Étude sur le langage populaire ou Patois de Paris et de sa banlieue ([Reprod.]) / [signé Charles Nisard]

Collection : Archives de la linguistique française ; 296

L'"Art poétique abrégé" de Claude de Boissière : 1554 ([Reprod.]) / [signé F. Gaiffe]

Collection : Archives de la linguistique française ; 169

Viabilidade da utilização de descartes de produção de uvas sem sementes para elaboração de passas

A região do Vale do São Francisco destaca-se na produção de uvas de mesa, com incrementos cada vez maiores na produção de cultivares sem sementes. A fim de evitar perdas e aumentar a renda do produtor, torna-se necessário o desenvolvimento de tecnologias para o aproveitamento do excedente da produção de forma economicamente viável. Considerando-se a dependência do Brasil ao mercado externo em uva-passa, este trabalho teve como objetivo avaliar a viabilidade da elaboração de passas a partir das cultivares sem sementes Sultanina, Catalunha, Superior Seedless e Crimson Seedless produzidas no norte de Minas Gerais. As passas foram analisadas quanto ao teor de umidade, sólidos solúveis totais (SST), acidez total titulável (ATT), pH, açúcares redutores e diâmetros longitudinal e transversal, e os resultados, comparados com o produto chileno adquirido no comércio local. As passas das cultivares produzidas nesta região apresentaram maior tamanho e composição semelhante ao produto importado. As passas de 'Crimson Seedless' apresentaram teor significativamente maior de umidade após 20h de secagem, enquanto Catalunha e Sultanina se destacaram quanto aos teores de SST, ATT e açúcares redutores. Os resultados obtidos indicam que a produção de passas é viável tecnicamente, porém trabalhos complementares são necessários para avaliar a viabilidade econômica deste processo.

Prevalence of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients Suspected for Pulmonary Embolism or Acute Aortic Syndrome: Rationale for the Triple Rule-out Concept.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to evaluate the prevalence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) among patients presenting with atypical chest pain who are evaluated for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) or pulmonary embolism (PE) with computed tomoangiography (CTA) and discuss the rationale for the use of triple rule-out (TRO) protocol for triaging these patients. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients presenting with atypical chest pain and evaluated with thoracic (CTA), for suspicion of AAS/PE. Two physicians reviewed patient files for demographic characteristics, initial CT and final clinical diagnosis. Patients were classified according to CTA finding into AAS, PE and other diagnoses and according to final clinical diagnosis into AAS, PE, ACS and other diagnoses. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-seven patients were evaluated: 396 (84.8%) patients for clinical suspicion of PE and 71 (15.2%) patients for suspicion of AAS. The prevalence of ACS and AAS was low among the PE patients: 5.5% and 0.5% respectively (P = 0.0001), while the prevalence of ACS and PE was 18.3% and 5.6% among AAS patients (P = 0.14 and P = 0.34 respectively). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of ACS and AAS among patients suspected clinically of having PE is limited while the prevalence of ACS and PE among patients suspected clinically of having AAS is significant. Accordingly patients suspected for PE could be evaluated with dedicated PE CTA while those suspected for AAS should still be triaged using TRO protocol.

Relationship between sedimentation sign and morphological grade in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis

Introduction Le canal lombaire étroit symptomatique est de plus en plus fréquent. Le traitement dépend des signes cliniques et des résultats radiologiques. Mais actuellement il n'y a pas de consensus concernant la classification radiologique. Le but de notre article est d'étudier la relation entre deux paramètres morphologiques radiologiques récemment décrits sur des examens par IRM. Le premier est le « signe de sédimentation » (Sedimentation Sign) et le second est le grade morphologique de la sténose lombaire (Morphological Grade), tous deux décrit en 2010. Matériel et méthode Nous avons étudié des examens IRM de 137 patients suivit dans notre établissement. De ces 137, 110 étaient issus d'une base de donnée de patients avec une sténose lombaire dont la Symptomatologie était typique. Dans ce groupe, 73 patients avaient été traité chirurgicalement et 37 conservativement, dépendant de la sévérité des symptômes. Un troisième groupe, le groupe contrôle, était formé de 27 patients ne présentant que des douleurs lombaires basses sans sciatalgie. La sévérité de la sténose a été évaluée sur les examens IRM au niveau du disque en utilisant les 4 grades de la classification morphologique, de A à D. La présence d'un signe de sédimentation a été, quand à lui, notée au niveau du pédicule, au-dessus et au-dessous du niveau présentant la sténose maximale, comme décrit dans l'article original. Résultat La présence d'un signe de sédimentation positif a été observée chez 58% des patients présentant un grade morphologique B, 69% chez les patients avec un grade C et 76% des patients avec un grade D. Dans le groupe de patient traité chirurgicalement pour une sténose canalaire, 67% des patients présentaient un signe de sédimentation positif, 35% dans le groupe du traitement conservateur, et 8 % dans le groupe contrôle. En ce qui concerne la classification du grade morphologique, nous avons regroupé les grade C et D. Il y avait 97% de patients avec un grade C et D dans le groupe du traitement chirurgical, 35 % dans le groupe du traitement conservateur et 18% dans le groupe contrôle. Nous avons donc calculé que la présence d'un signe de sédimentation positif chez les patients avec une sténose lombaire symptomatique augmente le risque d'avoir besoin d'une intervention de l'ordre de 3.5 fois (OR=3.5). En utilisant la classification du grade morphologique, nous avons calculé un risque encore plus élevé. Un patient avec une sténose canalaire de grade C ou D a 65 fois plus de risque d'avoir besoin d'une intervention (OR=65). Conclusion : Les résultats montrent une corrélation entre ces deux paramètres morphologiques. Mais la prédiction du besoin d'une intervention n'est pas équivalente. Un tiers des patients dans le groupe du traitement chirurgical n'avaient pas de signe de sédimentation positif. Ce signe apparaît donc comme un moins bon prédicteur pour le choix du traitement comparé à la sévérité de la sténose jugée avec le grade morphologique (OR 3.5 vs 65).

