In vitro roles of invariant helix–turn–helix motif residue R383 in σ54 (σN)

In vitro DNA-binding and transcription properties of σ54 proteins with the invariant Arg383 in the putative helix–turn–helix motif of the DNA-binding domain substituted by lysine or alanine are described. We show that R383 contributes to maintaining stable holoenzyme–promoter complexes in which limited DNA opening downstream of the –12 GC element has occurred. Unlike wild-type σ54, holoenzymes assembled with the R383A or R383K mutants could not form activator-independent, heparin-stable complexes on heteroduplex Sinorhizobium meliloti nifH DNA mismatched next to the GC. Using longer sequences of heteroduplex DNA, heparin-stable complexes formed with the R383K and, to a lesser extent, R383A mutant holoenzymes, but only when the activator and a hydrolysable nucleotide was added and the DNA was opened to include the –1 site. Although R383 appears inessential for polymerase isomerisation, it makes a significant contribution to maintaining the holoenzyme in a stable complex when melting is initiating next to the GC element. Strikingly, Cys383-tethered FeBABE footprinting of promoter DNA strongly suggests that R383 is not proximal to promoter DNA in the closed complex. This indicates that R383 is not part of the regulatory centre in the σ54 holoenzyme, which includes the –12 promoter region elements. R383 contributes to several properties, including core RNA polymerase binding and to the in vivo stability of σ54.

Protein crosslinking studies suggest that Rhizobium meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D, a sigma 54-dependent transcriptional activator, interacts with sigma 54 and the beta subunit of RNA polymerase.

Rhizobium meliloti C4-dicarboxylic acid transport protein D (DCTD) activates transcription by a form of RNA polymerase holoenzyme that has sigma 54 as its sigma factor (referred to as E sigma 54). DCTD catalyzes the ATP-dependent isomerization of closed complexes between E sigma 54 and the dctA promoter to transcriptionally productive open complexes. Transcriptional activation probably involves specific protein-protein interactions between DCTD and E sigma 54. Interactions between sigma 54-dependent activators and E sigma 54 are transient, and there has been no report of a biochemical assay for contact between E sigma 54 and any activator to date. Heterobifunctional crosslinking reagents were used to examine protein-protein interactions between the various subunits of E sigma 54 and DCTD. DCTD was crosslinked to Salmonella typhimurium sigma 54 with the crosslinking reagents succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate and N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl-4-azidobenzoate. Cys-307 of sigma 54 was identified by site-directed mutagenesis as the residue that was crosslinked to DCTD. DCTD was also crosslinked to the beta subunit of Escherichia coli core RNA polymerase with succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate, but not with N-hydroxysulfosuccinimidyl-4-azidobenzoate. These data suggest that interactions of DCTD with sigma 54 and the beta subunit may be important for transcriptional activation and offer evidence for interactions between a sigma 54-dependent activator and sigma 54, as well as the beta subunit of RNA polymerase.

Integration host factor suppresses promiscuous activation of the sigma 54-dependent promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida.

In the presence of m-xylene, the Pu promoter of the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida is activated by the prokaryotic enhancer-binding protein XylR. The intervening DNA segment between the upstream activating sequences (UASs) and those for RNA polymerase binding contains an integration host factor (IHF) attachment site that is required for full transcriptional activity. In the absence of IHF, the Pu promoter can be cross-activated by other members of the sigma 54-dependent family of regulatory proteins. Such illegitimate activation does not require the binding of the heterologous regulators to DNA and it is suppressed by bent DNA structures, either static or protein induced, between the promoter core elements (UAS and RNA polymerase recognition sequence). The role of IHF in some sigma 54 promoters is, therefore, not only a structural aid for assembling a correct promoter geometry but also that of an active suppressor (restrictor) of promiscuous activation by heterologous regulators for increased promoter specificity.