Report on the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship for the year ended June 30, 2011

Report on the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship for the year ended June 30, 2011

Report on a special investigation of the Benton County Conservation Department for the period June 1, 2010 through November 7, 2011

Report on a special investigation of the Benton County Conservation Department for the period June 1, 2010 through November 7, 2011

DSC Dispatch, September 2012, Vol. 6

A quarterly publication by the Division of Soil Conservation

The genetic structure of metapopulations and conservation biology.

A range of models describing metapopulations is surveyed and their implications for conservation biology are described. An overview of the use of both population genetic elements and demographic theory in metapopulation models is given. It would appear that most of the current models suffer from either the use of over-simplified demography or the avoidance of selectively important genetic factors. The scale for which predictions are made by the various models is often obscure. A conceptual framework for describing metapopulations by utilising the concept of fitness of local populations is provided and some examples are given. The expectation that any general theory, such as that of metapopulations, can make useful predictions for particular problems of conservation is examined and compared with the prevailing 'state of the art' recommendations.

11

Il est maintenant accepté par une large part de la communauté scientifique que le climat est en train de changer sous l'influence des gaz à effet de serre émis par les activités humaines. Pour la Suisse, cela correspond à une augmentation des températures et à une diminution probable des précipitations estivales.Etant donné le manque de recul et de données historiques précises, l'influence des changements climatiques sur la biodiversité n'est encore connue que d'études ponctuelles limitées à certaines espèces. Celles-ci nous livrent néanmoins des signaux clairs de changement dans la distribution et la phénologie des espèces, généralement cohérents avec les résultats des modèles prédictifs pour le futur.Globalement, les espèces montrent une tendance à migrer vers les altitudes supérieures. Celles qui occupent aujourd'hui les altitudes les plus élevées vont probablement voir leur domaine se rétrécir. De grands risques d'extinction planent donc sur les espèces alpines, pour lesquelles la Suisse a une responsabilité toute particulière. Parallèlement, la diminution des précipitations estivales va augmenter les problèmes de sécheresses, ce qui pourrait conduire, par exemple, à une réduction des forêts en Valais central et à un assèchement prématuré des lieux de ponte des amphibiens. Inversement, certaines espèces thermophiles de basses altitudes pourraient profiter des nouvelles conditions en accroissant leur domaine de répartition, comme déjà observé chez certains insectes.En plus des changements climatiques, d'autres facteurs menacent indirectement les espèces. La forte fragmentation du territoire limitera la capacité des espèces à coloniser de nouveaux territoires par manque de connexions entre les milieux favorables. Un climat plus chaud permettra une intensification de l'agriculture en montagne, accompagnée des effets néfastes déjà bien connus en plaine, ou pourrait favoriser certaines maladies. De plus, les printemps plus précoces décaleront le développement de certaines espèces, ce qui pourrait fortement modifier les interactions entre espèces et les chaînes trophiques.Les conséquences des changements climatiques sur la biodiversité dépendront aussi des décisions prises au niveau national et international et des mesures prises pour la protection du climat. Afin de limiter les pertes, il est important de mettre en place des corridors favorisant la colonisation de nouvelles aires par les espèces et d'utiliser les synergies possibles entre protection de la biodiversité et lutte contre les changements climatiques. De plus, le monitoring des espèces les plus sensibles aidera à développer, avant qu'il ne soit trop tard, les mesures complémentaires nécessaires à leur conservation.

DSC Dispatch, December 2012, Vol. 7

A quarterly publication by the Division of Soil Conservation

The hourglass and the early conservation models--co-existing patterns of developmental constraints in vertebrates.

Developmental constraints have been postulated to limit the space of feasible phenotypes and thus shape animal evolution. These constraints have been suggested to be the strongest during either early or mid-embryogenesis, which corresponds to the early conservation model or the hourglass model, respectively. Conflicting results have been reported, but in recent studies of animal transcriptomes the hourglass model has been favored. Studies usually report descriptive statistics calculated for all genes over all developmental time points. This introduces dependencies between the sets of compared genes and may lead to biased results. Here we overcome this problem using an alternative modular analysis. We used the Iterative Signature Algorithm to identify distinct modules of genes co-expressed specifically in consecutive stages of zebrafish development. We then performed a detailed comparison of several gene properties between modules, allowing for a less biased and more powerful analysis. Notably, our analysis corroborated the hourglass pattern at the regulatory level, with sequences of regulatory regions being most conserved for genes expressed in mid-development but not at the level of gene sequence, age, or expression, in contrast to some previous studies. The early conservation model was supported with gene duplication and birth that were the most rare for genes expressed in early development. Finally, for all gene properties, we observed the least conservation for genes expressed in late development or adult, consistent with both models. Overall, with the modular approach, we showed that different levels of molecular evolution follow different patterns of developmental constraints. Thus both models are valid, but with respect to different genomic features.

Report on the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship for the year ended June 30, 2012

Report on the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship for the year ended June 30, 2012

Iowa Wetland Management District: Environmental Assessment and Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan

This Environmental Assessment documents the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process for developing a Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for the Iowa Wetland Management District (WMD, district). In general, scoping reveals issues that drive alternative ways of managing the district. Implementation of each of those alternative management styles (including the No Action Alternative) may have different effects on the physical, biological, and socio-economic environment. Analysis of these effects reveals the “preferred” alternative, which constitutes the CCP. The CCP includes goals, objectives, and strategies for the district to guide overall management for the next 15 years. The Iowa WMD consists of scattered tracts of habitat (both wetland and upland grassland) known as Waterfowl Production Areas (WPAs). As of 2011, there are 75 WPAs in 18 counties in north-central Iowa totaling 24,712 acres in fee title primarily managed by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Even though district acquisition has only occurred in 18 counties to date, a larger 35-county boundary is approved. This boundary follows the historic range of the poorly drained Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) in Iowa, an area known for its waterfowl production. The district also includes 575 WPA acres and approximately 434 Farm Service Agency acres in conservation easements on private land. This plan was prepared with the intent that the strong partnership with the Iowa DNR will continue over the next 15 years.

Ma cure d'eau pour la guérison des maladies et la conservation de la santé (Ed. populaire) / par Séb. Kneipp,... ; [trad. de l'allemand par J. Bechtold qui signe le préambule]

Titre original : Meine Wasserkur

Ecological-economic optimization of biodiversity conservation under climate change

Substantial investment in climate change research has led to dire predictions of the impacts and risks to biodiversity. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change fourth assessment report(1) cites 28,586 studies demonstrating significant biological changes in terrestrial systems(2). Already high extinction rates, driven primarily by habitat loss, are predicted to increase under climate change(3-6). Yet there is little specific advice or precedent in the literature to guide climate adaptation investment for conserving biodiversity within realistic economic constraints(7). Here we present a systematic ecological and economic analysis of a climate adaptation problem in one of the world's most species-rich and threatened ecosystems: the South African fynbos. We discover a counterintuitive optimal investment strategy that switches twice between options as the available adaptation budget increases. We demonstrate that optimal investment is nonlinearly dependent on available resources, making the choice of how much to invest as important as determining where to invest and what actions to take. Our study emphasizes the importance of a sound analytical framework for prioritizing adaptation investments(4). Integrating ecological predictions in an economic decision framework will help support complex choices between adaptation options under severe uncertainty. Our prioritization method can be applied at any scale to minimize species loss and to evaluate the robustness of decisions to uncertainty about key assumptions.