Occurrence of the "applause sign" in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

The applause sign was originally described as a quick bedside test to discriminate progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) (positive applause sign, PAS) from Parkinson's disease (PD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) (negative applause sign). However, recent research demonstrated that the test is positive not only in a subset of patients with PD and FTD, but also in other neurodegenerative diseases. We tested 22 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) together with 22 healthy sex- and age-matched controls for the occurrence of PAS. Furthermore, we performed neuropsychological testing with the EXIT-25 battery to correlate PAS with neuropsychological deficits, especially frontal lobe dysfunction. Five ALS patients (23%) and none of the controls displayed PAS (p≤0.05). The occurrence of PAS in ALS patients was not correlated with pathologic EXIT-25 scores or subtests for aberrant motor behaviour. We describe for the first time the occurrence of the applause sign in ALS and provide additional evidence that PAS is not specific for Parkinsonian disorders. Although its occurrence has been related to aberrant motor behaviour due to frontal involvement, in our study PAS did not correlate with executive dysfunction as tested by the EXIT-25 test battery, or with subtests of aberrant motor behaviour.

Relationship between sedimentation sign and morphological grade in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to study the relationship between two morphological parameters recently described on MRI images in relation to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS): the first is the sedimentation sign (SedS) and the second is the morphological grading of lumbar stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRIs from a total of 137 patients were studied. From those, 110 were issued from a prospective database of symptomatic LSS patients, of whom 73 were treated surgically and 37 conservatively based on symptom severity. A third group consisting of 27 subjects complaining of low back pain (LBP) served as control. Severity of stenosis was judged at disc level using the four A to D grade morphological classification. The presence of a SedS was judged at pedicle level, above or below the site of maximal stenosis. RESULTS: A positive SedS was observed in 58, 69 and 76 % of patients demonstrating B, C and D morphology, respectively, but in none with grade A morphology. The SedS was positive in 67 and 35 % of the surgically and conservatively treated patients, respectively, and in 8 % of the LBP group. C and D morphological grades were present in 97 and 35 % of patients in the surgically and conservatively treated group, respectively, and in 18 % of the LBP group. Presence of a positive SedS carried an increased risk of being submitted to surgery in the symptomatic LSS group (OR 3.5). This risk was even higher in the LSS patients demonstrating grade C or D morphology (OR 65). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: One-third of surgically treated LSS patients do not present a SedS. This sign appears to be a lesser predictor of treatment modality in our setting of symptomatic LSS patients compared to the severity of stenosis judged by the morphological grade.

PERC rule to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in emergency low-risk patients: study protocol for the PROPER randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED) is crucial. As emergency physicians fear missing this potential life-threatening condition, PE tends to be over-investigated, exposing patients to unnecessary risks and uncertain benefit in terms of outcome. The Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria (PERC) is an eight-item block of clinical criteria that can identify patients who can safely be discharged from the ED without further investigation for PE. The endorsement of this rule could markedly reduce the number of irradiative imaging studies, ED length of stay, and rate of adverse events resulting from both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Several retrospective and prospective studies have shown the safety and benefits of the PERC rule for PE diagnosis in low-risk patients, but the validity of this rule is still controversial. We hypothesize that in European patients with a low gestalt clinical probability and who are PERC-negative, PE can be safely ruled out and the patient discharged without further testing. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a controlled, cluster randomized trial, in 15 centers in France. Each center will be randomized for the sequence of intervention periods: a 6-month intervention period (PERC-based strategy) followed by a 6-month control period (usual care), or in reverse order, with 2 months of "wash-out" between the 2 periods. Adult patients presenting to the ED with a suspicion of PE and a low pre test probability estimated by clinical gestalt will be eligible. The primary outcome is the percentage of failure resulting from the diagnostic strategy, defined as diagnosed venous thromboembolic events at 3-month follow-up, among patients for whom PE has been initially ruled out. DISCUSSION: The PERC rule has the potential to decrease the number of irradiative imaging studies in the ED, and is reported to be safe. However, no randomized study has ever validated the safety of PERC. Furthermore, some studies have challenged the safety of a PERC-based strategy to rule-out PE, especially in Europe where the prevalence of PE diagnosed in the ED is high. The PROPER study should provide high-quality evidence to settle this issue. If it confirms the safety of the PERC rule, physicians will be able to reduce the number of investigations, associated subsequent adverse events, costs, and ED length of stay for patients with a low clinical probability of PE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02375919 .