Young innovative firms and R&D strategies: is the Spanish case different?

This paper analyzes the profile of Spanish young innovative companies (YICs) and the determinants of innovation and imitation strategies. The results for an extensive sample of 2,221 Spanish firms studied during the period 2004–2010 show that YICs are found in all sectors, although they are more concentrated in high-tech sectors and, in particular, in knowledge-intensive services (KIS). Three of every four YICs are involved in KIS. Our results highlight that financial and knowledge barriers have much impact on the capacity of young, small firms to innovate and to become YICs, whereas market barriers are not obstacles to becoming a YIC. Public funding, in particular from the European Union, makes it easier for a new firm to become a YIC. In addition, YICs are more likely to innovate than mature firms, although they are more susceptible to sectoral and territorial factors. YICs make more dynamic use of innovation and imitation strategies when they operate in high-tech industries and are based in science parks located close to universities. Keywords: innovation strategies, public innovation policies, barriers to innovation, multinomial probit model. JEL Codes: D01, D22 , L60, L80, O31

Is the macromolecule signal tissue-specific in healthy human brain? A (1)H MRS study at 7 Tesla in the occipital lobe.

PURPOSE: The macromolecule signal plays a key role in the precision and the accuracy of the metabolite quantification in short-TE (1) H MR spectroscopy. Macromolecules have been reported at 1.5 Tesla (T) to depend on the cerebral studied region and to be age specific. As metabolite concentrations vary locally, information about the profile of the macromolecule signal in different tissues may be of crucial importance. METHODS: The aim of this study was to investigate, at 7T for healthy subjects, the neurochemical profile differences provided by macromolecule signal measured in two different tissues in the occipital lobe, predominantly composed of white matter tissue or of grey matter tissue. RESULTS: White matter-rich macromolecule signal was relatively lower than the gray matter-rich macromolecule signal from 1.5 to 1.8 ppm and from 2.3 to 2.5 ppm with mean difference over these regions of 7% and 12% (relative to the reference peak at 0.9 ppm), respectively. The neurochemical profiles, when using either of the two macromolecule signals, were similar for 11 reliably quantified metabolites (CRLB < 20%) with relatively small concentration differences (< 0.3 μmol/g), except Glu (± 0.8 μmol/g). CONCLUSION: Given the small quantification differences, we conclude that a general macromolecule baseline provides a sufficiently accurate neurochemical profile in occipital lobe at 7T in healthy human brain.

Brachial or wrist blood pressure in obese patients : which is the best ?

RESUME L'obésité et l'hypertension atteignent des niveaux épidémiques aussi bien dans les pays industrialisés que dans ceux en voie de développement. La coexistence de ces deux pathologies est associée à un risque cardiovasculaire augmenté. Traditionnellement on mesure la pression artérielle (PA) au bras au moyen d'un brassard qui détermine la pression systolique et diastolique en utilisant soit la méthode auscultatoire ou oscillométrique. L'utilisation d'un brassard de taille standard chez le patient avec un tour de bras augmenté peut surestimer la pression artérielle. Il semble même qu'il existe un rapport idéal entre le tour de bras, et la taille du brassard La mesure à domicile de la pression artérielle avec des appareils validés donne des valeurs de la PA valables. Plusieurs appareils existent sur le marché et depuis quelques années les appareils de mesure de la PA au poignet font leur apparition sur le marché. Cette étude vise à comparer chez des sujets sains et obèses les valeurs de PA obtenues au poignet avec celles obtenues au bras en utilisant deux appareils validés l'OMRON HEM 705-CP et l'OMRON R6. L'OMRON HEM 705-CP permet l'utilisation soit d'un brassard standard (13x30 cm) ou d'un brassard large (16x38 cm), et l'OMRON R6 mesure la PA au poignet. Nous avons comparé un groupe de sujets obèses [Body Mass Index (BMI) >35kg/m2] avec un groupe de sujets sains (BMI <25kg/m2). Ont été exclues de l'étudé les personnes prenant un traitement antihypertenseur ainsi que celles souffrant d'arythmies. La PA a été mesurée en position assise avec le bras gauche sur une table à hauteur du coeur. Un brassard large a été employé pour les sujets obèses et un brassard standard pour les sujets sains. Trois mesures ont été effectuées, la première après une pause de 5 min et chacune des suivantes avec un intervalle de 2 min. La pression d'inflation maximale a été fixée à 170 mmHg. Nous avons utilisé la formule proposée par Marks LA et al pour déterminer si le rapport entre la taille des brassards fournis avec l'OMRON .HEM 705-CP et le tour de bras de nos sujets était optimal (taille du brassard = 9.34 x log10 taille du bras). Nos résultats ne montrent pas de différence statistiquement significative de la PA diastolique entre les deux groupes, qu'elle soit mesurée au bras ou au poignet. La PA systolique mesurée au bras s'est par contre avérée significativement plus basse chez les sujets obèses que chez les sujets sains. Aucune différence n'a été trouvée lorsque la mesure est effectuée au poignet. En utilisant la formule fournie par Marks le rapport entre taille du brassard (large chez les obèses) et tour de bras a été de 10.30±30 chez les sujets obèses et 9.630.45 chez les sujets sains (p<0.001). Le rapport entre tour de bras et brassard chez les sujets obèses est nettement au-dessus de la valeur optimale, ce qui suggère une possible sous-estimation de la PA systolique chez ces sujets. Ces résultats suggèrent qu'il existe un risque de sous-estimer la PA chez le patient obèse lors de l'utilisation d'un brassard large. Cette erreur pourrait être réduite par l'utilisation d'appareils de mesure au poignet. validés chez le sujet obèse.

