rendre plus difficile l'identification d'écrits apposés dans une condition non conventionnelle ou inconnue. Ne pas connaître les circonstances d'apposition d'une mention manuscrite ou ne pas s'interroger sur ces dernières, pourrait conduire l'expert à faire des erreurs d'appréciation. Et le simple fait d'étudier une trace sur laquelle le corps peut exercer une influence fait de l'expertise en écriture une spécialité qui se distingue des autres disciplines forensiques. En cela, la trace écrite diffère des autres types de traces "inanimées" (physiques, chimiques, bigchimiques) considérées comme invariables (mais potentiellement sensibles à d'autres phénomènes tels que la température, la pression atmosphérique...). En effet, le mouvement d'écriture étant commandé et contrôlé par le cerveau, cela lui confère une certaine variabilité. Il est donc assez logique de penser que la connaissance des mécanismes neuroscientifiques à l'origine de ce mouvement facilitera la compréhension des phénomènes observés d'un point de vue forensique. Deux expériences ont été menées afin de comparer les performances de sujets écrivant dans différentes conditions (conventionnelle vs. non conventionnelles). Les résultats ont montré que cinq des sept conditions non conventionnelles n'avaient pas d'impact significatif sur la variabilité d'écriture. L'ensemble des résultats fournit aux experts forensiques des pistes leur permettant de mieux appréhender les écritures rédigées dans des conditions inhabituelles.

Audit report on the City of South English, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2012

Audit report on the City of South English, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2012