Household decision making : an exploratory study /

"This study is designed to gain insights into various aspects of family decision making. Specifically, the study examines the prevalance of autonomous versus joint decision making, the incidence of conflict in joint decision making, and the tactics used by individual household members in resolving conflict."

Social decision-making for high consequence, low probability occurences /

Oct. 1978.

The effects of alcohol on the driver's decision-making behavior. Volume I: executive summary and technical report. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

The effects of alcohol on the driver's decision-making behavior. Volume II: appendices. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Boater decision making /

"November 1976."

Improved career decision-making through the use of labor market information /

Mode of access: Internet.

Improve career decision making /

Mode of access: Internet.

Workshop to identify training requirements designed to reduce young driver risk taking and improve decision making skills. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Program Development and Evaluation, Washington, D.C.

A citizen's guide to transportation decision making.

"HEPH/3-01(15M)E"--P. [4] of cover.

Rapid assessment for decision making : efficient methods for data collection and analysis /

"January 1993."

A roadmap for the future : recommendations and guiding principles for Illinois Tollway decision-making /

"October 2010"--Cover.

The decision-making process: experimental findings and implications.

"Paper to be read at the 1963 convention of the Society of Technical Writers and Publishers."

A framework for military decision making under risks /

"August 1997."

Precautionary principles: a jurisdiction-free framework for decision-making under risk

Fundamental principles of precaution are legal maxims that ask for preventive actions, perhaps as contingent interim measures while relevant information about causality and harm remains unavailable, to minimize the societal impact of potentially severe or irreversible outcomes. Such principles do not explain how to make choices or how to identify what is protective when incomplete and inconsistent scientific evidence of causation characterizes the potential hazards. Rather, they entrust lower jurisdictions, such as agencies or authorities, to make current decisions while recognizing that future information can contradict the scientific basis that supported the initial decision. After reviewing and synthesizing national and international legal aspects of precautionary principles, this paper addresses the key question: How can society manage potentially severe, irreversible or serious environmental outcomes when variability, uncertainty, and limited causal knowledge characterize their decision-making? A decision-analytic solution is outlined that focuses on risky decisions and accounts for prior states of information and scientific beliefs that can be updated as subsequent information becomes available. As a practical and established approach to causal reasoning and decision-making under risk, inherent to precautionary decision-making, these (Bayesian) methods help decision-makers and stakeholders because they formally account for probabilistic outcomes, new information, and are consistent and replicable. Rational choice of an action from among various alternatives-defined as a choice that makes preferred consequences more likely-requires accounting for costs, benefits and the change in risks associated with each candidate action. Decisions under any form of the precautionary principle reviewed must account for the contingent nature of scientific information, creating a link to the decision-analytic principle of expected value of information (VOI), to show the relevance of new information, relative to the initial ( and smaller) set of data on which the decision was based. We exemplify this seemingly simple situation using risk management of BSE. As an integral aspect of causal analysis under risk, the methods developed in this paper permit the addition of non-linear, hormetic dose-response models to the current set of regulatory defaults such as the linear, non-threshold models. This increase in the number of defaults is an important improvement because most of the variants of the precautionary principle require cost-benefit balancing. Specifically, increasing the set of causal defaults accounts for beneficial effects at very low doses. We also show and conclude that quantitative risk assessment dominates qualitative risk assessment, supporting the extension of the set of default causal models.

Clinical decision-making and myocardial viability: current perspectives

Not all myocardium involved in a myocardial infarction is dead or irreversibly damaged. The balance between the amount of scar and live tissue, and the nature of the live tissue, determine the likelihood that contractile function will improve after revascularisation. This improvement (which defines viability) may be predicted with about 80% accuracy using several techniques. This review examines the determinants of functional recovery and how they may be integrated in making decisions regarding revascularisation. (Intern Med J 2005; 35: 118–125)