The Canadian law times.

From 1900-1908 includes the "Annual digest of Canadian cases ... decided in the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the Supreme and Exchequer Courts of Canada, and in the courts of the provinces ..

The Canadian law review.

Mode of access: Internet.

Memorial of the people of Red River to the British and Canadian governments, with remarks on the colonization of central British North America, and the establishment of a great territorial road from Canada to British Columbia.

Memorial of the people of Red River Settlement.

Lays of the 'True North', and other Canadian poems.

Mode of access: Internet.

Importation of feed wheat. Hearings, Eighty-third Congress, first session, on importation into the United States of Canadian wheat classified as "wheat, unfit for human consumption," under paragraph 729, Tariff Act of 1930.

[pt. 1.] January 29, May 13 and 15, 1953. 165 p.--pt. 2. October 8 and 9, 1953 - Minneapolis, Minn., October 13 and 14, 1953 - Galveston, Tex. pp. 167-545.

Canadian plant disease survey. : Inventaire des maladies des plantes au Canada.

English title only, 1960-1976; English and French title, 1977-

Transactions of the Canadian Institute.

Vol. 6: Semi-centennial memorial volume. 1849-1899.

Catalogue of Canadian plants ...

Part 6 is by John Macoun and N. C. Kindberg.

Canadian Railway Cases

"Containing a selection of cases affecting railways recently dedided by the judicial committee of the Privy Council, the Supreme Court and the Exchequer Court of Canada, and the courts of the provinces of Canada, including decisions of the Board of Railway Commissioners for Canada"

Canadian fruit, flower, and kitchen gardener, a guide in all matters relating to the cultivation of fruits, flowers and vegetables, and their value for cultivation in this climate.

Mode of access: Internet.

Canadian heroin supply and the Australian 'heroin shortage'

No Abstract

Homing devices in choice of Tort Law: Australian, British and Canadian Approaches

Since 1994, Canada, the United Kingdom and Australia have adopted new choice of law rules for cross-border torts that, in different ways, centre on the application of the law of the place where the tort occurred (the lex loci delicti). All three countries abandoned some species of the rule in Phillips v Eyre, which required some reference to the law of the forum (the lex fori) as well as the lex loci delicti. However, predictions were made that, where possible, courts in these countries would continue to show a strong inclination to apply the lex fori in cross-border tort cases - and would use a range of homing devices to do so. A comprehensive survey and analysis of the cases that have been decided under the Australian, British and Canadian lex loci delicti regimes suggests that courts in these countries do betray a homing instinct, but one that has actually been tightly restrained by appeal courts. Where application of the lex fori was formally allowed by use of a 'flexible exception' in Canada and the United Kingdom, this has been contained by courts of first appeal. Indeed, only the continuing characterization of the assessment of damages as a procedural question in Canada and the United Kingdom, seems to remain as a significant homing device for courts in these countries. © 2006 Oxford University Press.