Luc-Actes: une unité à construire

(Résumé de l'ouvrage) This volume contains the papers presented at the 47th Colloquium Biblicum Lovaniense (Leuven, 1998). The general theme of the meeting was the unity of the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles. Main papers on this topic were read by R.L. Brawley, J. Delobel, A. Denaux, J.A. Fitzmeyer, F.W. Horn, J. Kremer, A. Lindemann, O. Mainville, D. Marguerat, F. Neirynck, W. Radl, M. Rese, J. Taylor, C.M. Tuckett, and J. Verheyden. While a large majority of scholars agree that Luke intended his work to cover both the past and the continuing history of Jesus (Gospel and Acts), the essays also illustrate the complexities of this view on the unity of Luke-Acts when it comes to interpret the various aspects of Lukan theology, christology, pneumatology, and ecclesiology, the expansion of the Church in light of its Jewish origins, the genre of Luke-Acts, and the literary and stylistic means Luke used to make his work a unity. In total the volume includes some 40 papers, of which 24 are offered papers: L. Alexander, H. Baarlink, M. Bachmann, D. Bechard, T.L. Brodie, G.P. Carras, A. del Agua, C. Focant, G. Geiger, B.J. Koet, V. Koperski, D.P. Moessner, G. Oegema, J. Pichler, E. Plümacher, A. Puig i Tarrèch, U. Schmid, B. Schwank, N. Taylor, P.J. Tomson, S. Van den Eynde, S. Walton, G. Wasserberg, F. Wilk. This collection is an invaluable contribution to current discussions in Lukan study and to a nuanced understanding of the relationship between Luke's two volumes.

Regional Advisory Committee on Cancer Third Report - November 2004 (PDF 166 KB)

The Regional Advisory Committee on Cancer (RACC) was established in 1997 to carry forward the recommendations of the 1996 Campbell Report and to provide advice to the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety on the future development of cancer services. (Appendix 1) The 27 members of RACC come from the Health and Social Services Councils (which represent the interests of the public), Trusts, Boards, primary care and the Department. Members are listed in Appendix 2 RACC held its first meeting in June 1997 and has continued to meet twice a year since then. The Northern Ireland Cancer Forum was established in 1999 and is a subgroup of RACC. It was recommended that a Forum should be developed to provide meeting point for all voluntary and statutory bodies dealing with cancer in Northern Ireland. The Forum has now met on seven occasions and continues to work well with a unity of purpose. åÊ åÊ

Report to the Minister for Health and Children: Independent Examination related to the Medical Council and South-Eastern Health Board (Dr John Harding Price)

The Minister for Health and Children has requested that an independent review be carried out of the circumstances surrounding the employment of a UK based Consultant Psychiatrist, Dr John Harding-Price, to a locum psychiatrist position with the South Eastern Health Board (SEHB) while he was suspended by the General Medical Council (GMC) in the United Kingdom and consequently the subject of legal proceedings by the Medical Council in Ireland. The Consultant was continuously registered with the Medical Council since 1968. Download the document here

El temps en la justícia de menors

La recerca es proposa conèixer el temps objectiu que triga el sistema penal juvenil a donar resposta a les conductes presumptament delictives dels joves que hi arriben. L’interès per comptabilitzar i analitzar aquest temps de resposta del sistema penal juvenil es basa en dos motius: el primer és conèixer la incidència que té el temps en l’eficiència del sistema, eficiència que se sol associar al fet que es resolguin els assumptes amb agilitat. El segon motiu té a veure amb l’eficàcia de la pena o de la resposta que l’infractor pugui rebre. Des de l’àmbit penal i criminològic diversos autors, citats en la recerca, assenyalen que una resposta més ràpida fa la pena més eficaç. La recerca ha estudiat 8.059 procediments oberts a Catalunya l’any 2008 a joves infractors i en dona dades de la durada segons algunes variables (referides a les característiques dels joves, als fets delictius, al tipus de resolució, al territori que l’ha gestionat, als casos en els que s’ha fet mediació i reparació de menors, etc.). En els casos que ha estat possible, també s’ha fet una comparació entre l’any d’estudi (2008) i un any de control (2005) per saber quines han estat les diferències. Aquesta és la primera recerca que es publica a Catalunya sobre el total de temps que triga la justícia penal a donar resposta a una infracció presumptament comesa per un menor.

