Dual-service wireless LAN antenna-remoting system using uncooled directly modulated D'FB laser diodes

We report a fibre-optic wireless distribution system, which allows antenna-remoting of a dual-service IEEE 802.11b/g WLAN operating at 2.4GHz up to 700m over low-bandwidth 62.5/125μm MMF using highly linear uncooled directly modulated laser diodes. © 2004 Optical Society of America.

山东山旺中新世孢粉植物及古气候和古生态研究

本文对山旺中新世孢粉植物群进行了详细的研究。在22，95米厚的山旺硅藻土剖面上系统地采集了130块孢粉样品，样品之间的采样距离为10-30厘米。鉴定出孢粉类型111种。以此为基础，对山旺碰藻土沉积期间的古气候和古生态进行了高分辨率定量的恢复和重建。 根据每种孢粉类型的生物地层信息，山旺中新世孢粉植物群形成的时代为中中新世。这个年龄值也与同位素测年的结果16.78-14.11 Ma，以及根据哺乳动物划分的生物地层带MN4-MN5相一致。 运用共存分析法定量重建了山旺中新世孢粉植物群形成时的各项气候参数的定量值。所包括的10个古气候参数值分别为： 年平均温度(MAT) 15.6-17.2ºC，最冷月平均温度(TCM)5.0-6.6 0 C，最热月平均温度(TWM) 24.6-27.8 ºC，温度的年较差( TD) 20. 0-25.5 0 C，年平均降雨量(MAP) 1162-1308mm，最热月份的平均降雨量( PwarmM)108-lllmm，最湿月份的平均降雨量(PwetM) 148-180mm，最干月份的平均降雨量(PDM) 16-59mm，最干及最 湿月份降雨量的差值(DP) 81-153mm，平均相对湿度(RH) 72-74%，共存分析的结果表明，在整个22.95米厚的研究剖面上，从底部到顶部的古植物群形成期间的古气候有一个轻微的波动，其中年平均温度的波动范围大约在3度左右，最热月平均温度的波动范围在l度左右， 最冷月平均温度的波动范围在4度左右， 年平均降雨量的波动范围在100毫米左右。 山旺中新世时的气候应属于Koppen's的“Cfa”气候类型，与现今武汉与芜湖地区的气候相似。 与现代山旺地区气候上的区别主要在于年平均降雨量、降雨量的分配，以及最冷月份的平均温度。 通过应用多元分析的方法，对山旺中新世时期的植被进行了重建。山旺中新世时期的古植被为“混交中生林”，在研究剖面从底部到顶部的时间轴上，“混交中生林”经历了“湿润环境下的混交中生林”，“干旱环境下的混交中生林”，“湿润湖岸环境下的混交中生林”，“山地、湿润及碱性环境下的混交中生林”，和“碱性环境下的混交中生林”等5个阶段的变化。山旺剖面所代表的山旺湖周围的地形在断裂构造运动的控制下，也经历了一系列的变化。

Temporal and spatial aspects of bottlenose dolphin occurrence in coastal and estuarine waters near Charleston, South Carolina

The spatial and temporal occurrence of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the coastal and estuarine waters near Charleston, SC were evaluated. Sighting and photographic data from photo-identification (ID), remote biopsy, capture-release and radio-tracking studies, conducted from 1994 through 2003, were analyzed in order to further delineate residence patterns of Charleston area bottlenose dolphins. Data from 250 photo-ID, 106 remote biopsy, 15 capture-release and 83 radio-tracking surveys were collected in the Stono River Estuary (n = 247), Charleston Harbor (n = 86), North Edisto River (n = 54), Intracoastal Waterway (n = 26) and the coastal waters north and south of Charleston Harbor (n = 41). Coverage for all survey types was spatially and temporally variable, and in the case of biopsy, capture-release and radio-tracking surveys, data analyzed in this report were collected incidental to other research. Eight-hundred and thirty-nine individuals were photographically identified during the study period. One-hundred and fifteen (13.7%) of the 839 photographically identified individuals were sighted between 11-40 times, evidence of consistent occurrence in the Charleston area (i.e., site fidelity). Adjusted sighting proportions (ASP), which reflect an individual’s sighting frequency in a subarea relative to other subareas after adjusting for survey effort, were analyzed in order to evaluate dolphin spatial occurrence. Forty-three percent (n = 139) of dolphins that qualified for ASP analyses exhibited a strong subarea affiliation while the remaining 57% (n = 187) showed no strong subarea preference. Group size data were derived from field estimates of 2,342 dolphin groups encountered in the five Charleston subareas. Group size appeared positively correlated with degree of “openness” of the body of water where dolphins were encountered; and for sightings along the coast, group size was larger during summer months. This study provides valuable information on the complex nature of bottlenose dolphin spatial and temporal occurrence near Charleston, SC. In addition, it helps us to better understand the stock structure of dolphins along the Atlantic seaboard.