What is the Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass and Why is it Criticized?

The omega-loop gastric bypass (OLGBP), also called "mini-gastric bypass" or "single-anastomosis" gastric bypass is a form of gastric bypass where a long, narrow gastric pouch is created and anastomosed to the jejunum about 200- 250 cm from the angle of Treitz in an omega loop fashion, thereby avoiding a jejuno-jejunostomy.Proponents of the OLGBP claim that it is a safer and simpler operation than the traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), easier to teach, that gives the same results in terms of weight loss than the RYGBP. One randomized study comparing the two techniques showed similar results after five years.The OLGBP is criticized because it creates an anastomosis between the gastric pouch and the jejunum where a large amount of biliopancreatic juices travel, thereby creating a situation where reflux of the latter into the stomach and distal esophagus is likely to develop. Such a situation has clearly been associated, in several animal studies, with an increased incidence of gastric cancer, especially at or close to the gastro-jejunostomy, and with an increased risk of lower esophageal cancer. In clinical practice, omega-loop gastrojejunostomies such as those used for reconstruction after gastric resection for benign disease or distal gastric cancer have been associated with the so called classical anastomotic cancer, linked to biliary reflux into the stomach, despite the fact that epidemiological studies about this do not show uniform results. Although no evidence at the present time links OLGBP to an increased risk of gastric cancer in the human, this possibility raises a concern among many bariatric surgeons, especially in the view that bariatric surgery is performed in relatively young patients with a long life expectancy, hence prone to develop cancer if indeed the risk is increased. Another arguments used against the OLGBP is that the jejuno-jejunostomy in the traditional RYGBP is easy to perform and associated with virtually no complication.Supporters of the OLGBP claim that the liquid that refluxes into the stomach after their procedure is not pure bile and pancreatic juice, but a combination of those with jejunal secretions, and that the latter is not as harmful. We would urge the proponents of the OLGBP to undertake the necessary animal studies to show that their assumption is indeed true before the procedure is performed widely, possibly leading to the development of hundreds of late gastric or esophageal carcinoma in the bariatric population. In the meantime, we strongly believe that RYGBP should remain the gold standard in gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity.

Is the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine useful in preventing community-acquired pneumonia?

Although bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia is the most severe form of pneumonia, non-bacteremic forms are much more frequent. Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of nonbacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia have a low sensitivity and specificity, and therefore all-cause pneumonia has been proposed as a suitable outcome to evaluate vaccination effectiveness. This work reviews the epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and evaluates the effectiveness of the 3-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23) in preventing CAP requiring hospitalization in people aged ≥65 years. We performed a case-control study in patients aged ≥65 years admitted through the emergency department who presented with clinical signs and symptoms compatible with pneumonia. Weincluded 489 cases and 1,467 controls and it was obtained a vaccine efectiveness of 23.6 (0.9-41.0). Our results suggest that PPV-23 vaccination is effective and reduces hospital admissions due to pneumonia in the elderly, strengthening the rationale for vaccination programmes in this age group.