El tiempo en la justicia de menores

Este estudio aporta datos sobre el tiempo objetivo que tarda el sistema penal juvenil en dar respuesta a las conductas presuntamente delictivas de los jóvenes que llegan al sistema. El interés por contar y analizar este tiempo de respuesta del sistema penal juvenil se basa en dos justificaciones: la primera es conocer la incidencia que tiene el paso del tiempo en la eficiencia del sistema, eficiencia que se suele asociar al hecho que se resuelvan los casos con rapidez. El segundo motivo tiene que ver con la eficacia de la pena o de la respuesta que el infractor pueda recibir. Desde el ámbito penal y criminológico diversos autores, citados en la investigación, señalan que una respuesta más rápida hace la pena más eficaz. La investigación ha estudiado 8.059 procedimientos abiertos en Catalunya el año 2008 a jóvenes infractores y da datos respecto la duración según algunas variables (referidas a las características de los jóvenes, los hechos delictivos, el tipo de resolución, el territorio que la ha gestionado, los casos en los que se ha realizado una mediación y reparación de menores, etc.). En los casos que ha sido posible, también se ha realizado una comparación entre el año de estudio (2008) y un año de control (2005), para conocer cuales han sido estas diferencias. Es la primera investigación que se publica en Catalunya sobre el total de tiempo que tarda la justicia penal en dar respuesta a una infracción presuntamente cometida por un menor.

Discursos de gènere, nacionalisme i respostes col•lectives de les dones a Catalunya i Irlanda

El projecte realitzat se situa en el marc de la història contemporània, i s’ha centrat en primer lloc, en l’anàlisi, des d’una perspectiva comparativa, del desenvolupament dels discursos de gènere a Catalunya durant la Dictadura Franquista i a la Irlanda postcolonial. Mitjançant l’anàlisi del discurs, s’han estudiat els models de feminitat imposats pel Franquisme i les seves bases ideològiques com són el valors catòlics i l’antindividualisme. En el cas irlandès, s’ha analitzat com, a través de determinades institucions gestionades per l’Església Catòlica, es controlaven aquelles dones que es desviaven del model de gènere que propugnava l’Estat Irlandès, molt similar al proposat pel Franquisme i també basat en els catolicisme. De la mateix manera, s’ha estudiat com el feminisme Català i irlandès dels anys 1970 i 1980 van contrarestar aquests models de gènere imposats, a través de l’anàlisi d’un conjunt d’expressions culturals produïdes per ambdós moviments feministes. La perspectiva comparativa del projecte ha permès: El coneixement dels mecanismes culturals de repressió de les dones així com la seva institucionalització. Revelant els paral•lelismes pel que fa a les polítiques de gènere entre els dos casos estudiats malgrat diferències significatives entre els dos contextos (Catalunya es troba sota una dictadura, Irlanda és un Estat democràtic). La importància de l’agència de les dones i les seves diverses estratègies de resistència, especialment a través d’expressions culturals més efímeres o considerades frívoles que, malgrat el poc reconeixement que han obtingut, són molt eficaces en la deconstrucció de discursos de gènere repressius envers les dones. Ha posat de manifest, també, la importància de l’experiència i les pràctiques personals i íntimes com a pràctiques de resistència. Així mateix, ha visibilitzat les dinàmiques pròpies de moviments feministes.

Hedwig and The Angry Inch: Plato at the Sundance Film Festival

The aim of this article is to show how an ancient myth, that of the three genres, also known as the myth of the androgynous by Aristophanes in Plato¿s Symposium, becomes for John Cameron Mitchell the suitable image in order to explain the peculiar personality of a man, Hedwig, who by means of a surgical operation becomes in his turn an imperfect androgynous but symbolises the need of a sole mankind or the unity of different worlds, just as he belonged to both Berlins divided by an already fallen wall, which permitted their inhabitants to recover their lost unity and identity.

