L'Univers

1871/11/07 (Numéro 1605).

L'Univers

1871/08/28 (Numéro 1535).

Vägledare för allmänheten inom städerna Haparanda och Torneå samt Tornedalen m. fl. orter

kuv., 13 x 22 cm

Karta öfver Helsingfors omgifningar upptagande delar af Helsinge, Sibbo, Esbo och Kyrkslätt m. fl. socknar

Mittakaava laskettu janamittakaavasta

Les voiages de notre seigneur Jésus Christ et des apotres St. Pierre et St. Paul dans l'Asie, l'Afrique et l'Europe : l'on à ajouté tous les noms des regions et des lieux dont il est parlé dans le Nouveau Testament

Nimeketiedot nimiönkehyksissä

Ägodelnings-karta från Finland : [Eriksnäs m.fl. egendomar i Sibbo socken]

Kartta kuuluu A. E. Nordenskiöldin kokoelmaan

Nåden och gåvan i Philipp Melanchthons rättfärdiggörelselära 1521-1535

In this thesis Philip Melanchthon’s doctrine of justification is analyzed, especially the aspects of favor and donum in his writings until 1535. The research task is defined in the introduction of the thesis. Researchers agree, that Melanchthon emphasized the forensic aspect of the doctrine of justification, but this is not the case with the effective aspect of his doctrine of justification. Therefore, I have chosen to focus on the concepts of favor (grace) and donum (gift). The thesis begins with an analysis of the first edition of the Loci communes of 1521 in chapter two, and it ends with the second edition from 1535 in chapter seven. Melanchthon’s most important writings from the intervening period are analyzed in chapters three to six. In chapter eight, I describe my final results from the analysis. Although I have focused on how Melanchthon perceived the relationship between favor and donum, I have also taken note of such loci that are associated with his view of justification. I have done this in order to get a clearer picture of Melanchthon’s doctrine of justification, and of the issues which change in his theological thinking over time. In the research overview in chapter one, I divided the researchers in four different groups depending on how they perceive Melanchthon’s doctrine of justification. This classification is of course not comprehensive, since the reality is much more complicated. The main interpretations present in Melanchthon research are: 1. Christ as favor in justification, but donum is excluded from justification. 2. Christ as favor in justification, but the Spirit is donum in justification. 3. Christ as both favor and donum in justification until the early 1530s. 4. Christ as both favor and donum in justification throughout his life. The fourth option is in my opinion the most preferable. The analysis of Melanchthon’s writings shows that he expects both a forensic, and an effective aspect in the doctrine of justification throughout the examined period. Melanchthon strongly emphasizes that justification is by grace alone through faith for Christ’s sake, but also that the Holy Spirit works the justifying faith, and is the gift bestowed on believers in connection with this. Where the opponents according to Melanchthon see deeds, virtues, or a quality in the believer as the cause of the justification, there Melanchthon sees only Christ.

Carte nouvelle de tout l'empire de la grande Russie dans l'estat ou il s'est trouvé à la mort de Pierre le Grand dressée sur des observations toutes nouvelles et dediée à l'immortale memoire de ce grand monarque. Avec privilege.

Janamittakaavat: Lieuës, Werstes.

Suede et Norwege / par A. M. Perrot ; gravé par Pierre Tardieu.

Janamittakaava: Lieues de France.

A comédia desclassificada de Martins Pena

Após indicar o caráter ideológico de conceitos básicos habitualmente mobilizados em análises da literatura dramática, este estudo tenta mostrar que é possível enxergar mais longe quando nos livramos dos limites por eles impostos. Detectada a fundamentação classista da história do teatro no Brasil, a luta ideológica aparece como um refletor capaz de iluminar aspectos normalmente obscurecidos das comédias de Martins Pena.

El escepticismo radical de Pierre Gassendi contra la filosofía natural de los aristotélicos

Este artículo tiene como objetivo dar cuenta del escepticismo radical de Pierre Gassendi propuesto en el Exercitationes paradoxicae Adversus Aristoteleos (Disertaciones paradójicas contra los aristotélicos). Para dar cuenta de ello nuestro artículo se divide en tres momentos: Primero, damos cuenta de la estructura de la obra; segundo, se presentan los argumentos centrales propuestos por Gassendi para comprender su actitud crítica al escolasticismo. Y tercero, se muestra la crítica que realiza a la lógica aristotélica. La idea fundamental que sostenemos en este trabajo es que la actitud crítica y de libre pensador que caracterizó a Gassendi tuvo su origen directo en la actitud escéptica. Además, revisar su obra de juventud y su actitud filosófica nos permite comprender una parte importante del alcance del escepticismo en la reforma de la filosofía natural del siglo XVII.