Why Do Some International Institutions Contain Strong Dispute Settlement Provisions: New Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements

To understand why some international institutions have stronger dispute settlement mechanisms (DSMs) than others, we investigate the dispute settlement provisions of nearly 600 preferential trade agreements (PTAs), which possess several desirable case-selection features and are evoked more than is realized. We broaden the study of dispute settlement design beyond “legalization” and instead reorient theorizing around a multi-faceted conceptualization of the strength of DSMs. We posit that strong DSMs are first and foremost a rational response to features of agreements that require stronger dispute settlement, such as depth and large memberships. Multivariate empirical tests using a new data set on PTA design confirm these expectations and reveal that depth – the amount of policy change specified in an agreement – is the most powerful and consistent predictor of DSM strength, providing empirical support to a long-posited but controversial conjecture. Yet power also plays a sizeable role, since agreements among asymmetric members are more likely to have strong DSMs due to their mutual appeal, as are those involving the United States. Important regional differences also emerge, as PTAs across the Americas are designed with strong dispute settlement, as are Asian PTAs, which contradicts the conventional wisdom about Asian values and legalization. Our findings demonstrate that rationalism explains much of international institutional design, yet it can be enhanced by also incorporating power-based and regional explanations.

International delusions,

Printed in Great Britain.

Pursuing excellence : a study of U.S. eighth-grade mathematics and science teaching, learning, curriculum, and achievement in international context /

Mode of access: Internet.

Political community at the international level: problems of definition and measurement.

Mode of access: Internet.

The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Editors: 1890-95, E. J. James; 1896-1900, R. P. Falkner; Jan. 1901-Mar. 1902, H. R. Seager; May 1902-Sept. 1914, E. R. Johnson; Nov. 1914-July 1929, C. L/ King; Sept. 1929- T. Sellin.

Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et à l'étranger.

Editor: 1894- F. Larnaude.

International law reports.

Editors: 1919/22- H. Lauterpacht and others.

Cinq ans d'histoire grecque, 1912-1917; discours prononcés à la chambre des députés en août 1917,

Mode of access: Internet.

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Latest issue consulted: Vol. 598 (Mar. 2005)

Addresses, historical--political--sociological.

Mode of access: Internet.

De l'esprit des loix, ou, Du rapport que les loix doivent avoir avec la constitution de chaque gouvernemnet, les moeurs, le climat, la religion, le commerce, &c. ...

Includes index.

Elements of the science of religion,

pt.I. Morphological, being the Gifford lectures delivered before the University of Edinburgh in 1896.--pt.II. Ontological, being the Gifford lectures delivered before the University of Edinburgh in 1898.

Publications of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

Some papers issued in this set were also published in its Annals.

American politics. The American republic and its government; an analysis of the government of the United States, with a consideration of its fundamental principles and of its relations to the states and territories,

Mode of access: Internet.

The friend: a series of essays to aid in the formation of fixed principles in politics, morals, and religion, with literary amusements interspersed,

Photocopy.