Reforming the Iowa Civil Justice System, January 30, 2012

Executive Summary I. Survey The Task Force conducted a wide-ranging survey of more than 9,000 licensed Iowa attorneys and judges to obtain their input on a variety of civil justice system topics. The survey results helped inform the Task Force of problem areas in Iowa’s civil justice system. II. Two-Tier Justice System The Task Force recommends a pilot program based on a two-tier civil justice system. A two-tier system would streamline litigation processes—including rules of evidence and discovery disclosures—and reduce litigation costs of certain cases falling below a threshold dollar value. III. One Judge/One Case and Date Certain for Trial Some jurisdictions in Iowa have adopted one judge/one case and date certain for trial in certain cases. The assignment of one judge to each case for the life of the matter and the establishment of dates certain for civil trials could enhance Iowans’ access to the courts, improve judicial management, promote consistency and adherence to deadlines, and reduce discovery excesses. IV. Discovery Processes Reforms addressing inefficient discovery processes will reduce delays in and costs of litigation. Such measures include adopting an aspirational purpose for discovery rules to “secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action,” holding discovery proportional to the size and nature of the case, requiring initial disclosures, limiting the number of expert witnesses, and enforcing existing rules. V. Expert Witness Fees The Task Force acknowledges the probable need to revisit the statutory additional daily compensation limit for expert witness fees. Leaving the compensation level to the discretion of the trial court is one potential solution. VI. Jurors Additions to the standard juror questionnaire would provide a better understanding of the potential jurors’ backgrounds and suitability for jury service. The Task Force encourages adoption of more modern juror educational materials and video. Rehabilitation of prospective jurors who express an unwillingness or inability to be fair should include a presumption of dismissal. VII. Video and Teleconferencing Options When court resources are constrained both by limited numbers of personnel and budget cuts, it is logical to look to video and teleconferencing technology to streamline the court process and reduce costs. The judicial branch should embrace technological developments in ways that will not compromise the fairness, dignity, solemnity, and decorum of judicial proceedings. VIII. Court-Annexed Alternative Dispute Resolution(ADR) Litigants and practitioners in Iowa are generally satisfied with the current use of private, voluntary ADR for civil cases. There is concern, however, that maintaining the status quo may have steep future costs. Court-annexed ADR is an important aspect of any justice system reform effort, and the Task Force perceives benefits and detriments to reforming this aspect of the Iowa civil justice system. IX. Relaxed Requirement of Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law A rule authorizing parties to waive findings of fact and conclusions of law could expedite resolution of nonjury civil cases. X. Business (Specialty) Courts Specialty business courts have achieved widespread support across the country. In addition, specialty courts provide excellent vehicles for implementing or piloting other court innovations that may be useful in a broader court system context. A business specialty court should be and could be piloted in Iowa within the existing court system framework of the Iowa Judicial Branch. Appendix included as a separate document, is 176 pages.

Update on osteoporosis from the 2014 Santa Fe Bone symposium.

The 2014 Santa Fe Bone Symposium provided a setting for the presentation and discussion of the clinical relevance of recent advances in the fields of osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease. The format included oral presentations of abstracts by endocrinology fellows, plenary lectures, panel discussions and breakout sessions, with ample opportunities for informal discussions before and after scheduled events. Topics addressed in these proceedings included a review of the important scientific publications in the past year, fracture prevention in patients with dysmobility and immobility, fracture liaison services for secondary fracture prevention, management of pre-menopausal osteoporosis, the role of bone microarchitecture in determining bone strength, measurement of microarchitecture in clinical practice and methods to improve the quality of bone density testing. This is a report of the proceedings of the 2014 Santa Fe Bone Symposium.

Osakkeenomistajan suojaaminen vähemmistöosakkeiden hankinnassa - Oikeusvertaileva tarkastelu Suomen ja Delawaren käytännöistä

Tutkielmassa tarkastellaan osakkeenomistajien suojaamiskeinoja Suomessa ja Delawaressa. Oikeusvertailevaa metodia sovelletaan kolmella tasolla: lakien ja määräysten osalta, menettelyn osalta sekä suojaamiskeinojen osalta. Osakkeenomistajien katsotaan tarvitsevan suojaa vähemmistöosakkeiden hankinnan yhteydessä, sillä siinä osakkeiden vapaan vaihdettavuuden perusperiaate ja pakkolunastaminen kohtaavat. Suojaamiskeinot on jaettu etukäteisiin, menettelya koskeviin sekä hinnanmäärittelyyn liittyviin keinoihin. Etukäteisiin keinoihin voidaan laskea johdon vastuu, joka koostuu huolellisuus- ja lojaliteettivelvoitteista, ja yhtiöjärjestysmääräykset. Delawaressa johdon vastuu on määritelty Suomea tarkemmin. Yhtiöjärjestysmääräykset ovat ongelmallisia Suomessa, sillä ne saattavat olla arvopaperimarkkinalain vastaisia. Delawaressa niiden käyttö on runsasta. Menettelyyn liittyviaä suojakeinoja löytyi useita. Vähemmistönsuojaperiaatetta toteutetaan Suomessa yhdenvertaisuusperiaatetta noudattamalla sekä määräämällä lunastusoikeudesta tai -velvollisuudesta. Delawaressa vähemmistöllä on oikeus saada erityistuomioistuin Court of Chanceryn arviointi menettelyn oikeellisuudesta. Menettelyn oikeellisuutta pyritään kummassakin tutkimuskohteessa suojaamaan myös tiedonantovelvollisuudella. Lisäksi Delawaressa johdon on asetettava aina erikoiskomitea neuvottelemaan ostajan kanssa. Hinnanmäärittelyn osalta suojaa antavat käyvän hinnan vaatimus, sekä Suomessa taloudellisen yhdenvertaisuuden periaate ja Delawaressa vähemmistön oikeus saada Court of Chanceryn arviointi oikeasta hinnasta.