Determination of catalase activity and its inhibition by a simple manometric method

[Excerpt] Introduction: There has been a considerable amount of controversy about the use of manometric methods to measure catalase activity. As Maehly and Chance point out in their excellent review] the advantages of these methods is "... that they can be used for any kind of biological material, and purification of the enzyme is not required. The assay is independent of small amounts of peroxidase activity. It is fairly simple to perform, it is rapid and it can be adapted to continuous reading of the reaction". A variety of drawbacks are also listed by the same authors, viz, the inactivation of the enzyme under the experimental conditions and the time lag before a constant rate of oxygen evolution is reached. [...]

Evaluation of the marker of hypercoagulability prothrombin fragment F 1+2 in patients with mechanical or biological heart valve prostheses

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients with heart valve prostheses and similar International Normalized Ratios (INR) have the same level of protection against thromboembolic events, that is, whether the anticoagulation intensity is related to the intensity of hypercoagulability supression. METHODS: INR and plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) were assessed in blood samples of 27 patients (7 with mechanical heart valves and 20 with biological heart valves) and 27 blood samples from healthy donors that were not taking any medication. RESULTS: Increased levels of F1+2 were observed in blood samples of 5 patients with heart valve prostheses taking warfarin. These findings reinforce the idea that even though patients may have INRs, within the therapeutic spectrum, they are not free from new thromboembolic events. CONCLUSION: Determination of the hypercoagulability marker F1+2 might result in greater efficacy and safety for the use of oral anticoagulants, resulting in improved quality of life for patients.

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.1 (1890:March)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.2 (1890:April)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.3 (1890:May)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.4 (1890:June)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.5 (1890:July)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.6 (1890:Aug.)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.7 (1890:Sept.)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.8 (1890:Oct.)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.9 (1890:Nov.)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.10 (1890:Dec.)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.11 (1891:Jan.)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.1:no.12 (1891:Feb.)

Zoe:a biological journal.

v.2:no.1 (1891:April)